Even NBC's Donny Deutsch Doesn't See Racism in Obama Interruption
During a panel discussion on Tuesday's NBC Today about President Obama being interrupted by a reporter during a Friday speech on immigration, even liberal pundit Donny Deutsch didn't buy veteran newsman Sam Donaldson claiming the incident was racially motivated: "Sam Donaldson in response said he thought that some of this was racially driven....I didn't see that..."
Fellow panelist and Today co-host Kathie Lee Gifford said of Donaldson's remark: "Yeah, I wish he hadn't said that."
Deutsch did try to spin the Rose Garden exchange as a plus for Obama: "By the way, it was a great opportunity for the President to look presidential and scold him [the reporter]."
Fellow Today co-host Hoda Kotb commented that the reporter should have waited until the President "fields questions" but added: "I do think the press corps should be aggressive...I think that you can go for it."
Later, co-host Matt Lauer pointed to the British government as evidence of political leaders being interrupted regularly: "Have you ever been across the pond and watched a session of Parliament? And what they do with their leaders? They don't let them get a word out edgewise and they're harumphing them and haranguing them and all that stuff."
Here is a full transcript of the June 19 exchange:
7:01AM ET TEASE:
MATT LAUER: Also we're going to ask this question: Is it ever appropriate to interrupt the President of the United States? That question is getting a lot of attention after a reporter for an online website repeatedly interrupted President Obama during a speech last week. We're going to tell you what that reporter is now saying about the incident and talk about the whole concept and dynamic with Today's Professionals.
ANN CURRY: I'm sure they have a lot to say about that.
8:09AM ET TEASE:
CURRY: And coming up, we're going to be addressing the question, is it ever okay to interrupt the president?
8:11AM ET SEGMENT:
LAUER: We're back now at 8:11 with Today's Professionals. Here to chew over the hottest stories of the day, Donny Deutsch, Dr. Nancy Snyderman, and pinch hitting for Star Jones this morning, two people, Kathie Lee and Hoda.
KATHIE LEE GIFFORD: It takes two.
LAUER: Good morning, nice to see you folks. Alright, let's start with a story that developed over the last week or so. The President, President Obama, on the lawn of the White House giving remarks or a speech about an immigration policy when a reporter for Daily Caller, which is a conservative website, interrupted him in the middle of his speech. Here's part of the exchange.
BARACK OBAMA: It is the right thing to do. Excuse me, sir. It's not time for questions, sir, not while I'm speaking....And the answer to your question, sir – and the next time I prefer you let me finish my statements before you ask that question – is this is the right thing to do for the American people. I didn't ask for an argument, I'm answering your question.
LAUER: Alright, so this was not during a Q & A, this was during a speech. Neil Munro of Daily Caller interrupted him. So let's start with the basic question, is it ever okay to interrupt the President of the United States?
NANCY SNYDERMAN: Not in the Rose Garden, not in a formal occasion.
HODA KOTB: Yeah, he was giving – he was making a speech. I think when he's done with it and he fields questions, yes. But I do think the press corps should be aggressive.
GIFFORD: Absolutely.
KOTB: I mean, I think that you can go for it. But I think that you have to let him finish his statement and then you go in.
SNYDERMAN: Well, Sam Donaldson was considered aggressive when he was at ABC News and I was there at the time. But he waited while the President was walking to the chopper...
KOTB: Sure.
SNYDERMAN: ...it was a public forum, not in a formal situation like the Rose Garden.
DEUTSCH: Yeah, I don't – it's never, I don't care in any situation, to interrupt. We've got to keep that office up here. And it may be a function of that sometimes we are so over-media-ed, the president is everywhere, that people, including the profess – including the press, can forget that pedestal. But clearly wrong.
LAUER: You say you're going to keep the office up here. Have you ever been across the pond and watched a session of Parliament?
SNYDERMAN: Yeah, it's quite rowdy, and yeah.
LAUER: And what they do with their leaders? They don't let them get a word out edgewise and they're harumphing them and haranguing them and all that stuff. It's just a different system?
DEUTSCH: Yes, it's a different world. But interestingly, Sam Donaldson in response said he thought that some of this was racially driven, if their was a white president-
GIFFORD: Yeah, I wish he hadn't said that. I mean-
DEUSTCH: I didn't see that either.
LAUER: Tucker Carlson, who founded The Daily Caller, the website, says he is proud of Neil Munro, his reporter...
SNYDERMAN: Of course Tucker's proud.
LAUER: ...and that it is a reporter's job to ask questions and get answers.
GIFFORD: Respectfully. Respectfully. I think the President showed more respect for him by calling him "sir" three times.
DEUTSCH: By the way, it was a great opportunity for the President to look presidential and scold him.
SNYDERMAN: Yeah.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments

















Comments
Racers = people who see
Submitted by ray johnson on Tue, 06/19/2012 - 11:36am.
Racers = people who see racism everywhere. Like the little boy who cried wolf, the great unwashed have stopped paying attention to the elitist, high-brow, Ivy League, Manhattan "beautiful people" ... That's because the groupthink tv libs haven't got an effin clue!
White Race Baiters Are White Race Traitors
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Tue, 06/19/2012 - 11:53am.
The definition of 'racism' is being redefined every day. Soon, just talking to and looking at a black person will be considered 'racism'.
I know, let's just treat blacks like sacred cows and let them wander around doing whatever it is they want to do. Just stay out of their path and look the other way -- like all good Leftists do today.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
The fact that it took so long for my computer to load...
Submitted by Clinkin on Tue, 06/19/2012 - 12:18pm.
...this article tells me that it is a "man bites dog" story. Of course the MSM will not report it because "men don't bite dogs".
Even the liberals at NBC dare not...
Submitted by Conservator on Tue, 06/19/2012 - 12:19pm.
...defend Sam Donaldson's race baiting. Speaking of Sam Donaldson, below is a very brief video of Sammy friends yelling questions while Reagan held a press conference on Iran/Contra:
Ronald Reagan Iran Contra Scandal
So much for being a Dignitary
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 06/19/2012 - 1:14pm.
"By the way, it was a great opportunity for the President to look presidential and scold him "
So, that's what a President is supposed to do, scold people? Thanks Dude. You just turned our President into a Super Nanny.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Faulty memory
Submitted by James Youngblood on Tue, 06/19/2012 - 2:50pm.
SNYDERMAN: "Well, Sam Donaldson was considered aggressive when he was at ABC News and I was there at the time. But he waited while the President was walking to the chopper..." "Not in the Rose Garden, not in a formal occasion."
Either Ms. Snyderman is not telling the truth or has a faulty memory. Sam Donaldson was constantly yelling out at Ronald Reagan when Reagan was President. And yes, this included various Rose Garden chats.
J. Youngblood
I Oppose Barack Obama Because He’s Black
Submitted by gailannr on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 1:30am.
Posted By Andrew Klavan On June 18, 2012 @ 5:03 pm PJ MEDIA
Sam Donaldson, who regularly treated President Ronald Reagan with disrespect [1], feels he knows exactly why Neil Munro of the right-leaning Daily Caller treated Barack Obama with disrespect [2]. During the president’s recent announcement that he had decided to make up laws by himself from now on, effectively granting immunity to some illegal aliens with a wave of his almighty hand, Munro shouted out a question rather than waiting for the president to leave the podium without taking any questions.
Donaldson’s reaction in part: “Many on the political right believe this president ought not to be there – they oppose him not for his polices and political view but for who he is, an African American!”
Well, the old hairpiece has a point. As far as I’m concerned there are only two plausible reasons to oppose President Obama: either because he’s clearly the worst president in American history, or because he’s black.
For me, it’s because he’s black.
Oh, I know, some of you are suspicious. You think that secretly I dislike Obama because he’s increased the federal debt by nearly five trillion dollars [3] and given us our highest deficits [4] since 1946 and yet has made not one serious proposal to reform the entitlements that are clearly causing the problem.
But no, so help me, I just happen to be put off by the whole brown epidermis thing. It gets to me.
Some on the left have unleashed wild accusations that I harbor a primal animosity toward Obama’s shredding of the Constitution, or his opposition to the ideals of the American founding. They think I look at Obama’s membership in a European-style socialist party [5] (about which he lied) or his close relationship with anti-American terrorist William Ayers [6] (about which he lied) or his twenty year tutelage under the racist, anti-American preacher Jeremiah Wright [7] (about which he almost certainly lied) or the several attempts at government encroachments so overweening that they have been struck down 9-0 [8] by a normally divided Supreme Court — and see all that as evidence that this president is less committed to the American project than any leader of this continent since King George.
Wrong! I’m just not down with this whole African-American business. I mean, the guy’s all, like, dark and stuff. What’s that about?
Listen, I don’t mind black people in their proper place. I can accept someone like Thomas Sowell, say, as one of the greatest political philosophers of our time, or Congressman Allen West as a shining example of the best and bravest men this nation can produce. But when it comes to running an administration of incompetence, corruption, arrogance and ignorance, well, doggone it, I feel that’s a job for a white man!
So to Sam Donaldson I say: “You got me. I don’t like Obama because he’s black. You I don’t like because you’re an idiot.”
For your reference if you want to follow up on the article. http://pjmedia.com/andrewklavan/2012/06/18/i-oppose-barack-obama-because...