You keep not-answering coherently  The lack of ability to read on YOUR part does not constitute an emergency on MY part.

The reason I keep bringing up Foreign Affairs - which I see you are throwing a tantrum about, right now, or - dare I say it - maybe you are, to quote Sarcasmo "whining like a little girl"?  - is because of your idiotic habit of ascribing immense power to a club of pencil-necked geeks and pointy-headed intellectuals. 

Oh, but if only the nerds of the world had the power you say they have...

Again, not only do I sometimes taks a stab at their publication - though admittedly not in awhile - I looked into JOINING the CFR.  I could, no doubt, still file for a candidacy with them.  BUT, after doing my own research, I decided it would not be worth it, because they (like you) would HATE my "sorry, we tried" approach to diplomacy. 

So, exposing the CFR?  I will do that for you.  http://www.cfr.org Easier than you thought. 

Besides, did I not warn you previously that the next time I saw you - or anyone else - try to make out this pathetic organization into something infinitely bigger than it is, that I would ask you about the mag?  It is about the only thing they are good for.  The joke, as always, is squarely on you. 

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Ok, you know what an Anchor Baby is, right? Just in case you don't, it's a baby with illegal parents that has been born in the U.S.   That "anchors" it's illegal family here.   Many illegals have done that deliberately.

Huckabee's proposal to provide educational rights to the children of illegals expands the concept to children not born in the U.S.   Obviously, the illegal family has to stay in America to care for their child, right?  Voila! Instant amnesty for the family.

Pretty straightforward stuff, and it's not new.   The concept has been proposed here in Connecticut and in other deep blue states.  The libs love it.

As for the "empathy" thing, let's not forget that you flatly said conservatives don't have any.  As you said, you "said what you wanted to say."

I'm not him, and I'm not your researcher, either. It's not that I boost Dr. Paul at every opportunity either, it's more like some people here BASH him under that description, as we've all seen over and over. I just bust bias, but sometimes the fact that I do it singlehandedly or the fact that I've busted NB's bias makes me inconvenient. It doesn't change the facts, though.

I still say the tax and spend drugwar is an expensive big government failure that engenders rampant corruption in politics & law enforcement, both here and abroad. One moral failure of the tax and spend drugwar lies in letting people like Jessica Lunsford's rapist/killer out early in order to keep some pothead in a jail cell at taxpayer expense because of brain-dead "mandatory minimum" sentencing laws. Prohibition generally implies "God creates mistakes but politicians don't," and I take exactly the opposite view. These arguments usually degenerate into lies and dimwitted name-calling, though, as we've also-seen here frequently.

I'm totally against illegal immigration, I say "go to the back of the line" for all of them. I thought Reagan's amnesty was morally and politically wrong at the time, but he signed it anyway. Blame Alzheimer's. I expected actual border enforcement from that point on, and America & I didn't get it, because law enforcement priorities in this country are screwed up (see above).

There should be a separation of marriage and state. I think so-many people worship big government that it's unthinkable for them. Big government worshippers tend not to want to ADMIT to worshipping big government, and they get insulted whenever I point-out the obvious as to what they really-worship, but "follow their money" and tell me who's right. I know exactly what they worship. Gays are individuals, who should have individual rights just like the rest of us. Most of them just want to be left alone, and those gays certainly have my sympathy. If they want to be monogamous & commit themselves legally in a relationship, I fail to see what conservatives have against it, no matter what gays or their churches want to call the commitment. It's just a word. Homosexuals can do what they want, as long as it doesn't cost me tax-money I'm fine with it.

Want the candidate's views on all these issues? Go look at what he's said/written. There's an entire internet FULL of his weekly columns, and google is your friend. Want mine? Ask me, like you just did. But don't expect me to speak for anyone else, or to do your research for you unless I feel like it.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.