The left and the media love to hyperventilate about the right wing “hate speech” on the Internet, but the anger and vitriol of the left dwarfs that of the right, especially where female or minority bloggers are concerned. Hateful comments are not uncommon at lefty blogs like Daily Kos. That kind of hostility forces the Huffington Post to occassionally close comments on articles involving certain topics like Israel, the military or even Margaret Thatcher.
Right Wing News addressed this trend in its excellent ongoing series “Blogging While Female: 5 Conservative Women Bloggers Talk About Gender Issues and the Blogosphere.” (Pt 2 here). RWN sampled a variety of righty opinion from Michelle Malkin, Mary Katherine Ham, LaShawn Barber, Rachel Lucas and more, and they discussed experiencing misogynistic and often disturbingly aggressive comments.
Pictures of them are photoshopped into violent or sexually explicit positions, and they are stalked, online and occasionally offline. Liberals track down their addresses and phone numbers and leave obscene messages, even threaten rape. Moderate blogger Ann Althouse nailed the root of the hostility, “...people on the Left think you are evil if you don't agree with them, that you're actually a bad person” (all bold mine).
When a conservative is both a minority and a woman, the frothing can escalates exponentially. Several years ago, Michelle Malkin had to move after liberal blogs and forums posted her phone number and maps to her home, encouraging people to stake out her house. However, when tech blogger Kathy Sierra received death threats, the media and blogosphere supported her and condemned the posters.
Malkin doesn't think she is singled out because of her gender, stating, “I think it has more to do with my ideology and I think...liberal racism is much more rampant than liberal sexism.” She explained the all-too-common double standard that allows liberals to mock her “foreign sounding” maiden name while Barack Obama's middle name is off limits: :
Again, I find it amusing in terms of liberal double standards that none of these people who are so worried about middle name calling had anything to say when Keith Olbermann went on cable TV and started invoking my foreign sounding maiden name (Maglalang) as some sort of game winning argument. There he is going Mag-la-gong, Mag-la-gong, mispronouncing it...I think if I weren't a conservative, there would have been more of an uproar about it...
Like Malkin, LaShawn Barber experienced the liberal intolerance for conservative minorities:
Early in my writing career...I used to get all these "Aunt Jemima," "self-hater," "race traitor" type emails. I never got the kind of sexual stuff that Michelle Malkin has been subjected to.
They focused on race, "You sell out," "You want to be white," "You're still black," "I don't know who you think you are."
Shelby Steele has written about the liberal “plantation” that punishes minorities who stray from liberal doctrine. Many on the "tolerant left" do not see the ironic racism when they criticize minorities for daring to express conservative beliefs. It is acceptable for whites to be communists or conservatives, but minorities are expected to remain within the loving arms of the DNC.
In college, Townhall blogger Amanda Carpenter experienced the kind of pornographic liberal photoshopping that would never be accepted if aimed at a Democrat. That kind of editing is why Rachel Lucas is wary of posting photos:
It's maybe 5% because of the stalkers, but it's mostly because I have seen what they do to other people. I have seen what they do to Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin. They photoshop them. Do nasty stuff to them. Like pictures of Michelle Malkin hanging from a noose. That sort of thing.
The “borderline bad stalker material” contributed to Lucas's decision to stop blogging for a while. Of course, her readers know that following through on those messages would end very, very badly for anyone who challenged Lucas, her Rhodesian Ridgeback and her handgun.
Obviously, the right can throw bombs as well, and not all on the left are hostile. However, the unique intolerance shown by the worshippers of tolerance exposes a very ugly undercurrent of anger and hatred that only seems to be growing.
Lynn contributes to NewsBusters. Email her at tvisgoodforyou2—at--y a h o o—dot--c o m



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Yeah and what does the racist Leon have to say about this?
March 20, 2008 - 19:00 ET by Dee BunkI'd be curious.
Dee, Leon is too busy telling black Americans that they are...
March 20, 2008 - 19:45 ET by R D Helm...so inferior that they cannot make it in this world without the assistance of others, particularly the support of government.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
Leon's not too worried
March 20, 2008 - 19:05 ET by candanceAll he has to do is find proof that Michelle Malkin
-used to be fat
-used to live in a trailer park
-used to be a housewife
-used to work in retail
And any criticism against her will be justified. The ends justify the means, you know.
Lol candance and LeShawn and Condi both look like Aunt Jemima
March 20, 2008 - 19:26 ET by Dee Bunkthey don't mean anything negative by that right? Leon also believes they both want to be like white people so nothing wrong with that either.
If you are afraid of three black men walking down the street together you are racist (even if you do nothing to stop them from walking down the street together and you don't insult them or cause them any harm) you are simply racist because anxiety hits you.
On the other hand, you can threaten and call people racial slurs, and you are not racist as long as you are a liberal and the minority is a conservative. That's the world according to Leon and the libs.
Paging Wright-wingers
March 20, 2008 - 21:31 ET by acumenSpeaking of Leon (Hater), where are all our liberal commenters on this thread?
This would be the perfect opportunity to once again showcase their unique ability to defend the indefensible.
Maybe out on a stalking assignment...
Acumen - you were right on - Not a single liberal commented on
March 21, 2008 - 10:21 ET by Dee Bunkthis thread
except for
March 21, 2008 - 10:27 ET by sarcasmoThe classical one. :) And I was talking old-ACLU-style free speech in Lynn's Amen-corner.
JMR
A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.
I'll never consider you a liberal sarc - not by todays terms
March 21, 2008 - 10:48 ET by Dee BunkI'm a liberal in the true meaning of the word also and so are many others here.
A Liberal now is pretty much a socialist or communist. They could care less about liberty.
Uhh...candance... you
March 20, 2008 - 21:55 ET by KarmaUhh...candance... you forgot...- was homskuuled.
thanks karma
March 20, 2008 - 22:06 ET by candanceI knew there was one I was forgetting.
totally nonPC and inappropriate BUT ( that's me)
March 21, 2008 - 09:06 ET by theduck6Is it me or, in general, are right leaning female bloggers a lot better lookiing that the lefties? Dare I say smoookin? Sorry, got carried away. Not like Matthews and Barack, but...
»→ duck6
March 21, 2008 - 09:09 ET by Cool ArrowClosest thing to a diva the left has is Chris Matthews, Terry Moran, and of course Helen Thomas.
♣ a seal
HELEN THOMAS!!!!
March 21, 2008 - 09:53 ET by theduck6My minds eye!!!! MY EYEEEEEES! My sleepless weekend is on your hands!!!
Matthews is a wuss but not hot.
Why are most conservitive
March 20, 2008 - 19:13 ET by red_dragon311Why are most conservitive women hot and liberal women pigs?
I was a professional twice over - an analyst and a therapist. The world's first analrapist
I've often wondered that
March 20, 2008 - 21:35 ET by PeskyDaneI've often wondered that myself. Furthermore, if a liberal woman is hot, she is almost invariablly hooked up with and gloming off some rich guy. Of course they'll claim to be "independent."
WOW! Who is in that
March 20, 2008 - 19:17 ET by mostlymoderateWOW! Who is in that picture above? She is a total doll.
mostly
March 20, 2008 - 19:18 ET by candanceThat's Mary Katherine Ham, BOR's internet police.
That's another thing they
March 20, 2008 - 19:28 ET by motherbeltThat's another thing they hate....all the really good-looking blogger women are conservatives. I think MKH looks a lot like Lauren Graham of "Gilmore Girls."
The best the libs can do is Ana Marie Cox
aka "Wonkette."
Mary Katherine Gilmore
March 20, 2008 - 21:25 ET by Lynn DavidsonI also thinks MKH looks like Lauren Graham. They could pass for sisters.
The best the libs can do is Ana Marie Cox
March 20, 2008 - 21:32 ET bybut oh that high fashion sense
"Man created god(s) Anything believed was created by man"----Syrius
»→ mostlymoderate
March 20, 2008 - 19:21 ET by Cool ArrowThat is Mary Katherine Ham who appears weekly on O'Reilly and contributes to Townhall.
Your eye for the devastatingly gorgeous is keen indeed.
♣ a seal
Not only is she attractive,
March 20, 2008 - 19:26 ET by Chris NormanNot only is she attractive, she has the patience of a saint to put up with having every other one of her sentences cut off by O'Reilly.
»→ True Chris
March 20, 2008 - 19:32 ET by Cool ArrowBut in BOR's defense, I like to point out that there are no other media icons who regularly offer as much face time to protoges than BOR.
The Women who appear on his show are taking advantage of this opportunity. More power to them. And Thanks Bill.
♣ a seal
Ah, come on, CA, like
March 20, 2008 - 19:40 ET by Chris NormanAh, come on, CA, like O'Reilly needs defending - he's a one man army. :) Granted, he invites many of these young attractive women commentators on the show, much to my (and other's) delight, but I'm not completely shallow enough not to want to hear what they have to say, occasionally. :)
Chris,
March 20, 2008 - 19:50 ET by R D HelmWell, now that Laurie Dhue has left Fox, (damnit, as she was an Atlanta girl), hopefully BOR will see fit to put MKH on more often.
Heck, I might just start watching his show again.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
The Dhue is gone? When? Why
March 20, 2008 - 19:53 ET by Chris NormanThe Dhue is gone? When? Why wasn't I notified of this earlier? Please don't tell me she's gone over to the Dark Side (CNN).
Chris,
March 20, 2008 - 20:11 ET by R D HelmSadly, they couldn't come to terms on a new contract for her.
Too bad.
As for where she is headed, I have no idea.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
OK, I won't. LOL Deep
March 20, 2008 - 20:12 ET by motherbeltOK, I won't. LOL
Deep breaths, Chris...in through the nose, out through the mouth....
Seriously I don't know...I remember seeing something about her leaving, about a week ago, but I can't remember where she is going.
RD & MB Rats! If she didn't
March 20, 2008 - 20:19 ET by Chris NormanRD & MB
Rats! If she didn't have that restraining order against me, I'd call her up and ask her! :)
Chris, it'll be alright.
March 20, 2008 - 20:33 ET by R D HelmShe'll pop up somewhere, I'm sure. :-)
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
You know, it's cruel to
March 20, 2008 - 20:36 ET by Chris NormanYou know, it's cruel to supply a set-up line knowing full well there's no way I can give the obvious retort. :)
restraining order... You,
March 20, 2008 - 21:38 ET by PeskyDanerestraining order...
You, too? I think that's a pretty big club where she's concerned.
Chris
March 20, 2008 - 20:23 ET by acumenMissing those Carolina girls are we?
ac, Yeah, but those
March 20, 2008 - 20:30 ET by Chris Normanac,
Yeah, but those Carolina girls had an attack of good taste and got a class action restraining order against me, too. :)
Truly LOL Chris
March 20, 2008 - 20:32 ET by acumenAnd no place to go into exile like the high desert, eh?
I prefer thinking I'm on a
March 20, 2008 - 20:34 ET by Chris NormanI prefer thinking I'm on a vision quest... :)
Chris - Man of vision
March 20, 2008 - 21:24 ET by acumenThat's very ungoodthinking, a week in Joy Camp for you.
It appears we dirty old men have totally trashed Lynn's thread.
March 20, 2008 - 20:39 ET by R D HelmLOL-She will never let us in here again.
And Chris, Just how many restraining orders do you have against you out there, anyway?
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
I made history when I was
March 20, 2008 - 20:54 ET by Chris NormanI made history when I was faced in court with "The Women of the United States of America vs. Chris Norman". Fortunately, it was scaled back when the judge found that all those other women had no standing in a US court. So, after this, it's on to The Hague...
I tried to make up for my derailing of this serious subject by posting something long and serious below. Then the screen jumped and everything was lost. So, I'll just apologize to Ms. Davidson for my disruption.
Chris,
March 20, 2008 - 20:55 ET by R D HelmAh, yes, those Latin girls will do it every time.
The Hague, eh? Yes, I hear Gravenhage is rather pleasant this time of year. After all, Spring is about to be sprung, is it not?
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
I don't know about Spring,
March 20, 2008 - 21:06 ET by Chris NormanI don't know about Spring, but, obviously, my mind's sprung.
Back to the main subject, kind of, have you ever noticed when the media is talking about the left, they would have you believe that they're all "just folks" - like Ma and Pa Kettle - especially with the war protesters. You hear about it on the radio and you'd swear that accountants, doctors, and factory workers were marching in the streets. Then you get home and see it on television and the majority of the crowd looks like a bunch of old hippies and hippie wannabes? I'd like to think that these are the kind of whack jobs that do the thuggish things that these conservative female bloggers describe.
Chris,
March 20, 2008 - 21:12 ET by R D HelmYeah, like these people.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
Yep, that's who I'm talkin'
March 20, 2008 - 21:19 ET by Chris NormanYep, that's who I'm talkin' about.
Answer
March 20, 2008 - 19:46 ET by CapeCodScottMary Katharine Ham-
www.townhall.com/blog/MaryKatharineHam and I know she is on Fox News...SURPRISE
right...that is what I was
March 20, 2008 - 20:23 ET by red_dragon311right...that is what I was saying above.....conservitive women are alot more attractive then lib women
I was a professional twice over - an analyst and a therapist. The world's first analrapist
I really don't see anything
March 20, 2008 - 19:19 ET by ConservativeRexI really don't see anything wrong with turning the tables on the racist/sexist liberal bloggers. They are not immune.
If my wife were a blogger and this happened to her there is not a place these p*ssies could hide. I'd find them. Better yet, I'd leave bait so they'd find me.
You can't have them picking on the ladies. I got news for them too, what they are doing isn't covered by the 1st amendment, so as far as that is concerned they get what they got coming to them. If they have ANY sense, they'd knock it off, and damn quick.
Hate Speech Is Free Speech
March 20, 2008 - 23:58 ET by Lynn DavidsonI got news for them too, what they are doing isn't covered by the 1st amendment, so as far as that is concerned they get what they got coming to them.
I have to disagree with you. The problem with saying that "hate speech" is not protected speech is, who gets to define what "hate" is? I hate that those bloggers have to put up with all of that, but most of it is Constitutional.
I agree with the ACLU's old position; it is important to protect the worst speech. American Nazi party should be able to march through a neighborhood where mostly Holocaust victims live. Code Pink should be able to burn flags, and the KKK should be able to burn crosses.
The left chant "hate speech is not free speech" to silence people with whom they disagree. San Francisco State University College Republicans stomped on a Hezbollah flag, which had "Allah" written in Arabic on it. The school essentially charged them with hate speech, because, as the school's president said, "Hate speech is not free speech." Luckily, FIRE got involved.
Unfortunately, the ACLU is now taking baby steps down the anti-free speech road by supporting the latest hate crime federal law.
I may not like the nasty emails that I get, but I would rather get them than have that person silenced by the government. Hate speech is free speech. When "hate speech" is illegal, we no longer have free speech in this country. </rant>
I agree, Ms. Davidson. It's
March 21, 2008 - 06:31 ET by motherbeltI agree, Ms. Davidson. It's no big deal to "protect" speech that no one has a problem with. It is the offensive speech that needs protection (I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it! -Voltaire)
And as many pundits say today...the solution to offensive speech is more speech, not less.
A while ago, I read of a survey among young people that found nearly 2/3 of them favored restrictions on speech that might offend someone. Did you catch that? Might offend.
Self-censorship is becoming the order of the day. Very scary.
And thank heaven for FIRE....colleges are the worst restrictors of speech.
Exactly right, Lynn
March 21, 2008 - 06:33 ET by sarcasmoIf the left and the right want an Orwellian nightmare, try to imagine a hate speech law in some dystopic future, where sarcasmo or someone like me, with absolute and unchallenged power, gets to arbitrarily-define the meaning(s) of "hate." Your lives might suddenly become very-unpleasant.
JMR
A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.
I am not worried about
March 21, 2008 - 14:50 ET by ConservativeRexI am not worried about "hate speech". However, a threat is a threat. A threat to bodily harm someone is just that. I take threats seriously. Again, if these comments (threats) were directed at my wife, I would take them for what they were and act accordingly. It is my duty to protect me and mine against threats real or perceived. In my world, threats are not covered by the 1st amendment. I would be foolish to not think someone would not follow up on a threat. I am and will stay prepared.
Sorry for the confusion. They can carry on with the hate speech all the live long day for all I care, that, harms no one.
Thats right
March 21, 2008 - 00:18 ET by general companyI'd find them. Better yet, I'd leave bait so they'd find me.
Exactly ,I as well. What in the heck are these folks thinking? We find them out and quickly extinguish them around here.
Plus, punks bait easly. Turning them into foul stinking trash isn't very difficult.
Hope these Lady's have some good folks looking out for them
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
Definitely an on-target
March 20, 2008 - 19:20 ET by motherbeltDefinitely an on-target post, Lynn!
The oh-so-sensitive liberals who claim that race, and ethnicity don't matter, always manage to bring them up in the first sentence when they are descibing someone.
And it's always liberals who have to throw in the snide, sleazy personal attack along with the possibly legitimate criticism. Case in point: the recent attack on Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity by Sean Penn. He wasn't content with disagreeing with Hannity; had to describe him as Rupert Murdoch's "butt boy." Classy, huh?
But it's conservatives who are hateful, you know.
Goracles?
March 20, 2008 - 20:20 ET by acumenInternet inventor Algore's fault.
The left has gone mad.
March 20, 2008 - 20:37 ET by yruymiI'm not at all surprised these woman are targeted. The left is whack. I'd like to use a different word but I just scrolled through Kos and Huffington. They're whack. The Democratic party is imploding by its own racism. The party of slavery, the Ku Klux Klan, the party of Crow and segregation is one, bigoted beyond comprehension, and two, completely blind to their racism and their history of racial bigotry. How any self-respecting person of color can align themselves with the Democratic Party, I'll never understand.
As the left continues to implode and their chances of taking The White House evaporate, their anger will only increase. Watch out, they'll be even more dangerous.
I'm afraid someone is gonna
March 20, 2008 - 20:52 ET by Gary P JacksonI'm afraid someone is gonna get hurt before this is over. And I don't mean the Randi Rhoads type of hurt either.
Historical significance?
March 20, 2008 - 21:55 ET by FaulknerFanSo true Gary P. And the sad thing about it that the country is deteriating and going in the toilet along with all of this. These same tactics have been used throughout history to establish control of the majority by the minority and the eventual distruction of entire countries. Not a pleasant feeling about things these days.
Oh Poo- I guess we male
March 20, 2008 - 22:07 ET by NazarethOh Poo- I guess we male bloggers dont have nothing to worry bout.
Seriously htough, I just came off some blogs where I read some pretty vile leftist comments- even read one blog where hte owner was threatened- which he posted on his site hte letter he got. There's gotta be some pretty sad-case people out htere to get so worked up over opinions that they spew that kind of venom
A BIG ASSUMPTION on the
March 21, 2008 - 07:08 ET by Ruths husband BenA BIG ASSUMPTION on the left's side is that they are the only decent people, therefore whatever you do to a conservative is okay because we are bad people. See, once you de-humanize your enemy it becomes much easier to treat them ugly.
“There’s nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they
made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group.” -Obama (talking about Imus)
"Oh, rrrreaaaalllllyyyyy!!!!!!! -RhB
God Bless ALL of these
March 21, 2008 - 07:24 ET by rimskyGod Bless ALL of these Conservative ladies. They are way intelligent, they have more courage than most men dream about, they are witty, they are gracious, they are dynamic, they are moral, and of course, they are a total vacation for the eyes.
The left's psychosis
March 21, 2008 - 13:45 ET by greenfairieLeftists don't think conservatives are wrong or misguided. Conservatives are the only ones who fit their definition of evil and that definition is anyone or anything that gets in the way of the Workers' Paradise. Conservatives aren't just their ideological opponents, they are the enemy. So we are treated as such. This is why they say they oppose racism and sexism but feel privileged to send racist and sexist e-mails to people like Michelle Malkin. Michelle isn't human, she's a "traitor" to her race and gender, and as an inauthentic woman/minority and as a "subhuman," it is perfectly acceptable to heap abuse on her.
greenfairie
March 21, 2008 - 14:16 ET by MrShyPERFECT description of the left's mindset!
The tolerant, compassionate left.
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change