NBC's Curry: Santorum About to Go Through 'Meat Grinder;' Does He Have to 'Change His Conservative Message'?
On Thursday's NBC Today, co-host Ann Curry predicted that following his strong finish in Iowa, Rick Santorum was "about to face the meat grinder of tough scrutiny for the first time." Turning to Meet the Press host David Gregory, she wondered: "So is he going to have to change his conservative message as he's looking...into New Hampshire, which is a much less conservative state, David?"
Gregory suggested some lines of attack: "Well, he's going to be under a very intense scrutiny by the other candidates....you could go back about apparent contradictions between small government conservativism and some of his activism. Some of his attempts to moderate his positions...when he was running for re-election in Pennsylvania in 2006."
Gregory concluded: "So all of this is going to be on the table and Santorum has not gotten a hard look, not by the media, and certainly not by the other candidates." Curry added: "That certainly is about to begin."
<<Like this post? Help us take on media bias by donating to NewsBusters (there's also a PayPal option on that page). Without the support of our readers, NewsBusters would not be possible.>>
On ABC's Good Morning America, correspondent John Berman noted how Santorum was under "new scrutiny" and being, "Asked about past statements comparing same-sex relationships to bestiality."
On CBS's The Early Show, fill-in co-host Nancy Cordes proclaimed that Santorum's success in Iowa "is getting him a lot of attention, a lot of money and questions about his political past." In the report that followed, Correspondent Bill Whitaker declared: "In Iowa, his social conservatism had strong appeal to born-again Christians, 56% of caucus-goers. In the last New Hampshire primary, only 21% of GOP voters were born-again Christians. To win here he must broaden his appeal..."
Here is a full transcript of Curry's January 5 discussion with Gregory and Chuck Todd:
7:07AM ET
ANN CURRY: Let's bring in now NBC's David Gregory, who's the moderator, of course, of Meet the Press, and Chuck Todd, who's NBC's political director and chief White House correspondent, he's in Manchester, New Hampshire this morning. Good morning to both of you.
DAVID GREGORY: Good morning, Ann.
CHUCK TODD: Good morning, Ann.
CURRY: So four years ago Rick Santorum endorses Mitt Romney over John McCain and we all know what they say about payback. But does a McCain endorsement really help Mitt Romney in the race for the conservative vote? David, you want to take that?
DAVID GREGORY: Well, look, he is an establishment favorite in New Hampshire. He's won it twice. This is Mitt Romney, who's already got a lead, trying to spike the football a little bit early here and build some momentum. He is a frontrunner but comes out of Iowa still pretty fragile. Santorum's doing well. Perry's still in the race. Gingrich is at least trying to build that resurgency in New Hampshire. So he's actually got to demonstrate that he can win and that he can win big, and New Hampshire's got to be that place.
CURRY: And he's dealing with, of course, the accusation that is still lingering, that's haunting him, that he's a flip flopper. And in fact that was something that McCain called him when he was running up against him. And there's an interesting take on this by Nick Kristof in The New York Times this morning. He writes, "Until the Republican primary sucked him into its vortex, he was a pragmatist and a policy wonk rather similar to Bill Clinton and President Obama, but more conservative." So Chuck, what do you think about this idea that the more interesting battle may be Romney versus Romney?
TODD: Well, I mean, that's obviously what the conservatives in this race are trying to create. And the Obama campaign is hoping that a Newt Gingrich or a Rick Santorum uses this line of attack against Mitt Romney because they believe it's his biggest vulnerability. The Republicans trying to make the case he's not really conservative and the Obama campaign trying to make the case that he doesn't have a core, that he's not a center politician. So it is ultimately, we're going to find out if Mitt Romney does come under a sustained attack.
And remember, while he's been the frontrunner for a year there has not been a sustained attack on him. For the last six months all of these other candidates have been attacking each other. They've all been fighting inside this conservative primary. This is the first week where you're really seeing the entire field that's left focusing all their fire on Mitt Romney and it'll be interesting to see, what does he look like? What kind of shape is he in? And I think we'll know after South Carolina, because in the next, I'd say two weeks, it'll be pretty sustained. What does he look like after that? And we'll know if he's got what it takes to go all the way.
CURRY: Well, one of the candidates who perhaps has not faced as much attack as the others is Rick Santorum because he kind of escaped under the radar there from it. But now after a strong second-place showing in Iowa, he's about to face the meat grinder of tough scrutiny for the first time. So is he going to have to change his conservative message as he's looking into north – looking into New Hampshire, which is a much less conservative state, David?
GREGORY: Well, he's going to be under a very intense scrutiny by the other candidates. We'll see what Mitt Romney does and how much of a threat he feels that Santorum really is. But I think it's significant that Texas Governor Perry has decided to stay in the race. He'll go and debate in New Hampshire but he really wants to set up shop in South Carolina and he's going to target Santorum. He already did that in Iowa over pork barrel spending, you could go back about apparent contradictions between small government conservativism and some of his activism. Some of his attempts to moderate his positions, I'm talking about Santorum here, when he was running for re-election in Pennsylvania in 2006. So all of this is going to be on the table and Santorum has not gotten a hard look, not by the media, and certainly not by the other candidates.
CURRY: That certainly is about to begin. And boy, what a story this has been already so far. David Gregory, Chuck Todd, thanks so much for bringing us your perspective.
GREGORY: Thanks, Ann.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Yeah, it's too bad that Boy
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 1:32pm.
Yeah, it's too bad that Boy Barry didn't have to go through the 'meat grinder', because his anti-American, anti-Constitution, communist, Marxist, racist, mooooooooooooooslem-leaning agenda has only gotten stronger and 'bolder' since he's been in office - and these lemmings in the State-Run Media have helped him the whole way.
I guess we know what to expect...
Submitted by Conservator on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 1:36pm.
...from Gregory on Saturday when he moderates the NBC, Facebook and Union Leader GOP debate.
"THE meat grinder"?
Submitted by CO2Maker on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:09pm.
You mean, "OUR meat grinder," don't you, Ann whose last name is a cooking spice Curry. The "tough scrutiny" she refers to isn't the other candidates', because they have already done their homework and analyses. The "meat grinder" of "scrutiny" is what media drive around inside their satellite trucks and store off-camera in their anchorages at the Big Studio!
In other news part 185678368
Submitted by Tomorama on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:10pm.
Obama instead has a "meet and greet with the press for lunch and they ate grinders"...................
I could have used a "slurp and burp" analogy, but I needed the meet and greet meme to remain intact.
Tomorama,
Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:14pm.
Good but I was expecting a 'grinder'/'Weiner' joke first. Something like, 'when the media gets done putting a candidate through the grinder all you end up with is a Weiner.
You could also try 'blow and
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 2:18pm.
You could also try 'blow and go'...............it has a wide variety of meanings, all of which would fit into this story.
Santorum is just the new
Submitted by goldwater89 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 3:01pm.
Santorum is just the new flavor of the week. He's also a pariah to Independents.
"Santorum about to go through
Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 3:21pm.
"Santorum about to go through meat grinder", says one of the meat grinders.
The toothpaste is out of the tube, dear Ann
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 3:35pm.
How much support would Santorum retain if he changed his conservative message as she proposes?
Not much.
His current supporters, buoyed by his virtual-tie showing in Iowa, would distrust him and desert him.
Potential 'moderate' supporters would distrust his motives and not rally to him.
Unlike TV networks marketing sitcoms and morning talk shows, politicians can't repackage themselves in the middle of a campaign and hope to gain supporters. Look Romney. He's changed his message over the years and still has problems gaining support from those who see him as a flip-flopper. The public sees right through it.
On a related note, I understand the Obama campaign has obtained license to use a line from an episode of The Simpsons. Whenever the question about the state of the economy comes up, the President will assume his best Bart-voice and say --
"I didn't do it."
And his supporters will chuckle.
They are so cute.
Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 4:03pm.
The secular, liberal mindset is a minority in this Country, yet a conservative needs to, in their opinion, change his direction to fit the 20% minority in order to gain popular support. Make sense? BS rarely does.
Can't say i blame folks for being concerned
Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 4:49pm.
Santorum supports states rights to ban contraceptives. Pretty slippery slope there.
That sounds like a really
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 5:07pm.
That sounds like a really serious issue, which might just ruin our country...................all of our other problems are minor distractions, compared to that, gay marraige, animal rights, and the rest of those heavyweight problems.
its not
Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 5:13pm.
A huge issue, but big enough to to be concerned.
I'd say the main word here is
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 6:04pm.
I'd say the main word here is 'states' rights, as opposed to the federal government's 'rights', which is the direction we have been going under the Obama REGIME............and it's pretty apparant that they don't have a lot of empathy, respect, or support for 'states rights' in an ever-increasing number of areas. So, no............I'm not real concerned about the contraceptive issue.
Exactly. In theory, if New
Submitted by ant on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 6:19pm.
Exactly. In theory, if New Jersey banned contraceptives, you could drive to or order from Delaware. But, of course, the liberal government model would interfere and the Feds would overide a persons right to order products from out-of-State, that slippery slope is all cool to the left though.
To me it's a slippery slope
Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:21pm.
Will he try to ban the morning after pill? I understand you think Obama has been a terrible President and for the most part I agree with you.
I am simply saying that some of the social issues I see from him are kind of alarming.
If that's the case,
Submitted by killa37 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:22am.
If that's the case, Shawn-E-Boy..............we ALL should have taken a 'morning after pill' the day after Boy Barry won the 2008 election...........because he HAS been an ugly and disasterous abortion since then!!!
'Morning after pill'??? Are you serious, Shawn??? That is some kind of issue - in this era???? Jeeeeeez...........somebody give me a little dose of REALITY!!!!!
it is not a huge deal for me
Submitted by shawn. on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 12:46am.
Just an area of concern.
The mantra of baseball coaches everywhere is . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 9:55pm.
. . . "Keep your eye on the ball."
The ball, in this case, is Obama's miserable performance in dealing with a failing economy.
As important as social issues are, the Democrats will key on them to distract voters from the elephant in their living room -- Unemployment & Federal Spending.
Very true
Submitted by shawn. on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:30pm.
The MSM is totally in the tank for Obama. Allowing prayer in schools and religious freedom I agree with wholeheartedly. It's when he Implies sodomy should be illegal that concerns me.
What Curry is really warning
Submitted by celator on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 5:55pm.
What Curry is really warning Santorum about is: "Is Rick Santorum going to agree to lie down prostrate, kiss our feet and worship the MSM, giving us the adoration we so richly deserve, or are we going to have to slice him up into unrecognizable pieces of meat like we did to Herman Cain and Michelle Bachmann?"
Like the meatgrinder
Submitted by Pinetree3 on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 7:46pm.
Like the meatgrinder whats-it's-face went through? Oh, wait. He didn't have to go through a meatgrinder.
Oh, yes he did!
Submitted by CO2Maker on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 7:19am.
There was Chris the Wide Mouth Frog grinding on his shin like a little Maltese, getting a tingle. And Ed 'I hope my face doesn't freeze this way" Schmutz, grinding on his other shin like a Newfoundland with loco weed. And Larry O'Donnell doing the bump and grind like he was Rosie O'Donnell.
Obama got the daily grind from the MSW every day during 2008.
Grind grind grind. David Brooks couldn't contain himself when he saw the crease in BOB's pants. Think, "organ grinder" Brooks.
Yep, there's a reason that we
Submitted by killa37 on Fri, 01/06/2012 - 11:37am.
Yep, there's a reason that we call Christine Matthews the 'Leghumper'............