Steve Fraser might look mild-mannered, but when it comes to economic doomsaying, he is the Rocky Marciano of recession, the Tiger Woods of turndown, the David Beckham of depression.
Speaking of bending one, Fraser's LA Times column of today, "Symptoms of an Economic Depression," twists U.S. economic data into a harbinger of impending doom. Fraser begins by falsely claiming that "no one wants to utter the word 'depression.'" In fact, Fraser himself, a left-wing labor historian, wants not merely to utter it, but to bellow the word with a 10,000 megawatt bullhorn. Why? Because, as he gleefully predicts in that same column:
This perfect storm [of a bad economy] will be upon us just as the election season heats up, and it will inevitably hasten the already well-advanced implosion of the Republican Party.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓
I'm setting forth below excerpts from Fraser's breathless jeremiad. Hide the sharp objects, but note how he writes largely in generalities and conclusions largely devoid of supporting data.
- It is not only a matter of mass foreclosures. It is not merely a question of collapsing home prices. It is not simply the shutting down of large portions of the construction industry (which is inspiring some of the doom-and-gloom prognostications). It is not just the born-again skittishness of financial institutions that have, all of a sudden, gotten religion, rediscovered the word "prudence" and won't lend to anybody. It is all of this, taken together, that points ominously to a general collapse of the credit structure that has shored up consumer capitalism for decades.
- The equity built up during the long housing boom has been the main fallback position for ordinary people financing their big-ticket-item expenses, from college educations to consumer durables, from trading up in the housing market to vacationing abroad. Much of that equity has suddenly vanished, and more of it soon will. Also drying up fast are the lifelines of credit that allow all sorts of small and medium-size businesses to function and hire people. Whole communities, industries and regional economies are in jeopardy.
- All of that might be considered enough, but there's more. Oil, of course. Here the connection to Iraq is clear; but, arguably, the wild escalation of petroleum prices might have happened anyway. Certainly the energy price explosion exacerbates the general economic crisis, in part by raising the costs of production all across the economy and so abetting the forces of economic contraction. In the same way, each increase in the price of oil further contributes to what most now agree is a nearly insupportable level in the U.S. balance-of-payments deficit. That, in turn, is contributing to the steady withering away of the value of the dollar.
- Finally, it is vital to recall that this tsunami of bad business is about to wash over an already very sick economy. While the old regime, the Reagan-Bush counterrevolution, has lived off the heady vapors of the FIRE sector, it has left in its wake a deindustrialized nation, full of super-exploited immigrants and millions of families whose earnings have suffered steady erosion. Two wage-earners, working longer hours, are now needed to (barely) sustain a standard of living once earned by one. And that doesn't count the melting away of health insurance, pensions and other forms of protection against the vicissitudes of the free market or natural calamities.
Yikes! But compare and contrast Fraser's largely data-free doomsaying with economist Larry Kudlow's recent column, Bush Boom Continues. Kudlow uses hard facts to make the case that the U.S. economy is in very strong shape. Excerpts:
- Despite all the doom and gloom from the economic pessimistas, the resilient U.S economy continues moving ahead—quarter after quarter, year after year—defying dire forecasts and delivering positive growth. In fact, we are about to enter the seventh consecutive year of the Bush boom.
- The pessimistas are a persistent bunch. In 2006, they were certain a recession was just around the corner. They were wrong. Instead, the economy posted two consecutive quarters of near or above four-percent growth.
- Earlier today, a doom and gloom economic forecast from Macro Economic Advisors was released predicting zero percent growth in the fourth quarter. This report is off by at least two percentage points. These guys are going to wind up with egg on their faces.
- Here are the facts: Americans are working. The 4.7 percent unemployment number remains at an historical low. On a three-month rolling basis, the U.S. economy has added over 100,000 jobs. Meanwhile, the household job count shows that an average of 303,000 jobs have been added in the last three months. This is noteworthy because it suggests that the job market is turning around.
- Hours worked are growing more than 1-percent annually, while workers’ wages are running 3.8 percent, a full percentage point ahead of inflation. As for this week’s productivity report, it was nothing short of spectacular: the 6.3 percent productivity gain was the best in four years. A rise in productivity is good for growth. It’s good for profits. And it’s good for low inflation.
- Speaking of inflation, business inflation is down from 3.5 percent just over a year ago to 1.5 percent today. Meanwhile, oil prices have retreated to $88. And, to top it all off, last night we received a tremendous new number showing household net wealth has headed even higher. It stands at a record $59 trillion dollars. That’s more than seven percent above a year ago.
- Another factoid worth considering is that mortgage refinancings are soaring at lower rates. Since June, they are up nearly 70 percent, while mortgage rates on 15 and 30-year loans are down nearly a 100 basis points. That is a very positive, very welcome development that ought to cushion the plunge in home sales, and maybe even prices.
Ever since President Bush took office, liberal economists have been proven consistently wrong in predicting the worst. Given a choice between the latest prophesy of doom and fact-based optimism, I'm counting on Kudlow.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
This perfect storm [of a
December 9, 2007 - 08:28 ET by motherbeltThis perfect storm [of a bad economy] will be upon us just as the
election season heats up, and it will inevitably hasten the already
well-advanced implosion of the Republican Party.
That tells you his motivation. He is definitely hoping. Just like the media ignored the fact that the economy was already turning around before Clinton took office to preside over "the worst economy in fifty years," they will beat this economy into the ground (verbally) in hopes that a Democrat will be elected, upon which, a miraculous recovery will take place, simply because businesses and the stock market are so excited about a Democratic president (oh, and they will clamor for tax hikes too!).
}}---> Recession
December 9, 2007 - 08:31 ET by Cool ArrowWhether or not we're really heading into a recession, I'm living like it's gonna happen.
I have paid off all my cards. I have paid off my house and cars.
Somebody tell me why these were bad moves.
Recession or not
December 9, 2007 - 08:52 ET by motherbeltThey're not.
Recession or not, being completely debt-free is never a bad thing.
}}---> thanks MB
December 9, 2007 - 09:01 ET by Cool ArrowYesterday evil cap told me every business deal is a good one regardless of fairness.
Still trying to figure how the Herschel Walker deal was good for both teams. But Dallas only got what? Three Super Bowls out of it?
Yesterday evil cap told me
December 9, 2007 - 16:50 ET by motherbeltYesterday evil cap told me every business deal is a good one regardless of fairness. -Cool Arrow
I would guess that he/she meant that, every "deal" means both parties have come to an agreement over terms, so they were both content with what they were getting. That makes it a good deal.
As for Herscel Walker...I don't even know who he is, so I have no opinion on that.
Herschel Walker
December 9, 2007 - 16:57 ET by sarcasmoWas a Georgia Bulldog. Gator fans like me were particularly glad to see him graduate, because there were days when it literally seemed like Herschel couldn't touch the football without gaining 7 yards (at least!!!).
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
Cool Arrow, it depends on
December 10, 2007 - 01:23 ET by jdhawkCool Arrow, it depends on the cost of capital vs investment return of capital. If you have debt, but its cost is less than the investment return on capital then you are not doing yourself any favors.
In other words, if you have turned investment capital into cash and paid down debt with it, but the money that you could have invested would have earned you more than the cost of the debt, then you made the wrong move.
In even a modestly trending higher stock market (like we are experiencing this year), your money was probably better employed in it than paying off debt. The reason why I say that, is there are so many ways that the cost of debt is reduced. For example, I have a mortgage at 6%, but I get a terrific tax break because I deduct the interest on the mortgage and the taxes on the property from my federal income taxes. This make my mortgage's effective cost about 4 1/2%. I have made many times that in the stock market this year.
Also, during the life of the mortgage my earning power has gone up at the same time that inflation has also gone up. So, what may seem like a lot of money for the mortgage when the home is purchased doesnt' seem like so much in ten years. Yet, by keeping money in the market, it is acting as hedge against inflation.
The most competitive nation
December 9, 2007 - 08:41 ET by ThisnThat1 November 2007: U.S. Economy Ranks as World’s Most Competitive
The Global Competitiveness Report, published by the World Economic Forum (WEF), an international research and policy-support group, identified the U.S. as #1 in overall competitiveness. “The efficiency of the country’s markets, the sophistication of its business community, the impressive capacity for technological innovation that exists within a first-rate system of universities and research centers, all contribute to making the United States a highly competitive economy," said economist Xavier Sala-i-Martin, a co-editor of the report.
So, what's happened since 1 November? Oh yeah, the election, and the MSMs determination to influence it for the Dims by using its position to spread lies and mis-information every chance they get. Very pathetic. Very transparent. When will they learn they can't do this anymore without being exposed for the shrills that they are?
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
TnT, I think you meant to
December 9, 2007 - 08:51 ET by motherbeltTnT, I think you meant to say "without being exposed for the shills they are"?
"Shrills" was probably a Freudian slip. LOL
MB,
December 9, 2007 - 08:58 ET by ThisnThatWell, you caused me to go look up the definitions. The 4th definition of each, from http://dictionary.reference.com/:
Shrill: betraying some strong emotion or attitude in an exaggerated amount, as antagonism or defensiveness
Shill: to advertise or promote (a product) as or in the manner of a huckster; hustle: He was hired to shill a new TV show
So now I think perhaps "shrill shill" might even be appropriate.
Thanks for the correction!
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
"shrill shill" is perfect!
December 9, 2007 - 09:51 ET by motherbelt"shrill shill" is perfect! LOL
Hope you didn't take offense; I just thought it was funny because it fit so well!
♣ Shrill Bumper Sticker
December 9, 2007 - 09:55 ET by Cool ArrowHillary - Real Shill, Real Shill
Toy boat Toy boat Toy boat
Two wage-earners, working
December 9, 2007 - 08:52 ET by MidAmericaTwo wage-earners, working longer hours, are now needed to (barely) sustain a standard of living once earned by one.
But..... that 'one' paycheck in the old days was not buying multiple cell phones, two new (or nice) cars, video games, internet, frequent eating out, expensive vacations, cable TV, prepared food, nice clothes, and larger houses. Credit cards were not easy to get. Credit itself was not easy to get. People will always push the limit of their budget. Until we can get the government to control consumer spending people will always be 'struggling'. The soviets often had this problem figured out. Sometimes when a worker had some extra money he didn't spend it because there wasn't anything available to buy.
Good points
December 9, 2007 - 09:10 ET by ThisnThatand might I add also, that people were happy to choose the state college instead of Princeton or Harvard because that's what they could afford; "leftovers" wasn't such a bad thing to eat; tennis shoes didn't have to be $300 Nike's; and no one ever had to be placed onto a 3-year waiting list to get into prestigious "pre-schools".
It's always the little things, isn't it? For example, I live in snow country with a 200' driveway that I clear by shovel and a 12-year old snowblower. My neighbor has a 20' driveway that he gets snowplowed. He is overweight; his son is overweight; but neither of them would ever think about spending an hour shoveling snow themselves.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
One of my favorites is
December 9, 2007 - 09:29 ET by MidAmericaOne of my favorites is watching people with litle yards and oversized garden tractors that they can barely maneuver around with but they have to have the 'biggest and the best'.
people were happy to
December 9, 2007 - 10:02 ET by motherbeltpeople were happy to choose the state college instead of Princeton or Harvard because that's what they could afford;
I have to "sort of" disagree with you on that point.
I say "sort of" because Princeton and Harvard are probably WAY up there for tuition. But with the "regular" private colleges, tuition can be made very comparable with scholarships. We just did that, our daughter just started in a private college, with 1/2 her tuition being paid by scholarships. She was a good student in HS, but she didn't have to be Valedictorian to get them either.
I don't understand why so
December 9, 2007 - 09:28 ET by sublight68I don't understand why so many people put themselves in position TO "struggle." Toys and gadgets are great, but if you're always worried about money or how you're going to pay the month's bills, how much true satisfaction are you ultimately derving from them?
I live well within my means and I sleep well at night. I'm happy to trade the latest material goods for the peace of mind that comes with the lack of stress over money and debt.
My favorite in this deal is
December 9, 2007 - 09:57 ET by motherbeltMy favorite in this deal is the young married couple that right off the bat goes and buys a $250,000 (or more) house...no starter house for them, nosiree...and a couple of cars. Then when they have a baby, the wife whines, I'd love to stay home with my baby, but I can't afford to. I HAVE TO work.
Well, DUH!
Dr. Laura says if you decide what your priorities are, you can make it work. IOW, if you decide when you first get married that you want Mom home with the baby, you don't buy the big house, the brand new cars, etc. You plan for living on one income eventually, even if you have two to start.
That's why we need mortgage
December 9, 2007 - 10:01 ET by sublight68That's why we need mortgage bailouts, paid FMLA, credit forgiveness and relatively painless bankruptcy.
Expecting people to be held accountable for themselves and their decisions is just cruel...and racist and fascist, chickenhawkish, whatever.
♣ Interesting sublight
December 9, 2007 - 10:06 ET by Cool ArrowWonder how much of this "crisis" is due to people following the wisdom of those "Make Money In Real Estate" preachers who kept telling ppl to cash out equity.
BTW, what is FMLA? Feel My Lovely . . .
Family and Medical Leave
December 9, 2007 - 10:12 ET by sublight68Family and Medical Leave Act. Right now employers are mandated give you unpaid time off work for family and/or medical reasons without losing your job (I forget the time limit...6 months?) but I keep hearing distant drumbeats for PAID time off.
Those same real estate gurus are now pimping how you can make a fortune by swooping in on home foreclosures.
No way to say...
December 9, 2007 - 10:12 ET by sarcasmoBut it's safe to say that when Republicans try to out-Santa-Claus the Democrats with irresponsible ideas like the current bailout, they NEVER win in the end. The crisis is this socialist bailout's reward of irresponsible behavior at the expense of those of us who've behaved responsibly & our grandkids. I will keep beating that particular drum over and over, because it needs desperately to be learned, not just said.
FMLA is, I think, the "family & medical leave act," as if obese-government politicians should stick their noses into that employer-employee issue along with all the others. They're doing such a good job in Washington, DC, after all. Sigh...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
I'm with you. One of these
December 9, 2007 - 10:17 ET by sublight68I'm with you. One of these days I'm going to max out my credit cards, have a dozen babies out of wedlock and take a subprime mortgage on a McMansion in a brush fire/hurricane/flood/tornado zone just so I can get in on the action.
Family/Medical Leave Act.
December 9, 2007 - 10:12 ET by motherbeltFamily/Medical Leave Act. Unpaid leave for childbirth, adoption, family illness etc. Last I knew it was 12 weeks unpaid.
♣ OK Already
December 9, 2007 - 10:19 ET by Cool ArrowI do work for a Fortune 50 company, after all.
I was inviting new words to the FMLA acronym.
Amen! You know, years ago,
December 9, 2007 - 10:08 ET by motherbeltAmen! You know, years ago, when the unpaid FMLA started, Rush Limbaugh predicted that the libs would soon whine that no one could afford to give up their paycheck for 12 weeks, so then they would start pushing for paid leave.
The lib agenda is always incremental.
I'm waiting for someone to propose strict regulations on ARM mortgages, such as a ceiling on increases.
That's a pretty stupid
December 10, 2007 - 00:27 ET by NL207That's a pretty stupid remark. In some markets, $250K IS a starter home. There even a small few markets in which $250,000 is a garage!
Although not the subject
December 9, 2007 - 09:06 ET by Seabeach4348Although not the subject here, you never once hear the libs or their buddies in the lamestream media complain or wring their hands about causing a "recession" or an "economic depression" whenever they scold us about not signing on to global warming and what the enviro-socialists recommend we do to save the planet.
If those things won't usher in economic doom, nothing will.
The liberals have the
December 9, 2007 - 10:18 ET by nythatesusaThe liberals have the pom-poms on for a recession. This guy says, why go half way, what we really need is a depression. He probably thinks the Great Depression was one of the best things that ever happened to the United States, because it allowed for the advancement of collectivist policies.
recession, just like in
December 9, 2007 - 19:48 ET by Edhenryrecession, just like in the 30s, is the libs play for control. The anti-american fossil media will play it up to create fear and a flight for gubment "safety" = socialism = decline of america.
Get behind the stats and the LaLa Times article falls apart. Three important stats in our favor: low interest rates, low unemplyoment and most important, productivity.
Slower growth in 2008, but nothing that spells doom on the horizon, except for the left's support of terrorists
Fraser and the LALA Times
December 9, 2007 - 20:09 ET by GoodieNever heard of this guy but it is another self serving, anti America junk article. Look, LA Times is scrapping the bottom of the news barrell, as we all know these papers are bleeding money and cannot figure why their AGENDA cannot be taken seriously. So they run an article by Steve Fraser??? a Labor Historian???Seriously!!!Give me back Larson Cartoons.
Deja vu on the economy
December 10, 2007 - 00:23 ET by nkviking75In '92 when Bubba ran for president the first time, he spread the lie that the economy was the "worst in 50 years". A quick check of the facts would have shown that the worst economy in 50 years belonged to Jimmy Carter, and that the '92 economy was far, far better than that, but of course the MSM weren't inclined to uncover facts that might undermine Clintoon. Unfortunately, George H.W. Bush's campaign was not inclined to attack his opponent with much force, so Clinton got away with it. These recession reports might well be planted by Hillary's campaign, laying the groundwork to repeat this tactic.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
While your points are well
December 10, 2007 - 01:29 ET by jdhawkWhile your points are well taken, it was Perot that lost the presidency to the dimocrats in '92 and '96. In both races, the Republican candidate would have won handily if the votes for Perot had gone to the Repulican candidate.
By the way, in both elections, Clintoon never received a majority of the American people's votes.