It's not as if Frank Rich has a deep and abiding hatred of his nation's leadership, or contempt for his fellow Americans. It's just that he accuses the Bush administration of using tactics worthy of the Gestapo -- the Nazi secret police headed by Heinrich Himmler -- and his fellow Americans of being like citizens of Hitler's Germany who turned a blind eye to the atrocities in their midst.
Those "see no evil' residents of the Third Reich came to be known as the "good Germans," and Rich unsubtly sets the tone for his New York Times column of this morning by entitling it "The 'Good Germans; Among Us."
Rich approvingly cites Andrew Sullivan's claim in last weekend's Sunday Times of London to the effect that "America’s 'enhanced interrogation' techniques have a grotesque provenance":
Verschärfte Vernehmung, enhanced or intensified interrogation, was the exact term innovated by the Gestapo to describe what became known as the ‘third degree.’ It left no marks. It included hypothermia, stress positions and long-time sleep deprivation.
But Rich, unsatisfied with his Bush administration = Gestapo slur, goes on to smear millions of his fellow Americans. Thunders the Times columnist in self-righteous fury:
Our humanity has been compromised by those who use Gestapo tactics in our war. The longer we stand idly by while they do so, the more we resemble those “good Germans” who professed ignorance of their own Gestapo.
Note Rich's "their own Gestapo." As far as he's concerned, Nazi Germany had its Gestapo, and we have ours.
I believe that when the history of this war is written, it will be seen that our nation waged it in accordance with some of the highest ethical standards ever observed in a major conflict. Yet Frank Rich paints our government as adopting Nazi tactics, and average Americans as akin to passive supporters of Hitler's regime. Were it not ever-so-gauche to do so, you might call that unpatriotic.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Unable to Make Distinctions
October 14, 2007 - 07:44 ET by allanfRich is an unusually nasty and hysterical man. There is a pattern to his thoughts and liberal/left wing thought in general. It hinges on the inability to make distinctions. The possibility that a program can be abused is the same as an abusive program.
The CIA is the same as the "Gestapo" in this demented calculus. Bush is like Hitler. The US Military commits massacres. Yet they support "our" troops and are "concerned" about military casualties. These are self loathing and self hating people who actually lack a moral compass.
One's ability to make distinctions flows from a firm set of core beliefs and principles. Liberals, who take the view that all sides are equally right, cannot muster the mettle to take a courageous stand.
Criticizing the United States government is as easy as being a liberal. There are no consequences. There is no fear of retribution. It is an easy way to feel good about yourself.
These people have no principles or values except perhaps for a common hatred of American success and morality.
Well said, allanf
October 14, 2007 - 12:26 ET by KC MulvilleWe apologize if our interrogation techniques are more advanced than: "OK, what do you want to tell us?" Yes, we do use techniques in interrogation. That alone doesn't equate us with Nazis. If you have a criticism of a technique, then address the technique directly, instead of trying to broad-brush us with the sensationalistic charge that Nazis used interrogation techniques. After all, "The Nazis used pencils. We use pencils. Therefore, we are on the verge of committing genocide." is not a valid syllogism.
Liberals like Rich are uncomfortable with the moral ambiguity of normal life, and try to escape the discomfort by seizing a metaphorical higher ground. It becomes vitally important for them to feel morally superior to others. Of course, there are two ways to feel morally superior: you either rise above others, or you accuse others of falling beneath you. It doesn't matter which method you use, so long as you're looking down on someone -- but since accusations against others are easier and quicker than self-improvement, that's their method of choice.
Well Said
October 14, 2007 - 14:26 ET by allanfVery well said KC
Frank Rich : Mocker, Pharisee, Complainer
October 14, 2007 - 07:59 ET by jonathanandersonMen like Frank Rich are aptly illuminated here ...
Jude 1:8-10
(8) Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion [just government], and speak evil of dignities.
(9) Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, "The Lord rebuke thee."
(10) But these [men like Frank Rich] speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally [carnally ... according to their carnal, or worldy, knowledge], as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
Here ...
Jude 1:11-13
(11) Woe unto them! For they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying [slandering, defamations, and calumniations] of Korah.
(12) These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
(13) Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever.
And here ...
Jude 1:14-16
(14) And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, "Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
(15) To execute judgment upon all, and to convince [convict] all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him [the Lord and those who stand for Him]."
(16) These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having [wicked] men's persons in admiration because of [political] advantage.
Frank Rich : 100 Verses
October 14, 2007 - 08:17 ET by jonathanandersonWell, I could easily whip out a hundred verses on that s.o.b. but won't waste my time. I'll try to wrap it up with these ...
Jude 1:17-19
(17) But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;
(18) How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time [eschatos chronos - the lowest, or trying, time ... the time of adversity], who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
(19) These be they who separate themselves, sensual [carnal, worldly], having not the Spirit.
2 Peter 2:10-12
(10) But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of [spiritual] uncleanness, and despise [just] government. Presumptuous are they, self-willed, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities [those things, and those men, which are honorable, true, and valiant].
(11) Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.
(12) But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;
Deuteronomy 19:16-19
(16) If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;
(17) Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the Lord, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days;
(18) And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother;
(19) Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.
Frank Rich's Jihad
October 14, 2007 - 08:03 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsI guess Frank Rich, and many on the NYT staff, idly standing by while Islamo-fascists murder people daily, would consider themselves 'good Jihadists' since they seem to favor America losing this epic struggle.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
And to pick up his Nazi
October 14, 2007 - 08:15 ET by sublight68And to pick up his Nazi metaphor but from the other side, how did things work out for the Good Poles when growing evil went unchecked? The Good Chamberlins almost found out as well.
During WW2 , when the world
October 14, 2007 - 09:04 ET by Seabeach4348During WW2 , when the world started to learn the grim facts of when happened in the Nazi concentration camps, the NYT was reluctant to report any of the atrocities (except for maybe a small column on page 37....).
I suppose that the NYT staff was simply trying to be objective since in the eyes of "good liberals" the Third Reich was apparently "equally correct" in their final solution and lust for world dominance.
Guess that would make the NYT staff "good Nazis".
They finally did report what happened in Hitler's concentration camps after it became so obvious that they could no longer ignore it.
It included hypothermia,
October 14, 2007 - 08:11 ET by sublight68It included hypothermia, stress positions and long-time sleep deprivation.
Sorry, none of those are torture in my book, not with the people we're dealing with. Rich probably considers mean words and finger pointing to be torture.
We are waging this war as humanely as possible, often to our own detriment. Our rules of engagement and sensitivity to civilian casualties puts our troops at unnecessary risk and compromises missions, but we do it because we're civilized.
We would be perfectly justified tossing the Geneva Convention provisions out the window, but we don't. We hold ourselves to higher standards than we expect from anyone else.
Frank Rich and his ilk are citizens of the world and are embarrassed by their country. As a proud, red-white-and-blue, flag waving American, I am embarrassed by them.
Notice how the NYT and
October 14, 2007 - 09:15 ET by Seabeach4348Notice how the NYT and other commie-wanna-be rags never seem to mention the torture chambers, mass executions, and other forms of daily terror that went on in Saddam's Iraq.
And they never mention how we brought this to a halt.
As far as interrogating terrorists: no matter what methods we use, it will still pale compared to what would happen to them if Iraq was still under Saddam. I'm a bit more concerned about my kid going to school safely and not having to worry about a terrorist bomb in the school cafeteria!
.....hypothermia, stress
October 14, 2007 - 08:39 ET by MidAmerica.....hypothermia, stress positions and long-time sleep deprivation
Heck... I bet my Boy Scout winter camping trip was worse. It was back before all the modern camping gear. We'd only get a couple hours of sleep on a cold hard ground and then get up shivering to restoke the fire. At daybreak we loaded up our packs and hiked more miles on slippery snowy trails.
MidAmerica, your parents
October 14, 2007 - 09:28 ET by motherbeltMidAmerica, your parents should have sued BSA!! How dare they!!
You could have gotten a chill!! Oh, the humanity!!
Don't you know, our military are supposed to be soooo nice to our prisoners, that in sheer gratitude, they will tell their captors everything they need to know?
As Dr. Phil says: How's that working out for you?
The good Germans = liberals who excuse Dictators and terrorists
October 14, 2007 - 09:40 ET by Dee BunkThe good Germans = liberals who excuse Dictators and terrorists. They excuse massive systemic murder and torture but condemn our whole country for a few isolated cases. Do they think there was no torture by the Americans, British, French or any other country in World War II?
Liberals have no concept of scale and don't know how to use appropriate analogies. The conservatives are the one’s condemning large scale murder and torture while liberals excuse it. Liberals now are just like the liberals in France, Briton and elsewhere who were apologists for Hitler. In WWII many liberals believed that their country needed to “get along” with Hitler. A great documentary that illustrates this is called “The Sorrow and the Pity”. It has actual footage and interviews from French people during the Nazi occupation. It shows how easily the French people were fooled by Nazi propaganda. Many blamed the Jews not Hitler.
Frank is a petty little man
October 14, 2007 - 10:11 ET by bassndudeFrank is a petty little man with a petty little job that nobody listens to anymore. Personaly, I think a week with some of those poor terrorists out there, is just the ticket for Frank. If he suvrives he will have some idea what we are in for if they are allowed to live and make their way over here.
For my money, I dont care how, what, when or where question these thugs. I dont care if they kill em in the process, so long as it is to keep my grandkids safe in the schools. Terrorists rights do no exist. The only right terrorists have is the right to die.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
So when liberals compare
October 14, 2007 - 10:12 ET by rbosqueSo when liberals compare conservatives to NAZIs but then they throw babies into the flames of an abortion clinic then walk away as if they just threw out the garbage...I guess that's OK? Are we to presume they are good liberals? Good Americans?
Frank Rich ...
October 14, 2007 - 10:32 ET by drillanwrGiving a whole new meaning to "ass-backwards" ...
Attention- starved
October 14, 2007 - 10:46 ET by iveseenitallRich is a typical attention-starved liberal. The more he is ignored, the worse he gets. Stamp your feet and call people names, Franky. And how imaginative you are. Nazis--how original! Immature and pathetic.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Oh yes, because our so
October 14, 2007 - 10:46 ET by Independence4AllOh yes, because our so called "torture" techniques are vastly more horrendous then the actual cutting off of heads, mutilations, beatings, shootings and bombings from the jihadis, oh excuse me, the "feedom fighters" we are at war with who follow the Geneva Conventions.......wait a min....
Answer me one
October 14, 2007 - 10:54 ET by wiwfAnswer me one question:
WHERE ARE THE DEATH CAMPS???! HUH?
Wrong day to get on my bad side. This is a bunch of idiocy by people who claim to have a brain.
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
I guess I should have put a
October 14, 2007 - 11:04 ET by Independence4AllI guess I should have put a /sarc at the end of my comment.
Liberal Anti-War Whinefest
October 14, 2007 - 10:59 ET by BlondeLet's see...if I can hit all the liberal anti-war whines that Rich used in this article.
Bush Lied; Abu Ghraib; Mission Accomplished; Blackwater "massacre"; Paul Bremer the "Viceroy"; stampede a nation shell-shocked by 9/11; makeshift armor; Bush-Cheney secretiveness; extralegal contractors; "Gestapo tactics in our war".
He should have used Cindy Sheehan as his by-line.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
But Blonde
October 14, 2007 - 11:03 ET byhe will be sure to defend Murtha now won't he?
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho
B
October 14, 2007 - 11:05 ET by BlondeBut of course.
I really have a hard time wrapping my head around the way those people think (or do they?).
We can start calling Mark Rich "Tumbler"....accusing us conservatives (those who openly support the GWOT) of being Nazis.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Rich --- Tumbler
October 14, 2007 - 11:15 ET byand Turner --- Leon
does that make Dowd ---- the EYE?
i think you have a theory of the MSM --- 1 degree separation to trolls
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho
1 degree of separation
October 14, 2007 - 11:19 ET by BlondeB,
Well, the MsM annoys me just as much as the trolls do.
Hey...my toolbar on comments isn't on, I know there's a way to fix that...do you remember it?
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
mine too
October 14, 2007 - 11:24 ET bysometimes hitting the red X stops whats running in the background, not today. It has been resetting just takes a looonng time. Could it be the Newsbusted being replaced? Sometimes they appear after hitting the preview before the post.
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho
Red X didn't work
October 14, 2007 - 11:27 ET by BlondeAh well, no links for me today.
About the most I can manage with the html stuff is italics.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Red X
October 14, 2007 - 11:32 ET byyeah not today, but there's the Newsbusted and my buttons it seems there's something in the background taking lots of time to load
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho
Yeah --
October 14, 2007 - 11:47 ET by dervishand that something seems to be NewsBusted. I noticed YouTube trying to load something for a while, then ta-da! Up came the NewsBusted link, and the toolbar.
Same here
October 14, 2007 - 11:27 ET by RJWhassup, NB?
Actually,
October 14, 2007 - 11:20 ET by dervishit sounds more like Ward Churchill. He must be making his living now writing Rich's columns for him.
Rich is wrong, but only in
October 14, 2007 - 11:13 ET by fosstenRich is wrong, but only in that his description is misdirected. There is a Gestapo in America today, but it's not what Rich thinks it is. It's called the BATFE. But it was around long before Bush.
Forget 911, I dial 9MM.
Stephen Colbert
October 14, 2007 - 13:02 ET by Vivian LeeMark,
Did you happen to catch the op-ed from Stephen Colbert in the NYT's this morning? He subbed for Maureen Dowd. He talks about Frank Rich. There's a link on my blog, for anyone interested. It's priceless.
ConservativeBelle
http://conservativeb...
Belle
October 14, 2007 - 13:10 ET by BlondeThat was great..thanks for the link.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Mr. Rich is guilty of false
October 14, 2007 - 17:39 ET by dscottMr. Rich is guilty of false moral equivalence by use of a faulty time line.
Our moral trajectory over the Bush years could not be better dramatized than it was by a reunion of an elite group of two dozen World War II veterans in Washington this month. They were participants in a top-secret operation to interrogate some 4,000 Nazi prisoners of war. Until now, they have kept silent, but America’s recent record prompted them totalk to The Washington Post.
Notice how Mr. Rich never draws the distinction between a terrorist and a soldier? Somehow a captured terrorist has the legal or moral rights on the order of a POW. Sorry Mr. Rich, your equivalence falls flat right there. The German POWs were interrogated under the rules of war that their country agreed to by signing the Geneva Convention. Please note that the Germans near the end did not treat our POWs with equal distinction I am sad to say. OBL and al Qaeda did not and will not abide by the rules of war, so why should we treat them differently than they behaved? When a group decides to kill innocent civilians as a means to advance their agenda, that's cold blooded murder and such qualifies them as terrorists.
It's a good thing people like Mr. Rich and Clinton are not in charge now as they were during the incompetent reign of Bill Clinton. It was Bill Clinton's feckless governance that inspired OBL to do his deeds (according to OBL), the conception, the planning and the preparation of 911 were all done on Bill Clinton's watch. Sandy Berger attempted to cover up Clinton's malfesance and incompetence.
No Mr. Rich, your moral outrage is a falsehood, an act (a poor one at that) and the fact you now accuse the average American of collaborating with an evil government as the Germans of Hitler's day demonstrates that you acknowledge most Americans will not countance Islamofascism as your liberal predecessors did the NAZIs and Communists of that era. In fact, it was liberals who wholey embraced Adolf Hitler, his anti-Semitism and his sickening Eugenics just as you do now of the Mullahs of Iran.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
dscott -
October 14, 2007 - 20:34 ET by drillanwrPerfect!
And thanks for the link ...
Rich at it again
October 14, 2007 - 19:44 ET by celatorPoor Frank Rich, a one-tune boy if there ever was one. Here we go again with the Gestapo/Hitler thing.
Rich is probably better known as the "theater critic" (yea, I know, I'm laughing too) whose greatest joy was in destroying the careers of young talented writers and actors, And man was he good at it. Remember the spoiled jealous fat kid in Pee Wee's Great Adventure who wanted Pee Wee's nice bike and would do anything to get it? That's Rich's entire philosophy. Acquired what others have (like talent, for example) at any cost, including destroying the charecter of the possessor. Oh, he's a piece of work, alright.
it really takes a naive person ...
October 14, 2007 - 23:06 ET by pmohbuckto ever equate anything in this country with any form of life in nazi germany. if frank rich really knew his history, he would understand that IF his statements were true ... he would never have had the opportunity to speak or write about it as he does ... he'd be considered a political enemy or more likely ... a communist. therefore, it is safe to assume that frank rich would be imprisoned, if not executed for writing his trash columns.
someone may want to suggest that frank rich read a history book before he starts running his mouth about this country, because this country (even under the "rule of george bush") is still one of the very few places on the planet where he can get away with making statements the way he does.
the more this liberal editorialists write, the more arrogant, narrow-minded and plain stupid they appear. keep it up frank ... the nyt is probably one of the few places that would consider employing your "wit".
Sullivan and Rich
October 15, 2007 - 01:16 ET by Lame CherryAndrew Sullivan and Frank Rich should really visit history or ask someone who actually understands it to get the following points:
Like World War I which Germany got into trouble because Bismark was feuding with the European cartel powers as Prussian Frederick the Great was feuding with the royal whores of Europe, it was socialist, fascist, globalist cartel patrons in Rockefellers and Rothschilds who funded the German Socialist obscure party which the world knows as Nazi.
These socialists are the ilk Frank Rich and Andrew Sullivan are employed by and they break bread with often.
The religious cult of Nazism was bred for war as much as the cartel funded Karl Marx in communism to govern masses on the cheap while the cartels raped said nations of mineral wealth.
The cartel has it's own religion, a false messiah cult, and they saw 3 brick walls to world domination. The first in Europe was the German people who trace immigration to the Assyrians, but are the protractors of Christianity in Europe. The British were the other problem and America was the third problem to world domination.
In just focusing on Germany, the first World War was designed to destroy the World Colonial Empires. World War II was designed to destroy the independent super state backed by Christian undertones and a coming third World War will be designed to destroy the nation state leaving the world without borders. (Check the European Union and North American union being implanted.)
It was enormously necessary to destroy the German superpower state and the Nazi was chosen to so antagonize nations that the Soviets would swoop in and conquer Germany which would mean all of Europe. The "problem" in the plan of the elite though is Hitler got wind of Stalin beign urged and instead attacked first.
The end result though was what was desired in Germany wiped from the map not as she was. Whether people want to face the fact or not, the allies basically by Rockefeller plants infused the wealth into the west and America after the war by not bombing German industrial areas. People might be shocked to know during the war that the German Warburgs ran the American Federal Reserve. Not too surprising the same Rockefellers were dealing with the Soviet's during the Cold War and Europe was buying Russian oil funding nukes aimed at the west.
So Frank Rich can look to his bed mates for the Nazi programs which incorporated. He is quite wrong though in his "wide spread" use of torture techniques being Nazi as the Europeans have been doing this before 1500 AD.
What Germany got though is this after World War II. A western state harnessed by the west and an eastern state where most of the population born from 9 months after the Soviet invasion were Russian bastards as the Russian military raped every female from infants to old fraus to the rumor of even animals.
This bastard population of communists have now been incorporated into modern Germany bringing the complete destruction of an ancient people immigrated from Assyria.
As a note modern Germans derive their name from the Romans who actually named the region after the "Germani" who are in reality an immigrant people of the Scythians who plunged into central Asia spreading from the Caucusus out of northern Iran. In that region they were known as Khumri and Cimmeran according to Babylonian and Persian writings.
The names being derived like Reaganites and Yankees (Jahn Cheese) after these people's location and King who was Omri of Samaria or of the Lost 10 Tribes of Israel.
While the Assyrian "Germans" remained, a great many Germani migrated in different waves to England and in mass to the United States building this nation with the unique character it has with the other immigrant sects of Scots, Irish and Huegonauts of France of Norman ancestry contrary to the coastal patrician Angles who harbor these cartel cliques making war on Americans today.
Frank Rich is responsible for all the terrorism, torture and genocidal movements and his propaganda is paid for by the cartels. He may try and divert attention by blaming the patrician Bush clan, but there are enough of witnesses in this Farenheit 451 to carry the message along.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS