Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 13, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Lachlan Markay's blog
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

FNC's Chris Wallace 'Offended' That People Watch Scarborough, Denies Rolling Eyes At Palin

By Lachlan Markay | February 11, 2010 | 16:50

Change font size:  A |  A

Fox News's Chris Wallace Thursday blasted Joe Scarborough for suggesting that he rolled his eyes at the camera after Sunday's interview with Sarah Palin, and said he was "offended" people even watched the former Congressman on MSNBC.

The "Fox News Sunday" host was referring to what transpired on Monday's "Morning Joe."

"Look at the end of Chris Wallace's interview where he rolls his eyes, uh, embarrassed. There's no doubt he is," said Scarborough. "Now he will deny that, but Chris was sending a message to all his friends, 'yes I know she is not a serious thinker.'"

As Scarborough predicted, Wallace did deny the charge. Asked by Fox's Megyn Kelly if the eyes had rolled, Wallace said, "no, is the quick answer to that," adding that he wasn't offended the MSNBCer had suggested such, but only that people watched "Morning Joe" in the first place (video below the fold, full transcript to be added soon, h/t Johnny Dollar):

KELLY: Alright Wallace, true or not true, confirm or deny, did you roll the eyes or didn't you?

WALLACE: No, is the quick answer to that. Secondly, let me just say that Joe Scarborough lives out where the trollies don't run at night. The last time I heard of somebody getting that kind of a secret message it was Son of Sam hearing from a labrador retriever that he should go out and shoot people. And I think that Morning Joe definitely needs to switch to decaf.

KELLY: Okay but, in Joe Scarborough's defense, it's not just Joe. Others on the Internet then picked up on it and started speculating as well. Did you or did you not roll your eyes? What was that look into the camera? What was happening with those eyes when they cut back to you on the set?

WALLACE: Listen, you know, and here's one thing I'm going to disagree with you about, the idea that that's what most people are talking about. In fact what most people are talking about, and certainly here in Washington the political chattering class, is Sarah Palin.

I mean there was a column today by that notoriously conservative columnist David Broder in the Washington Post, and also a column by that other conservative Joe Klein in Time Magazine, based on that interview saying what a formative political figure Sarah Palin is now, that she really does seem to have captured the populist unrest and anger int he country, that she is going to be a real player if she chooses to run for the Republican nomination in 2012. I think Broder finished his column by saying, 'this lady is good.'

I came away from the interview with nothing but admiration for Sarah Palin. And this idea, you know its interesting people talk about Palin Derangement Syndrome. The fact is I threw everything at her in that half an hour about Obama, about Rush Limbaugh, and the R-word, about all kinds of things, and there was a beat, a pause. I thought she did a first rate job. The sarah plain of the Republican Convention is back and the deer in the headlights of later on in the campaign is long gone and forgotten.

KELLY: Chris are you offended when you hear something like that, when you hear somebody like, you know, scarborough say, and this is a quote, "Chris was sending a message to all his friends, 'yes I know she is not a serious thinker.' "

WALLACE: I'm offended that people watch him on MSNBC.

Later in the interview, Kelly asked Wallace if he was offended that Scarborough had suggested he rolled his eyes in contempt of Sarah Palin. "I'm offended that people watch him on MSNBC," he responded.

Wallace did briefly look at the camera, as one can see if (and only if) the camera zooms in and freezes frame right as Wallace turns his eyes to the lens. But "it's not just Joe" who thinks Wallace rolled his eyes, as Kelly noted. The blogosphere has been buzzing with that suggestion.

Wallace gave a "real" eye roll at the end of the segment to provide contrast.

Whether or not Wallace did roll his eyes, one thing is certain: Sarah Palin has the ability to stir up controversies about the most insignificant details. As Wallace told Kelly, Palin Derangement Syndrome seems to be on the rise.

Share this

About the Author

Lachlan Markay is an associate with Dialog New Media. Click here to follow Lachlan Markay on Twitter.
  • Chris Wallace
  • Joe Scarborough
  • Megyn Kelly
  • Sarah Palin
  • Fox News Channel
  • Morning Joe
  • MSNBC
  • Other FNC
  • Lachlan Markay's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • ⇒ We're not shocked
    6 min 32 sec ago
  • wonder what Rachel thinks about Al's thinking
    31 min 31 sec ago
  • Yeah,
    34 min 11 sec ago
  • Understanding the Required Minimum Distribution is on my short
    36 min 55 sec ago
  • After the movie comes out
    55 min 54 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Breitbart Warns MSNBC: 'We’re Watching You to Play the Race Card'
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.