... weasle Wesley rears his head again. It's like Bill Murray in "Ground Hog Day". The only difference is that was a movie and was funny. Clark is ridiculus and tragic.

Who do we need to e-mail to keep Rush ON AFRTS????

Poor Liberal, he educated beyond his intelligence.

What bothers people like Vieira & other media lightweights about Rush is the following. He has, over a period of years, had the most listeners by miles, been the most effective conservative voice, & has made the most money & enjoys it. He'll never say I'm sorry for being on top of the pile. The funniest thing is how pissed the lefties get over him because he does'nt care if they like him, it does'nt bother him, but it bothers them.

As for Gen.Clark, ask the troops if they want El Rushbo pulled from AFR. If they say yes, fine. If not, shut up.

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

Still crying about not getting a Bush appointment, Wes?

You're reservation is for the left side of the auditorium with the Phony Patriots.

Sure have heard a bunch about your leadership abilities from those who served under you.  Oh, wait a minute, no I haven't.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Yeah, I saw this and thought the comment from Viera was to be expected so it didn't bother me so much. Clark is a snivling little politician these days and his comments about Armed Services Radio and Rush was just stupid.

Drudge is reporting Hillary and B. Hussein Obama have signed a letter of condemnation of Rush.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

I hear the left throw the word incompetent around alot when speaking of the President, but I think it may fit as an apt description of the msm and newsreaders like merideth.  The story has been proven false and a weak smear by a fringe left website.  The fact that Merideth doesn't know this makes her either incompetent or corrupt.  Her job is to challenge Wesley on his false premise.  I'll let her decide if she is incompetent or corrupt, but neither speaks well of her.  How embarrassing.

All this talk of pulling Rush from Armed Forces radio for this made up controversey...

I haven't seen one report yet where the MSM (or anyone for that matter) has discussed this with currently serving men in uniform...or as Harry Reid would refer to them as "losers"

If they wanna do this to Rush, then Harry Reid must really be behind the 8 Ball.........

One would think the MSM would shut up, sit down, and hide in the bushes with this false story....instead, they are working the airwaves.

Well guess what MSM  ?  Rush / Fox / New Media, can reach 10,000 times more people than voted for Harry Reid.  That smell of burning toast in the air, is Harry....better start looking for a replacement.  

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

I would like to see a column here devoted to the truth about Wesley Clark, with statements from those that have served with him and know the score.  Also, how he is a stooge for the Clintons; e.t.c.   I want to hear it again from those who have it first hand.

   I would like to see Viera's bobble-head handed to her on a plate by someone over what b.s. she has tried to put over on the viewers, once again.   Unlikely they'll have anyone to rebut their yellow reporting, huh?  Laura Ingraham would fit the bill nicely, though....

   The Left won't rest until they pull a Hugo Chavez on this country.   

Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar. 

This idiot is on MSDNC right now saying that Rush has a long history of slandering the troops that disagree with him. Proof?

Rush should sue him for slander. 

Indoctrinate-U 

Our Education. Their Politics.

Here's the thing.

1. Rush didn't say the things his opponents are trying to claim he said.

2. The words they are trying to attach to him are not offensive nor in any way a violation of any FCC regulation.

Rush is safe, and the left knows it. They're simply trying to get a little mileage out of perhaps one of the worst straw man issues I've seen emerge from the left in a long time. Man, Rush is going to come out looking good next time he goes to visit the troops in Iraq and receives an enthusiastic welcome that Reid, Murtha etc. could only dream of receiving, leaving them scratching their heads saying, "Wha' Happen?"

*****

"I heart famous people."

This is how they play the game. We begin with: why did they invite Clark on the show in the first place? There are plenty of other stories that have more social importance, but why do they highlight Clark? Because although Clark has a respectable military background, he is reliably liberal and anti-Bush. That means the media can exploit Clark's service to shield them while they take potshots at conservatives. The first step of bias is who you choose to interview.

Next, they give him a "when did you stop beating your wife" question, only they use that rhetorical trick to their advantage. They reinforce the assumption that Rush's comment was offensive by discussing how Clark wants to penalize it, instead of asking Clark to prove that it was offensive in the first place.

Then, like a crock pot, they'll leave the story alone ... for a while. Then they'll return later (in maybe a month, or three months) and refer to the whole incident as "When Limbaugh made that insult to the troops..." That's when Katie Couric will start referring to it, like she does now with the Iraq war as a mistake, as an 'accepted truth.'

It's dishonest, even if it isn't entirely deliberate.

I am a vet of Iraq (twice) and am now in the Guard. I am not a staunch supporter of the war in Iraq, but I believe that failure is not an option. I heard the program of Rush's last week and was not offended at all. I understood what he was talking about since I was aware of the stories of MacBeth and Beauchamp. There is a big difference between disagreeing with a war while still carrying out your orders and lying to demonize those of us that serve. Those phony Soldiers who would lie just to make us look bad need to be brought to light and punished. Rush said nothing wrong and I am still a fan of his. Liberals hate the truth when it doesn't go along with their agenda. For being a group that claims tollerance, I see little, if any, from them.

Vieira=rat (actually in that picture she does look like a rat)

Clark=Soros whore

Clark sold his soul for Soros money.  He has no credibility on any miliatary matters.    Soros pulls the strings and Clark speaks.

Like Rush or not.  Agree with Rush or not.  No one has been a bigger supporter of our troops over the last 15 years than Rush.  NO ONE.

Reid has called the troops losers, war criminals, and supported calling their commander a traitor.  Reid should never have the right to accuse anyone of being disrespectful of the troops.

I've suddenly hit a non-hole in my Swiss Cheese mind ...

Does anyone else recall during the late 1990s, at the height of all the Bill Clinton mess, a "reminder" went out to the armed forces that they were NOT permitted to publicly speak out against the President or the administration?  That free speech did not pertain to those in the military service?

But NOW it's okay for active duty military to use free speech against this President and the war?

Somebody please fill me in here ...

It's going to get far, far worse in the coming months.

Sadly, I don't expect much help from the republicans in stemming the tide, as they appear to be content to just sit on the sidelines with their heads burried deep in the sand.

The Republican Party is well on its way to losing my vote in '08. They have done absolutely nothing to earn it.

When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.

I saw Wesley Clark on Abrams last night.  He explained how liberal commentators on Armed Forces Radio are ok, listing things they did not say that Limbaugh had, like saying that soldiers who do not agree with him are not "patriotic", yadda yadda yadda.  I guess it is easy to convince yourself how bad Limbaugh is if you just make up stuff.

Of course, when considering Clark's opinion, remember that he has not only said that our soldiers are not men enough to stand up for themselves, but also that white soldiers are inferior to Asian ones because Asians do not value life as highly as whites, and that most soldiers who enlist do so to either escape jail or to fulfill some sadistic fantasy.

See how easy that was?  My negative opinion of Wesley Clark is bolstered.  Doesn't everyone agree with me now?  :-)

Of course Abrams never asked Clark what his support was for saying that Limbaugh had said the many things Clark attributed to him ... mainly because, in what passes for journalism today, it didn't matter if it was true.

Discourse by politicians and "journalists" now is just sick.  They truly do not care about the truth - to them, "facts" do not involve truth; rather "facts" are anything that will support their opinion, even if they have to make it up.

This Limbaugh dispute is perhaps the worst of all.  First hearing Mel Gibson call someone a Jew-bastard or something might be telling if you had no reason to know his view of Jews.  But when Limbaugh spends years and years doing nothing but support the troops in more words and ways than any of us can even imagine, for someone to say that they are outraged at some supposed broad statement that might be twisted to insult a broad group of soldiers (depending on how you view the inclusion of "s" in one of the probably million words he has spoken on this subject!) says nothing about Limbaugh but says a lot about those who attempt to make something of it.

Not that it wasn't long ago obvious what a tool Harry Reid is.

 JeffC

Does anyone really care about the truth any more?