An August 4 Time magazine article by Michael Grunwald comes to Sen. Barack Obama’s defense against Republican claims that his energy policy of keeping tires properly inflated is a joke. The article, entitled "The Tire-Gauge Solution: No Joke," argues that if everyone were to keep their tires properly inflated and keep up with regular auto maintenance, demand for gasoline would immediately be reduced by several percentage points whereas offshore drilling would only meet one percent of America’s demand two decades from now:
The Bush Administration estimates that expanded offshore drilling could increase oil production by 200,000 bbl. per day by 2030. We use about 20 million bbl. per day, so that would meet about 1% of our demand two decades from now. Meanwhile, efficiency experts say that keeping tires inflated can improve gas mileage 3%, and regular maintenance can add another 4%. Many drivers already follow their advice, but if everyone did, we could immediately reduce demand several percentage points. In other words: Obama is right.
Grunwald also used this opportunity to promote energy conservation, claiming that:
The real problem with the attacks on his tire-gauge plan is that efforts to improve conservation and efficiency happen to be the best approaches to dealing with the energy crisis — the cheapest, cleanest, quickest and easiest ways to ease our addiction to oil, reduce our pain at the pump and address global warming. It's a pretty simple concept: if our use of fossil fuels is increasing our reliance on Middle Eastern dictators while destroying the planet, maybe we ought to use less.
But ABC’s Jake Tapper also fact-checked Obama’s statement on keeping tires inflated, and he reached a different conclusion. Tapper quoted Frank Verrastro, Director and Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), who came up with this analysis (emphasis mine):
[T]he production offset [from keeping tires inflated] is more likely to approach 800 thousand barrels per day – a tidy sum and a worthwhile target for savings, but not equal to [Outer Continental Shelf] output.
Finally, without knowing what production volumes could be expected from lifting the ban on OCS drilling moratoria, it’s impossible to assert that taking these fuel savings actions would exceed future offshore oil volumes, and in fact, one might argue that the combination of achieving these savings AND developing new supply would doubly enhance US energy security.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The liberal democrats and their lackeys
August 5, 2008 - 09:58 ET by c5thenconstantly set up the strawman that it is an either/or proposition when we can easily do both and more. Rather than piss and moan about 2% here and 3% there, why not do everything and aim for a 10% - 20% impact that starts low but continues to ramp up as longer term solutions begin to bear fruit. That will guarentee that the price will be impacted immediately and continuously as the demand drops.
Conservation
Solar
Wind
Geothermal
OCS drilling
ANWR drilling
etc.
DO IT ALL! DO IT NOW!
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
sigh
August 5, 2008 - 09:59 ET by candanceWith each passing day the left changes their numbers a little more. Now it'll take 20 years to see 1% difference. They better fax those numbers over to Nancy Pelosi because she had a different story talking to Stephannopoulos on Sunday.
Gas in my city has dropped 30 cents since Bush repealed the executive ban. Why isn't that getting any coverage?
candance...Bob Beckel was
August 5, 2008 - 11:04 ET by motherbeltcandance...Bob Beckel was on Hannity's radio show yesterday, and he actually dragged the results timeline out even more...he actually said it will take 10, 20, 30 years to see a difference!! This is how liberals operate...they start with a number, and then, like the fish that got away, it keeps growing with every telling. I can't wait for them to start claiming that it will take a generation for results to begin!
And if Jake Tapper doesn't agree with their assessment, he's obviously wrong...and a racist to boot!
PS: Oil down to $110 a barrel today. Gas is down 30 cents where I live too.
Gas Prices Dropping
August 5, 2008 - 11:46 ET by AndyR"Gas in my city has dropped 30 cents since Bush repealed the executive ban. Why isn't that getting any coverage? "
It has also dropped since the Senate said they would go after the speculators. Can't have one without the other.
andy?
August 5, 2008 - 12:28 ET by candanceBush lifting the executive ban was him actually *doing something* and not just flapping his gums about cracking down. Also, public support for domestic drilling seems to get higher by the day, which is the real reason Pelosi is stalling on that vote - she knows Congress could go for it if they voted right now.
This kind of public pressure is making speculators feel like the supply will probably increase in the future.
I very much doubt speculators are purposely downplaying the price because they're really afraid of Congress punishing them. Number one that implies they have the power to manipulate prices at will, and number two it implies that we're now living in the UK where success is punished by the government.
And even if these speculators are a big part of the problem (as Dems would have us believe) then it only makes sense that they would bank on lower prices when they saw the supply go up.
And furthermore, if Congress plans on punishing speculators, then they better be going around to local gas stations and punishing average citizens who fill up three and four jugs of gas when the price comes down - because that's blatant speculation that adds to the current supply dwindling.
Speculation
August 5, 2008 - 14:00 ET by mbuel"Number one that implies they have the power to manipulate prices at
will, and number two it implies that we're now living in the UK where
success is punished by the government."
I think you are right but need a little nudge:
1) If speculators drive price, why not drive it to 500 dollars per barrel? Surely they don't care how much it hurts the consumer, just how much it will drive their profits right?
2) If it's not a supply problem why release oil from the SPR? With Obama and Pelosi decrying this dangerous action as a solution CONTRADICTING the "no drilling" ridiculous reply.
Bush himself is something of an eccentric moderate liberal conservative... an enigma wrapped in an eggshell.
Some of his actions I applaud, and other... liberal actions I am stunned?
Why is he not forcing Pelosi back to vote on the energy bill?
Why did he wait 3 weeks before signing the executive order? He should've signed it, had roughnecks ready to break ground in south dakota, and stated; "Today we are securing our nations energy freedom", then announced that we plan on building more coal and nuclear power plants.
You can't "save" energy; you
August 5, 2008 - 10:00 ET by robert108You can't "save" energy; you can only use less of it, and that in general will make us less productive, which is the real goal of the lefties. Their "big lie" is that we're wasting energy, which just isn't true; we're using all the energy we should be using. Without knowing exactly how many cars and trucks there are with significantly low tire pressure, there is no way to calculate any possible "savings" in that area, either.
Sorta
August 5, 2008 - 11:53 ET by ArcherBWe do use more energy than is needed. We always will until we have the entire country running at 100% efficiency, which is literally impossible.
However, it should be noted that not all of our oil is used for gasoline for cars. Inflating the tires of a jet liner will do little to increase its efficiency. The same can be said for a cargo ship or train hauling gravel (or cars!). So, you are correct in that they are not at all considering all the factors when calculating savings from proper automobile maintenance.
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara
How about Jackrabbit starts?
August 5, 2008 - 10:02 ET by mitchfloridaIs Obama running for Garage Mechanic or President of the United States?
Obama also needs to speak out strongly against using "jackrabbit starts" when driving from a redlight.
Given His Hopelessness:
August 5, 2008 - 10:10 ET by stratmanGiven His Hopelessness: The Obama's lack of experience in the very area he's aspiring, I sure as hell wouldn't entrust him to work on my vehicle which I rely upon for my daily safety.
Hat tip to Jack Bauer for the sure-to-be-seen-as racist Obama moniker.
RRAM Tough!
strat .. any mention of the
August 5, 2008 - 10:15 ET by Jack Bauerstrat .. any mention of the name of He Who Must Not be Named, only Obeyed is ipso facto, racist.
Glad you like His Hopelessness: The Obama. Arrggghhh, note to self: stop being racist!
no
August 5, 2008 - 11:13 ET by mbuelA 3rd party will never make it into office and will only take votes away from the republican or democrat candidate.
So if this 3RD party attracts republican voters Obama wins.
A better solution is to JOIN the party that closest matches your point of view than work to change that party towards what you think is right.
I find your catist, and
August 5, 2008 - 11:18 ET by Jack BauerI find your catist, and specist, comment to be unacceptable.
This is 2008, and it is more than past the time when a black feline can lead the nation in the White Cat House.
sorry mbuel
August 5, 2008 - 11:23 ET by candanceA better solution is to JOIN the party that closest matches your point of view than work to change that party towards what you think is right.
The GOP is not the party that matches my point of view - it wasn't with a "compassionate conservative" eight years ago and it isn't with a maverick who demands loyalty from others now.
I realize that it bothers you when you can't get every single American who dislikes Obama to vote for McCain, but after 20 years of "going along to get along" that slow death is finally upon us with less and less time for us to put it off.
It isn't about teaching the GOP a lesson. It's about finally admitting that plan isn't working. I don't WANT to settle for a slow death.
this isn't about "slow death"
August 5, 2008 - 14:11 ET by mbuelVoting for Obama is NATIONAL SUICIDE.
Seriously. HE will make you YEARN for the days when Carter was President.
Here's a short list:
1) He will tax EVERYONE on property sales. That includes those people that sell their 80,000 dollar trailer homes for a 5,000 land profit.
2) He will get rid of the Bush income tax cuts.
3) He will NOT DRILL for more energy.
4) He believes in the globull warming bullcrap, and will tax the crap out of us for emitting carbon.
5) He will push for bills that pay "reparative damage" to possible former slaves.
In short, pulling the lever for Obama is no longer the "slow death", it's instant suicide.
And the GOP is NOT ALL THAT BAD.
1) Have we had another militant Islamic attack on this country?
2) Have we had consistent power delivery across the grid?
3) Have we had consistent growth (until the dems were elected in 2006) of the economy?
4) Have we gained respect of countries abroad? (France, Germany, Poland and several other European countries are ALL electing pro-american, pro-bush leaders!)
5) Homelessness has dropped 14%!
It doesn't bother me that I can't force your vote, I just don't understand why you would vote for such a complete numbskull socialist.
Maybe that does match your point of view?
You agree with his anti-americanism? That capitalism fails?
"We are the light of the world, we are the leaders of the free world.
But when we depend on foreign energy we cannot be as strong of a leader
as
we should and can be." - Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA)
um...
August 5, 2008 - 20:09 ET by candanceLike I mentioned in my first post, many of us have been chatting about Obama's reign of terror on the forums. You can't tell me anything about Obama's plans that I don't already know. If you ask anyone else on NB they will tell you I'm as scared of Obama as everyone else.
But John McCain simply does not represent what I want, starting with Juan Hernandez and working down to Cap and Trade. I'm sorry, but praising Pelosi as a great person doesn't give me any confidence that he plans on appointing conservative judges or that he'll fight for lower taxes.
IMO it's national suicide either way.
LOOK at Jack's link first
August 5, 2008 - 11:28 ET by SouthJersey1953mbuel, please look at Jack's link for the 'only alternate thrid party choice before you chide him for promoting a third party candidate...or are you just a cat hater?
SJ -- I'm laughing.
August 5, 2008 - 12:24 ET by Jack BauerSJ -- I'm laughing. Inside!
absolutely
August 5, 2008 - 14:13 ET by mbuelCan't stand fat cats.
Seriously though, we can't afford Obama as president.
I saw a bumper sticker
August 5, 2008 - 11:16 ET by general companyI saw a bumper sticker yesterday, dont think it was political, but it stated ; "Now that I have lost all hope, I feel much better"
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
That Seventies Show
August 5, 2008 - 10:03 ET by SickofLibsStay tuned for Obama Energy Plan Part 2:
Mandatory carpooling, reinstatement of multiple occupancy-only lanes, 55 mph national speed limit, odd/even days gas rationing.
And my personal favorite, NO LEFT TURNS
Stop the exploration!!!!!!
August 5, 2008 - 10:03 ET by athoughtor2Stop the exploration!!!!!! No need for any more oil...The messiah has spoken and we just need to increase our tire pressure. it's just that easy....after all look what he did with wine at a wedding and loaves of bread and fish...
All those experts are just flat out wrong.
Addicted to Oil
August 5, 2008 - 10:07 ET by V the KOur economy is addicted to oil about the same way our bodies are addicted to blood. And the Democrat solution is for us to accept chronic anemia.
The real heroin of our economy is government spending.
no kidding
August 5, 2008 - 11:15 ET by mbuelOil is the blood of freedom and democracy, denying the american body blood will cause the death of freedom and democracy.....
precisely what the socialists want.
the dirty little secret
August 5, 2008 - 10:10 ET by candanceHere's the unconvenient detail Obama fails to share with his audience: the less we use, the less taxes Congress can collect which makes their revenue drop. Next stop: raising the gas tax. Thus the more we cut back we'll actually be punished by being charged even more.
Congress will get their same income no matter what and we'll be left sitting at home with poisonous light bulbs and the thermostat set on 80. Ahh, that's change I can really believe in.
1929 Redux
August 5, 2008 - 10:29 ET by dboI can just see the panic on Wall Street now. " Oh my God, people are inflating their tires. SELL, SELL, SELL"!
An Addiction?
August 5, 2008 - 10:30 ET by Wildcatter1980The problem with this is considering the desire for cheap, clean energy an addiction. Clean, cheap energy is key to economic prosperity and is the easiest way to enable the most people to live free and prosper personally.
Technology has enabled us to use fossil fuels in clean, environmentally-friendly ways. Among fossil fuels, oil remains cheap and efficient. Given the economic importance of cheap, efficient energy, oil is not addiction. It is a necessity for any country that wants its citizens to be free, independent and prosperous.
you're right wildcat
August 5, 2008 - 10:43 ET by candanceThat's like saying we're addicted to fire to cook our food or we're addicted to plants to produce more oxygen.
It's estimated that nearly 50% of Americans drive...
August 5, 2008 - 10:47 ET by JohnMcGrew...with misinflated tires. So it is true that if people just paid more attention to simple maintenance issues, they'd get far better mileage and we'd be using somewhat less oil.
Compare this to the misinformation regarding reinstating the 55-MPH speed limit: The vast majority of miles driven daily in America are not driven on highways, but are local in-town miles. Reducing the interstate speed limit would result in a marginal reducition in oil consumption nationwide.
We'd save far more oil just inflating our tires than messing with the speed limits.
Nearly 50%
August 5, 2008 - 12:42 ET by ScrapironNearly 50%, could it actually be the same 46% that always vote democrat even if they know the vote will result in their families death? Wow, the same 46% of the population that studies (USC) show need for mental health treatment. (put a smiley face here)
Old, Retired and glad of it.
Obama Lovers
August 5, 2008 - 11:23 ET by VinncyGIts so hard for ordinary people to think like a liberal it so chaotic they live in their own fantasy world. Don't try to understand them, just enjoy the stupidity of it all.
Assumptions....
August 5, 2008 - 12:32 ET by ScrapironLeft winger's, aka democrats, make the assumption we are all like them and that everything we have was given to us by the 'democrat' welfare system, paid for by the rich, which to a democrat is anyone who has ever worked more than one day in a row. Dhimmi's may be running around with low air pressure in their tires, as well as empty heads, but at $800+ for a set of four tires I take care of them on my vehicle. You will find a digital, as well as a common, tire gauge in the door pocket of my truck, and an air compressor in my garage.
That brings up a question since I noticed lately that gas stations now have machines that charge .25 to .50 cents to air up your tires and it's self service. Did Hussein O recently invest in the company that make these rip off machines? That would answer why ' hot air ' is his only cure for the nations energy crisis.
Old, Retired and glad of it.
Tire inflation
August 5, 2008 - 12:40 ET by billb"The One" recommends using HOT AIR for proper tire inflation
Tire inflation.. more is better.. just maybe free energy if
August 5, 2008 - 13:12 ET by upcountrywaterthe pressure is high enough..
pelosi sez we can "find energy", like some sort of a scavenger hunt..
it's somewhere ..keep looking...
Liberals62%
IranianUranium
All those quarters...
August 5, 2008 - 13:35 ET by Chris NormanIf people inflate their tires fully, like Obama calls for, won't "Big Air" profit obscenely?
McNotObama '08
Possible solution to Big Air
August 5, 2008 - 13:42 ET by SickofLibsPossible solution to Big Air dilemma:
Solid tires.
Big Rubber? McNotObama '08
August 5, 2008 - 13:52 ET by Chris NormanBig Rubber?
McNotObama '08
SoL-Nahh, that would just benefit Big Rubber.
August 5, 2008 - 13:53 ET by R D Helm:-)
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz
Chris, maybe the politicians could inflate our tires for us.
August 5, 2008 - 13:51 ET by R D HelmI mean, they are all so full of it. :-)
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz
They probably would like
August 5, 2008 - 14:30 ET by Chris NormanThey probably would like that much more than "Big Air" making more money - of course they also might like the revenue from a "WIND Fall Profits" tax...
McNotObama '08
If any Republican..
August 5, 2008 - 16:26 ET by Prester John...had made such a suggestion he would've been laughed out of politics within a week. There would be jokes on late night TV for months, numerous allusions to Marie Antoinette, and accusations that he was completely out of touch with reality and the common man. Experts would be paraded on the major networks for weeks on end saying that the whole idea was preposterous. 25 years down the road he would be forever known as the Tire Guage senator and upon his death commentators would speak of this one thing he was infamous for.
But when the Messiah proposes it, attention must be paid.
DUH
August 5, 2008 - 17:38 ET by jonesey65244These nuts throw numbers around like confetti.
Yes, proper inflation and maintenance can increase your mileage. But they toss out the 3 and 4 percent savings as though NO ONE already maintains their vehicles.
Every once in a while, I see someone driving on deflated tires, but I say, the vast majority of us already maintain our vehicles properly. So where's the relief for the responsible drivers, eh?
Be sure to tuck in a caribou tonight.
jonesey65244
can we inflate our tires with CO2
August 5, 2008 - 20:24 ET by lunaticcringeradioas an experienced auto tech this is criminal to mislead the public on such a grand scale to push this kind of lie. sure inflating tires help and tune ups help but to exaggerate things to the scale they are proposing is downright a fradulent scam. i would love that everyone would spend the next 2 weeks recording their mpg in their average travels and then do exactly what glory to he that be obama says, and compare your results at the pump, them multiply that results by millions and you will come nowhere near the socialist dream is claiming.
lunaticcringeradio
Renewable energy!!!!!
August 5, 2008 - 20:40 ET by general companycan we inflate our tires with CO2
Maybe this is the creative thinking that Pelosi is wanting to here from the Repubs. Yeaa, maybe now we can quit giving our $ to folks that hate us,,,,hurrrayyy.
Lets keep our fingers crossed. : ]
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg