NBC's Curry Rips Ryan Budget: 'Where is the Empathy?' Won't Poor People 'Suffer'?
In an interview with Congressman Paul Ryan on Tuesday's NBC Today, co-host Ann Curry slammed the Wisconsin Republican's proposed budget: "Where is the empathy in this budget?...Do you acknowledge that poor people will suffer under his budget? That you have shown a lack of empathy to poor people in this budget?" [Listen to the audio or watch the video after the jump]
Curry cited a left-wing non-profit group in condemning the plan: "...the Center of Budget and Policy Priorities....says 62% of the savings in your budget would come from cutting programs for the poor. That between 8 and 10 million people would be kicked off of food stamps. That you would cut Medicare by 200 billion, Medicaid and other health programs by something like 770 billion."
Curry failed to make any mention of the organization's clearly liberal agenda. The Center of Budget and Policy Priorities mission statement reads: "The Center conducts research and analysis to help shape public debates over proposed budget and tax policies and to help ensure that policymakers consider the needs of low-income families and individuals in these debates. We also develop policy options to alleviate poverty."
Ryan dismissed the slanted figures:
So, not only do I take issue with a lot of their analysis and their numbers, spending in all of these programs still increases under our budget. You have to remember food stamps quadrupled over the last decade. So what we're saying is we have to bring spending to a more sustainable rate of growth. And we can't keep spending at the pace we are on, otherwise we will have a debt crisis.
In response to Curry's declaration that the poor would "suffer" under the budget proposal, Ryan pushed back:
Quite the contrary. Our poverty rates are the highest they've been in a generation. One out of six people are in poverty today. The President's policies are not working and we're advancing pro-growth policies to get people off of welfare on to work....We just don't agree that throwing more money at failed programs works. We want to reform these programs so that they actually achieve the result of getting people on their lives of self-sufficiency.
Prior to personally tearing down the budget, Curry highlighted Democratic attacks on the plan: "President Obama, in his discussion, seems to be really almost running against you. He started talking about your budget being a Trojan horse. I mean, how do you explain this?...Why is he targeting you?"
Ryan responded: "You know, we've gotten kind of used to this sort of verbal tantrums from the President. To me it's a little more petulance than presidential.... I think it's because we're actually offering solutions to a debt crisis where he isn't. So I think we – our existence and our solutions point out the fact that he hasn't offered any solutions to these problems."
Curry also dismissed the Republican budget as futile: "You talk about this being a solution. Of course your budget was passed last week by the House but the Senate's not going to pass it. The President's not going to sign it. So what do you want most to come out of this exercise?"
Curry chose to ignore the fact that the President's budget recently failed to get a single vote in the House. In addition, Ryan pointed out: "The law requires the Senate pass their budget as well, but they have decided for three years now, over 1,000 days, not to even budget. I – it boggles my mind that we're not going to be passing budgets when the biggest crisis confronting this generation is a budget-driven crisis."
Here is a portion of the April 10 interview:
7:13AM ET
(...)
CURRY: Meantime, you say that you haven't even thought about being on this ticket.
RYAN: I haven't given it serious thought.
CURRY: And – serious thought about being on this ticket – and yet President Obama, in his discussion, seems to be really almost running against you.
RYAN: Yeah.
CURRY: He started talking about your budget being a Trojan horse. I mean, how do you explain this?
RYAN: You know, we've gotten kind of used to this sort of verbal tantrums from the President. To me it's a little more petulance than presidential.
CURRY: Why is he targeting you?
RYAN: I think it's because we're actually offering solutions to a debt crisis where he isn't. So I think we – our existence and our solutions point out the fact that he hasn't offered any solutions to these problems. And we want to confront a debt crisis before everybody gets hurt. Before we have a crisis on our hands. And I think because we've offered these principled solutions and he has not, he's trying to use, you know, this kind of rhetoric to distort away from his failed record.
CURRY: You talk about this being a solution. Of course your budget was passed last week by the House but the Senate's not going to pass it.
RYAN: I know.
CURRY: The President's not going to sign it. So what do you want most to come out of this exercise?
RYAN: I want us to fix the problem. I want us to give our kids a better future. I want us to pay off the debt. And so, what we thought we would do is we would pass our version of what we think the solution is. The law requires the Senate pass their budget as well, but they have decided for three years now, over 1,000 days, not to even budget. I – it boggles my mind that we're not going to be passing budgets when the biggest crisis confronting this generation is a budget-driven crisis.
CURRY: Let me ask you about this because the Center of Budget and Policy Priorities, says 60 – you're smiling because you know about this...
RYAN: I do.
CURRY: ...says 62% of the savings in your budget would come from cutting programs for the poor. That between 8 and 10 million people would be kicked off of food stamps. That you would cut Medicare by 200 billion, Medicaid and other health programs by something like 770 billion. Where is the empathy in this budget?
RYAN: So, not only do I take issue with a lot of their analysis and their numbers, spending in all of these programs still increases under our budget. You have to remember food stamps quadrupled over the last decade. So what we're saying is we have to bring spending to a more sustainable rate of growth. And we can't keep spending at the pace we are on, otherwise we will have a debt crisis.
CURRY: Do you acknowledge that poor people will suffer...
RYAN: No.
CURRY: ...under his budget?
RYAN: No.
CURRY: That you have shown a lack of empathy to poor people in this budget?
RYAN: Quite the contrary. Our poverty rates are the highest they've been in a generation. One out of six people are in poverty today. The President's policies are not working and we're advancing pro-growth policies to get people off of welfare on to work. What we want to do is replicate those successful strategies that worked in the late '90s, that were not applied to these other welfare programs, to get people on to lives of self-sufficiency, from welfare to work. And we're proposing reforms and transitions that do that. We just don't agree that throwing more money at failed programs works. We want to reform these programs so that they actually achieve the result of getting people on their lives of self-sufficiency.
CURRY: I could talk to you some more, but I'm out of time. Congressman Paul Ryan, a pleasure to speak to you in person.
RYAN: Thank you, Ann.
CURRY: Thank you.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Curry
Submitted by Jersey Girl on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:03am.
Fair is fair annie girl. Donate 95% of your income. After all, how much do you need?
A better idea
Submitted by oldfart on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:19am.
When EVERYONE employed at her network donates 100% of their after tax income to the poor then they will have some credibility. What you do speaks so loudly I can't hear a word you are saying.
I agree with the previous poster. I have also seen people purchase several shopping carts full of groceries at Wally World, on food stamps, and load them into their BRAND NEW cross over's. Plus they have the latest cell phones and are dressed to the 9s.
These are NOT isolated occurrences. Go and observe for your self – you of the chattering classes.
How about a free cell phone and 250 minutes?
Submitted by ThisnThat on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 12:30pm.
Here's the link for your free gov-subsidized cell phone. o'bama has doubled the subsidy this year to multiple billions of dollars. But you have to qualify, of course -- by being on Section 8 housing, SSI, food stamps, medicaid, TANF, school lunch program, LIHEAP, or only make 135% of the poverty level. And if you were referred by a friend, you both get bonus minutes! This, of course, is one of the programs Curry insists can't be cut or eliminated. https://www.safelinkwireless.com/Safelink/
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
Not sure if this is part of that or only in PA
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 12:41pm.
But on my cell phone bill is a direct charge that goes towards cell phones for the "poor". This is the nonsense that conservatives want to stop, but then the libs say we're so hateful.
Rad, everyone who actually pays for their cell phones
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 2:13pm.
is subsidizing Safelink and Assurance and the rest of the "free" cell phones for those on any program you can think of. It depends on what the state requires, as far as fair notice on billing.
In Michigan, it doesn't show up, but it could be hidden in the "Federal Universal Service Assement", or the "administrative charge", or maybe the "regulatory charge"? Or, it could be hidden in the "surcharges" or the "government taxes and fees".
what a joke.
Submitted by Savonarola on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:11am.
at our church, we give the poor food all the time. guess what, they mostly complain about the selection, and drive off in a volvo.
Ann Curry: Bright as Cauliflower
Submitted by libBuster on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:28am.
According to the New York Post, Ann will soon be out as co-host of the Today Show. Apparently, Curry is not sophisticated enough for Today's target audience: women with double digit IQs.
A humorous taste of "pure Curry" can be found in Ladies Home Journal:
She was warm and earnest, but also a little spacey; Al Roker once called her "our ambassador from Planet Zebulon." And she had a kind of ditzy, girlish innocence. In 1998, when I interviewed her for this magazine, a Today staffer told me how they were going to cover picture hanging on the show, and they were all discussing it. "Yes!" Curry piped up. "It's so important to be well hung." "We all started snickering," the staffer said, "and Ann was going, 'What? What? What did I say?'"
Those were some nice White House talking points.
Submitted by NeoKong on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:28am.
Did she get them from her Blackberry....?
The neutral need not apply.
Agreed
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 1:19pm.
Curry assumes the role of Grand Inquisitor. She gets PowerPoint bullets from a single source, and throws them at Rep. Ryan as if he on a witness stand.
Fortunately, Ryan has the answers. Too many Republicans retreat behind rhetorical responses, when what's really needed is a challenge back at the interviewer to demonstrate that the latter has no idea what the question really means, let alone the answer.
If Ryan's budget is an 'exercise', WTH was Obama's budget?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:29am.
How about 'laughable sham'? Not even Pelosi voted for it.
Kinda surprised that the distinguished host of Meet The Primate didn't pull rank on her to do this interview this morning.
Rumor has
Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:51am.
it she will soon join the ranks of the unemployed
And it couldn't happen to a
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:59am.
And it couldn't happen to a more deserving person . . . I swear that woman is dumber than Megan McCain.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
"Verbal tantrum"
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:48am.
Well said Mr. Ryan.
My other question is, where in the Constitution is it written that the government is supposed to be empathetic? Or take care of poor people? We were founded on the idea that the government does NOT take care of anyone. Charities and churches will do that. What sucks for the poor is that sometimes churches require the poor to make lifestyle changes, like attending church, abstaining from drugs, etc.
I like that phrase myself
Submitted by panzerakc on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 2:33pm.
Also, the "more petulance than presidential" line has a nice ring to it.
I love the "Senate won't pass
Submitted by forest on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:54am.
I love the "Senate won't pass it so you're wasting time" argument.
Has Curry ever badgered Democrat Senators about why they haven't even considered a serious budget bill for three years? (I'm not counting Obama's clown budget that went down 97-0 last year - not serious)
Are Most Poor People Really Poor?
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 11:52am.
And what, exactly, is 'poor'? And, why are the 'poor' people always Leftists? Is there a connection between illegal drug and alcohol abuse and being poor? Is there a connection between illiteracy and being poor?
Being poor for the majority of the poor is more a matter of making bad life style choices. Most 'poor' people wouldn't be poor if they didn't want to be.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
Faux care-obsessed libs like
Submitted by ray johnson on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 12:38pm.
Faux care-obsessed libs like Curry have one goal...act and seem like they're lookin' out for the "little guy"... What a BS interview. Ryan is likeable, and no matter what they say, he's very disarming and nonthreatening, and did good, though.
Won't economic collapse hurt the poor?
Submitted by Russian55 on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 12:39pm.
If the budget implodes, it will hurt the poor far more. If inflation increases, it will hurt the poor most.
In fact, there are almost no circumstances under which the economic consequences of doing something about the deficit are worse than not doing anything.
---
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will end up plowing for those who kept their swords in the first place!
Where's the Empathy for the Needy
Submitted by DMullins051 on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 12:41pm.
Dear Ann Curry:
You are like the proverbial house wife that only somewhat supports the family financially, but believes in spending (both in family needs & supporting causes outside the home) the total income of $60,000 plus an additional 40%: total purchasing of 140% each and EVERY week.
After several years of increasing the family's debt from 0 to $150,000.00, the credit card companies refuse to issue more cards, reduce the family's credit rating, and begin to demand payments on the principal --- not just your usual minimum payments (interest rates).
Now the family struggles for mere necessities and the out of home good samaritan work has to stop. And you have the audacity to ask "What about Empathy?"
Try: Work Within The Budget --- what you HAVE (actual revenue received) is what you are allowed to SPEND --- you can NOT BORROW to keep spending.
You & your relatives (Progressive-Liberals) have forced the "family" (America) into bankruptcy with your irresponsible spending (Nat'l Debt). If you want the empathy, it'll have to be from your personal piggy bank --- and if you don't know what that means, it's YOUR extra (beyond tax rate donation) charity.
America can no longer afford your extravagant wish list or any additional theft (TAXATION).
Curry never wories about
Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 12:44pm.
Curry never wories about Obama's energy policy or lack thereof. His energy hurts the middle class on down. The poor, especially, are hurt by high fuel prices.
Ryan should have asked about
Submitted by NC Cop on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 12:45pm.
Ryan should have asked about the millions of dollars found spent in Las Vegas on the "Welfare cards". I guess they can be too bad off if they're spending millions of dollars of taxpayers money gambling in Vegas.
Nice.
I Am Anne Curry, and I Was Born Without a Brain
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 1:06pm.
Like the man said...
You can't fix stupid.
Dear Anne,
Do you ever wonder why God made you such an undeniable imbecile? Worse yet, you're not even attractive. So what do you have going for you? Do you work cheap and/or free? have you given the reacharound to the suits at NBC?
Do tell, moron.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
What she REALLY means is . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 1:22pm.
CURRY: I could talk to you some more, but I'm out of time. . .
"I wish I could talk to you some more, but I'm out of talking points and I'm in over my head."
Give a man a fish...
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 2:20pm.
and he'll be dependent upon you for life. Where's the empathy in that?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Why do our national parks have...
Submitted by P. Aaron on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 3:13pm.
...DO NOT FEED THE ANIMALS! signs? Because they won't then fend for themselves. It wrecks their natural ability to survive by using their own instincts.
Why is welfare any different?
The standard retort to Curry's empathy questions
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 6:11pm.
"Why does your network refer to women as bitches and portray them as sex objects? Does NBC have a gender gap??
Charity, Miss Curry, is - forget it.
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 04/10/2012 - 9:33pm.
Miss Curry, the government does not exist to pamper and baby people. It does not exist to coddle the "poor". It is not a freaking charity. If you are so heartbroken over the plight of the poor, get off you ass and start a charity.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
It never changes..
Submitted by Mark81150 on Wed, 04/11/2012 - 7:41am.
They always smile when sticking that knife in your back..
"CURRY: I could talk to you some more, but I'm out of time. Congressman Paul Ryan, a pleasure to speak to you in person.".................... translation and addition... (I'd love to further distort your position and lie about your motives some more, but I'm out of time.)...
They do this with a candy eatin grin everytime..
and a democrat in that same chair gets candy canes and softballs... "Gosh Congressman, how do you handle your job and be so saint like at the same time?... would you like something to drink?.. a pillow?... How awesome is it to be you?...
that is the way the MSM rolls, and why folks can see right through them.
it may not quite... quite, as blatant as I depicted,, but not damned far from it.
Curry clearly never learned
Submitted by HockeyKid on Wed, 04/11/2012 - 2:36pm.
the story of the goose that laid the golden egg.
Obysmal and his cronies are killing the goose, all the while complaining that it doesn't give them enough gold.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me