
UPDATED:
Journalists love reporting that Americans are stupid, and they salivate at the thought of asking us to find the United States on a map or who we fought in the American Revolution. That's why it is rather amusing that the Los Angeles Times mistakenly claimed that George Washington only served one term in office as US president.
LAT television critic Mary McNamara made the slip up in this April 19 article about HBO's surge in popularity when she began describing the cable network's “John Adams” miniseries (via Patterico) (all bold mine):
In his portrayal of our second president, Paul Giamatti creates a man perpetually dissatisfied, disgusted by the preening ambition of politics even as he is infected by it... [S]etting up a new government is a bureaucratic nightmare, with oversized personalities disagreeing over things both petty and fundamental. George Washington (David Morse) so quickly tired of the infighting among his Cabinet and vagaries of public opinion that he stepped down from the presidency after a single term. "I know now what it is like to be disliked," he says to Adams, his perpetually disliked vice president.
How could this glaring mistake squeeze by an LAT fact checker? Perhaps with the paper's budget cuts and reduced staff, the Times doesn't waste resources fact checking articles about television shows.
What's amusing about this gaffe is that Washington established the tradition of presidents limiting their time in office to two terms. He believed it was important that presidents not become de facto monarchs, so he declined to stay in office beyond his second term. Successive presidents voluntarily followed Washington's unofficial standard until Franklin D. Roosevelt spent four terms as Commander in Chief. FDR's extended stay in office prompted the passing of the 22nd Amendment, which restricts presidents to a total of two elected terms as well as two more years of an unelected term.
Blogger Patterico gave McNamara the benefit of the doubt, wondering if HBO had made a mistake and depicted Washington as only having served one term. However, according to Big Lizard blogger Dafydd ab Hugh, the miniseries got the history correct, but the way that Washington's story was told was somewhat misleading and might have resulted in McNamara's confusion:
The HBO miniseries presumes throughout that viewers have some basic knowledge of colonial and early American history...Ergo, it doesn't bang you over the head with irrelevancies... such as Washington's 1792 reelection.
They don't bother showing it: Nobody "ran" for president back then, as you know; the electors were chosen by the states and sent to the capitol (Philadelphia, in Washington's case) to cast their votes. Washington was unanimously elected in 1788 and again in 1792... so with no campaign and no competition, and since the focus is on John Adams anyway, not GW, the miniseries doesn't even mention the election.
Based on ab Hugh's description, it seems that if McNamara was unaware that Washington served not one, but two terms before she watched "John Adams," then the miniseries's vagueness about that first term might have confused her. Regardless why it happened, a fact checker should have caught the mistake.
At least this significant gaffe was in the entertainment section. Unfortunately, it is part of a string of mistakes (at times without a correction), false statements and retractions, including the recent embarrassment where an LAT reporter used fabricated documents to accuse Sean "Diddy" Combs of ordering the murder of '90s rapper Tupac Shakur.
Everyone makes mistakes, but with each occurrence, the Times's reputation suffers, which doesn't help its rocky financial condition.
***UPDATED 04/22: Mary McNamara added an online correction to her article April 21 and also ran a correction in the print edition April 22. It's easier to make mistakes like this than many readers would expect, and McNamara didn't just correct the original article; she turned it into an amusing short piece that hinted at the scope of reader response:
For the six or seven people living in the Los Angeles Basin who did not e-mail to correct me, he served two terms, not one. And my daddy was a history teacher! Ever since the first e-mail hit my box (on Friday afternoon, about two seconds after the story went up on the website), I have been bathed in hot shame. But I want to thank you, well, most of you, for the gentle tone you took -- most clever subject line award goes to: Is a TV Critic Smarter Than a 5th Grader? -- though I certainly deserved all those incredulous exclamation marks as well. And yes, I did go to college. Graduated even.
Read the whole mea culpa.
*Official portrait via WhiteHouse.gov
Lynn contributes to NewsBusters. Email her at tvisgoodforyou2-at-y a h o o-dot-c o m















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Saw that...
April 21, 2008 - 01:15 ET by Warner Todd HustonI saw that article and had to just laugh at the completely garbled version of history. What this LATimes twit probably meant was that Washington had wanted to retire after his first term but was convinced to stay on for one more term.
And, I'll tell you why the LATimes "fact" checker didn't catch the error. THEY don't know anything about American history EITHER!
I also was interested in a
April 21, 2008 - 01:56 ET by Lynn DavidsonI also was interested in a fact checker's involvement, and the real surprise is that one didn't catch the mistake. Did this story go out without someone screening it? It really makes me wonder if they actually have anyone checking entertainment stories now. I just can't imagine that a professional LA Times fact checker wouldn't know how long America's first president was in office or wouldn't be able to find out somehow.
I don't think a mistake like this in an entertainment article is as significant as it would be if it had been in the general news or editorial section. Also, her job isn't to report on American elections, so it's possible that, like everyone, the info slipped her mind. It's easy for that kind of information to fade away once school is over.
I wonder why the miniseries didn't make how long he was in office clearer? All it would take is a sentence or two or perhaps a few minutes. Eh, I guess we should be grateful that there wasn't a volcanic eruption, a Braveheart-type fictionalization of real events or a giant mechanical spider.
With that in mind, maybe the media insist on running all of those stories about Why Johnny Doesn't Know History because they need a few refresher courses. : )
Lynn
I saw the series and I did
April 21, 2008 - 02:32 ET by Warner Todd HustonI saw the series and I did not think the show made it seem as if Washington served only one therm. But, then again, I already knew that Washington was elected to two terms so maybe my previous knowledge allowed me to fill in the blanks from the series to the point where I didn't notice that they weren't clear on that point?
I don't get HBO, so I didn't
April 21, 2008 - 02:40 ET by Lynn DavidsonI don't get HBO, so I didn't see the miniseries. Dafydd ab Hugh also said that it was in the movie, but it wasn't very prominent and could have been overlooked. Like you, he suggested that the people behind it assumed that most viewers would have a basic grasp of Washington's life and career.
Adams and his wife
April 21, 2008 - 02:53 ET by nicksmith112Adams and his wife have a conversation about Washington only serving two terms.
The gist was with his popularity he could be king. I thought they made it clear GW served two terms.
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
George Washington was
April 21, 2008 - 02:34 ET by nicksmith112George Washington was president??
that explains why he is on the five dollar bill....lol.
Not knowing GW served two terms is an embarrassment for any journalist, TV or political!!!
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
I'm Taking Bets
April 21, 2008 - 01:30 ET by geoff.galeAnyone out there want to bet that Ms. Mary McNamara is a proud graduate of the public school/college system? Better odds are that she received a significant portion of her education in California.
"All that is necessary for the trimuph of evil is that good men do nothing."
- Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)
www.conservativeboot...
LAT and History
April 21, 2008 - 12:09 ET by GoodieAgree with Gale, this reporter (so to speak) attended a Ca public school, where they teach in Spanish first and disregard the US history book, while concentrating on MECHA and the evil Americans whom stole CA, NM, AZ and the rest of the western US.
Lets guess where she attended college (on the US taxpayer $)
>Cal (hug and live in a tree) Bezerkly
>UCLA (my sh*t don't smell, badges we don't need no stinkn;' bages)
>UC Santa wastn' Cruz
>Cal State Sonoma Smokin'
>UC San freakn' wierd Diego'os (we are elite, now where is Blacks Beach?)
Hey maybe more time in La biblioteca OTEY Mary?
She probably thinks.....
April 21, 2008 - 05:15 ET by old croMaximilian I was emperor of California also, according to the Vodka map.
FDR
April 21, 2008 - 06:22 ET by Increase MatherFDR was elected to four terms but died early in his fourth administration.
Don't want you looking like the LA Times.
Is Mary and her editor
April 21, 2008 - 09:11 ET by jcrapes4Is Mary and her editor smarter than a fifth grader??? Survey says no:)
I watched the entire
April 21, 2008 - 09:45 ET by marpelI watched the entire mini-series and loved it. I already had read about the historical details during John Adams' life, but I was more interested in the amazing love story of he and Abigail. I was not disappointed...ok, it's a girl thing...
Nonetheless, as I read this article, I couldn't help but think how hard these patriots worked to give us the freedoms we have, and look how we've screwing up this country. If our reporters and politicians would please take history classes, their behavior may be a little less disingenuous. The main lesson of this show was that current citizens behavior should live up to the hopes the patriots had for us. They would be appalled at what they may see now.
All that said, I was really taken aback by how vicious the press was back in those days.
If we learn anything from the lat
April 21, 2008 - 09:59 ET by FastEdthen we should be waiting for GWB to stay in the White House for another 4 years! - Using the logic demonstrated, and using their own reportage, GW "stole" at least one election, meaning he was there "illegally". Thus, to date, he has only been in office for one term, all according to the wacky left. To further stir the waters, the whole government has allowed this to happen, never mind the oaths regarding the Constitution. When will the lat start supporting this line of thinking, using their crack research and reporting staff??
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
"Successive presidents
April 21, 2008 - 10:48 ET by mattm"Successive presidents voluntarily followed Washington's unofficial standard until Franklin D. Roosevelt spent four terms..."
Figures it was a Democrat....power hungry autocrats...
To Be Fair
April 21, 2008 - 12:09 ET by jweaverIt seems that even the Fact checkers and editors are loathe to read Newspapers anymore.
J. Weaver
scoffery.com
Pearl Harbor
April 21, 2008 - 12:24 ET by P.J. GladnickAnd the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor.
--
April 21, 2008 - 14:21 ET by ClarinetAndrewShhh! He's on a roll!
in retaliation for the
April 21, 2008 - 14:27 ET by Jack Bauerin retaliation for the German Gray Coats losing the Revolutionary War of Independence!
"Over? Did you say, 'over?'
April 21, 2008 - 14:46 ET by nicksmith112"Over? Did you say, 'over?' Nothing is over until WE decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.