The media love comparing Iraq to the Vietnam War. So why didn't Reuters relate Iraq to this July 31 story about a joint Cambodian-UN tribunal that charged one of Pol Pot's top henchmen with crimes against humanity related to the deaths of 1.7 million people in that country's “Killing Fields?”
They also like to link America's actions to unpleasant world events. So why not even mention how the US pulling out of Vietnam and Congress halting aid to Vietnam and Cambodia, allowed the rise of Pol Pot's brutal and deadly communist Khmer Rouge regime that killed, tortured and displaced millions? Maybe take it a step further and connect it to what might happen if the US follows the wishes of many Democrats and withdraws from Iraq too soon?
The tribunal charged Duch with the deaths of 1.7 million people after confessing to “committing multiple atrocities during this (sic) time as head of the capital's notorious Tuol Sleng or S-21 interrogation center.” (emphasis mine throughout):
At least 14,000 people deemed to be opponents of Pol Pot's "Year Zero" revolution passed through Tuol Sleng's barbed-wire gates. Fewer than 10 are thought to have lived to tell the tale.
Most victims were tortured and forced to confess to a variety of crimes -- mainly being CIA spies -- before being bludgeoned to death in a field on the outskirts of the city. Women, children and even babies were among those butchered.
In addition to avoiding the obvious link to Iraq, Reuters omitted a few basic details in this article. There was no mention that it was a genocide tribunal; in fact, the word “genocide” wasn't even used. It mentioned that Duch became a born-again Christian, but not that he was a communist in a communist government. Perhaps some of this is because the reporter might not be a native-English speaker.
Reuters addressed a familiar theme, by stating “(m)ost victims were tortured and killed after being forced to confess to being CIA spies.” Without American money to buy influence and bullets, the insurgents took power in Cambodia and millions of people were killed for their real or imagined connection to the US.
Now I see quite a resemblance to modern-day Iraq, but in what must be a record, a member of the media didn't exploit a Vietnam connection to our modern-day “quagmire” in Iraq. There was also no mention that nearly one fourth of the Cambodian population died after our disengagement. I wonder why.
Contact Lynn at tvisgoodforyou2 AT yahoo DOT com















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Lynn ... Lynn ... Lynn ...
August 2, 2007 - 00:13 ET by drillanwrThere ya go again with those pesky facts ...
There is no reason to
August 2, 2007 - 00:22 ET by jdhawkThere is no reason to wonder why, Lynn. Our "press" has always obsfucated the heinous atrocities of their fellow travelers.
Why do you think they described Mao as a kindly old man with a cherbic like smile when the truth is he has killed more human beings than any other man in history - the estimate is some 70 million.
Or, how about "Uncle Joe" aka Joseph Stalin, the second most murderous communist with an estimate 60 million murdered at his hands.
Heck, the "press" just doesn't talk about 'ol Pol Pot at all if they can help it. Yet, as a percentage of the population that was killed at his hands, he is the most murderous.
Boy! I'll bet everyone of the "press" wishes that the movie "The Killing Fields" never made is to a theater near you. Although it barely scratches the surface of the torture, incarceration, and murder that took place in Cambodia.
And, lest we forget, the "press" never gets around to the torture, incarceration, or murder of Fidel Castro. They are too busy telling us, ad naseum, about the health care "paradise." What a cruel joke that is on the Cubans and the rest of the world.
And, in all of the above, our "press" will go to any lengths necessary to avoid the word communist or its linking to the hundreds of millions of people who lost there lives to it. Let alone, the miserable wasted lives of those that lived and are living under these still heinous regimes.
This shows how morally
August 2, 2007 - 00:32 ET by rbosqueThis shows how morally bankrupt these people are. The dems never met a commie they didn't like.
I swear to God that guy in
August 2, 2007 - 08:16 ET by Roger the ShrubberI swear to God that guy in the photo served me some Moo Shoo Pork over the weekend.
}}}----> Moo Shoo
August 2, 2007 - 08:18 ET by Cool ArrowI had a Poo Poo platter.
Heh heh, he said 'poo-poo'.
August 2, 2007 - 08:41 ET by Roger the ShrubberHeh heh, he said 'poo-poo'. Heh-heh heh-heh.
Democrats in a hurry...
August 2, 2007 - 09:09 ET by AlgerHissDemocrats in a hurry... leftists on steroids... the overseer of liberals, progressives and populists... call them what you want, but Communists and Communism have never yet been covered fully by the press or historians.
Probably the best attempt to catalog the human misery is The Black Book of Communism.
Rochester, Minnesota: A Fem_Leftist City!
A sobering reference, no
August 2, 2007 - 14:57 ET by jdhawkA sobering reference, no doubt, AH.
Also, see this: http://www.victimsofcommunism.org/
Genocide
August 2, 2007 - 10:04 ET by pocomocoLynn,
There's no reason to ask why. The MSM considers it 'old news', therefore, not worth bringing up. You should know the routine by now.