I am constantly amused by the double-think of microcephalic bigots like Uberdork and Cox.

"I think it smacks of opportunism for him to, you know, throw the guy aside."

Translation: Romney, no matter what he says or does will never be a "Christian" (which Cox knows that he isn't) because he is Mormon.

If Romney disassociates himself from Craig, it is opportunism. If he allies himself with Craig, he will considered a confederate of deviancy.

The political and religious insight of Uberdork and Cox is a credit to all of us U.S. Americans. Sarcasm off.

Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell

It is no secret that so many of the mainstream pro-democrat media come from bonafide liberal backgrounds. Bill Moyers, George Stephanopoulis, Chris Matthews, Tim Russert and now...Ann Marie Cox, formerly known as the Wonkette. From liberal blogger to editor at Time confirms (as if any more evidence is needed) that Time has shifted far away from it's original stature of reasonable journalism to a complete and utter journalistic joke.

I always find it bizarre in the bazarre of liberal rug sellers how a rather ugly high lit blonde with a uggo too small brown sweater poured over her neon frilly green blouse that looks like it came off of a 70's version of Soul Train can always find an Olberman to find her an expert on anything, but how to make men wince "at what is that".

Catty chics like this need a brain for one thing and for 2 thing a fashion miser and for 3 thing she needs make up or a skin cutter to fix her aging neck.

Nope not a Katie Couric fan, nor a Romney nor a Craig fan any more...........but am wondering why is it that Craig if he is homosexual is all of a sudden a pariah to Liberals?

If Larry Craig is judged by his wanderings, than the interesting stories on Janet Reno liking leather and little girls to Hillary swinging both sides of the gender are fair game now too.

Was it not Democrats parading gayly in debate before the same gay groupings who everyone knows who lives in a big city can find screaming into the night in public parks having battery sex on each other in sodom revelation, to the recruitment brigades which fan out to clubs introducing young kids to the ecstasy of ecstasy and booze as they pass out raping them into their first "experience" to the wonderful growing lawyer money pit of "divorced gays in mass who were married in massachoosettes"........were not Obama, Edwards, Clinton and company all telling us what goes on behind closed doors is nobody's business?

I do believe Larry had the potty door closed, so according to Phil Donahue all his wankerings are Clinton amnesiac "I did not have sex with that woman Monica Lewinski".

It would be wonderful if Newsbusters just kept a running tally of Letterman, Cox, Oblerman, Matthews and friends to prove exactly what I exposed long ago.........the biggest homophobes in the world are liberals. If you go on Huffington you soon see the biggest sin and insult they will level at Bush is his being homosexual. The featured blogger Robert Shearer did unfunny satire on it concerning Bush and Rove.

So how is what Craig did a bad thing when Democrats court and promote this activity all the time? One would think Cox would be applauding the RNC for expanding it's gay horizons..........

Unless Cox is exposing she hates gays like all Democrats hate gays just like they talk about in their private parties.

Where is Hollywood coming to the aid of a gay male under attack by the liberal press? It sure isn't right bashing gays in this one.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

As for Cox, those of us who really are Christians will take care of her, so no need to worry.

/spoken through a megaphone

Mark, it's actually a simple matter--honestly, I don't understand why people get so up in arms about a factual statement.

There are a lot of denominations, sects, and groups that legitimately can be said to be Christian, but the Mormon religion is not one of them.

An example, if I may: Christianity, by definition, is Trinitarian, affirming the Biblical revelation of one God in three Persons: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.  Mormonism does not affirm this Biblical truth, and considers the triune God to be, instead, three separate individuals.  That simple difference is enough to put Mormonism outside the big tent of Christianity, but they didn't stop there.  

Mormonism teaches that the present-day god of Earth was, in the distant past on some faraway planet, a man who achieved godhood by listening to his deity.  Fortunately, this newly-minted god was able to bring his wife along for the ride, and all past, present, and future inhabitants of our planet are a result of this god and goddess' rabbit-like reproduction.  If we listen to Earth's god, according to Mormonism, we can also have the opportunity to become gods of our own respective planets!

And that's just a sliver of their belief system, one that is far closer to Scientology than to Christianity.  However, if the Washington editor of Time.com questioned Tom Cruise's insistence that Scientology was really a Christian denomination, I doubt anyone would do a double-take, much less express outrage.

Mr. Romney self-identifies as a Mormon, so by his own admission, he is not a Christian.  If you'd like to discuss this in more detail, Mark, just follow the link below.

--Mike

www.thebrattonreport.com

And let us not forget her self-immolation during the Imus incident.

I'm embarrassed to admit that it took Imus' saying something so devastatingly crass to make me realize that there just was no reason beyond ego to play along. I did the show almost solely to earn my media-elite merit badge.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1609447,00.html

NOTE TO ALL: I will now begin deleting posts by people who ignore my polite request to take their theological debate elsewhere.

Mark

Regardless of the side argument here and returning to the topic at hand....

Does anyone here know if Romney considers himself a Christian?

If he does, wouldn't that by DEFAULT make a flippant, absolute, and unsupported claim to the contrary a very irresponsible position for a journalist to take?  When I say unsupported, I merely refer to her not supporting her claim in this instance... a claim which is "not obvious" to a significant number of people.

I feel the nature of the remark, not the veracity of its content, is what makes this a very relevant NB post.

What a pair sweet Ann Marie and Keith Udderman make. She is a twit and he is a certified loon. Time, like the NYT is becoming more and more irrelevant because of its hard-left tilt and MSNBC isn't even on the ratings radar, so no one ever hears Udderman's maniacal rants. (If a crazy man babbles in the forest and nobody hears him, does he actually make a noise?) It is hilarious how seriously he takes himself.

Maybe he should go on Letterman and they both could have a real cerebral conversation about how terrible conservatives are and how meaningful their insights are.