Conservatives are resuming their historically dominant position atop the New York Times and Amazon.com bestsellers lists after a short hiatus that coincided, not coincidentally, with George W. Bush's tenure in the White House.
While the mainstream media raved about a new era of leftist intellectual supremacy during the liberal ascendance on the bestsellers lists, the return of conservative books to the tops of those lists seems to be going unnoticed.
Amazon, which, unlike the New York Times, ranks books according to the number of actual copies sold, shows Glenn Beck's Common Sense rounding out the top, with Michelle Malkin's Culture of Corruption coming in a close second. Ron Paul's End the Fed comes in at number seven, Mark Levin's Liberty and Tyranny is at number nine, and at number 22 is Dick Morris and Eileen Mcgann's Catastrophe, which carries the blunt sub-heading, "How Obama, Congress, and the special interests are transforming... a slump into a crash, freedom into socialism, and a disaster into a catastrophe... and how to fight back."
The New York Times, which uses an opaque though accurate algorithm to rank its bestsellers, has Culture of Corruption at number one, Liberty and Tyranny at number five, Catastrophe at number seven, Bill O'Reilly's memoir A Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity at number eight, and Robert Wright's less political but ostensibly conservative The Evolution of God at number 12.
The New York Times ranks paperbacks separately, and puts Common Sense at second on that list. Further down, at number 14, is Timothy Keller's The Reason for God, a spirited defense of Christian faith.
The left is reeling from this regression to the pre-Bush days, which also saw conservative dominance of the bestsellers lists. From 1991 to 2001, there were eight overtly conservative books that topped the NYT list, while only two liberal authors, Al Franken and Hillary Clinton, managed to publish number-one bestsellers.
All that changed as Bush's approval ratings began to decline and the Times's bestsellers list became a political battleground. From 2002 through 2008, 16 books by conservatives managed to take the number one spot on the Times's list, while 15 books topped the list that were written by leftist authors or were primarily criticisms of the Bush Administration or its policies.
In 2003, as Bush's numbers faltered, the left proclaimed its comeback on the bestsellers list. In September of that year, the Boston Globe proclaimed liberals "triumphant" against "conservatives' decade long hold on popular culture." The Globe was celebrating the upcoming bestsellers list that showed five liberal books in the top 15 hard-cover bestsellers. Many of them seemed to be about lies (Al Franken's Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them, and Joe Conason's Big Lies to name a couple).
In October 2003, Gersh Kuntzman gleefully proclaimed on Newsweek.com that "the best-seller list, once the sole bastion of conservative screeds by Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity and Rush ‘OxyContin is my Co-Pilot' Limbaugh, is now crammed with liberal broadsides. TO THIS UNABASHED lefty, it all adds up to one thing: We're back, baby, we're back! And, man, it feels good!"
With the Times's bestseller list boasting five liberal books out of the top 10, Kuntzman rejoiced at the thought that liberals would finally fight back, and would no longer "[keep] our mouths shut while the right-wing [takes] sole possession of God, the flag, national security and family values (things we think are pretty damn important, too - except, of course, God)." Interesting, after so readily bashing religion, that Kuntzman went on to compare his elation with a sailor taking "shore leave at the nearest brothel."
Yes, it seemed such wonderful liberal values were finally en vogue. Barnes and Noble, reacting to the outpouring of Bush-bashing literature in August of 2003 announced that it would set up ‘political science/cultural affairs' tables at its stores to feature the newest partisan works.
But conservatives have reclaimed their hold on the Times's bestseller page. The closest any of the top 15 hard-cover non-fiction books gets to a defense of liberalism or the Obama Administration is In Fed We Trust by David Wessel, which argues that the Bernanke Fed staved off an even deeper economic down-turn.
The intense rivalry felt during the Bush years was a symptom not of a long-term trend in political publishing, but rather the political trends of the time. Strong anti-Bush sentiment among Americans provided a strong market for anti-Bush writings.
"The books from the left strike me as an obvious reaction to Bush," conservative commentator Tucker Carlson told the Associated Press in 2003. "And for people who buy them, it's a way of voting against him in an off-election year."
With Bush gone, liberals no longer have a blatant target at whom to direct a coordinated literary and rhetorical assault. The rise of conservative works on the bestsellers list could be explained away as a similar trend (that is, distaste for Obama sells books, and his poll numbers have reached a new low) were it not for the fact that conservative tomes continued to do well during the first years of Bush's administration.
Given the Times's reticence to even review Culture of Corruption, Liberty and Tyranny, or Catastrophe, it does not seem that the mainstream media will seize on this trend as they did during the Bush years to proclaim the beginning of a new era of political thought-or the return to an old one.
Malkin reported recently that liberal authors have launched a campaign explicitly designed to bump her, Beck, and O'Reilly off of the Times's roll of top-sellers. She told me in an email today that she does not see a forthcoming shift in the treatment of successful conservative books, including her own, by the New York Times or other major media outlets.
"There's been a major shift in the political landscape. There's a hunger for a counter-narrative to the Hope and Change propaganda disseminated by the mainstream media. The New York Times is still deluding itself into believing that conservatives can't/don't read books.
"The Times will only cover conservative books when they start falling off its best-seller lists."



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The irony is that Bush was hardly a rock-ribbed conservative...
September 1, 2009 - 22:48 ET by wnaegeleSigh!
The Libtards only read
September 1, 2009 - 23:44 ET by RR GOPThe Libtards only read stuff that:
1. Fits into their ideology.
2. Impresses their Libtard friends, potential sex partners and college professors (maybe all the same?).
3. Makes them feel outlandishly intellectual and superior to the masses of humanity.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
4. Drastically marked down
September 2, 2009 - 14:53 ET by SickofLibs4. Drastically marked down
Libs read??
September 2, 2009 - 18:14 ET by DarkwolfeLibs read??
WE DON'T NEED NO EDUCATION...
September 2, 2009 - 19:43 ET by danybhoyLibs control the schools, it's their fault.
"...How blind can you be, don't you see...
...that the gambler lost all he does not have..."
Nightwish
RR GOP...
September 2, 2009 - 18:35 ET by JerThe Libtards only read stuff that:
1. Fits into their ideology.
2. Impresses their Libtard friends, potential sex partners and college professors (maybe all the same?).
3. Makes them feel outlandishly intellectual and superior to the masses of humanity.
I don't have a lot of time. Can you suggest one book that fulfills all three objectives. And preferably one I can begin reading after dinner and finish before Olbermann.
Thanks...
Jer
Jer
September 2, 2009 - 19:20 ET by well99The cat in the hat?
Maybe...but it sounds a
September 2, 2009 - 20:49 ET by JerMaybe...but it sounds a bit challenging. Is there a cliff note version? Monkey notes?
Jer
Jer... Monkey
September 2, 2009 - 20:51 ET by bigtimerJer...
Monkey notes?
Aren't you being racist?
'Go Green...Recycle Congress'
BT
September 2, 2009 - 20:58 ET by MightyMouthI think Jer is a closet conservative, he just doesn't want to admit it to the people he drinks/shoots with. No really, it's like a "fix" with Jer... He has his antagonists at NB but he must satisfy his drinkin' buddies in liberal Hell where he resides.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM... Lol...Sounds like
September 2, 2009 - 20:59 ET by bigtimerMM...
Lol...Sounds like 'Monkey Business' to me.
'Go Green...Recycle Congress'
Monkey business for sure BT.
September 2, 2009 - 21:11 ET by MightyMouthStill Jer ranks up there with balboa as one who has not been punted to the "Access Denied" zone. A welcome poster (although damnnear almost always wrong!) yet respectful, but still a mislead dummy!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Mr. Mouth...
September 2, 2009 - 22:44 ET by JerMy drinkin' and shootin' buddies are all conservatives (although I haven't done either in a while). I swap recipes with my lib pals.
Jer
bt...Monkey Notes
September 2, 2009 - 22:49 ET by JerI had never heard of them either until a clerk at Barnes & Noble mentioned them when I was looking for a copy of The Lost Horizon [for my son] several weeks ago.
Jer
Jer
September 2, 2009 - 22:38 ET by well99Not sure.I am still on page 2.I want to find out how to get that nifty hat.
Jer-"I don't have a lot of
September 2, 2009 - 22:21 ET by RR GOPJer-"I don't have a lot of time. Can you suggest one book that fulfills all three objectives. And preferably one I can begin reading after dinner and finish before Olbermann.
Hmmm. Well, anything by Noam Chomsky, but you can always just say you've read it and no one would be the wiser. Chicks dig guys who have read Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (actually any work with "zen" in the title)...that's a fairly quick read. Then there's Upton Sinclair's The Jungle. The Communist Manifesto is pretty short...
Siddhartha, Steppenwolf, The Razor's Edge, Campbell's Myths to Live By, Journey to Ixtlan, Maus I and II, and possibly Cows, Pigs, Wars and Witches.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
Thanks, RR GOP... I've
September 2, 2009 - 23:07 ET by JerThanks, RR GOP...
I've never read Chomsky, but I have tossed his name out at a couple of cocktail parties. I bought Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance years ago just to have on my bookshelf as per your "chicks dig guys etc." theory. Don't know if it worked or not. I know it didn't to the extent I would have liked. Big fan of Upton Sinclair. When he ran for governor of California back in the 30's, he was the target of what is considered to be the genesis of the modern era of negative campaigning. I keep The Communist Manifesto on the nightstand to frequently peruse and refresh my talking points. ;-)
Appreciate the recs: I'll print out your list.
Jer
Well
September 2, 2009 - 01:50 ET by well99The left prefer fiction to facts.Look at their arguments.
well99
September 2, 2009 - 08:28 ET by Georgia GirlExactly. Which also explains why it would be hard for a lib to come up with a great book right now. They don't want to talk issues. They just want to bash people -- because they have nothing substantial to say, and they're too squishy to spell out their views and agendas. Like healthcare...it's no mistake nobody knows (or claims to know) what the heck Obama has been gunning for with that -- heck, Obama won't even tell us.
If a liberal wrote a book
September 2, 2009 - 08:45 ET by anonymous621If a liberal wrote a book titled: "Obama is awesome and Bush is a Mr. Poopy Pants", it would go through the roof. Like you said, liberals only can bash others.
-Eric
Anonymously Eric
September 2, 2009 - 08:57 ET by Georgia GirlHa! You know, I can almost picture that in a Barnes and Noble bookstore. ((*_*))
You'll be able to find it
September 2, 2009 - 10:02 ET by anonymous621You'll be able to find it in the children's section. It's part of the indoctrination to a greater Socialist Motherland. The foreward is by Bill Maher, and it has an accompanying cd by Eddie Vedder doing a spoken-word rendition of all Obama's speeches set to Phillip Glass music. It'll be the hottest thing since Bratz. I'm hoping I can get a signed copy.
-Eric
Too real...
September 2, 2009 - 10:16 ET by Georgia GirlI shudder at the thought that it all seems so very possible. ((*_*))
Just wondering
September 2, 2009 - 07:24 ET by tarunkjuyalCan you say "coincided, not coincidentally"?
As if we need more proof...
September 2, 2009 - 07:25 ET by P. Aaron...the healthcare debate, C(r)ap & Trade, the bestselling books: it's obvious Conservatives READ.
It's the Liberals who ask someone else to interpret things for them
The MSM and covering Conservative resurgence.
September 2, 2009 - 07:29 ET by Airforce_5_OThe NYT and the MSM don’t want you to know that the Conservatives are making sense on Obama and the Democrats in Congress.
Right now the President is losing the battle with the Independents that put him in office who were looking for change. They got a spending bill and more debt shoved down their throats and its left a bitter taste.
Now that the Presidents numbers are down you are going to see a shift in thought. I predict the Public Option going off the table. I see the President having to take the route of eating the parts of the bill that will keep it from passing. That will hurt him with his liberal base but they will still blindly pull the lever come 2010 and 2012 for the Dems.
It’s very humbling to have your God knocked from his throne on high. Right NYT?
Liberalism: The haunting feeling that someone, somewhere, can help themselves.
Political Book
September 2, 2009 - 08:49 ET by AvitarOne of the problems is that the objectives of the conservative and liberal books are not very similar. The conservative books like Mark Levin's are largely philosophy. What is good and how to treat people in society. The liberal books are advertising for power. Elect liberals and all good things follow and anyone who elects conservatives is an evil creature who will poison children if they are free. This is despite also advocating abortion and eugenics policy.
Stand back!!!!
September 2, 2009 - 09:45 ET by TexndocI adore Michelle Malkin and Mark Levin, but the liberal heads are going to explode when Glenn Beck's new book probably debuts at #1 on The NYT Bestseller's list and sits there for quite a while. Glenn is the boggieman-du-jour, don't you know?
The emperor has no
September 2, 2009 - 09:58 ET by QueenMumThe emperor has no clothes.
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people's money."
—Margaret Thatcher
A minor change
September 2, 2009 - 18:16 ET by DarkwolfeChange "socialism" to "liberalism" in Thatcher's quote and get the same results.
SHARP DRESSED MAN...
September 2, 2009 - 19:45 ET by danybhoyYea, & Bill Clinton trys not to wear pants.
"...How blind can you be, don't you see...
...that the gambler lost all he does not have..."
Nightwish
Bestsellers
September 2, 2009 - 10:48 ET by ajc55nyPoor Gersh Kuntzman. It must be lonely to hate your political opponents so much you need to attack them personally, as Gersh did with Rush Limbaugh. But with a name like Kuntzman, I understand from where the anger comes.
Speaking of his anger, let's send him a Chismakkuh gift too
September 3, 2009 - 02:45 ET by legacyrepublicanSo, let's all send him a Chismakkuh gift that he will dreadal!
All together now, "VOTE THE BUMS OUT!"
Gersh can turn off Rush if he doesn't like him, but we can't turn off the radicals running the show unless we turn them out first. And, boy, is that coming soon.
Somewhat related point:
September 2, 2009 - 13:41 ET by anonymous621Somewhat related point: If conservatives dominate the NYT bestseller list, have the highest ratings on their news shows, and are representative of more than half of America's population, then how in the hell did we lose this last election? The numbers just don't add up. Is it that we didn't vote? Is it that we didn't vote for the RINO McCain and that's why we lost? We have the numbers. We have the votes. I just cannot figure out how it is we lost. Did ACORN really fudge the election that well?
-Eric
On TV libs dilute their market share
September 2, 2009 - 14:08 ET by Matthew Sheffieldbetween ABCBSNBCNNMSNBCNNHNPBS.
Conservatives, meanwhile, have one channel on cable which has a strong presence there.
I see what you're saying,
September 2, 2009 - 20:09 ET by anonymous621I see what you're saying, but I'm looking a bit deeper. I mean, seriously, if America is so conservative, (and we are at our core), then how in the world did Obama win this election? Are there not more of us than of them? It just doesn't add up. Something is fishy here. Call it my political ignorance, as I'm just a simple-minded right-winger, but something just ain't right. Does my quest for the truth make sense, or am I trying to ice skate uphill?
-Eric
Hate
September 2, 2009 - 14:45 ET by 1uncle1uncle: All of us should calm down . The Kenyan won after 8 going on 9 years of lies and negativism. Nazi Gooebbels said it works to repeat lies. It did. If you can't imagine someone voting Al Franken into office, neither can I. We have a lot, too many, uneducated people in the country. It started with the demos using our taxes to breed demorats on welfare and dumbing down the schools for them, The thing that is needed to reverse this is for the states to get back the power ursurped for the Feds and The Kenyan either through tenth amendment to the constitution or another added to the constitution preventing congress from spending our taxes on special interest groups. Term limits might help also. IMPORTANT