Lefties Accuse Kirk Cameron of Hate Speech for Christian Beliefs
There’s nothing the Hollywood left prizes more than the right to free expression. Just not Kirk Cameron’s free expression. The former “Growing Pains” actor appeared on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight” on March 2, where the host prodded him relentlessly about his traditional, Christian stance on gay marriage. When he didn’t back down from his beliefs, Hollywood screamed for him to be silenced.
Cameron told Morgan, “"Marriage is defined by God in the garden between Adam and Eve, one man, one woman for life, til-death-do-you-part", and said he would never attempt to re-define marriage – he did not support gay marriage because of his Christian beliefs.The reaction from Hollywood liberals was swift and over the top.
A plethora of celebrities and many of his former co-stars pounced. Gossip blogger, bully and gay activist Perez Hilton wasted no time in labeling him a "bigot" who suffers from "homophobia."
Roseanne Barr tweeted that “kirk or kurt or whatever cameron is an accomplice to murder with his hate speech. so is rick warren. their peers r killing gays in uganda.” That would be the Rosanne Barr the anti-Semite who recently called for beheading the rich right here in the U.S.
The gay rights group GLAAD struck back with charges that Cameron “sounds even more outdated than his 1980s TV character” and that he is “out of step with the vast majority of Americans.” They launched a petition called "Tell Kirk Cameron To Finally Grow Up", because of his so-called “hateful” remarks.
Joy Behar, co-host on “The View,” agreed that Cameron should have the right to free speech but expressed he should "just shut up" anyway.
Piers Morgan actually seemed to come to the defense of Cameron, tweeting that his testimony was “brave,” however Morgan couldn't resist a final jab at the Christian actor stating that “barbarus” is brave’s Latin origin.
Fran Drescher, star of “Happily Divorced” lectured Cameron in civics, telling CBS he should "reexamine what it is to be an American."
At the end of the day, Cameron refused to be bullied and called the left out on their hypocritical double-standard.
He told ABCNews.com, “I should be able to express moral views on social issues, especially those that have been the underpinning of Western civilization for 2,000 years — without being slandered, accused of hate speech, and told from those who preach ‘tolerance’ that I need to either bend my beliefs to their moral standards or be silent when I’m in the public square.”
- Lauren Thompson's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
I can shut them all up in one sentence.
Submitted by NeoKong on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:02pm.
"Why don't you go ask some Muslims from CAIR what they think of gay marriage....?"
Let them ask Louis Farrakhan.
They wouldn't dare to speak to or about Muslims like that because they know they wouldn't put up with that for a second.
The lefties always prefer the soft targets who aren't frightening.
Ordinance delivered on target!
Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:06pm.
Touche from this former collegiate sabre fencer. Thoroughly skewers their skewed and double-standard worldview.
I dare Long-walk-off-a-short-Piers to aggressively grill either a CAIR member or some fire-breathing imam in like manner.
Come on, dude, pull on your big boy pants and show your journalistic chops by speaking truth to power and confronting the intolerant.
Just let us know in advance so we can tune in to watch the fireworks.
Pass the popcorn!
"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects...
hypocrisy of the left
Submitted by allouchsit on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:00pm.
I am constantly amazed that those who pretend to preach "tolerance" to others are so intolerant of anyone with whom they disagree. Maybe some day the left will finally grow up and follow their own advice.
Getting the story wrong
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:21pm.
Kirk Cameron said ""I think that it's detrimental and ultimately destructive to so many of the foundations of civilization."
That's stupid.
~The foundation of civilization is the family unit
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:25pm.
Homosexuality precludes the creation of a family.
Also, 2+2=4.
Yea but
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:35pm.
Without homosexuality, where am I going to to find a good chef? They are one of the foundations of cilvilization no?
~No
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:39pm.
If you're going to use the "Humorous riffing in order to change the subject" tactic, you're going to have to work on your delivery.
Ok, I'll try another approach
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:59pm.
Did Leonardo da Vinci contribute anything to civilization? I mean that guy was clearly homosexual.
~Rumor
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:06pm.
It was the most common form of slander in that day and age. Still is pretty common, come to think of it.
Nicely done
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:23pm.
Nicely done, mandrake! After all, most of da Vinci's work was clearly non-religious, clearly non-Christian, NOT!
Mandrake, da Vinci did most of his work for the Catholic Church! He was a devout Catholic who's religious beliefs were the very inspiration for his greatest works of art.
He didn't have to work for the Church, you know. There were plenty of others who were willing, eager even, to take his place. He worked for the Church because that Church, and the religious beliefs it instilled upon him, was his greatest passion. Does that sound like someone who was "secretly" a homosexual?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
liberal lies from a movie
Submitted by cocodrie on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:10pm.
The DaVinci Codes is hardly reality. Leonardo was never known to be homosexual but don't let that stop you from your constant misrepresentations. You certainly have a fetish for homosexuality.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
cocodrie
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:17pm.
"You certainly have a fetish for homosexuality"
Not so much. But since I don't have a broad spectrum knowledge of the American political landscape..it's one of the few vectors I have to annoy folks.
You're not annoying us
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:23pm.
You're not annoying us, mandrake. You're just publicly displaying your own ignorance.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Ouch!
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:35pm.
Words can hurt ya know!
I knew at some level this is pointless..which is why I'm giving up, in let's say three weeks.
⇒ Congratulations, Mandrake
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:08pm.
You and your life partner have finally won the right to marry.
Spring wedding in Maryland. Sweet!
more boring
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:42pm.
than annoying
I think da drake is mixing
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:13pm.
I think da drake is mixing him up with Leonardo da Caprio...................
And you know da Vinci ...
Submitted by NL207 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 8:39pm.
was homosexual how?
Cause I'm gay
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 8:48pm.
and can tell a gay man 500 years away. It's a gift
Caj has the gift*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 8:54pm.
Caj is a straight older woman and I know a Sandra Fluke when I see one.
Translation ....
Submitted by NL207 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:01pm.
you do not know.
⇒ Mandrake
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:12pm.
So y'all really do have secret signals?
Don't you mean "fasion designer?"
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:49pm.
"Good chef?" I think you mean "good fashion designer," don't you?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Good morning mandrake
Submitted by cocodrie on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:50pm.
Peg Bundy is available.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Not so much her
Submitted by mandrake on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:46pm.
But I think her son is really hot!
You are forgetting
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:37pm.
that many heterosexual couples also do not create families. Are they contributing to the demise of civilization?
~Their union produces no life, only death
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:43pm.
So in a sense, yes. If the absence of children is voluntary.
But they are also not actively engaging in behavior that runs directly counter to the way a family is supposed to function, so I would say that they simply don't contribute to it's continuance.
Still Unfair
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:44pm.
It's not like Gays are insisting that EVERYONE become gay, and heterosexual couples with no children are not insisting that EVERYONE produce no life just like they do. There are plenty of people still having kids today. To claim that the existence of gays contributes to the decline of America is ridiculous.
~Homosexuality is a biological deadend
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:58pm.
therefore the wider it's influence the more it negatively impacts the population.
I see you're reading impaired as well, porn star
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:06pm.
Bru wrote they simply don't contribute to it's continuance, you read and interpreted it as contributes to the decline.
This is the problem we have with you leftists. In your world, black is white, day is night, up is down, and the immoral is moral and good.
Keep trying, though. Your posts are instructive for the new readers here on how NOT to make a point.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
"It's not like Gays are insisting that EVERYONE...."
Submitted by dyardley on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 1:37pm.
VD2000, No, but Gays ARE insisting that traditional people ACCEPT their lifestyles or we're all homo-something-or another. What you don't get or can't accept is that a small minority of people want to take what we hold dear, marriage, family, religious beliefs, etc and MAKE us call it okay.
It isn't going to happen, EVER. Do what you want with whomever you want, I really and truly don't care. But don't force me or indoctrinate my children and grand-children to accept it or else. I won't tell you how to live and what to believe, and I expect the same from you. It's called 'respect for the individual.'
Welcome, dyardley
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 2:07pm.
We can always use another MOL (Mean Old Lady, Conservative) here.
You're wasting your time with VD....he's a garden variety (or as another MOL, cajun2 would say, "sto'bought") troll. We get them here all the time. This one is kind of funny, though, a naif by the usual standard of liberal nastiness. VD, I think, actually believes the nonsense he writes here, which in and of itself is pretty amusing.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
You're stupid!
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:29pm.
vandammaged!
...Yeah... What she said!
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Y'know, VD, you get destroyed by the women here so often,
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:33pm.
I'm surprised you aren't asking Holder to investigate NB for hate crimes.
Your remark was the only stupid thing I've seen.
He won't get any result from
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:16pm.
He won't get any result from (with) Holder unless he's 'black', doncha'know??? There's no such thing as a 'hate crime' perpetrated on a white person..........................................and I still think that the 2008 elections were a 'hate crime'!!!
It's "stupid," alright
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:44pm.
It's "stupid," alright. Just ask the civilizations who openly embrace things like Homosexuality. For example The Greeks. Oh, wait, their civilization died. Well, ok, bad example. How about the Romans? Oh, wait, they're dead too. The Spartans? Humm, same problem,: dead civilization.
Damn it! I can't actually think of a single civilization that openly embraced homosexuality and not only survived, but flourishes to this day, like those stupid, archaic, retrograde civilizations that do not openly embrace homosexuality (The Chinese, for an example. 5 thousand years of backwards thinking, like the idea of marriage is that of one man and one woman, and STILL they exist? What's up with that?) But there must be an example out there somewhere! Right? Right?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Um....what?
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:43pm.
Your argument against embracing homosexuality is that ancient peoples are dead? And you think thats the only reason they died?
No one is asking for Christians to "embrace" the gays, or even to call it normal. Just allow them to get married in accordance to civil law, and stop telling Piers Morgan and Fox News that its going to end the world as we know it. Gays have been around forever, and they're not going away.
~Problem
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:49pm.
There is no "accordance with civil law" unless a new law is made for them, like in Massachusetts.
That's the problem most people have with the whole thing, because gays aren't simply asking to be left alone, they're demanding that others write new laws just for them. With the implied threat that if you don't go out of your way to accommodate and affirm their sexual behavior, you're a bigoted homophobe.
You just proved the argument
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:50pm.
yes, they will be around, why, you ask?(well, someone might ask)
Because like it or not, regardless if a person is a homo or a hetero or anything, it still takes a man and a woman to create a baby. That's an undeniable fact.
And don't anyone dare try to tell me that neither one is needed for creating a baby, yes, I know science is capable of it, but it's not a natural thing.
But if the population of homos should ever outnumber the population of heteros, the human race is in danger of extinction. Biological extinction.
-Jon
Jon
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:47pm.
When gays outnumber heteros, then we can talk about the dangers of the human race. Do you really think gays are just going to take over the world? They've had plenty of time to do it.
You are not entitled to your own facts, porn star
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:57pm.
No one is asking for Christians to "embrace" the gays, or even to call it normal. Just allow them to get married in accordance to civil law,
That is simply not true. Most of us have no problem with "civil unions", just don't ask us to call it marriage, because it isn't. Marriage is between one man and one woman. There have been numerous ballot initiatives in states across this country, approved by the voters, you may have heard of it, the Defense of Marriage act. These ballot initiatives have been overwhelmingly approved by the voters. Yet the Gay Lobby continues to push the issue.
Furthermore, the Left, via the teachers unions, have managed to insert the Gay Agenda into our public schools, with such books as "Heather Has Two Mommies".
So you are DEMANDING that we embrace the gay agenda, as if it were normal.
Now go find some new talking points.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Oh Blonde
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:50pm.
I googled "Blonde" and found out a ton of embarrasing stories about you. But anyhow...
Marriage in America used to be one white man and one white woman. The definition of Marriage in America has evolved over quite some time. And it will continue to evolve.
I don't think voters get to choose what "rights" are afforded to minorities. You either have the right or you don't. It's not up to a vote.
There is no Gay Agenda. Just because you ask kids to read a book about a subject they probably know nothing about is not indoctrination, its education.
You don't get to change the facts
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:59pm.
Your talking points are beyond lame, porn star. They are all fictitious dreams of the liberal left fever swamp.
As to the most egregious of your fevered rantings....indoctrination is indoctrination. If the public schools mandated the reading of the Bible for all elementary age students in public school, you leftists would be tearing your eyes out.
My blog is Blonde Gator. Feel free to read it, you might learn something.
I didn't select a s/n of a porn star, you did that, own it.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Oh Blonde
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:50pm.
I googled "Blonde" and found out a ton of embarrasing stories about you. But anyhow...
Marriage in America used to be one white man and one white woman. The definition of Marriage in America has evolved over quite some time. And it will continue to evolve.
I don't think voters get to choose what "rights" are afforded to minorities. You either have the right or you don't. It's not up to a vote.
There is no Gay Agenda. Just because you ask kids to read a book about a subject they probably know nothing about is not indoctrination, its education.
I heard you the first time
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:00pm.
No need to jump up and down and wave your hand around there, VD.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Sorry about that, my mistake
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 7:18pm.
Ugh, we already settled religion in schools. Gay isn't a religion.
Apparently it is to YOU!
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 8:04pm.
.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Evolved??
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:12pm.
You mean devolved.
There's nothing evolutionary about taking marriage, which is the joining of a man and a woman to create(if so desired) a child, into something that's a dead end and creates nothing.
Evolution doesn't work that way, human reproduction still requires a male and female, not a male and male or female and female.
-Jon
If so desired...
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 7:16pm.
So men and women can enter into marriage and decide to not have children, but men can't have the same luxury.
Sounds like a double standard to me.
Unless you want to make marriage without reproduction illegal?
More leaping liberal illogic
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 8:02pm.
Why don't you concentrate on what people actually WRITE here, instead of what you think?
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
double standard according to an idiot
Submitted by jon_torlin on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 10:44am.
No, you idiot,"having children" doesn't work the same way, there's always adoption, but kids don't get created in a factory(and yes, even that's in the works, God forbid).
You said it most correctly that men CAN'T have that luxury because it's PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. You just deliberately forgot to include that last part.
I said it earlier and I'll say it again, a man or a woman could gay, but either one of them were created the same way, with a man and a woman.
Too bad this is too logical for you. I never said anything about marriage without reproduction being made illegal because again, men can't have that luxury because it's PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, key word being reproduction. Just because a gay couple adopts a kid doesn't mean they reproduced.
-Jon
Correct CobraMan, but I might
Submitted by lotr on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 2:14pm.
Correct CobraMan, but I might add that NO civilization, society or culture, even ones with permissive attitudes toward male homosexual behavior, has ever recognized "gay marriage." The occurences of male homosexuality in ancient pagan cultures was more akin to "situational homosexuality." "Marriage" has always been understood as male-female,with the purpose of providing for a stable foundation and propagation of society, by definition. The notion of a society-sanctioned non-male-female "marriage" is a completely foreign concept to history.
Hey, civilization has kept you alive up to this point,
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:43pm.
in spite of your obvious handicaps.
So don't poo-poo it.
Im not.
Submitted by misterbee241 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:13pm.
In fact, I expect it from the amoral, Godless left.
Exactly...
Submitted by KO on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:40pm.
I read this on National Review (not sure who wrote it - think it was Jonah Goldberg) but I thought it was good enough to save it:
"Actually, we shouldn't be too surprised by any of this. Under the traditional definition of tolerance, the true definition, people amicably agreed to disagree with others whose beliefs or lifestyles were different than their own, as long as they weren't breaking any laws. But the problem is liberals changed the meaning of the word. By their definition, tolerance means we must all affirm the beliefs and lifestyles we disagree with and say that they are equal or even better to all other beliefs and lifestyles.
Thus, anyone who refuses to be tolerant – according to the revised definition of the word – is some sort of a hate-monger, some neo-Nazi, some racist/sexist/anti-gay nut who must not only be denounced, but silenced by whatever means necessary, whether it's a pie to the face or a bullet to the head."
This is the problem with the
Submitted by Kevpot on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:05pm.
This is the problem with the left and their gay agenda. It's not enough that you say, 'to each his own'. You must embrace homosexuality and declare it's normal or you are a hateful bigot and there is something wrong with YOU.
Liberal pains?
Submitted by Tomorama on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:10pm.
I am a catholic who doesn't fully agree with the "doctrine" in it's entire form, but I have no issue with someone following it with 100 percent passion and belief.
The same people who hammer Cameron allow Obysmal to "follow his christian belief" that marriage is one man and one woman.
But Obysmal is evolving, me thinks............. his evolvement ends in eraly October and the seas will part and ................................................
Gutsy guy
Submitted by lrgon on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:16pm.
I was not a fan of the sit com "Growing Pains but if this guy can give the redefiners of marriage so much pain by telling them that God already defined marriage he is on the right path.
Hollywood has teamed up with the nanny state. Rebranding marriage is a prime example. Other examples of the Nanny state and Hollywood partnership to condition Americans to be docile subjects to edits from Washington is the "click it or ticket" of the seat belt.
Next time you tune in to CSI notice the care that the director takes to film the actor taking time to "buckle up for safety." The message: do as DC says.
great point!
Submitted by OuttaMyWay on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:53pm.
also kids always where bike helmets...
But they don't show the full consequence of their liberal lifestyle, a ruined marriage etc.
check out kirk's ministry: www.livingwaters.com
for the record, i usually point this out when he is mentioned for those who want more info, and look into the biggest question.
Perez, Barr, Behar, Drescher...
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:23pm.
all the great influential thinkers of our time.
All the more reason....
Submitted by GeneralAl on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:24pm.
All the more reason to defeat Obama no matter who the nominee is in November and send as many Commiecrats packing from the house and senate. When we're once again in full control, lets round up all these Hollywood Commies and deport them to Cuba or China!
"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!
There is a good reason for this
Submitted by c5then on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:25pm.
The leftist / socialist agenda does not tolerate differences of opinion nor will it tolerate free speech for those who disagree with it's agenda and goals.
Why do liberals get completely and absolutely extreme when the issues are about religion and especially Christianity and its tenants? It's because the liberal ideology is driven by Satan. He is the master of this world and he will suffer no opposition to his complete and total dominion.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
1. Who? 2. He's still
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:33pm.
1. Who?
2. He's still alive?
3. What's he done lately?
4. Shut up and act.
5. Growing Pains was a stupid show.
Did I miss any standard responses?
Yes you did.
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:36pm.
6. Free Mumia.
7. No Blood for Oil 8.
Submitted by Jerry on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:15pm.
7. No Blood for Oil
8. Viva la Che
Day-um, UpNorth, ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 8:23pm.
a Super Zinger!
Don't see too many of those.
MD
living waters
Submitted by OuttaMyWay on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:59pm.
He continue to makes movies, like monumental.
and he is a partner at a ministry and speaks at their and other events, has 6 kids and raises chickens.
www.livingwaters.com
But Cameron
Submitted by misterbee241 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:18pm.
is right about this and that's what sticks in your craw, ain't it?
"Right"? Hm... No.
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:59pm.
"Right"?
Hm...
No.
Good for Kirk.
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:33pm.
Matthew 5:10
Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
2 Timothy 3:12
Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.
MARRIAGE according to me
Submitted by I hate marxists on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:13pm.
Marriage is the joining of a man and woman who share common interests and love in good and bad times. It was God's plan since he put Eve into the life of Adam to grow in abundance offspring of their love and affection, to have families and a hierarchy from the beginning of time.
Marriage is not between two men or two women.
Now having said that, any leftist that wishes to have a confrontation with me then step right up and let's go for it.
As far as Kirk Cameron is concerned, he stands by his beliefs and is too damn bad that it differs from the leftist idiots. I'll stand with him anytime especially up against these bufoons.
Hey speaking of big noses and elephant heads has anyone seen Bill Maher lately? He looks like he could occupy one of the stalls at the Bronx zoo next to Ollie the elephant. I'll bet none of you could tell one from the other. Hey speaking of Rosanne Barr how many pairs of BOOBS does she own. Man if she bends over I'll bet you could draw the entire world on her arse.
How many cutips does it take to clean Obama's ears? If a strong wind should happen he wouldn't have to us Air Force 1 he could just let his ears take him up.
how's that you leftist as - - h- - es
“I should be able to
Submitted by Jerry on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:26pm.
“I should be able to express moral views on social issues, especially those that have been the underpinning of Western civilization for 2,000 years — without being slandered, accused of hate speech, and told from those who preach ‘tolerance’ that I need to either bend my beliefs to their moral standards or be silent when I’m in the public square.”
What a wonderful rebuttal by a wonderful Christian. This man should run for office.
WoW!
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:48pm.
I almost spit coffee all over my keyboard until I looked at the "submitted by" again and saw it said "Jerry" and not "Jer". I thought maybe the poles had reversed polarity or the Cubs had won the world series!
Don't be silly. It is
Submitted by Ruths husband Ben on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:20pm.
Don't be silly. It is possible that someone could steal Jer's password and post such a post in his name. But the Cubs couldn't win the World Series even if the Card's played in their place.
I seem to get that a lot :-)
Submitted by Jerry on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:41pm.
I seem to get that a lot :-)
They can't stand the truth,
Submitted by GreenTea on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 1:50pm.
They can't stand the truth, they don't like being or feeling convicted of their sins so they do what they can to shut christians up..they would rather live in their own imaginative world that doesn't include the true God
For those capable of grasping history beyond the current moment
Submitted by lotr on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:04pm.
While I commend Kirk Cameron for not backing down before the Media Inquisition, and for pointing out the hypocrisy of being preached to about the latest pop-morality fashion du jour, at the end of the day there was nothing really profound about what he said, nor is his position limited strictly to Christian dogma.
The fact is, a paltry 15 years ago pretty much everybody would answered the same way -- that they would be against the proposition of "gay marriage."
And 50 years ago (you know, back in the "dark ages" when John F. Kennedy was president), the "reporter" would've been laughed out of the room and probably fired from his job for asking such an asinine, oxymoronic question.
The Only
Submitted by Mark81150 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:14pm.
The gay issue is stupid anyway, only 5% of the general population, and they have millions of people terrified to say anything which the gay lobby doesn't like, for fear of their career..
Christians, conservatives, men and especially conservative women are prime liberal targets. The activists are nothing more than a pink mafia working fist and fist with the ultra leftwing liberals to silence any conservative or traditional voice. They are only happy, when only their surragates hold the microphone, and will use any lie smear and slander to achieve that.
amazing that when their idiots fan out on the internet, they call our women sluts, accuse every conservative man of being in the closet, and then call them all evil and or crazy..
apperantly gay slurs are fine.. verbally assaulting women is ok
if it's a liberal accusing a conservative..
but a conservative saying being gay, is not healthy for the greater society, that's hate speech.. slips and says slut like the grand homies of the left.. and lets get out the tar..
I never used to hate anyone..
but the liberal left has taught me well,.. to hate them for their lies, distortions, their vile war against anyone who disagrees with their radical views.. it's a war.. and they drew first blood, and it will remain a war, till they remember how to act like a decent human being, and put being American ahead of being der uber liberal.
How long before Christians start getting arrested and prosecuted
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:40pm.
...for having committed a "hate crime" for daring to speak out against homosexuality?
I would say not very.
And if you don't think that day is coming, you need to go read the history of Germany during the inter-war years, and pay particular attention to 1935-1942.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Canada already has that.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:45pm.
And as Ottawa goes, so goes the world.
The truth will set you free
Submitted by russedav on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:34pm.
Sadly even dear Cameron and those defending him haven't a clue as to what they're saying/defending in our age of historical and especially Biblical illiteracy because history and the Bible clearly teach there's no such thing as the deranged, dimwitted "homosex-" or "gay" fraud, no matter the post-19th century Bible mistranslations that use the bogus "homosex-" to mistranslate "arsenokoitai," unlike in previous centuries when they were more educated and knew better. See "The gay invention" at www.touchstonemag.com for a fine article on how this is just a fascist propaganda war by vile lawless & thus fascist perverts like Kinsey to brainwash everyone into using their evil propaganda vocabulary instead of the Biblical vocabulary that used to control our former civilization/culture now perilously close to being lost, including today's fools who wickedly use "sex" as a verb instead of the only proper "have marital relations" of my '60s childhood days when both divorce and intimacy outside of true marriage versus today's counterfeits were a shocking rarity unlike our barbaric age of deranged lawless fascist lunacy where the inmates are running the asylum, especially seen in the white house.
Also see www.DrJudithReisman.org for how the deranged lawless and thus fascist pervert Kinsey (helped by his position with Indiana University) with connections with Nazi Germany, almost singlehandedly decimated America's moral jurisprudence. These clever fascist sodomite ploys (Adolf Hitler and his boyfriends) were amazingly successful and continue to today; we can only imagine the pull these perverts have at the white house. Only God can save us now.
Excellent advice
Submitted by Model850 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 4:56pm.
Fran Drescher, star of “Happily Divorced” lectured Cameron in civics, telling CBS he should "reexamine what it is to be an American."
Outstanding advice, Fran. You should heed it, because last I checked Americans have the right to voice an opinion. And "what it is to be an American" is much, much broader than your apparently narrow view that all dissent against the gay lifestyle is un-American and that all Americans apparently are required to wholeheartedly embrace the practitioners of it.
And yes, I understand that this is not a First Amendment case as it is not government (directly) trying to silence Kirk. Nevertheless this is a free country -- though for how much longer is anybody's guess -- and Kirk has every right to speak his mind, just as his detractors have every right to criticize him for his views. Criticize -- NOT silence.
Tongue-in-cheek thought: If the opposite of homosexual is straight then doesn't it follow that the opposite of straight is warped?
The most radical and out-spoken members of the homosexual community always seem so angry and miserable I cannot understand why they label themselves as "gay."
Heh. Ever hear a radical gay
Submitted by ozarkian on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:29pm.
Heh. Ever hear a radical gay talk about "breeders"?
I wasn't quoting bru
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 5:48pm.
because i dont know who bru is.
Cameron is saying its detrimental to society. How?
Kirk Cameron on marriage
Submitted by Steve Cakouros on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 6:10pm.
Homosexual marriage is an oxymoron. We cannot marry our own gender. It is impossible for all the following reasons.
[1]Marriage is a sexual union. We are not designed so that we can have sex with our own sexual type. Homosexuality is an anatomical contradiction.
[2] Marriage is for the purpose of propagation within a family structure. Homosexuals cannot propagate.
[3] Marriage illustrates according to the New Testament the mystery of Christ in communion with His church. In that union Christ [He] is the groom and the church [she] is the submissive bride. Marriage is thus being defined in that passage. It therefore cannot be between two brides or two grooms. That would be impossible. The metaphor would break down. [see Ephesians 5:25-33]
I salute Kirk Cameron.
The Left must be crazy to try and further the agenda of deviates and child molesters who want to thought of as married. In old Greece they passed a law which said that any male found in the gymnasium [school] who was not a father to one of the students was sentenced to death. We need such laws.
I hope the queer community will recognize that homosexual marriages are flatly contradicted by both reason and revelation.
I'm sure they'll get right on
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 6:31pm.
I'm sure they'll get right on board with you, given your tremendous death penalty ideas...
Ok Steve
Submitted by Vandamage2000 on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 12:21am.
Thats as extreme as it gets. Good luck selling that "no father-less children in gyms" law.
Death penalties and religion in civil laws aside, would you be willing to enforce laws that prohibit childless couples from being married?
How about barren women and men who cant impregnate women? Will they also be not allowed to marry?
Perez, Barr, Behar, Drescher
Submitted by soCal on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 7:06pm.
poster children for TOLERANCE
⇒ Sarah burns Obama!!!
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:23pm.
In answer to a question as to whether she had received an apology from Bill Maher or a phone call from the President on Maher's comments:
"Granted, Barack Obama, I think, has never been seen in the conventional, traditional way we would describe a man of valor" Sarah Palin (8 minutes into Hannity, 3/8/12)
Got that right, Sarah.
And may I add? I find it disgusting that now, a second time, The President of the United States conjures up the image of his very much underage daughters in defense of his permissive ideology towards sex.
Sarah, sweet gaudy Star of
Submitted by PaleHorse on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:36pm.
Sarah, sweet gaudy Star of David necklace, puke green shirt, and Faux Leather jacket. How long until we can be done with her? She is truly an embarrassment to herself and the Republican party.
⇒ Thanks Palehorse
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:48pm.
Your frantic attempt, through contrived visual imagery, to direct attention away from her remark indicates your inability to think of anything in refutation of it.
expect it cool*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:49pm.
Superficial instead of substantive is because things are pretty bleak in the basement this time of year
I think you mean refudiation.
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:51pm.
I think you mean refudiation.
Yeah, bal, like when you ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:55pm.
refudiated Mumia
What's that you say?
You refuted him?
Oh.
You didn't do that either?
Well, my, my.
Carry on with your supercilious twaddle about Palin, then.
MD
⇒ Now that's a good one, bal
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:55pm.
That's funny. So I won't apply all of my previous reply to you. You get a pass on the misdirection (because I'm still soft bigotizing you with low expectations)
Got to celebrate it! :-)
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:51pm.
Got to celebrate it! :-)
Here ya' go Balboa*
Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:01pm.
Your "man of valor".
Refudiate THIS
http://www.hapblog.com/2009/07/white-house-blog-photos-show-sgt.html
Palid Pony,
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 10:58pm.
As a Jew, I couldn't care less if Sarah - a Christian - wears a Magen David or not. What the hell does it matter to you anyway?
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
So you want to play definitions, Piers?
Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Sat, 04/14/2012 - 3:19pm.
The word/name "Piers" can be traced to the Latin petra meaning "rock" or "stone".
One definition of a "pier" is a stone barrier.
Some might infer from all this that you have rocks in your head, and that your brain is a barrier against reason and rational thought.
Indeed, people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones or piers.
And most ex-child "stars" should just move on.
The Hogans???
Must have missed that one.