What's up with leftoid media, they mostly start with: " Alot of people", "Some say...", Some think..." Some believe...". But in reality, it is them saying, believing, thinking, etc. Scarborough and Mika are showing their true colors in this exchange of conversation- they will not vote for an AfricanAmerican! These leftoids are the ones raising racism to a higher level in a negative context.

Instead of discussing the issue at hand- in this case, the inexperienced Obama, race has become the subject of the discussion. And I believe that Obama lacks experience! 

Hey Joe, there are alot of white democrats who never voted for Reagan and would never vote for an African-American.

If Obama does not become nominee for either President or VP, will the media say the Dems are racist?

Nah.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Democrats would vote for a Republican (Reagan) but not a black man? And the Republicans who wouldn't attack him "head-on" does that mean they will use "code words"?

And what is this reputedly racist sentiment of the Reagan Democrats? This is more of the "some say" garbage they use to get their point across without taking responsibility for it. Joe Scarborough thinks that Reagan democrats are racist.

Does this guy actually HEAR what he is saying?

If a lie is repeated long enough people believe it to be true, as is the case with all Republicans being racists. As the clock begins to tick toward next November it is only going to get worse for Republicans.

agree more.  My dad taught my brothers and myself that racial slurs were simply unacceptable.  Not liking someone for something they did or how they treat you is one thing, but not liking someone based on the color of their skin?  Unacceptable.

As for the left being the ones to bring it up in a debate (or argument) - you are right.   As a sidenote not having anything to do with the argument/debate issue, here is a little story from my past in regards to a lefty (my roommate) and race (I swear that this is a true story): 

In College my roomie and I had a basement apartment on a street corner on campus.  There was a bus stop at that corner.  One nice spring day we had the door open and we were relaxing and playing video games (Tecmo Bowl, I believe - the first great video football game).  Two guys are waiting at the bus stop and one of them glances down and sees what we are playing and states, "alright, Tecmo Bowl".  That's it.  Nothing more.  My roommate mutters under his breath, "F-ing N******".  What could I say other than, "Dude?!?!?".

As for anything Scarborough and Mika might say, we all here at NB know what the left is all about and how their playbook works.  Simply never trust them and always be aware that they have ulterior motives --- that's probably what they mean by "nuanced".

I don't understand why everyone has a problem with this. I'm glad he brought up that the true racism problem is in the Dem party. Republicans have no problems, running, appointing and embracing people of color. It's about time someone said it like it is. Democrats normally only run minorities in a minority dominated districts. Minority Republicans win with a large number of white votes. Of course it's not just the Reagan Democrats who are racist. Many who didn't vote for him are as well.
If Obama were to win the nomination - he'd be elected because of Republicans. That's how it was in IL. Republicans who don't follow politics closely are easily fooled by Obama's charm and don't really understand how he stands on the issues and what his record is like.

 but I think there are a lot of Reagan Democrats that voted for Reagan twice and Clinton twice that would think twice about voting for an African-American.

  If these democrat voters voted for clinton twice after voting for Reagan then how are they still considered 'Reagan Democrats'?  If their most recent voting was for a democrat then aren't they 'clinton democrats' that are racists and won't vote for a African-American?

Well then, it looks like that will be the angle. If the country doesn't elect a women we will be guilty of objectifying women, if we don't elect Obama we're all a bunch of rascist? 

Buchanan is right. Conservative's, aside from President Bush, are more interested in an individual's resume than race or gender. Liberal's are more interested in electing a liabitiy than an asset.

By the Democrat's low standards, in the age of high def, Lincoln was too homely to run on matters of substance, grit or virtue. 

I don't think it's an issue with racism, but one of envy. Back in the 1960s, my dad used to go to the same gas station all the time. It was owned by an old white guy, and he had a mid-40s black guy working for him. The owner died, and willed the gas station to the guy who had worked loyally for him for so many years. We saw that the gas station was closing just a few months later, and we assumed (incorrectly) that once the station was owned by a black guy that he had lost a lot of his white business. My dad asked the new owner what was happening, and it turned out that the white business was fine, but it was the blacks who had stopped coming to the station. The view was that he had gotten something they didn't, or that he had kissed up to the whites, etc., and now the black community wanted nothing to do with him. So, the station closed and was sold to Gulf who reopened it as one of their own stations.

Based on that experience, and that of Michael Steele in MD, I'm thinking that a lot of black Democrats will not vote for Obama for essentially the same reasons. I think that many in the black community see the success of Obama or Steele as making them look bad, and they don't like anyone who points out their own shortcommings.

How in hell would Republicans "indirectly appeal" to "Reagan Democrats" not to vote for Obama because of his race? Would they say, "Don't vote for Obama because he's well, you know?". Come on, there are racist voters out there. Republicans would hardly need to point out that Obama is African-American, even if they were inclined to do so - which they're not.