Damn the NewsBusters, full speed ahead!
Look for Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to be pinning a DNC medal for heroism on Mika Brzezinski. The MSNBC newsreader opened today's "Morning Joe" with an intrepid assault on President Bush, undaunted by the rhetorical fire she knew it would draw from NewsBusters.
View video here.
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Not a lot of fans, though, in the Democratic party, about what the president said last night.
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Well, I think first of all, I was hoping he would answer the fundamental question, and I just feel like, in order to have credibility when you're running a war you sort of need to have a handle on when it's going to end.
And a bit later . . .
BRZEZINSKI: Well, you know, I'm sorry, what really made me mad, and you know, whatever, NewsBusters, but this drawdown thing, and everybody's saying it, I'm not the only one, it's not a drawdown. And the numbers now are that by next summer we'll have 12,000 more troops there than before the surge began. So it's not a drawdown, and it seems to me that one could characterize it as a misleading statement or possibly even worse.
SCARBOROUGH: "Some say." Do that Kate Couric thing!
BRZEZINSKI [playing along]: Some say it could be misleading. Actually, I say it's misleading.
SCARBOROUGH: People can take offense at what you said, but what you said is just the truth.
BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, and it's misleading Americans.
SCARBOROUGH: I voted for the president twice and supported this war --
BRZEZINSKI: [unintelligble] this entire war from beginning to end was based on misleading statements.
SCARBOROUGH: Now you're taking a leap.
BRZEZINSKI: No I'm not! How am I taking a leap?
It's taken some time, but Mika has gradually come out from behind any pretense of objectivity and is now openly letting her anti-Bush flag fly. We'll be looking for her to wear that DNC medal with pride on an upcoming "Morning Joe" episode.
Note: The photo captures Mika's "whatever, NewsBusters" moment.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"it's not a drawdown." A
September 14, 2007 - 07:19 ET by Gat New York"it's not a drawdown."
A drawndown is when you reduce the number of troops. Is there some other meaning that we are missing here. The only one who is misleading is Mika. She is NOT a news person and is a mouthpiece and propagandist for the Democratic Party, the Jimmy Carter wing of the Democratic Party, and the MoveOn.org wing of the Democratic Party.
She is the one who is misleading because she is placing everything in the context of objective news analysis and she is anything but.
Scarborough is no better because he has evidently turned his back on his political party in the name of dollars he gets to empower this treason from Mike and the rest of the clan.
this entire war from
September 14, 2007 - 07:20 ET by motherbeltthis entire war from beginning to end was based on misleading statements.
There it is, the "Liberal watermark." I'm just surprised she didn't bring in Halliburton.
Bush does mislead - with honesty
September 14, 2007 - 14:44 ET by TruthMongerI get it now!
...the MSM's definition of "mis-leading" is telling the truth...
...the MSM defines "true leadership" as the spinning of bullshit...the way they always do in partnership with the DNC...
That's why the Clintons are such left-wing heros...! It all makes sense now...
Incidentally this is also Satan's MOD - coincidence? Nope...
TM -
September 14, 2007 - 17:41 ET by drillanwrWhen I was a kid my Mother read everything she could get her hands on about the Antichrist. While I remember things in generalizations, I do recall her saying the Antichrist will be attractive to his followers (I never could see what all those broads saw/see in Clinton), would have a way with words so that you would believe he was telling you the truth (I always thought Bill Clinton would have made the perfect used car salesman), and would be seen as a person who would bring "peace to the world" (yeah, that's what Hitler thought ...)
Mika knows her history!
September 14, 2007 - 07:22 ET by Mica the Magnificent" . . in order to have credibility when you're running a war, you sort of need to have a handle on when it's going to end."
Lincoln: The south is trying to advance northward, the battles are bloody but we are having progress in their defeat. The civil war will end around April 1865 and I will be shot.
Roosevelt: We have nothng to fear but fear itself. The war will end and I will die around the same time. Truman will have to drop the bomb in Japan to accomplish this.
Mika knows her history.
Mika, you ignorant slut
September 14, 2007 - 07:43 ET by HelenS"The US will be closing all its bases in Germany, Korea, and Japan and bringing the service members home by...
Oh look, we're out of time!"
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" - Shakespeare
Woohoo!!!
September 14, 2007 - 09:01 ET by HelenSLook at me! I'm on TV!! HI MOM!!!
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" - Shakespeare
...If only briefly...
September 14, 2007 - 11:10 ET by HelenSMy avatar was there then it wasn't. A brief moment of fame...
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" - Shakespeare
MTM: Conur. It always
September 14, 2007 - 10:57 ET by BDMTM:
Conur.
It always AMAZES me how the liberals defintion of failure keeps shifting.
2003 - we failed because we were temporarily halted in a sandstorm for a day south of Bagdhad. Then the storm cleared.
Then we failed because all of Iraq's national treasures were supposedly stoeln by looters. Only to discover that the bulk of the Treasures had been removed for safe keeping except for those removed by Saddam himself.
2004 - We failed because electricity generation was lower than prewar levels. Except it was not and CONSUMPTION was elevated.
We were then failures because the oil was not being produced at prewar levels, except then it was.
We were also failures because we had not set up a democratic government yet, except we had and the locals showed purple fingers to the world.
2005 - We failed because Fallujah was not secure enough, except then it was. Same-same Najaf, Ramadi, et al.
We were raving failures because the Iraqi Army only had one battalion fully trained to the point that it could operate in the lead. Except two months there later there was another, then another, then another till now we have fewer numbers of soldiers in operations than Iraqi's
2006 - We were failures because small numbers of thugs were killing social/ethnic enemies. Then the Iraqi Military and Police began cracking down.
2007 - We are failures because the Iraqi Politicians are not cooperating in divying up petroleum money (I thought we were failures because there WAS no petroleum money --Did I miss something?)
2008 - Any Predictions???????
Never mind, just read the
September 14, 2007 - 12:44 ET by BDNever mind, just read the Balimore Sun and have spotted the first indicator....
...a critical piece of the Iraq puzzle has gone largely unmentioned: jobs.
Okay, we are failures in Iraq because the unemployment rate is high. Got it!
Do you know your history?
September 14, 2007 - 12:41 ET byDo you know your history? What was Roosevelt referring to with his "nothing to fear, but.." quote?
Economic hardship prolonged
September 14, 2007 - 12:43 ET by BDEconomic hardship prolonged by the New Deal programs.
Hitchcock's The Birds and
September 14, 2007 - 12:45 ET by Jack BauerHitchcock's The Birds and Psycho perhaps?
Fear itself!!!
September 14, 2007 - 14:48 ET by TruthMonger...before Pearl Harbor Americans were too afraid to confront Germany and Japan...
Like the libs are too afraid to confront world fasciasts today...
Roosevelt was essentially saying "grow a pair!"
He put if very nicely, I thought...
Roosevelt's first act as
September 14, 2007 - 13:06 ET byRoosevelt's first act as president was to deal with the country's banking crisis. Since the beginning of the depression, a fifth of all banks had been forced to close. As a consequence, around 15% of people's life-savings had been lost. By the beginning of 1933 the American people were starting to lose faith in their banking system and a significant proportion were withdrawing their money and keeping it at home. The day after taking office as president, Roosevelt ordered all banks to close. He then asked Congress to pass legislation which would guarantee that savers would not lose their money if there was another financial crisis.
The New Deal was extremely popular with the electorate and Roosevelt easily defeated the republican candidate, Al Landon, by 27,751,612 votes to 16,681,913.
Popular does not equal
September 14, 2007 - 13:54 ET by BDPopular does not equal effective.
Most economists today say that the Keynsian efforts FDR employed in the New Deal actually prolonged the depression and has saddled the economy to this day.
You mean pump priming of
September 14, 2007 - 14:14 ET by dscottYou mean pump priming of the economy via road projects (public investments), instead of cutting tax rates to get private investment going. I object to calling it Keynsian since Keynes said the point of taxation was to be a brake on the economy to limit inflation. FDR was operating on the Gold Standard way of thinking where there was a fixed amount of wealth that was hoarded by the rich. Instead he sold bonds and increased the national debt to pump prime the economy. FDR's idea was of using debt to expand the economy which would latter be paid off by printing more money as the economy grew. This is a variation of what Keynes said since the government theoretically could print all the money it needed to fund government programs, however, doing this in excess of the capacity of the economy to absorb the new money flowing into the economy would cause inflation. (Think Germany after WWI or Robert Mugabe's Zimbavwe currently) This is what Dems did for 50 years, it works to a point but at the cost of severe boom bust business cycles.
dscott's postulate: The degree to which someone exaggerates or deceives is inversely proportional to the merit of the advocated position.
Concur.
September 14, 2007 - 16:20 ET by BDConcur.
Most economists
September 14, 2007 - 16:54 ET byMost economists today...
Would that be 51%? Are you serious?
His First Inaugural
September 14, 2007 - 12:51 ET by bassndudeHis First Inaugural Address.
"I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction into the Presidency I will address them with a candor and a decision which the present situation of our people impel. This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days."
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
...sounds like this is where
September 14, 2007 - 14:49 ET by TruthMonger...sounds like this is where Bush gets alot of his material:)...
Don't expect Scarborough to
September 14, 2007 - 07:31 ET by Warner Todd HustonDon't expect Scarborough to say much to confront anyone, though. He lets anyone say anything despite how true it is or isn't. Joey hasn't the guts to get involved in a real dialog.
Joe: Softball Champ
September 14, 2007 - 07:33 ET by Sergeant ROCKJoe is like the rest of them, he's just there to announce when the commercial break is coming during the guest's 'talking points'.
Nonsense
September 14, 2007 - 07:43 ET by allanfNonsense - wars end in victory or failure. Scary that her father held a policy position in goverment.
My thoughts exactly. She and
September 14, 2007 - 08:31 ET by gueinMy thoughts exactly. She and her "pull-out now" friends remind me of the whiny kid in the backseat wanting to know "when we are going to get there". Even if there is a exit strategy in place, it is not going to be revealed to the public, which includes Mika. Revealing it to the public (and Mika) also reveals it to the terrorists.
You mean the former
September 14, 2007 - 09:03 ET by dscottYou mean the former National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter? No, I'm not surprised at all. Look at the track record, a model of consistency.
dscott's postulate: The degree to which someone exaggerates or deceives is inversely proportional to the merit of the advocated position.
I've fallen and I can't
September 14, 2007 - 07:54 ET by whatis isget up. I'm here on the floor in a puddle of coffee and wireless keyboard starting to cackle like the Wicked Witch of the West. Or heaven forbid, Hillary. These people are killing me, they're imploding right before our eyes. Somebody please make them stop, they're killing me. What a wonderful start for a gorgeous fall weekend. Thanks NB
Mika's roll on the Morning Schmo is misunderstood.
September 14, 2007 - 08:01 ET by CTMika is the Peoples Democratic apparatchik, her presence is to present and enforce the Party’s line.
Correct
September 14, 2007 - 08:05 ET by Sergeant ROCKAnd Joe is just there to introduce and praise the guests.
Joe appeared to be a tiny
September 14, 2007 - 08:03 ET by charlietexasJoe appeared to be a tiny bit scared of Msss Mika. Shes a
typical bitter liberal woman. I won't of expected any less from her. We
are hearing the samething from all the left...."Bush lied". Thanks for
the imput, Mika. At least you're watching "Newsbusters". I hope she
reads all the comments about her. But, for anyone who thought
this war was going to be in and out and its over is really pretty
naive. I don't if she know it or not. But we still have troops in
Japan, Germany, Bosnia, all over the world. When are we going to bring
home these troops??
Hey, Joe.....grow a pair.
Love Momydearestc
Perhaps someone should teach
September 14, 2007 - 08:28 ET by Free ThinkerPerhaps someone should teach Mika how to subtract first. Second, can you imagine Roosevelt being told he has to wrap up ww2 by next spring or Reagan being told the cold war must end by March so the next President doesn't have to worry about it? The left has put itself in an unenviable position of owning defeat to the point that they can't turn back and accept success. The new line is they don't want a democrat President (if elected) to pull out of Iraq and be blamed for the ensuing catastrophe. What a nice vision for our future. How about winning. I know Mika grew up in a house where she was taught to be a loser, but it is not working for her on tv.
LIES, LIES I SAY!!!
September 14, 2007 - 08:39 ET by CrashForgive me, but, who the hell is Mika Brezinski?
No matter how it comes to being - more terrorist dead = Good.
Using the lefts logic: If WMD's were a lie and Saddam wasn't really a threat ... that would mean both Bill and Hillary are liars. Oh wait, I forgot they are. I'll have to rethink my argument.
Mika
September 14, 2007 - 12:19 ET by charlietexasHer daddy worked for Carter......that explains alot....Mommy
and the Soviets before
September 14, 2007 - 14:51 ET by TruthMongerand the Soviets before that...hmmm...
Leave the commanding to the COMMANDERS THANK YOU
September 14, 2007 - 08:41 ET by Six String Spiff"you're running a war you sort of need to have a handle on when it's going to end."
Ummm... No. You see, wars are complicated things. I know you have been spoiled and pampered in this wonderful nation, but wars don't come with any guarantee of a timeline. There is no "Mail in Presidential Rebate". Ok?For Christ sake, don't you see how utterly stupid that sounds? I'm glad you have enjoyed your freedoms so much that you are used to having everything you want, faster, better, more, now, and free. Your kind of whining and LYING ("This war was based on misleading info...") Don't make me pull up the list of Democrat statements saying the same same damn thing Bush is saying today. Of course, that never seems to matter to you people. Facts matter not. Opine opine opine. That's all you can do. BTW.. Chisel off some of that Revlon.
The American Revolution Continued
Those terrorists know when
September 14, 2007 - 08:48 ET by dvdaughtryThose terrorists know when this war will end.
They give it 100 years (and reserve the right to extend it, until we get tired of playing patty-cake).
Well, for once, the rich white man is in control. --Montgomery Burns
When it looked like the war
September 14, 2007 - 09:32 ET by motherbeltWhen it looked like the war was a "quagmire" the liberal line was "Listen to the generals!!" Now that Gen Petraeus has said things are going pretty well, and we shouldn't quit, they want the Commander-in-Chief to ignore him.
Excellent Point Motherbelt!
September 14, 2007 - 09:53 ET by Six String SpiffI had completely forgotten about that! These people are waffling so much, they should invest in proctor-silex
The American Revolution Continued
The arrogant MSM...
September 14, 2007 - 14:53 ET by TruthMonger...yes, when Bush wouldn't "listen to the generals" he was, what was it again...arrogant? In denial? In a bubble? Out of touch? Stubborn?
I know I'm missing a few...
Cluess
September 14, 2007 - 09:01 ET by Steve08080I always have to laugh at the MSM. They believe they're experts in all fields. They haven't a clue how the military operates, how wars are executed, and I don't even believe they know how to report. A timeline? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!! All this crap they call reporting the news is nothing more than Bush bashing.
Journalism is becoming or has become one of the most hated/despised professions. It's no longer news, but a propaganda machine. They can't even conduct interviews without rudely interupting their guest (Tony Snow, Condaleeza Rice, the more recent examples). These elite snobs just want power back so they can continue to institute socialist policies.
If it wasn't for people like Soros funding them, they would be bankrupt just like Air America.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!!!
Mika is MSNBC
September 14, 2007 - 09:14 ET by jweaverMika is just another of the long line of "quality" journalism MSNBC is becoming known.
J. Weaver
scoffery.com
" . . in order to have
September 14, 2007 - 09:18 ET by USA4freedom" . . in order to have credibility when you're
running a war, you sort of need to have a handle on when it's going to
end."
Is this not the perfect example of just how ignorant the
left is.
Hell we should have made an appointment. I hope they don’t
keep us waiting toooo long. I have other things to do..
While we are on the subject, what credibility do you have?
Also hey Jo, way to stick up! Spineless..
I agree with you motherbelt:
“this entire war from beginning to end was based on
misleading statements.”
Bush lied people died.
Halliburton..
Big oil
Neocons. Bla Bla Bla.
Just once come up with something other than the standard
talking points.. please. If for no other reason so the rest of us will have to
wake up to address them.
Dam, they always complain that Rush listeners are brain dead
robots..
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Unsurge, Desurge what's the word?
September 14, 2007 - 09:25 ET by Dee BunkDid they want the President to make up a word so they could make fun of him for it? Drawdown is only misleading if you didn't know about the surge. I just can't even believe the ignorance of these people. If you know about the surge then you know the drawdown comes from it. Anyone who didn't know about the surge had to be hiding under a rock for how much negative coverage it got.
What was Bush supposed to call it? Unsurge? Desurge? What's the word Joe and Mica?
What was Bush supposed to
September 14, 2007 - 09:36 ET by motherbeltWhat's the word Joe and Mica? - Dee Bunk
Here's what they wanted Dee: Do the words "Peace with honor" ring a bell?
You fight a war to win
September 14, 2007 - 09:34 ET by Tom1969caFunny, I don't seem to recall reading about Churchill and Roosevelt being asked for a fixed timeline for ending the war...
Democrat version: "We will push toward Berlin until the end of 1944, at which point - regardless of how far we've advanced and how many lives we've lost - we're committed to pulling our boys out and bringing them home." (At which point the Germans would've promptly re-occupied everything we'd liberated.)
Republican version: "It'll be over when we've won and they've lost. And not a day sooner. Deal with it."
~~~
If you don't stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them!
It's interesting that Ms.
September 14, 2007 - 09:52 ET by SMGalbraithIt's interesting that Ms. Brzezinski isn't worred about getting in trouble with her superiors - Dan Abrams or Phil Griffin - at MSNBC for revealing her opinions over the air.
No, she's worried about Newsbusters busting her for her open bias.
That's because apparently MSNBC has no news standards. Olbermann is advertised as a news anchor (enough said); Shuster can broadcast erroneous information without having to later correct it (Rove will be indicted?); and Matthews can just, well, be Chris Matthews.
What a news outfit this place is.
And Fox News is destroying journalism?
SMG
Yeah ... Right, Mika ...
September 14, 2007 - 10:07 ET by drillanwrHad Bill Clinton given that same exact speech Mika would be slobbering all over the set.
BTW, Mika, I have ALWAYS questioned our "invading" the Balkins during Clinton ...
I've seen more mass graves in Iraq than I've ever seen evidence of in the Balkins.
As for all this yammering about "lack of political progress" in Iraq ... Yeah, and what we have in the Swamp these last few years has been such a grand example of "political progress".
On that note, this word ... Political progress ... the dems are always whining over ... Well, here in the States "Progressive" has become the code-word for socialist/communist. Are the dems crying for a socialist/commie government in Iraq?
Libs: "Reducing troops
September 14, 2007 - 10:08 ET by GregELibs: "Reducing troops levels from their current level isn't a drawdown."
Libs: "Not making tax cuts permanent and letting the rates go up isn't a tax increase."
The lib media would like us to believe she and others are objective and middle of the road. But they literally can't control themselves. It's not their fault, they're a victim, their mind involuntarily tricked into nullifying their objectivity claims. It's beyond their control.
Liberalism is a mental disease. The only reason it's not officially categorized as such and treatable under health insurance claims is that it would be an admission of a true mental problem. The situation is a catch-22.
Mika and Joe
September 14, 2007 - 16:10 ET by iveseenitallMika and Joe --- solid members of the ignorant, feckless, traitorous, biased, left-loving MSM. Relatively few people watch these fools --- good.
Add Mika to the star-studded group of intellectuals on The View.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
This commercial was brought
September 14, 2007 - 10:59 ET by well99This political ad was brought to you by the Democratic party.Oh wait this wasnt suppose to be a political ad.Wow seemed like one.Mika should just wear a badge with Democrat on it just like they have at their conventions.
Now it is time for who is smarter than a first grader.Mika for 10000 dollars.What president was able to predict the end the war?
help! I've fallen and can't get up.... (part 2)
September 14, 2007 - 11:01 ET by wizardjrI've fallen on the floor and can't get up due to <ROFL>.
nicely said Crash,
chuck in st paul
Mika, Speak for yourself
September 14, 2007 - 11:02 ET by Conservative_in_mass."BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, and it's misleading Americans."
I do not feel mislead. Is that o.k. with you Mika? Should a war be directed by political and media types like yourself, or military officers carrying 4 stars. I know your answer, and you can guess mine.
Mika has reduced herself to nothing more than a parrot reciting Kos talking points. She has no credibility with mainstream thought.
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. ~ Unknown
I thought journalists
September 14, 2007 - 11:52 ET by MidAmericaBRZEZINSKI: Well, you know, I'm sorry, what really made me mad
I thought journalists were 'citizens of the world' and as such are uninvolved observers and chroniclers of events.
Mid: nice pick up.
September 14, 2007 - 17:02 ET by Conservative_in_mass.Remember libs are soooo refined and evolved that they are able to "seperate" their personal convictions from their responsibilities as newsreaders. <sarcasm off>
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. ~ Unknown
ending the war ...
September 14, 2007 - 12:12 ET by Parkerz"... when you're running a war you sort of need to have a handle on when it's going to end."
By the way, how is that War on Poverty going? Any end in sight for it? I'd like to see a timeline by December and be out of it by this time next year. Talk to Teddy Kennedy about that if you would. I'm sure he has a plan somewhere.
How about it?
Actually, they extended it
September 14, 2007 - 12:29 ET by dscottActually, they extended it by importing more poor people from Mexico and other Latin American countries. The Dems are stubborn, they insist on having lots of poor people.
dscott's postulate: The degree to which someone exaggerates or deceives is inversely proportional to the merit of the advocated position.
All it will take...
September 14, 2007 - 13:34 ET by Conservative_in_mass.is more money Parkerz. Thats the mantra. we are not spending enough money, not collecting enough taxes, not creating enough programs. It's all the short sighted right wingers holding up things.
But, remember, this does not include Teddy's money. Just before the matriarch Rose died, they shifted her residency from Mass. to Fla. to avoid the death tax we have up here.
So we all need to be more enlightened and compasionate...there is and end in sight...when we all have no more money and are on all their wonderful programs.
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. ~ Unknown
Leftards like Mika will
September 14, 2007 - 14:02 ET by fitzfongLeftards like Mika will call a reduction in the increase of budgeted spending on public schools a "cut", yet will claim that Bush's proposal for troop reduction is misleading. Well, Mika, which is it? This bimbo's presence on "Dead Secretary" Scarborough's morning show is down to sheer nepotism.
"... when you're running a
September 14, 2007 - 16:05 ET by ckc1227"... when you're running a war you sort of need to have a handle on when it's going to end."
Come on, Mika, be honest. You mean while running THIS war, you need to have a handle on when it's going to end. That HAS to be what you mean, since no other war in our history has had a fixed ending date just for the sake of having one. That is the typical liberal point of view though, isn't it Mika? Hold Bush to a standard not required of any other President.
Furthermore, this just shows the ignorance of those on the left. Us pulling out of Iraq isn't going to end the war, it just delays the inevitable, which will be MORE conflict, either in Iraq, here in the U.S., or in some other country.
How about being a real journalist, Mika, and prove your menopausal musings about Bush lying us into Iraq instead of parroting back the same old tired nonsense provided to you by your moonbat handlers on the left? Come on, Mika, be a pioneer and go get us that proof. You can do it, I know you can. Jus think of how popular you will be with the moonbat crowd, when you, Mika, are the one to finally deliver the proof these people would sell their souls for. You, Mika, will be their hero!
And when you come up empty, maybe Dan Rather can help you out. But, until you come up with that proof, maybe you should save the fairy tales for your children's(if you have any) bedtime stories.
She's afraid of what is
September 14, 2007 - 16:35 ET by dscottShe's afraid of what is happening to Katie Couric, the libs are jumping on her just for being a wee bit positive about Iraq. She's no cheerleader. Libs love to eat their own.
dscott's postulate: The degree to which someone exaggerates or deceives is inversely proportional to the merit of the advocated position.
ANYONE associated with the
September 14, 2007 - 18:57 ET by buddycANYONE associated with the Carter administration by position, employment, blood or marriage should NEVER say anything about ANYTHING of importance. This woman's father was one of the single most incompetent idiot bureaucrats in the history of the world politics. He presided over the gutting of our intelligence agencies, the creation of the Taliban, the installation of Saddam, the rise of the nutballs in Iran and funded UBL' s initial training and arming.
Just think what the world would be like if the Shah and/or his heirs were still in power in Iran. Iran would be like Turkey and seeking to join the EEC and maybe even NATO. It would be an entirely different world.
To call her father Carter's Intelligence adviser is insanity. More like one deaf dumb and blind idiot leading another.
She and her father should skulk away in total shame and silence and never say anything about political events ever again.
Hear! Hear!
September 14, 2007 - 22:48 ET by fitzfongHear! Hear!