Ummm, to play devil's advocate here some facts:  http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3275195,00.html

and was not an Israeli PM killed by a Jewish Extremist? http://www.adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/2636-00.asp

However, I disagree with the underlying intent of the program as it is patently unfair to claim an entire group is either guilty or will be guilty of extremism by using anecdotal evidence of individuals or subgroups independently acting out. Every barrel has it's rotten apples. This is the same fallacy as using stereotypes to define a group's behavior.  In fact, this the same stupidity that was recently alluded to by some study claiming people with light blue eyes tended to be intelligent.  Clearly genetically racist in it's implication against brown eyed people no matter what their skin color.

Sin is an equal opportunity offender, all have sinned and all fall short of the glory of God.

The true intent of the program is to advance the hidden agenda of separating Religious values and practice from the mainstream.  By defining or proclaiming religion as the source of mass murder they seek to delegitimize religion and morality.  I find it quite hypocritical of the left since they via Mao, Stalin, Hilter and others are responsible for close to 100 million deaths in the 20th century. The murderous reign of Socialism/Communism is far more dangerous and radical than any thing we have even seen yet of Muslim Extremists.  We may recoil at Islamofascism because they publicly strike at innocent individuals minding their own business in an ad hoc manner for a political agenda.  The Socialist/Communist did their butchery in secret or so demonized the target group that they rationalized their systematic mass murder in broad daylight.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

.. they hold the religion of 'Liberalism' above that of their own? How else do you explain it?

I agree.  She asks "how long will the separation exist?"  Well, it's existed for HUNDREDS OF YEARS so far. 

Let's see, Islam has been violent, intolerant, non-Democratic, and trying to kill every infidel and take over the world since its inception.

Christianity and Judaism: some violent episodes in the beginning and some violent periods in their history (which have always been addressed and corrected) with a philosophy to love one another, get along, and live according to the Lord.

Yeah that millenial-long separation is on the razor's edge, ready to crumble.  *rolls eyes*

What a moron! 

"Yesterday's Communists are Today's Democrats....

Yesterday's Democrats are Today's Republicans..." - An analogy made by *ME*

Leon:

You have framed the question/argument incorrectly.  Actually, you framed it exactly as the terrorists desire - Christians/Jews vs Muslims. 

Islamofascists attacked America and American interests.  While the terrorists espouse Muslim purity against crusading Christians, the issue is a power grab by fanatics and a desire to impose their will on all people of the planet, Muslim or not.  I think quite a few dead Muslim Iraqi's would beg to differ with your premise, being they were killed by fellow Muslims.

When America or American interests are attacked, all American's are involved, whatever religious beliefs.  The response to Islamofascist violence is an American response (note the lack of a religious reference) to protect America and American interests, which fundamentally is our democratic republic, Constitution/Bill Of Rights based way of life.  The American response has not been to root out and kill every Muslim.  The American response has not been to convert every Muslim to Christianity or Judaism at the muzzle of a gun. 

The military and other governmental agencies involved in the GWOT involve people of various religions, including agnostics, atheists, and even (gasp) Muslims.  America is not framing this as Christians vs Muslims fight.  You should not either as this is a prime goal of the Islamofascists to be used as a recruiting tool.

As for Jews and the State of Israel, if Israel is attacked, whether from Muslims, Christians or Martians, Israel will respond to protect their souvereignity and way of life.  I sincerely doubt Israel would allow an attack by Christians or a radical Jewish movement and only respond if the attackers are Muslims.  You will also not see Israel attempting to convert non-Jews to Judaism.  Ditto for America and Christianity.

America's wars are not ideologically based on religion.  America's wars are based on national interests, whether you agree with the reasoning or not.

You failed to mention that all religions other than Islam, including the non-religion religions of atheism and agnosticism will be in the cross hairs of Islamofascists.  Your question should have been "Do you think all Muslims will declare war/jihad against non-Muslims?" in order to connect your premise of Christians/Jews vs Muslims.  Do you, Leon, believe that will happen?

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

Tamaron Hall is a primped up black woman who, but for America being what it is ( a Judeo-Christian nation with Judeo-Christian values), would be far from sitting on a television set spewing her nonsense. Give the liberals 95% of what they want and all they'll do is bitch about the other 5%.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Woody is not dead

What do you call george bush, whom God tells to attack and country and kill 750K of their citizens and destroy their infrastructure?

If you didn't have 2 oceans, a decent northern neighbor and a scummy but weak southern neighbor, but that southern neighbor was replaced by an encroaching massive military who killed Americans, yet .... and here's the punch line: imagine that we have no military. What would you do? Ghostbusters might not work for newsbusters. Would you then defend and do what you had to do? Probably so.

But you'll never know due to geography and the fact that you're a wimp to begin with, so you wouldn't be in the military anyway.