NBC's Guthrie: Does Romney Look Like He Has 'Something to Hide'?
In an interview with Republican strategist Steve Schmidt on Monday's NBC Today, co-host Savannah Guthrie portrayed Mitt Romney's decision not to release more tax returns as a sign of guilt: "Mitt Romney is within the letter of the law, but he's on the low end of the norm. Do you think that he's left the impression with voters that perhaps he does have something to hide?"
A list appeared on screen of the amount of tax returns released by other presidential candidates in past years as Schmidt provided a bland response that only reinforced Guthrie's assertion: "...when you don't disclose something, one side is demanding you disclose it. People in your own party are saying you ought to disclose it. I think the American people look at it and they go immediately to, 'What's he hiding?' Whether that's a fair conclusion or not."
Guthrie followed up with these questions:
> On this issue of Bain Capital, it seems that the Obama campaign is trying to turn this major credential that Romney has to run for president into a liability. Have they been successful at doing that?
> In one sense, are you surprised that the Romney campaign isn't better prepared for these attacks? It's well-known that this was the Obama campaign's plan to go after him in this way and Newt Gingrich did it during the primary?
Guthrie rounded out the series of anti-Romney questions by wondering: "Real quickly, Romney asked the President to apologize for these attacks. Was that smart?"
Schmidt took the bait and ripped the Romney camp:
No, I don't think it was a particularly smart thing to do. For one, Mitt Romney's not a particularly sympathetic character on this front. No one feels sorry for him. The race is about the American people. It's not about Mitt Romney. It's not about Mitt Romney's feelings on an issue like this. So Mitt Romney would have been much better off, I think, hitting back, pivoting, pivoting to a contrast on the economy, and begin taking the fight to the President.
Here is a full transcript of the July 16 interview:
7:06AM ET
SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Steve Schmidt is an MSNBC political analyst and served as senior advisor to John McCain's campaign in 2008. Steve, good morning to you.
STEVE SCHMIDT: Good morning, Savannah.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Decision 2012; Obama Doubles Down on Bain Attack as Romney Fights Back]
GUTHRIE: Let's start on this issue of the tax returns. If you look at what presidential candidates have turned over in the last few years, you see that, of course, Mitt Romney is within the letter of the law, but he's on the low end of the norm. Do you think that he's left the impression with voters that perhaps he does have something to hide?
SCHMIDT: Well, I think one of the things that characterizes our politics today, Savannah, is the collapse of trust in institutions of government by the American people. So when you don't disclose something, one side is demanding you disclose it. People in your own party are saying you ought to disclose it. I think the American people look at it and they go immediately to, "What's he hiding?" Whether that's a fair conclusion or not.
GUTHRIE: And so you think he should just go ahead, turn it over, just to make this issue go away?
SCHMIDT: I think it's a very difficult issue going forward. And you know, it's really a – you know they have a big decision to make. If they're going to fold on this and they're going to release more, they should do it now. If they're going to dig in on it, they need to make sure that they're going to dig in on it permanently and they're going to ride out all the bad press that's going to come from it.
GUTHRIE: On this issue of Bain Capital, it seems that the Obama campaign is trying to turn this major credential that Romney has to run for president into a liability. Have they been successful at doing that?
SCHMIDT: Well, they haven't been successful so far when you look at the polls. It remains a very, very close race. But there's no doubt that they're trying to knock down one of the central pillars of Romney's candidacy, which is his ability to give a critique of the President on the economy from his private sector experience. And the Obama campaign is going at that very, very hard right now.
GUTHRIE: If nothing else, Romney is now on the Obama campaign's agenda. He scheduled five network interviews late last week to respond to these issues. In one sense, are you surprised that the Romney campaign isn't better prepared for these attacks? It's well-known that this was the Obama campaign's plan to go after him in this way and Newt Gingrich did it during the primary?
SCHMIDT: Look, these Bain attacks have been a centerpiece of attacks against Mitt Romney since 1994 when he ran for office. They knew it was coming. I think that this is much more part of the rhythm of a presidential campaign. This is Mitt Romney's first real defensive posture since he's won the Republican nomination. Both campaigns go through this. And it's the campaigns that are best able to handle the down cycles that wind up on top in November.
GUTHRIE: Real quickly, Romney asked the President to apologize for these attacks. Was that smart?
SCHMIDT: No, I don't think it was a particularly smart thing to do. For one, Mitt Romney's not a particularly sympathetic character on this front. No one feels sorry for him. The race is about the American people. It's not about Mitt Romney. It's not about Mitt Romney's feelings on an issue like this. So Mitt Romney would have been much better off, I think, hitting back, pivoting, pivoting to a contrast on the economy, and begin taking the fight to the President.
GUTHRIE: And Steve, I can't let you go without asking about the VP selection process. You were the man who was integral in the selection of Sarah Palin back in 2008. Do you think the Romney campaign should go for a game change or play it safe?
SCHMIDT: No, I think it's a very different election cycle. You know, four years is a long time in politics. I think the Romney campaign has been very safe, very cautious, and I think you're going to see them look to a safe, very cautious pick in this race, because they're in a very close race and the fact is we weren't four years ago.
GUTHRIE: Alright, Steve Schmidt, great to get your perspective. Thank you very much.
SCHMIDT: Great. Good to be with you, Savannah. Thank you.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Did Romney hire the back-stabbing Steve Schmidt?
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 6:09pm.
This article by John Podhoretz titled "Back Stab" does a good job of pinning Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace to the wall for undermining Sarah Palin during the McCain campaign. Why on earth would Romney want to even associate with such an obvious lowlife like Schmidt? Take his last name and subtract the c, m and d and you have my opinion of him.
Back Stab is at http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/back-stab_633411.html
You mean like college
Submitted by inquiringmind on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 6:08pm.
You mean like college transcripts or birth certificates, Savannah?
I wish Sherman really DID siege this Savannah!
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 6:19pm.
This broad sounds like shes going to be REAL good, eh? Makes me pine for the good ol days of Ann Curry!
hiding?
Submitted by g55rumpy on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 6:38pm.
ain`t no dead bodies in romney`s closet, but there is at least one in obama`s
Like
Submitted by grammajane on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 8:05pm.
Rush said today "obama and his cronies all go for the success of a person trying to make them look/sound bad. Romney has a clean slate and the radicals want to ruin it as they have nothing else to lie about as far as Romney and his successes and morals. steve schmidt......why would anyone give a dam what he says.
Think
Submitted by grammajane on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 8:09pm.
maybe Romney will continue to focus on the economy, jobs etc. The maybe come Sept/Oct might insist on obama's collage records, fast and furious and his numerous failures and associates
Romney needs to
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 8:13pm.
Take the glove off, and bash Obama for his world view, the creeps he surrounds himself with, and his failed policies.
^*LIKE*^
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 9:07pm.
You nailed how the whole campaign really should be run, Boudin.
And, point out that Obama has no trouble apologizing to anyone who might happen to be in the area, or "resetting" realations with a communist who would like nothing better than to see Baracka re-elected.
➚ Think so, UpNorth?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 9:24pm.
Let's see if he apologizes to the President of Mexico for running guns to the drug cartels.
You got that right,
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 9:26pm.
That is, if their not in cahoots.
Probably not, CA.
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 9:36pm.
After all, I'm sure that Baracka feels that he and Holder were actually trying to help out the Mexicans, while being able to issue EO's restricting sales of long guns and ammo, at least in the border states to begin with. After all, they'd be able to dry up the sales of long guns if F & F panned out the way they planned it. And probably ammo, too.
I'm sure it never occurred to those two neophytes that the cartels purchase ammo in the same lots as DHS does.
➚But we can say
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 9:43pm.
We can say with certainty it should be foreseeable to a logical person, that the release of thousands of assault weapons into the hands of drug cartels would result in deaths of innocent civilians, and would endanger further the lives of ICE and DEA agents.
But of course, America wants to know about Bain Capital . . . yeah, right.
Actually
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 9:57pm.
Romney is looking more presidential than Obama. Nobody likes a mean, dishonest president.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
There is frozen mammoth-squeeze in Siberia that is smarter than
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 1:44am.
...Savannah Guthrie.
And I'll just bet this stoopid tw*t would eat worms before she would raise the same issue concerning the current POtuS.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
If I were Romney...
Submitted by Stan T on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 2:12am.
I would wait another month, because we already know that obama is either running low on money, or in debt, or why else would he be asking people to send money to him in their children's names, in stead of giving them birthday presents?
Then I'd throw everything in the world against obama....his lack of college transcripts, no illinois legislature records, no senate records, his association with Rezko and Blago...all the things he's said and done as president...all this past associations...
Mention all the companies obama has given green money to to create jobs overseas, the fact he took GM and bankrupted it, then took it over as a government business, then even this year GM is building plants in China. And about the fisker plant, and all the green energy bankruptcies....
all of it..in commercial after commercial, at a time late, when obama has no money to counter them....
Obama's money
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 9:49am.
Please don't fool yourself into thinking Obama will run dangerously low on money. He still has resources from the last election that he has not tapped yet and backers with the means of making sure he gets his money even if they have to do credit card donations on line from anywhere in the world (never mind).
There is a trend to the foreign nations that Obama has surrogates campaigning in but it's too conspiratorial and too soon to bother with for now.
Well, looks like this lady is going to be a perfect fit for...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 4:13am.
the ultra liberal Today Show. I guess that woman she replaced wasn't Liberal enough? I've never watched the show (except one time when Sarah Palin was on) and I have no reason to start now.
She's the perfect Obama
Submitted by celator on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 9:03am.
She's the perfect Obama stooge, asking a question of Romney's reputation, while hawking for a president who is, by far, the most bio-secretive dude we've ever had in the WH. And she does it with a trace of insight into the buffoonery of her question. The perfect media dunce.
I don't know much about this guy Steve Schmidt, but...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 4:28am.
what I do know about him I don't like. He will continue to be invited on Liberal networks (all except FOX NEWS and sometimes CNBC) in order to bash Republicans. This makes him a very sought after Republican strategist guest (except on FOX NEWS and sometimes CNBC).
Where are ObamAA+s Tax Returns?
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 07/17/2012 - 9:37am.
Romney would be wise to ignore this.
The more he responds to this crxp, the more the MBM will keep it up.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال