Islamophobia-obsessed Media Silent on Anti-Semitic 'Hate Crimes' at Indiana U
Most Americans are probably unaware that Jews were the victims of more than eight times as many anti-religion hate crimes last year as were Muslims. And the reason is simple: anti-Muslim crimes receive far more media attention.
Case in point: the media has been all but silent on a slew of anti-Semitic acts of vandalism at Indiana University, coinciding with the beginning of the celebration of Hanukkah (h/t Stephen Richer):
A series of anti-Semitic acts of vandalism aimed at various Jewish facilities on and near campus has caused Indiana University police to contact local FBI officials and members of the U.S. Department of Justice for help with their investigation.
On Monday, eight different Hebrew texts were taken from the shelves at Indiana University’s Wells Library and distributed to eight different men’s bathrooms, where they were thrown in toilets and urinated on, university officials confirmed. The defiled books were from the research collections section on the sixth and seventh floors of the library.
On Tuesday morning within an hour, two more rock throwing incidents at Jewish facilities were reported to police. At 7:50 a.m. Tuesday, someone threw a rock into the staff directory sign of the Jewish Studies Program in Goodbody Hall.
And earlier at 7:15 a.m. Tuesday, the Chabad House Jewish Student Center got hit with a rock for the second time in a week — this time, a rock was hurled through an upstairs apartment window and struck a wall, according to Chabad House Rabbi Yehoshua Chincholker.
"He meant to hit people, not only windows; this is my assumption," he said.
A woman was in the apartment when the rock was thrown, but was not injured, according to a news release from campus police.
"It seems to be escalating," said Jeffrey Veidlinger, IU’s director of Jewish studies. He said the recent acts of vandalism, especially the defiling of the Hebrew texts, are being used to intimidate and instill fear in the Jewish community. "People are worried. People are concerned."
Veidlinger said the books that were destroyed were all commentaries on the Talmud, the code of Jewish law, and are considered sacred.
"Anyone who knows anything about the defilement of books — that’s disturbing," he said.
And the media certainly know a thing or two about the defilement of books. They devoted quite a bit of coverage to a crazy pastor in Florida who had a plan to burn copies of the Koran on September 11. The plan absolutely dominated the news cycle for days.
And more than that, the media used the plan (which was not carried out) to hype a rise in "Islamophobia" in the United States. CNN.com characterized much of the media's attitude throughout the controversy when it claimed that in just a few weeks in August and September, "Muslims and mosques have been attacked, and Islamophobia has boiled up."
A writer at Salon.com channeled the attitude of many media liberals when he claimed that "the leaders of the right-wing’s anti-Muslim brigade" such as Sarah Palin and Sean Hannity "owe this man a fruit basket. He may not have sparked the recent explosion of Islamophobia, but he’s done as much as just about anyone to drag it into the mainstream."
Time's Bobby Ghosh echoed this sentiment, claiming that "there is a lot of Islamophobia about in this country, and it's growing and becoming more vicious, and, with this latest mosque controversies- not one, but several controversies around the country- it's coming into the mainstream, and that is reason for alarm."
A few Muslims and mosques were of course attacked. But if the media is so concerned about religious phobias - irrational fear towards certain religions - as evinced by anti-religious "hate crimes," where is its concern for the tide of anti-Semitism sweeping the nation (as it must be, by the media standard established during the Koran-burning controversy)?
Of course a few incidents of anti-Jewish or anti-Muslim hatred are not indicative of a national mood or trend. The United States is not dominated by anti-Semitism because a few despicable people decide to desecrate holy Jewish texts, just as the country is not being overrun by Islamophobia because a crazy pastor burns some Korans or some thug throws a brick through a mosque window.
But it would be nice to see some consistency. If America is Islamophobic because numerous hate crimes are committed against Muslims each year, then certainly it must also be anti-Semitic, given the vastly greater number of hate crimes crimes committed against Jews.
We know, of course, that the vast majority of the American people are neither Islamophobic, nor anti-Semitic, and that irrational religious hatreds are not part of the "mainstream." Now if someone would only inform the nation's talking heads.
- Lachlan Markay's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
I don't understand why
Submitted by Satchmo on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 3:00pm.
I don't understand why supposed conservatives are so quick to accept and use liberal terminology and beliefs. Racist/racism, hate crimes, and hate speech are three ideas that the left have defined or redefined, and instead of challenging it, they've been accepted. There is no such thing as a hate crime; hate crime equals thought crime. Please, quit using their terms on their conditions.
First if you'll notice, 'hate
Submitted by scarebear83 on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 4:24pm.
First if you'll notice, 'hate crimes' marked in single quotes in the title, implying that they are using their word. Secondly I believe the idea behind using the term hate crime in the article is only to point out hypocrisy. If the left is quick to show any sign of "islamophobia" then they need to be quick to point out anti-semitism. So basically, if one's going to call it a hate crime against muslims then they better be consistent and point out "hate crimes" against jews.
It's not news that the left
Submitted by Satchmo on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 4:58pm.
It's not news that the left are hypocrites, but using their own code against them doesn't and hasn't ever worked. While it's the ultimate crime for a conservative or Republican in the eyes of a liberal, it is not a code they apply to themselves. In fact, it underscores my point about letting them set the terms on their conditions and allowing them to create and control the framework.
Does Whoopi believe this story...
Submitted by jimbo297 on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 3:16pm.
...cuz she most certainly did not belive that Jews were threatened as recently as the O'Reilly broadcast.
No different than when 5
Submitted by mostlymoderate on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 4:18pm.
No different than when 5 black thugs rape, sodomize, kill and mutilate their victims. The media will usually stay 'mum'. A prime example is the Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome murders a few years back.
Meanwhile, you get a muslim or a black guy that has a rock or something thrown at them, it makes the news for months. Perfect example was the Jena noose hanging prank.
Hate crimes bills are nothing more than 'affirmative action for the judicial system'. The bills only benefit a few groups that have been deemed to "need more attention and protections" than other groups of people. We are not equal when it comes to hate crimes.
Ban exchange students
Submitted by mzk1 on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 4:25pm.
We have to ban student visas for Moslem countries in the Middle East, except for religious minorities (including certain Muslim sects) that need them as a first step to refugee status. Thiey come over here and persecute the Jewish students, and this has to stop.
Oh, I'm sorry, it's not anti-semitism, it's just anti-zionism. Yeah, right!
Has
Submitted by NDanielson on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 4:40pm.
anybody questioned Helen Thomas yet? She's had a lot of time on her hands lately.
Suicide by Ideologues
Submitted by The Grooter on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 4:48pm.
The only explanation must be that the media wants to commit suicide by ideologues. This goes for their buddies teaching in the universities as well. Whether it is commies, maoists, muslims, fascists or socialists, the media and the academics do whatever they can to support any cause so long as the central premise is: As soon as we have power, the first people we kill will be the media and the academics. Sort of a broad-based Kool-aide pact.
The Grooter
It does not fit the media's
Submitted by WarEagle66 on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 4:59pm.
It does not fit the media's anti-Jewish agenda. All people have to do is start calling them out on it. Every time someone is on the air with them and they say stupid stuff, call them on it.
Now If That Isn't A Hate Crime, I Don't Know What Is...
Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Thu, 12/09/2010 - 12:21am.
As I've stated before, the Jewish people are uniquely targeted as scapegoats because their religion is also a race, which gives the accusers the ammunition to carry out such crimes including ethnic cleansing. What surprises me, though, is how underreported this particular story is. I'd like to think it is a conspiracy by the MSM to start a new race war against the Jews, but based on the facts that I know about media news producing and reporting, my ultimate conclusion is that they are simply cowards who don't want to offend the wrong people, judging by some of the responses of offending Islamic "sensibilities" (though it's kind of strange, if not sick, if one of your sensibilities is to kill over a hundred people over a mess of cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad).
This particular incident, by the way, pokes a hole in the logic of not just appeasing Islamo-Nazi extremists, but also (and I mean to a lesser extent) the idiotic whining over that crucifix with ants crawling over it. The most you can say about that is that it isn't attempting to murder you.