In the most florid criticism I can recall a network "correspondent" leveling at a major party presidential candidate, MSNBC's David Shuster has branded Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) a border-control "fanatic."
The editorializing came in the course of Shuster's report during today's 5 PM ET "Hardball," which included an update on the GOP primary.
DAVID SHUSTER: No television commercial in Iowa is generating as much heat as the one just unveiled by Republican Tom Tancredo, a border-control fanatic.
View video here.
Shuster proceeded to play the Tancredo ad, which can be seen, along with Shuster's "fanatic" comment, in the video linked above. A higher-quality video version of the ad is available at Tancredo's website.
There's no doubt that the tone and certain of the images contained in the ad are dramatic. People will draw their own conclusions as to whether the ad crosses the line.
But let's look at Tancredo's actual proposals for immigration and border policy as laid out in the press release accompanying his ad.
- secure our borders and ports
- stop all visas to nations that sponsor terrorism
- arrest and deport any alien who preaches violence and hatred
- prosecute those who provide sanctuary to anyone who would harm us
- deport all those who do not belong here
- put the military on the border if necessary, to keep them from coming back.
See anything "fanatic" there?
And if Tancredo is a fanatic, how would you describe those who would wink at border security, grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, and grant them driver's licenses and other documents that might permit them to register to vote?
For that matter, what word would apply to a "correspondent" who injects his own political opinions in this manner into his reports?
UPDATE 11-13 8:30 PM ET: Tucker Carlson loves the Tancredo ad. From his show this evening:
TUCKER CARLSON: Now, I look at that ad, and people are appalled by that ad: "it's disgusting, it's over the top." I think that ad is totally defensible I love that ad. I think it's kind of true.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Wow
November 13, 2007 - 18:12 ET by well99Sounds like someone who believes in protecting the people of this country and enforceing the law.If that is a fanatic then I am one too.
-
November 13, 2007 - 20:05 ET by dahliatraversIf that is a fanatic then I am one too.
Yoo hoo - David. Me, too.
Tancredo / Hunter or
November 13, 2007 - 18:26 ET by alamojbTancredo / Hunter or Hunter / Tancredo. I really wish one of these men would drop out of the race and become the others stated "VP" canidate. That alone would be worth some free media coverage.
Poor progressive
November 13, 2007 - 18:32 ET by bigtimerPoor progressive Shuster...he must not pay attention to the polls that say 77% of the American people agree with Tancredo.
I have never liked Shyster...never will.
NOT A CORRESPONDENT
November 13, 2007 - 18:35 ET by pilsenerYou properly put "correspondent" in parentheses. David Shuster IS the Hardball propagandist. His daily reports are usually highly slanted to serve as set-up pieces for Chris Matthews' version of speculative reality.
I surmise that Shuster's goal is to replace Tucker Carlson as host , and then vie with Olbermann for the most deranged MSNBC host.
I love your term
November 14, 2007 - 12:06 ET by BeowulfI love your term "speculative reality". That has to be the most descriptive term I've heard for MSLSD.
And what is it with Schuster? Is he vying for the MSLSD holy grail - to become one with Crissy and Olbie? He's making a serious play at becoming as much of (or more) an idiot than those two. I'd bet he did the Happy Dance when Rosie The Mouth didn't get her/it's show. One less moron to compete with.
I'd ask why he is still on the air, but that would be too rhetorical...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
I wish there WAS a border
November 13, 2007 - 18:36 ET by mostlymoderateI wish there WAS a border control fanatic in politics. Unfortunately, nobody is fanatical enough. Illegals still are crossing the border, bringing drugs, pregnant wives, lowering our standard of living, taking our tax-dollars, etc. (sigh)
By the way...Tancredo's
November 13, 2007 - 18:41 ET by bigtimerBy the way...Tancredo's words in his ad saying the price we pay for spineless politicians is right!
Anyone who runs on this and makes it one of if not the top issue because it is National Security when it comes to the borders will win the election.
Tancredo should read up on Reid's old view
November 13, 2007 - 18:56 ET by Gary HallAnd for the life of me, I don't know where I copied this from some time back, and I apologize to the source - but it's too good not to share. (;~>
What happened to this Harry Reid? And.. the MSM is not going to revisit this.
Please note. That WTC bombing was in 1993 - and it shocked Harry Reid to his senses.
It's a crying shame to see so clearly that what was true then, is even more true today. Had the country heeded the warnings and the reccomendations of immigration reform and in tearing down the wall between intelligence and justice, perhaps the lives of over 3,000 Americans might have been saved, and much that has followed since, might have been preempted.
Gary... Great find and
November 13, 2007 - 19:08 ET by bigtimerGary...
Great find and keeper that you shared here with us... I love it.
Someone needs to bring this up to the politicians and the media, words from the Fearless Leader himself would be great campaign issue, ads ect, let alone eventual laws themselves from the Senate...heaven forbid.
Your last paragraph spoke volumes.
What happend to Harry indeed?
November 13, 2007 - 19:15 ET by general companyWhat happend to Harry indeed? So what happend this Bill? What killed it, or should I ask?
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
Thanks bt
November 13, 2007 - 19:57 ET by Gary HallYou know, strong views on the need for agressive immigration reform (legal and illegal) are and have been shared publically by many on the Democrat side of the isle. Clinton's Immigration refrom commission chair, the late Barbara Jordan (black congressional caucus member) comes to mind.
If the view doesn't fit the media's agenda - it just does not exist. It is censored by the media.
Imagine what would have happened this past year, if the voters were familar with the polls (i.e., they think that they are in a minority) and if every voter was familiar with Harry Reid's former view.
blackout area
November 13, 2007 - 19:08 ET by LighthouseJNB needs to have a "blackout area" where certain people like Shuster, Rosie and others that say obviously stupid/ignorant/hostile things on a regular basis can go. At the top of the page can say something like "The following people have indirectly declared themselves unfit to address social, political, or economic problems faced by the United States of America."
We need this to establish a level of standards in which we approach new stories and simultaneously declare we aren't interested in picking the low-hanging fruit (like Shusters' stupidity).
"Boats are safe in the harbor, but that's not what they're made for." -- Maritime quote
Oh yea, I like
November 13, 2007 - 19:47 ET by general companyOh yea, I like it!
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
I do too...only problem I
November 13, 2007 - 19:53 ET by bigtimerI do too...only problem I see is a bunch of us would probably go ahead, read and comment anway because of curiosity and then disgust and anger...
You just never know.
I am sick of The View, Olbermann and Rosie to-boot.
Yup
November 13, 2007 - 20:01 ET by well99I will take anger for 300.I think the problem is most of the blogs would be there.There is to much misinformation being pushed by the msm.