NBC Cites Illegal Immigrant Activist to Label Court Ruling 'Threatening'
Fretting over the Supreme Court upholding a portion of Arizona's immigration law, on Monday's NBC Nightly News correspondent Mike Taibbi declared: "[Leticia Ramirez] and her husband have been in this country illegally for over a decade and when she later watched the Supreme Court ruling unfold, she said the verdict, though it only upheld the so-called 'show your papers' part of the law, was still threatening." [Listen to the audio or watch the video after the jump]
Ramirez decried the decision: "It's going to affect the whole community because they're not going to be able to go out, have a normal life. They're going to be afraid that if we go out they might – we might get stopped just for your color." As she spoke, Ramirez wore a t-shirt that read: "Arrest [Arizona Sheriff Joe] Arpaio, Not the People; End Police and ICE Collaboration."
Taibbi did include supporters of the ruling as well: "Kelly Townsend is a mother, too....She and other supporters of 1070 saw today's ruling, which requires law enforcement to check immigration status, as a clear win and a reason to keep pushing for the parts of the bill ruled unconstitutional."
However, unlike his description of Townsend, Taibbi never identified Ramirez as an activist on the issue, even as footage rolled of her in a room surrounded by fellow activists wearing "Legalize Arizona" t-shirts and a large poster of communist Cuban revolutionary Che Guevara.
Taibbi concluded: "And the reality, too, that one group, primarily, believes today's ruling leaves them as vulnerable as ever."
He also observed that supporters of the illegal immigration law in the state may be forced to give up: "Arizona's already spent about $3 million defending its controversial law. Most of it from private donations. There are some questions raised today about whether they'll still be the appetite, the political will to continue to defend the law vigorously if the taxpayers have to start footing the bill."
Here is a full transcript of the June 25 report:
7:03AM ET
BRIAN WILLIAMS: And now to where this all started. This was the Arizona case the Court decided today, after all. NBC's Mike Taibbi is there tonight and has reaction for us to the Court ruling.
MIKE TAIBBI: It only seemed like a normal day for Leticia Ramirez's family, her husband off to his construction job, and her children watching early morning TV. But she and her husband have been in this country illegally for over a decade and when she later watched the Supreme Court ruling unfold, she said the verdict, though it only upheld the so-called "show your papers" part of the law, was still threatening.
[Ramirez is shown wearing a t-shirt that read: "Arrest Arpaio, Not the People; End Police and ICE Collaboration"]
LETICIA RAMIREZ: It's going to affect the whole community because they're not going to be able to go out, have a normal life. They're going to be afraid that if we go out they might – we might get stopped just for your color.
[Click on image to enlarge]
TAIBBI: Kelly Townsend is a mother, too.
KELLY TOWNSEND: My daughter is half Hispanic.
TAIBBI: She and other supporters of 1070 saw today's ruling, which requires law enforcement to check immigration status, as a clear win and a reason to keep pushing for the parts of the bill ruled unconstitutional.
TOWNSEND: I do believe that is a victory that was the heart of SB-1070. One step at a time, if necessary.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN [PIMA COUNTY BORDER CRIMES UNIT]: This is where the rubber meets the road.
TAIBBI: Meanwhile, on the front line of the state's effort to curb illegal immigration, local units, like Pima County's Border Crimes Unit, work with federal Border Patrol agents to try and stem the flow along 120 miles of border. If they get to this spot, they're almost home free?
MAN: Yes.
TAIBBI: The sheriff's department has detained and arrested hundreds while SB-1070 was drifting in the political winds, and Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik says the ruling will change nothing about how this job is done.
CLARENCE DUPNIK: It doesn't take a genius to determine whether somebody is here illegally, given the reality of our work.
TAIBBI: It's also a reality that most in this state believe Arizona must do what they say the federal government has not done.
TOWNSEND: This is the law. We need to enforce it.
[Click on image to enlarge]
TAIBBI: And the reality, too, that one group, primarily, believes today's ruling leaves them as vulnerable as ever. Arizona's already spent about $3 million defending its controversial law. Most of it from private donations. There are some questions raised today about whether they'll still be the appetite, the political will to continue to defend the law vigorously if the taxpayers have to start footing the bill. Brian.
WILLIAMS: Mike Taibbi in Phoenix for us tonight. Mike, thanks.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
then go home!
Submitted by c5then on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 4:20pm.
If i were to cross into Mexico illegally and got stopped by the local police, what would be my fate?
20 years in a mexican prison.
I'm ok with that. We should have similar laws so there is no confusion.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
Illegal, and ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 4:41pm.
in your face about it, as well.
Nation of laws, my ass.
Ok, ok.
We have a multitude of laws; just selective enforcement, apparently.
MD
Well if you find it that
Submitted by John21 on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 4:46pm.
Well if you find it that threatening, GO HOME
Yes I like how Taibbi
Submitted by Sude23 on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 9:10pm.
Yes I like how Taibbi concluded: "And the reality, too, that one group, primarily, believes today's ruling leaves them as vulnerable as ever."
Would that be the illegal aliens? Thats what these laws are designed to do so people do not break them and have fear when they do break them. They should be afraid of being illegal aliens and being caught. If you can't do the time (or punishment) then sure as hell do not do the crime.
Amen. . .
Submitted by rickbren on Wed, 06/27/2012 - 5:16am.
Go back to where you came from ILLEGALLY!!!
Obama Lied!!
Submitted by minky on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 5:55pm.
When Obama took the oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States he lied...period! Now, just as these people are illegal, so is our president. Barack Hussein Obama belongs in PRISON and these people should be deported. Do I say that because I'm racist? No, I say it because it is the LAW!!!
BOOYA with a capital B, baby!
Submitted by Michael_in_Orlando on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 6:13pm.
.
Half the story
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 6:17pm.
Lets try talking about the illegals who commit crimes, the ones who bring disease with them, and the jobs they take away. Instead they always show families or struggling single mothers. That doesn't make their behavior any more lawful.
Threatening?
Submitted by CrazyHungarian on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 6:47pm.
Threatening? Yes, that's the whole point, and it looks like it's working.
Can you imagine that for a
Submitted by Sude23 on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 9:17pm.
Can you imagine that for a defense on a murder trial? Your Honor this case should be thrown out because the verdict would be threating to my client if he were to be found guilty...
Illegal aliens
Submitted by TheLoneRanger on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 8:44pm.
Illegal aliens are growing more and more arrogant because both Republican and Democrat administrations refuse to close our southern border and keep these job stealers out of our house.
Send them all back and let them stand in line to get here.
Deport her and her family and
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 06/26/2012 - 11:48pm.
Deport her and her family and confiscate all the property they have illegally accqiured in the US. She is a criminal.
The point missing here
Submitted by Cappmann1962 on Wed, 06/27/2012 - 8:17am.
Is that the only ones "threatened" are illegals. Granted, the dems are trying to make this a HUGE race issue, but all a Hispanic-looking US citizen has to do is whip out their driver's license. Illegals, on the other hand, are already criminals, so ANY dealings with law enforcement are felt as "threatening" to them. Why is this any different? Well, I'll tell you why - it's because Obambi WANTS it to be different. Why do you think he came out the week before the SCOTUS decision with his backdoor amnesty order? This was all planned in anticipation of the decision. And the one (and only) thing Obambi and his cronies are actually good at is creating distractions from real issues. Expect many more "issues" to come up between now and November.
why is breaking into our country any different
Submitted by ohio granny on Wed, 06/27/2012 - 10:01am.
Why is breaking into our country any different than breaking into a house and claiming it as yours? Both are illegal. Does it make any sense that breaking into our country is violating a civil law and breaking into a house is breaking criminal law.
Why should it not be a criminal act to break into the country? A lot of time the person breaking into the country is doing/does more damage than breaking into someone's house. Cases in point,. drunk driving, Muslim terrorists.
So I ask again why should breaking into this country be a violation of civil law and breaking into someone's house be a violation of criminal law???????? They are both illegal.
You'r eabsolutely right Granny
Submitted by Cappmann1962 on Wed, 06/27/2012 - 3:05pm.
Actually, I feel breaking into our country is worse (although from the homeowner's perspective it probably isn't). Illegals affect so many more AMERICANS through job poaching, identity theft, taxpayer money sucked up, and your examples of criminal behavior and terrorism.
One smart comeback would be a broad campaign detailing the major social programs illegals benefit from, i.e welfare, housing assistance, education, and medical. Put out the dollar amount it's costing AMERICANS for each of these programs,
The figure how much law enforcement dealing with illegals costs and a listing of crimes committed against AMERICANS.
Maybe that would open some eyes to the true cost of coddling these invaders.