NBC's Curry: Is Romney 'On the Wrong Side of History' on Gay Marriage?
After grilling Romney campaign adviser Eric Fehrnstrom on a variety of topics on Tuesday's NBC Today, co-host Ann Curry wrapped up the interview by portraying Mitt Romney's support of traditional marriage as behind the times: "...there's a Gallup poll now that shows an increasing support by Americans for relationships between same-sexes. I'm wondering, do you believe that on this issue Mitt Romney is on the wrong side of history?" [Listen to the audio or watch the video after the jump]
Curry prefaced her left-wing question by noting how President Obama "is painting gay marriages as an expansion of human rights." In a prior report, chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd touted how during a New York campaign fudraising swing, the President experienced "an embrace of enthusiastic donors happy with his new gay marriage stance....firing up his liberal base as he basked in the glow of a friendly audience..."
Todd's report featured sound bites of Obama stirring up supporters:
We have never gone wrong when we expanded rights and responsibilities to everybody. That doesn't weaken families, that strengthens families....That's how we achieved women's rights. That's how we achieved voting rights. That's how we achieved worker's rights. That's how we achieved gay rights.
Meanwhile, Todd failed to include a single clip of Mitt Romney or any opponents of gay marriage.
Here is a portion of Todd's May 15 report:
7:05AM ET
ANN CURRY: President Obama was in New York to deliver a commencement speech and to attend a fundraising event, and he had more to say about his recent announcement of support for same-sex marriage. Chuck Todd is NBC's chief White House correspondent and political director. Chuck, good morning.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Firing Up the Base; Obama Takes Campaign Message to Friendly Crowds]
CHUCK TODD: Well, good morning, Ann. You know, the President's New York trip had a little something for all parts of his re-election campaign, a nod to women and hopes of expanding the gender gap, an embrace of enthusiastic donors happy with his new gay marriage stance, and an awkward attempt to raise big Wall Street money while bashing some of Wall Street's practices, at least when it comes to how Mitt Romney did it.
RICKY MARTIN: Ladies and gentlemen, it is my honor to welcome the President of the United States of America, Barack Obama.
[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]
TODD: President Obama with singer Ricky Martin in New York Monday, firing up his liberal base as he basked in the glow of a friendly audience, following his decision to embrace same-sex marriage.
BARACK OBAMA: We have never gone wrong when we expanded rights and responsibilities to everybody. That doesn't weaken families, that strengthens families.
TODD: Earlier, Mr. Obama taped an appearance of The View, hinting he might use the gay marriage issue against Mitt Romney because of Romney's support for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. But also targeting Congress on the same issue.
OBAMA: Look, Congress is clearly on notice that I think it's a bad idea.
TODD: The official reason for the President's New York swing was a commencement address for the graduating class at the all-female Barnard College, which took place at his own alma mater, Columbia University. His remarks often felt like a campaign speech, encouraging his audience of young women to remain politically active.
OBAMA [AS CROWD CHEERS]: That's how we achieved women's rights. That's how we achieved voting rights. That's how we achieved worker's rights. That's how we achieved gay rights.
(...)
Here is a portion of Curry's May 15 exchange with Fehrnstrom:
7:11AM ET
(...)
CURRY: Meantime I don't have a lot of time left but I really need to ask you this question about Mitt Romney's reiterating his position that marriage is between one man and one woman, while the President is painting gay marriages as an expansion of human rights. And there's a – there's a Gallup poll now that shows an increasing support by Americans for relationships between same-sexes. I'm wondering, do you believe that on this issue Mitt Romney is on the wrong side of history?
FEHRNSTROM: Well, look, we – Mitt Romney understands that people have different opinions on marriage. His opinion is that marriage is between a man and a woman. Why does he have that opinion? It's because he believes a home headed by a man and a woman, married, is the best environment for the raising of our children. But we understand that – that this is a tender and emotional subject for many people. Not everybody comes down on the same side. But where Mitt Romney stands is that marriage is between a man and a woman.
(...)
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
History?
Submitted by richflanj on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 11:25am.
Thousands of year of Judeo/Christian history that accurately describe homosexual conduct as against nature, degrading to humanity, and generally disgusting?
No, Ms. Curry, you fracking idiot, he is not on the wrong side of history. You are.
"OH YES ANN...............
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 11:42am.
I am sure just because you have a poll Mitt Romney is going to throw away what he believes in his heart so he can follow your STUPID IGNORANT LEFTIST POLL.... YEAH RIGHT!
What History???
Submitted by allouchsit on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 11:47am.
Ann, please cite for us the examples from "history" where same-sex marriage was considered normal!!!
She must live in some alternate reality with a different history than this planet.
As I watched this interview
Submitted by inquiringmind on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 11:56am.
As I watched this interview this morning I thought Eric was very level headed and did a good job of answering Ann's reasonably fair but slanted questions. I have no problem with a press asking some prickily questions.
I just wish they would do it to the other side as well. I'm not holding my breath.
NBC continues their "Public
Submitted by John21 on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 11:57am.
NBC continues their "Public Relations" work for the Obama administration as usual. Ms. Curry will continue the cheerleading as always.
No honesty, integrety or credability at the propaganda network is permitted.
And why haven't the young legalized marijuana?
Submitted by DaMav on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 11:59am.
I remember when that was the "inevitable" outcome of letting 18 year olds vote & the rising tide of youthful boomers.
Don't let up! Today's young have been fed a steady stream about the glories of homosexuality for over a generation but they still use "gay" as a pejorative. Support for SSM is a mile wide and an inch deep. We shall overcome the hatred against religion and normality coming from the left and successfully defend traditional marriage.
An Obama defeat will make a great line in the sand
Clue to people who use this
Submitted by redfish on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 12:13pm.
Clue to people who use this phrase: everyone who is "on the wrong side of history" thinks he's on the right side of history.
Magazine Cover
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 12:29pm.
Shouldn't the caption have been "We Are All Gay Now"? Or, should the earlier one have been "Obama, America's First Socialist President"? The latter one is the more truthful one.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
Alert, Ann! Meme watch!
Submitted by CO2Maker on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 12:36pm.
"Wrong side of history." Oh, what an original phrase. Ann, do you want to be caught on the wrong side of a metaphor? Geez
And then there's "what is old will be new again," "there is nothing new under the sun," "meme is the new trope," "the pendulum swings back," etc.
Is Ann Curry on the Wrong Side of Gay Marriage?
Submitted by Conservator on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 12:52pm.
Based on the results of the new CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES POLL published yesterday, I think the answer is YES.
While the race for president remains close, Mitt Romney now has a 3 point lead over President Obama and Romney is also leading among men and women (so much for the war against women):
Men: Obama 42% v. Romney 45%
Women Obama 44% v. Romney 46%
Heck, even Obama's historic gay marriage "Evolution" is costing him votes in this poll which over-polled democrats (36%) to republicans (30%):
"Most Americans favor some type of legal recognition of same-sex relationships, including 38% who support marriage. When asked directly whether same-sex marriage should be legal or not, 42% say it should be, but 51% say it should not."
CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES POLL - For release: Monday, May 14th, 2012
Curry
Submitted by mmilesll on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 12:55pm.
Typical dumbo on CNN-the network nobody watches.
Someone PLEASE explain to me
Submitted by chiefpayne on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 2:14pm.
how a poll could say a majority of Americans SUPPORT homosexual marriage yet there are 30 states that have State Constitutional Amendments against it.
How could this be...UNLESS the poll was skewed to get the answer of approval?
The people polled lie.
Submitted by IdahoJim on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 5:05pm.
It is that simple. They do not want to appear to the pollster (is that a word?) to be homophobic bigoted gay bashers, so they lie.
Not everybody has the guts to say they oppose gay marriage out loud. But, in the privacy of the voting booth, they are allowed to vote whatever way they feel without the possibility of public scorn or ridicule.
You can oppose gay marriage without opposing gays.
Is "gay marriage" an oxymoron? or is it a contradiction in terms? I forget how to judge which is which.
IdahoJim
http://idahoandy.net
No, I was wrong. It IS the pollsters being dishonest.
Submitted by IdahoJim on Wed, 05/16/2012 - 7:31pm.
How have liberals managed to inflate the numbers for so long? "For the most part," the Post says, "the polling out there is combining the civil union and gay marriage responses together to get their 'majority' supporting gay marriage.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tony-perkins/2012/05/16/tony-perkins-column...
What a bunch of shrubs!
IdahoJim
http://idahoandy.net
"wrong side of history".
Submitted by forest on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 2:17pm.
"wrong side of history".
Ugh. Come up with original words that actually mean something.
History isn't the question
Submitted by mustango on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 2:53pm.
It's impossible to know with 100% certainty who will end up "on the right side of history", which is why it always makes me a bit nauseous to hear people presume to speak for future generations.
But "history" isn't Romney concern right now anyway. Future generations are not voting in November. What matters today is that Romney is quite clearly on the right side of 2012, and now Obama is not.
Tomorrow is also on the wrong side of history.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 3:52pm.
But two days from now it should be fine.
Obama never wants to be on the wrong side of history.
Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 4:11pm.
Ev-O-lution
I get sick of this 'wrong
Submitted by Slyrr on Tue, 05/15/2012 - 4:42pm.
I get sick of this 'wrong side of history' crap.
Need we remind the vapid Curry that 'all gay society' was tried in ancient Greece, and it failed miserably? If being gay was the 'wave of the future', then it would have taken hold ages ago when other societies tried it out. Instead is has bombed miserably each and every time.
It's a sociological fad that creeps in every few hundred years or so, sticks around for maybe a couple hundred years, tops - then gets broomed as the failed notion that it is.
Curry and her like minded gay-friendly chums are simply goosing the 'fag-end' of this fad (look it up), which has sadly reared it's ugly head yet again. Once people come back to their common sense and realize that gay couples can't reproduce and therefore sustain themselves, it will ebb out yet again too. That isn't to say they won't go militant - like the ancient greeks did. Their whole army was gay way back when. Look where that got them.