Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’
  • Obama Losing Chris Matthews? Host Rails Against 'Profiling' By IRS: It's Like Targeting Innocent Arabs
  • Jake Tapper Slams Obama Admin for Treatment of Fox News Reporter
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief

NBC's Curry: Santorum About to Go Through 'Meat Grinder;' Does He Have to 'Change His Conservative Message'?

By Kyle Drennen | January 05, 2012 | 13:04

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

On Thursday's NBC Today, co-host Ann Curry predicted that following his strong finish in Iowa, Rick Santorum was "about to face the meat grinder of tough scrutiny for the first time." Turning to Meet the Press host David Gregory, she wondered: "So is he going to have to change his conservative message as he's looking...into New Hampshire, which is a much less conservative state, David?"

Gregory suggested some lines of attack: "Well, he's going to be under a very intense scrutiny by the other candidates....you could go back about apparent contradictions between small government conservativism and some of his activism. Some of his attempts to moderate his positions...when he was running for re-election in Pennsylvania in 2006."

Gregory concluded: "So all of this is going to be on the table and Santorum has not gotten a hard look, not by the media, and certainly not by the other candidates." Curry added: "That certainly is about to begin."

<<Like this post? Help us take on media bias by donating to NewsBusters (there's also a PayPal option on that page). Without the support of our readers, NewsBusters would not be possible.>> 

On ABC's Good Morning America, correspondent John Berman noted how Santorum was under "new scrutiny" and being, "Asked about past statements comparing same-sex relationships to bestiality."

On CBS's The Early Show, fill-in co-host Nancy Cordes proclaimed that Santorum's success in Iowa "is getting him a lot of attention, a lot of money and questions about his political past." In the report that followed, Correspondent Bill Whitaker declared: "In Iowa, his social conservatism had strong appeal to born-again Christians, 56% of caucus-goers. In the last New Hampshire primary, only 21% of GOP voters were born-again Christians. To win here he must broaden his appeal..."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Here is a full transcript of Curry's January 5 discussion with Gregory and Chuck Todd:

7:07AM ET

ANN CURRY: Let's bring in now NBC's David Gregory, who's the moderator, of course, of Meet the Press, and Chuck Todd, who's NBC's political director and chief White House correspondent, he's in Manchester, New Hampshire this morning. Good morning to both of you.

DAVID GREGORY: Good morning, Ann.

CHUCK TODD: Good morning, Ann.

CURRY: So four years ago Rick Santorum endorses Mitt Romney over John McCain and we all know what they say about payback. But does a McCain endorsement really help Mitt Romney in the race for the conservative vote? David, you want to take that?

DAVID GREGORY: Well, look, he is an establishment favorite in New Hampshire. He's won it twice. This is Mitt Romney, who's already got a lead, trying to spike the football a little bit early here and build some momentum. He is a frontrunner but comes out of Iowa still pretty fragile. Santorum's doing well. Perry's still in the race. Gingrich is at least trying to build that resurgency in New Hampshire. So he's actually got to demonstrate that he can win and that he can win big, and New Hampshire's got to be that place.

CURRY: And he's dealing with, of course, the accusation that is still lingering, that's haunting him, that he's a flip flopper. And in fact that was something that McCain called him when he was running up against him. And there's an interesting take on this by Nick Kristof in The New York Times this morning. He writes, "Until the Republican primary sucked him into its vortex, he was a pragmatist and a policy wonk rather similar to Bill Clinton and President Obama, but more conservative." So Chuck, what do you think about this idea that the more interesting battle may be Romney versus Romney?

TODD: Well, I mean, that's obviously what the conservatives in this race are trying to create. And the Obama campaign is hoping that a Newt Gingrich or a Rick Santorum uses this line of attack against Mitt Romney because they believe it's his biggest vulnerability. The Republicans trying to make the case he's not really conservative and the Obama campaign trying to make the case that he doesn't have a core, that he's not a center politician. So it is ultimately, we're going to find out if Mitt Romney does come under a sustained attack.

And remember, while he's been the frontrunner for a year there has not been a sustained attack on him. For the last six months all of these other candidates have been attacking each other. They've all been fighting inside this conservative primary. This is the first week where you're really seeing the entire field that's left focusing all their fire on Mitt Romney and it'll be interesting to see, what does he look like? What kind of shape is he in? And I think we'll know after South Carolina, because in the next, I'd say two weeks, it'll be pretty sustained. What does he look like after that? And we'll know if he's got what it takes to go all the way.

CURRY: Well, one of the candidates who perhaps has not faced as much attack as the others is Rick Santorum because he kind of escaped under the radar there from it. But now after a strong second-place showing in Iowa, he's about to face the meat grinder of tough scrutiny for the first time. So is he going to have to change his conservative message as he's looking into north – looking into New Hampshire, which is a much less conservative state, David?

GREGORY: Well, he's going to be under a very intense scrutiny by the other candidates. We'll see what Mitt Romney does and how much of a threat he feels that Santorum really is. But I think it's significant that Texas Governor Perry has decided to stay in the race. He'll go and debate in New Hampshire but he really wants to set up shop in South Carolina and he's going to target Santorum. He already did that in Iowa over pork barrel spending, you could go back about apparent contradictions between small government conservativism and some of his activism. Some of his attempts to moderate his positions, I'm talking about Santorum here, when he was running for re-election in Pennsylvania in 2006. So all of this is going to be on the table and Santorum has not gotten a hard look, not by the media, and certainly not by the other candidates.

CURRY: That certainly is about to begin. And boy, what a story this has been already so far. David Gregory, Chuck Todd, thanks so much for bringing us your perspective.

GREGORY: Thanks, Ann.

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Rick Santorum
  • ABC
  • CBS
  • Early Show
  • Good Morning America
  • NBC
  • Today
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Yeah, it's too bad that Boy

Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 1:32pm.

Yeah, it's too bad that Boy Barry didn't have to go through the 'meat grinder', because his anti-American, anti-Constitution, communist, Marxist, racist, mooooooooooooooslem-leaning agenda has only gotten stronger and 'bolder' since he's been in office - and these lemmings in the State-Run Media have helped him the whole way.

  • Login to post comments

I guess we know what to expect...

Submitted by Conservator on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 1:36pm.

...from Gregory on Saturday when he moderates the NBC, Facebook and Union Leader GOP debate.

  • Login to post comments

"THE meat grinder"?

Submitted by CO2Maker on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:09pm.

You mean, "OUR meat grinder," don't you, Ann whose last name is a cooking spice Curry. The "tough scrutiny" she refers to isn't the other candidates', because they have already done their homework and analyses. The "meat grinder" of "scrutiny" is what media drive around inside their satellite trucks and store off-camera in their anchorages at the Big Studio!

  • Login to post comments

In other news part 185678368

Submitted by Tomorama on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:10pm.

Obama instead has a "meet and greet with the press for lunch and they ate grinders"...................

I could have used a "slurp and burp" analogy, but I needed the meet and greet meme to remain intact.

If you make poverty easy, you will have more of it. Benjamin Franklin
  • Login to post comments

Tomorama,

Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:14pm.

Good but I was expecting a 'grinder'/'Weiner' joke first. Something like, 'when the media gets done putting a candidate through the grinder all you end up with is a Weiner.

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

You could also try 'blow and

Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:18pm.

You could also try 'blow and go'...............it has a wide variety of meanings, all of which would fit into this story.

  • Login to post comments

Santorum is just the new

Submitted by goldwater89 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 3:01pm.

Santorum is just the new flavor of the week. He's also a pariah to Independents.

  • Login to post comments

"Santorum about to go through

Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 3:21pm.

"Santorum about to go through meat grinder", says one of the meat grinders.

  • Login to post comments

The toothpaste is out of the tube, dear Ann

Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 3:35pm.

How much support would Santorum retain if he changed his conservative message as she proposes?

Not much.

His current supporters, buoyed by his virtual-tie showing in Iowa, would distrust him and desert him.

Potential 'moderate' supporters would distrust his motives and not rally to him.

Unlike TV networks marketing sitcoms and morning talk shows, politicians can't repackage themselves in the middle of a campaign and hope to gain supporters. Look Romney. He's changed his message over the years and still has problems gaining support from those who see him as a flip-flopper. The public sees right through it.

On a related note, I understand the Obama campaign has obtained license to use a line from an episode of The Simpsons. Whenever the question about the state of the economy comes up, the President will assume his best Bart-voice and say --

"I didn't do it."

And his supporters will chuckle.

  • Login to post comments

They are so cute.

Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 4:03pm.

The secular, liberal mindset is a minority in this Country, yet a conservative needs to, in their opinion, change his direction to fit the 20% minority in order to gain popular support. Make sense? BS rarely does.

  • Login to post comments

Can't say i blame folks for being concerned

Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 4:49pm.

Santorum supports states rights to ban contraceptives. Pretty slippery slope there.

  • Login to post comments

That sounds like a really

Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 5:07pm.

That sounds like a really serious issue, which might just ruin our country...................all of our other problems are minor distractions, compared to that, gay marraige, animal rights, and the rest of those heavyweight problems.

  • Login to post comments

its not

Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 5:13pm.

A huge issue, but big enough to to be concerned.

  • Login to post comments

I'd say the main word here is

Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 6:04pm.

I'd say the main word here is 'states' rights, as opposed to the federal government's 'rights', which is the direction we have been going under the Obama REGIME............and it's pretty apparant that they don't have a lot of empathy, respect, or support for 'states rights' in an ever-increasing number of areas. So, no............I'm not real concerned about the contraceptive issue.

  • Login to post comments

Exactly. In theory, if New

Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 6:19pm.

Exactly. In theory, if New Jersey banned contraceptives, you could drive to or order from Delaware. But, of course, the liberal government model would interfere and the Feds would overide a persons right to order products from out-of-State, that slippery slope is all cool to the left though.

  • Login to post comments

To me it's a slippery slope

Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:21pm.

Will he try to ban the morning after pill? I understand you think Obama has been a terrible President and for the most part I agree with you.

I am simply saying that some of the social issues I see from him are kind of alarming.

  • Login to post comments

If that's the case,

Submitted by killa37 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:22am.

If that's the case, Shawn-E-Boy..............we ALL should have taken a 'morning after pill' the day after Boy Barry won the 2008 election...........because he HAS been an ugly and disasterous abortion since then!!!

'Morning after pill'??? Are you serious, Shawn??? That is some kind of issue - in this era???? Jeeeeeez...........somebody give me a little dose of REALITY!!!!!

  • Login to post comments

it is not a huge deal for me

Submitted by shawn. on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:46am.

Just an area of concern.

  • Login to post comments

The mantra of baseball coaches everywhere is . . .

Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:55pm.

. . . "Keep your eye on the ball."

The ball, in this case, is Obama's miserable performance in dealing with a failing economy.

As important as social issues are, the Democrats will key on them to distract voters from the elephant in their living room -- Unemployment & Federal Spending.

  • Login to post comments

Very true

Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:30pm.

The MSM is totally in the tank for Obama. Allowing prayer in schools and religious freedom I agree with wholeheartedly. It's when he Implies sodomy should be illegal that concerns me.

  • Login to post comments

What Curry is really warning

Submitted by celator on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 5:55pm.

What Curry is really warning Santorum about is: "Is Rick Santorum going to agree to lie down prostrate, kiss our feet and worship the MSM, giving us the adoration we so richly deserve, or are we going to have to slice him up into unrecognizable pieces of meat like we did to Herman Cain and Michelle Bachmann?"

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

Like the meatgrinder

Submitted by Pinetree3 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 7:46pm.

Like the meatgrinder whats-it's-face went through? Oh, wait. He didn't have to go through a meatgrinder.

  • Login to post comments

Oh, yes he did!

Submitted by CO2Maker on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 7:19am.

There was Chris the Wide Mouth Frog grinding on his shin like a little Maltese, getting a tingle. And Ed 'I hope my face doesn't freeze this way" Schmutz, grinding on his other shin like a Newfoundland with loco weed. And Larry O'Donnell doing the bump and grind like he was Rosie O'Donnell.

Obama got the daily grind from the MSW every day during 2008.

Grind grind grind. David Brooks couldn't contain himself when he saw the crease in BOB's pants. Think, "organ grinder" Brooks.

  • Login to post comments

Yep, there's a reason that we

Submitted by killa37 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 11:37am.

Yep, there's a reason that we call Christine Matthews the 'Leghumper'............

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Goldberg: Scandal Reporting Needs to Focus on Hard News, Not Political Spin
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use