Let's all close our eyes and imagine Hillary in one of those '70's hotpants stewardess outfits.

Now install new keyboard, clean up, and try to keep the next breakfast down.

Could Dowd possibly be more wrong? American men aren't looking to date Hillary, they're looking to elect a president.

Dowd is implying that American men are too stupid to know what they need in a President, and would want a woman who simpers and flirts.

But, you know, every rabid feminist believes that if a man doesn't like her, it's only because he feels threatened by her.

Come November '08, Americans will be going to the polls to vote for the person with the highest integrity, decisive, strong character and one who LOVES this country and not the enemies!  Well, so far none of the democrack leftoids don't have those traits I enumerated, Yes including Hillary...and, well, a few other of the Republicans. 

Sorry, but I refuse to take criticism from a guy who watches chic trash like Sex in the City.

Islamic Religious Services Will Be Held at the Firing Range At 0800 Daily.

Hippies used drugs to make their ugly liberal girlfriends look better.

I would say the airlines have trouble enough.  Can you see hiring stews who look and or have personalities like Hillary?

That we tend to like hot flight attendants?? Lawyers act like lawyers, and flight attendants don't. In this case, for once, it's NOT all about looks. And sadly http://www.john-ross... no-longer works.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

...to say that men prefer women that act like women and not like crazy left wing feminists who hate men and women prefer men that act like men and not like effeminent wimps who don't stand for anything.

Do you realize how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could afford. -Montgomery Burns

The column is really a list of reasons why Dowd can't get a date. With scholarly back-up.

http://dowdreport.bl...

Dowd Report: All MoDo, All The Time

Dowd is wrong on so many levels, where does one start????  Let's see, first there is confirmation bias - cherry picking a group to get the desired results.  Tell us dear professor Fisman was this study done on only college students which so many of these rediculous studies spewed out by universities typically do????  You know 20 somethings with raging hormones????   Did the study group reflect general society with a bonified statistical respresentation of socio-economic, gender, race, and age??  Did one account for MATURITY on any level??   What you ascribe your PC view of groups, i.e. gender and evolution I ascribe to individual character, maturity and experience.  

Ms Dowd has been repeatedly guilty of confirmation bias in her writings, a sign of a bigot, in her case a hate filled feminist bigot.  One does not need to eat tripe to know what it is.  Here's some advice Ms Dowd that bears repeating, if you fish at the bottom you get catfish and eels, if you fish at the surface and midwater you get trout and bass.  Life is not about choiceless victimhood, but about your choices. All choices have consequences, pick the consequence you want and then make the appropriate choice. 

Every barrel has it's rotten apples, I do not judge women as a group by your example Ms Dowd precisely because your one of those rotten apples.

Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.

it's hard to take any opinion she has of male-female relationships seriously. almost all of her columns reek of her own deep insecurity over failed relationships with men - which is well-known ... imus pointed this out all the time.

the stewardess line seems to be an obvious hint of 50+ year old single female's frustration that men must be too weak and stupid to be attracted to a highly intellectual woman (which is what maureen views herself to be). she appears to be using hillary as an extension of herself. so it is amusing that she portrays herself/hillary as highly intellectual, sophisticated and powerful, as well as physically and emotionally irresitable to men. reality, on the other hand, is that men view her as a bitter, sagging hag of a liberal suffering from man-hating, permanent PMS and bitter about her love-life being nothing more than a serial one-night-stand act with never-ending "walks of shame".

Now that Dowd has achieved feminist nirvana as a writer for The New York Times, she writes like a person who is frustrated and unfulfilled.

It appears that she bought into The Feminine Mystique lock-stock-and-barrel, and it ain’t working for her.

Over the years her putdowns of men are legion, which Sigmund Freud would find fascinating. And, although she admits to dating men, why do I feel that being ‘serviced’ by them doesn’t enter into her relationships.