"We'll go to a revival and then go to Guantanamo Bay and torture some people just for fun." -- David Shuster on evangelicals, 12-7-07
So astonishingly malicious were the words of David Shuster today that they leave me at a loss for words of my own. So let's just say it simply: David Shuster is an anti-evangelical bigot.
Video (0:35): Real (991 kB) and Windows (1.11 MB), plus MP3 audio (274 kB).
MSNBC "correspondent" Shuster was a panelist on today's Morning Joe. For his "must-read" of the day at 7:20 AM ET, Shuster predictably chose the New York Times editorial panning Mitt Romney's speech on faith. Shuster approvingly cited this passage:
He was trying to persuade Christian fundamentalists in the Republican party, who do want to impose their faith on the Oval Office, that he is sufficiently Christian for them to support his bid for the Republican nomination. No matter how dignified he looked, and how many times he quoted the Founding Fathers, he could not disguise that sad fact.
Host Joe Scarborough pointed out the Times's history of hostility toward evangelicals.
JOE SCARBOROUGH: This is the same New York Times editorial page that ran columns after George W. Bush was elected in 2004 saying evangelicals were closer to Osama Bin Laden than our allies in Europe. That of course came from Garry Wills. Then Maureen Dowd said that evangelicals were going to take us back to the Dark Ages. I think there is some hostility, on the New York Times editorial page, toward evangelicals.
DAVID SHUSTER: They still get it right on occasion.
Even Mika Brzezinski was shocked, exclaiming "oh, man!"
SCARBOROUGH: Once in a while, but Alabama beats Auburn once in a while, too.
SHUSTER: We all must believe in football, and I suppose if we all go to Pensacola [Joe's hometown], we'll have a sidetrip where we'll go to a revival and then go to Guantanamo Bay and torture some people just for fun.
Mika seconded Shuster's notion: "Exactly, to make sure that they don't get [unintelligble] illegal."
The lightness of Scarborough's tone in reply belied the seriousness of his words: "It's that sort of mean-spirited view of America and that soft bigotry of low expectations that upsets me so much."
Shuster and Brzezinski shared a hearty chuckle in response.
Ace of Spades comments: "If only those who screamed the loudest about religious tolerance actually believed in religious tolerance themselves."
Bryan at Hot Air:
Shuster’s religious tolerance and fidelity to the facts speak for themselves. He’s a bigot. And so is Mika Brzezinski for chuckling along with him, agreeing, and piling on with the reference to legal counsel.
To think, this crew replaced Imus after his bigoted “nappy headed hos” flap. If anything, this gang is worse.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.





"We'll go to a revival and then go to Guantanamo Bay and torture some people just for fun." -- David Shuster on evangelicals, 12-7-07









Editor at Large

Comments Policy
This so clearly shows
December 7, 2007 - 09:28 ET by c5thenThe famous and legendary "tollerance" of the left and how "big" their tent is. See how Shuster accepts those with views that are different from his own? See how he opens his arms and embraces the diversity of views? He would never denigrate and slander people just because he doesn't agree with their viewpoints, would he?
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08. RenewAmerica.us
Shuster is much more than an "anti-evangelical bigot", Mark
December 7, 2007 - 09:32 ET by RJHe's an anti-religious bigot....although I agree he showed particular scorn for evangelicals this morning.
I agree Mark,Thre are
December 7, 2007 - 09:50 ET by USA4freedomI agree Mark,
Thre are times when you read these things and think to yourself..wow, I don’t know how to respond to crap like this. There is no other group that gets dumped on a daily basis.
Its just shocking.
I wonder do they say these things like OB just to ge tnoticed? Or are they just that stupid?
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
OO.....OO.....PICK ME!!!
December 7, 2007 - 09:53 ET by OldSailor88I vote "JUST THAT STUPID!!"
No other explanation really makes sense.
I tend to think it's a
December 7, 2007 - 09:55 ET by Mark FinkelsteinI tend to think it's a combination of immaturity on Shuster's part and a desire to establish his far-left bona fides at MSNBC for purposes of promoting his career.
So, he's like a KO protege,
December 7, 2007 - 10:12 ET by rimskySo, he's like a KO protege, eh?
I think you nailed it.
December 7, 2007 - 10:13 ET by sockmonkeyImmaturity, ignorance, and just condescendingly snarky. And yet, I'm still shocked at how free he feels to say such ugly things. Makes me want to consider removing my Pollyanna hair ribbons and choking him with them...
Liberalism
December 7, 2007 - 10:25 ET by iveseenitallJust modern "liberal" hypocrisy at work. The intolerant s.o b.'s make you want to puke. Shuster is representative of the spoiled young in America, indoctrinated with "liberal" hatred for anything that smacks of authority, moral or otherwise. The immature jerk has been handed everything on a silver platter and this is how he shows his appreciation. Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
That's because these
December 7, 2007 - 11:17 ET by pbanks7That's because these enlightened geniuses know that religion is the opiate of the masses.
Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.
delete
December 7, 2007 - 12:27 ET by motherbeltdelete
Gets paid to do that
December 7, 2007 - 11:05 ET by celator"He's an anti-religious bigot....although I agree he showed particular scorn for evangelicals this morning."
Shuster consistently presents himself as anti-religion, anti-American, anti-capitalist person. So he is the perfect prototype for an MSNBC "reporter". Hey, he gets paid a lot to say the things his masters tell himto say. He's a very good useful idiot.
My response to Shusters
December 7, 2007 - 10:16 ET by LilyPearlMy response to Shusters comments regarding us evangelicals:
Matthew 5:11-12
11 "Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
out the window
December 7, 2007 - 10:16 ET by candanceJust when we start hearing good things about Morning Joe, they go and say something stupid like that.
Joe will have Shuster to thank when his fledgling audience starts disappearing.
candance, in Joe's defense
December 7, 2007 - 10:20 ET by RJ...he did go after Shuster fairly hard for his remarks. He was calm, but you could tell he was steamed.
It was also telling (about how phony Shuster is) that Shuster said later that he believed in deliberately making trouble. That fits with Mark's statement above that Shuster is just trying to establish his bonafides for MSNBC.
good for Joe
December 7, 2007 - 10:25 ET by candanceWe'll see if Shuster keeps it up in the future.
It was also telling (about
December 7, 2007 - 12:27 ET by motherbeltIt was also telling (about how phony Shuster is) that Shuster said later that he believed in deliberately making trouble. That fits with Mark's statement above that Shuster is just trying to establish his bonafides for MSNBC. -RJ
Does the phrase "a monkey posing as a newscaster" ring any bells?
Nothing like a little
December 7, 2007 - 10:37 ET by kgNothing like a little liberal humor in the morning to brighten a Democrats day. Plus half of the liberals will take this as fact because they have no sense of humor.
I really like Morning
December 7, 2007 - 11:28 ET by FAR52I've really liked Morning Joe because it's a fairly balanced look at politics. But everytime they bring in Shuster, I turn the channel. Those who have said that he exudes immaturity are right on the mark.
David Shuster is an
December 7, 2007 - 10:21 ET by Trix RabbitDavid Shuster is an anti-evangelical bigot...and to the detriment of this sanctimonious creep's bile he adds nothing of value except that which is mean, cheap, flacid, and impotent.
If anything, he has proven beyond a shadow of doubt that as far as is journalism goes, he as all the brains of a flea and the balls of a moth.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
Olberman Lite !
December 7, 2007 - 10:27 ET by 186kpsThat's Schuster in a nutshell.
Although the guy has added some "spice" to morning Joe.
His hatred for Bush and Republicans comes through so clear.
Actually I don't think he is "Olbermann Lite" I now believe he is the guy behind the curtain and Olbermann is the "Wizard".
Our Defense Plan
December 7, 2007 - 10:29 ET by Kirk TurnerFor a secularist to opine on Christianity is like a a kindergarten child explaining the Theory of Relativity. If one thing has become a clear, defensible fact, it is that the elites do not understand a thing about evangelicals.
Every civilization that has outgrown its spiritual foundation has failed, so as we move to the historical phase in which those who believe in God are routinely diminished and ridiculed, there is no surer sign of the decline of the west.
It is a strange world in which the secularists defend Islam while destroying Christianity, but if you have studied history, it is a familiar scenario. In short, the west is dying, with political correctness as the facilitator and secularist pundits and intellectulas as the ringmasters.
We have been sold out, fooled, and damaged as a people because we did not have the guts to stand up to the Republicrats when they went on their free-trade, sell America first binge. Because we were cowards, now the elites run roughshod over our most precious beliefs, provoking us as they do. They do not run over Islam because Islam has protected itself at the cost of blood and courage.
When will we gather all 160 million Christians (or more) in this country and march on Washington? One non-violent protest march of all Christians in America on Washington would protect us for a hundred years and silence our critics.
That is what it will take--do we have the courage to pull it off?
but...but...
December 7, 2007 - 10:35 ET by candanceWe had to vote in all those RINOs...it was the only way to stop the Democrats....
/sarc off
Immaturity
December 7, 2007 - 11:07 ET by iveseenitallThe little "girl" with the "monkey " remark and now the little "boy" with this immature comment. Seems that the main requirement for "journalists" these days is a mental age of 15 or less. Instead of Morning Joe, it should be called The Children's Hour.
Write to Joe@msnbc.com
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
"Every civilization that has
December 7, 2007 - 12:38 ET by Sonny Lykos"Every civilization that has outgrown its spiritual foundation has failed,......"
Exactly!
Now you are getting the point, and purpose of these people. Does the word "Socialist", or worse, ring a bell?
Would anyone be shocked to find out that a tiger caught, ripped apart, and eat an antelope? Of course not, because that's what they do. Now think about what socialists and communists would do to destroy a republic as ours. Stupid? Wrong. Ignorant? Wrong. Shrewd, consistent, vicious, and purposeful. Yes. It's that obvious and that simple. It's what "they" do.
edhenry This is
December 7, 2007 - 11:01 ET by Edhenryedhenry
This is dispicable, immature, bigoted, anti Christian rhetoric. Let me take a stab at a theory and welcome comments.
I think most Baby Boomers have matured, having children, jobs and understanding that we are lucky and that gubment is largely and thankfully irrelevant. They understand personal responsibility = personal freedom & the most corrosive element to life is governement dependence and the only thing that will destroy this democracy is if gubment gets too big. They largely believe in God and family.
And then you have those BBs who haven't grown up or are sad marxists. They are in hollywood, city councils in SFO, and in the media (how bad are Diane Sawyer and Robin Roberts). These adolescent BBs in the media are now controlling (Bill Keller, "pinch") the agenda and these people: are 1. seperated from reality (pinch was handed the job - his father must be so proud to see the rapid decline of the grey lady ) 2. do not want to grow up. 3. sycophants for hollywood and famous (having losers, and I mean BIG L, like David Crosby on Chrissy mathews).
This is their last gasp - Clintons/Obama/Sharpton/Jackson/Alcie H/Striesand/Kucinich/Keller/Sulzberger/Schummer/Harry Reid/Polosi at destroying america and designing their vision of communism.
If we get by this election and get these weasles in the fossil media to retire, we will escape the zennith of the radical left's power, exerted by ersatz white guilt from race hustlers and weak, co-dependent liberals, misguided and otherwise stupid (remember educated does NOT mean smart) college professors and group think fossil media.
We can give our children a better US if we vote with our principle's and not our emotions.
Edhenry
December 7, 2007 - 11:33 ET by iveseenitallRight on, Ed. And thank God for the internet and sites like NB. Too bad many boomers who knew better had no place to go with their compaints about the "liberal" invasion of America in the last four decades. The majority of our "jounalists" had always been "liberal", but not with the strain of liberalism which came upon us like a cancer in the 60's. Then the educational institutions began to change. I was there on the inside as these roaches spread throughout the system. The few sane voices were snuffed out as hordes of immature, illogical haters set out to become "agents of change" in an America which they viewd as racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. They had captive audiences in the young who have now grown into the physically mature, but mentally immature "liberals" we see today throughout our society. And they have the dual pulpit of the MSM and the schoolroom. We can only hope the our new weapon, the internet, will be as effective as we believe it can be against the enemy within, the roaches who attack in the dark of night while you are sleeping. Let's all wake up, turn on the lights, and watch them scurry away.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Shuster's ignorant, but...
December 7, 2007 - 11:13 ET by chuckoHey Mark, I've read what Shuster said over and over again, but I think you need to interpret what he was saying in the proper context: that the evangelicals or "Christian fundamentalists" that support Republicans like President Bush and perhaps Mitt Romney on the basis of tolerance are the same people who are silent and don't speak against the immorality of torture and the questionable legailty of what we as a country do at Gitmo. He was speaking more to the (alleged) hypocrisy of the religious right than to anything that could be interpreted as bigotry.
Having said that, I think Shuster was wrong to say that Romney was trying to appeal to just Christian fundamentalists in the Republican Party. I think people of all faiths (including myself, raised as a Catholic), no matter their politicial affiliations are interested in what he has to say, especially in the primary states.
Yes, evangelicals in the Republican party will pay close attention to what he has to say, but Romney's speech yesterday was meant to be so broadly based that it could have been given in a primary OR a general election.
Remember, JFK's "Catholic" speech happened in 1960 (during the general election). So while people smarter than David Shuster know that politically active Evangelical Christians may be his biggest target audience, it's not accurate to say that's ALL he was appealing to. Bigotry? No. Ignorance? Yes.
Chucko
December 7, 2007 - 11:30 ET by fosstenYou're giving Shuster too much credit. He is a simple minded man, a mile wide and an inch deep. It's actually very simple - Gitmo and torture are obviously things the left likes to bash Bush with. Tying evangelicals to that is a swipe at Bush's faith. It's really very clear unless you're trying to spin it in favor of Shuster. And I know this for a fact because I've been following Shuster on this site, and the man is NOT a thinker. He is NOT subtle. He has NO nuance. He really does believe that Christians favor torture. You said it yourself, the man's ignorant.
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
Fossten
December 7, 2007 - 12:03 ET by iveseenitallAbsolutely, fossten. Shuster is an immature, ignorant hater, so typical of today's "liberals". They generalize because they don't have the capacity to think beyond their own prejudices. They appear on entertainment shows which feature the back yard gossip which, unfortunately, appeals to the masses. It is laughable how shows like Morning Joe pretend to be so serious about what they are saying. "News analysis"; what a misnomer for all the "news" programs on the boob tube.
On a more somber note, this is a prime example of the organized left in America. Read what the Communist say about "religion" and weep. Let's hope that at best Shuster is just another useful idiot. If not, watch out.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
At a loss?
December 7, 2007 - 11:48 ET by drillanwrMy only response to anything/all things David Shuster is Dip-Sh!t.
Imagine this: Scarborough's
December 7, 2007 - 12:12 ET by Chris NormanImagine this: Scarborough's contract expires. MSNBC gets rid of him and the new show is "Morning Talk with Mika and David"...
edhenry Who would
December 7, 2007 - 12:23 ET by Edhenryedhenry
Who would watch?
Except for Mark F (poor guy - terrible job, but someone has to monitor Pravda).
Well, so far, MSNBC doesn't
December 7, 2007 - 12:29 ET by Chris NormanWell, so far, MSNBC doesn't appear to care much about ratings when selecting personalities and shows.
Do they really know what
December 7, 2007 - 13:10 ET by Senior ChiefDo they really know what "Revival" means from an Evangelical perspective. Oh, I forgot they're athiest, and maybe Islamo-facist fanatics...
Merry, Merry CHRISTmas to the Shusters and Scarboroughs out there! From a very Happy and Joyful Christian here in Virginia...
The Village Idiot
December 7, 2007 - 13:34 ET by pocomocoFrom his past pronouncements, Schuster should be designated The Village Idiot. I don’t think he, or those of his ilk, realize who they’re dealing with.
Evangelical Christians make up much of American society, and because of the anti-Christian drumbeat that has gone on for years, they have said ‘enough is enough’ and are now becoming a force to be reckoned with.
This, obviously, is scaring those who have been demeaning religion and are now finding it necessary to intensify their bigoted rhetoric, thinking, I assume, that it will make them go away.
Today, the bigoted rhetoric is overwhelming especially toward the current Republican candidates for president as they outwardly profess their religious belief. This is an abomination as the bigots see it.
But, as I see it, the bigots are having their ‘last hurrah’.
Although it may not occur this election cycle, the religious will have the final say as they start to kick out of office those who have so despised them over so many years.
And those who are sent packing will wonder what happened as they refuse to admit that they, themselves, were responsible for their own demise.
To put the religious in a Star Wars term: The Force Is Now With Them.
The MSM Fear Factor...
December 7, 2007 - 16:36 ET by GoldAngelis they cannot deny the fact that the Evangelicals are the largest voter base out there---or else why would the Dimocrat front-runners be taking all opportunities to trumpet their own so-called faiths? They and the MSM KNOW that the White House was won by the informed base of faith and values evangelical voters who saw the character debacle of the Clinton Administration and how it denegrated the office of POTUS...and that very voter base, once they put their support behind a Republican will cause a recurrance in '08 of the same tidal wave that the left fears.
This latest rant by Shuster is just a sure sign that the liberal media is aware of that fact---their motto being "Be afraid... be VERY afraid...
(cue spooky music)
I pity Shuster and those
December 7, 2007 - 13:36 ET by msh1973I pity Shuster and those like him, they are so stupid and they don't even know it. I have read the last chapter...and guess what, we win.
David Shuster
December 7, 2007 - 14:29 ET by CellaDavid Shuster is a little creep. He is Chrissy Matthews' favorite left hand man.
Another horrible rumor is that Shuster could take Tucker's spot on MSNBC.
Who is running that zoo?
schmuck
December 7, 2007 - 14:30 ET by scotthThe dude's a schmuck. I hate him almost as bad as I hate Olbermann.
Shuster is a [deleted].
December 7, 2007 - 14:57 ET by RackieShuster is a [deleted].
I will never watse my time
December 7, 2007 - 19:37 ET by Andrew H.I will never watse my time watching or hearing Shuster--it has become more clear than ever there are so many idiots being broadcasted, there is little point in tuning in to the news.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Do you think Shuster ever
December 7, 2007 - 20:21 ET by the strugglerDo you think Shuster ever got picked up for dodgeball in gym class?
"We'll take the girls,you can have Shuster and Olberman."
Someone said...
December 7, 2007 - 20:41 ET by m4ster chief...why, yes, I do believe it was Jesus: "...they hated Me before they hated you."
Scripture also says: "Every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord."
These liberals are gonna need their kneepads.