NBC's Matt Lauer Praises Richard Branson's 'Different Kind of Capitalism' Not Driven By Profits
Updated [12:54 ET]: More analysis and full transcript added.
Introducing an interview with CEO Richard Branson about his new book, "Screw Business As Usual," on Thursday's NBC Today, co-host Matt Lauer proclaimed: "...Sir Richard Branson argues the driving force behind capitalism should not be about making a profit, it's about caring for people, communities, and the planet." [Audio available here]
After questioning Branson on the practicality of such a business model, Lauer concluded: "So it's a different kind of capitalism. You're not saying that once you become successful you abandon the principles of capitalism, you just adjust those principles." Moments later, Lauer wondered if, "that form of capitalism would calm some of these emotions that we're seeing in the streets right now" in the Occupy Wall Street movement? [View video after the jump]
Update:
Branson praised the left-wing protesters: "Well, I'm actually a supporter of Occupy Wall Street....it's peaceful demonstrations by and large. They're demonstrating because they don't like business as usual. They want to see business change. And I think they're right in wanting to see business change."
Lauer replied: "So as part of the 1%, and some would argue part of the 1/10 of 1%, you identify with the 99%?" Branson continued: "I identify completely. I mean, for instance, in America you've got a lot of people who are out of work and you've got a lot of people in work. Now, a business – "Screw Business As Usual" would make sure that every single person had a job."
Here is a full transcript of the December 1 interview:
8:01AM ET TEASE:
AL ROKER: We all know Sir Richard Branson. I mean, an eccentric billionaire who does things differently than a lot of folks. Well, he's got a surprising message for anybody starting a business. It's not just about the bottom line. He's going to explain that in just a moment.
MATT LAUER: I always look to forward to having him here.
8:18AM ET SEGMENT:
LAUER: He's an entrepreneur, an adventurer, one of the most successful businessmen in the world, but in his new book, Sir Richard Branson argues the driving force behind capitalism should not be about making a profit, it's about caring for people, communities, and the planet. The book is called "Screw Business As Usual." Sir Richard Branson, great to have you back. Welcome.
RICHARD BRANSON: Thank you.
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Business Unusual; Richard Branson's Surprising Approach to Success]
LAUER: I can almost hear the naysayers right now saying, "Wait a second, this guy has made his billions. He's got his money. I'm starting a brand new business, I'm trying to make ends meet. I need to turn a profit. I need to be efficient. I can't be worrying about some of the things he's preaching." How would you respond?
BRANSON: I think I would say they're right. I think when you're starting to build a business all that matters is survival, so, you know, make sure that you survive so you can do good once you've actually built your business. But whatever happens, run it in an ethical way whilst you're building it. Once you've built your business, then I think everybody in the business needs to become a force for good and get out there and try to, you know, help the communities around them.
LAUER: How do you respond to people – and I hear this a lot – who say, "You know what? Running a green business or running a socially responsible business is great for public relations but it's not how you make money, it's not good for the bottom line." How do you respond to that?
BRANSON: I would say it's rubbish basically. I mean, Marks & Spencer's in England reduced their – increased their bottom line by $180 million a year by turning their business into a green business. So there's enormous amounts of money to be saved by going out there and trying to become an efficient business. And so, you know, if you can actually turn your business around and have all of your employees realizing that you have become a force for good, you know, people will work harder.
LAUER: So it's a different kind of capitalism. You're not saying that once you become successful you abandon the principles of capitalism, you just adjust those principles.
BRANSON: Yeah. I mean, you've – obviously making profit is critical if you're going to create new jobs and you know, expand your business and you know, conquer the world in whatever you're trying to do and make a difference within your business. But then, you know, people like myself, we're entrepreneurs, and I think we are able to see problems in the world like global warming or like, you know, disease in Africa, or, you know, other major problems and get in there and tackle them.
LAUER: Do you think if more people at a later stage in business embrace these kinds of ideas we would see less of a back lash, the kind of back lash that we're seeing in the streets of cities all across the country and around the world right now, the so-called Occupy movement? Do you think that there would be – that that form of capitalism would calm some of these emotions that we're seeing in the streets right now?
BRANSON: Well, I'm actually a supporter of Occupy Wall Street, I think-
LAUER: Tell me why.
BRANSON: Well, first of all, it's peaceful demonstrations by and large. They're demonstrating because they don't like business as usual. They want to see business change. And I think they're right in wanting to see business change. I think, you know, if every single business leader and every single person working within every business could actually, you know, persuade the people who are running their companies to get out there and sort out the world's problems we would get those problems sorted. We can't just leave it to the politicians and the social workers.
LAUER: So as part of the 1%, and some would argue part of the 1/10 of 1%, you identify with the 99%?
BRANSON: I identify completely. I mean, for instance, in America you've got a lot of people who are out of work and you've got a lot of people in work. Now, a business – "Screw Business As Usual" would make sure that every single person had a job. It would mean that some – the people who are in work might work a little bit less, they might have slightly longer holidays, which I don't think a lot of them would mind, and you would ask for volunteers first of all and just share the amount of work around. Why have a situation where, you know, some people are on the dole and, you know, not making ends meet and other people are working sometimes much harder than they would like to work.
LAUER: Do you really think people would embrace that concept here?
BRANSON: I believe so. I mean, if – we are, you know, we've asked work forces how many of you who are in work, if you were given the chance to job share or go part-time during, you know, a year or two of crisis whilst other people are being laid off, how many of you would do it? And at least 20% of every work force stick their hand up and say, "You know, I'd love to have six months at home and maybe more holiday time and a bit less money for a year or two in order to help protect my fellow employees. And it's just that kind of thinking that needs to go on.
LAUER: Let me change subjects for a second. Because you were in the headlines – not that you made the headlines, it wasn't by your own making – not long ago, earlier this year because your home on Necker Island, where I have been privileged enough to be at one point, was destroyed by fire. Just take me through what it was like to be there through that. Luckily no one got hurt.
BRANSON: It was a obviously very frightening night in that my mother and my children were in the house and I was just in an out house at the time and woke up to see these 200 or 300 foot flames.
LAUER: An out building is what we call it here, an out house is a different thing.
BRANSON: Alright. I wasn't actually in the out house.
LAUER: Right.
BRANSON: And, anyway, I mean, actually you're the number one suspect for that because they were looking for people who might have had a reason to do it.
LAUER: It wasn't me.
BRANSON: It was the lightning.
LAUER: Right.
BRANSON: And a massive lightning strike and it was a hurricane, 90-mile-per-hour winds going through.
LAUER: But losing the place that was so dear to you, you also say, kind of triggered something in your mind that you have a different way now of looking at stuff. What do you mean by that?
BRANSON: Yes, I mean, I was, not wanting to name drop, but I was actually standing with Kate Winslet's kids, we were looking up at the house and I just said to the kids, "Look, you know, stuff is not important. I mean the fact that we're all safe and we're all well, that is what matters in life." And so, you know, it's family, friends, and this wonderful life we live in, just to throw ourselves into it is what matters. And so everything, you know, a lot of precious things went up. You know, putting life in perspective but they're really not that important.
LAUER: Sir Richard Branson, it's always nice to have you here. I'm glad you're well and the book is called "Screw Business As Usual."
BRANSON: Thank you.
LAUER: Come back and see us soon.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
I call BS on this one. If you
Submitted by inquiringmind on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 11:51am.
I call BS on this one. If you could go back in time 20 years and ask Branson that same question you would get a very different answer.
Likely true, but regardless of his stoooopid opinion,
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:29pm.
...if companies didn't make a profit every day, they would not be here the next day, providing idiot professional bloviators the opportunity to ask them inane questions. Without making a profit, Richard Branson would be just another 'hole with an opinion.
The primary, and only constant reason for any company to exist is to make a profit - anything after that is gravy, and only possible because of that profit. Just like any living species; their only purpose is to survive and perpetuate the species. Without that primary goal being fulfilled, nothing else is possible.
"Their ONLY purpose"?
Submitted by goodone91 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:15pm.
Uhm... they have another purpose, glorifying God, you know. P.S. Sorry for all caps, but I couldn't get HTML Code to work on the title.Glorifying God...okay, I'm not sure how broadly one would define
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 12:38am.
that so as to include:
http://www.satanshop.com/
but I think my point stands...it isn't necessary to "glorify Gawd" for a business to survive, however, without profits, regardless of how it reflects upon any deity, a business WILL cease to exist as such.
It's not the 1%ers
Submitted by pockets64 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:54pm.
It's not the 1%ers who strive for continuous success. They can afford the largess.
It's the top 1% of the 99%ers. At that level, you are either trying to become a top 1%er or fighting to not be one of the bottom 1%er.
It's a precarious battle at that level.
I see more Red Flags than at a May Day parade at Red Square!
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:05pm.
What's funny is that I don't see Mr. Lauer volunteering to work for Comcast/NBC at minimum wage. Or volunteering, period. Because, you know, wanting to make money is so evil and wrong and all.
I'm calling BS on this one too. Mr. Branson's businesses would not be operating if they weren't making a profit regardless of motivation.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Sir Richard.....
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:15pm.
I'd be happy to take Nekkar off your hands once you rebuild your island manse. If you gift it to me, I'll create a paradise for all of my conservative NewsBuster community.
Now, let's see you practice what you blather....for the good of the NewsBusters community, give ME your private island.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
B.S. is B.S.
Submitted by retrocon on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:17pm.
Branson lives one of the highest lifestyles on the planet.
Money enabled it.
He is not living to a middle class income lifestyle, and giving the rest to charities.
It's nice that these mega-wealthy libs do have their foundations and such, but Branson giving a 100 million bucks to a charity has less effect on his lifestyle than me giving 1000 bucks.
Where's the sacrifice?
Oh, wait, he is making the world better, he is enabling the super-rich to buy rides into space. Sorry, i forgot.
I have great admiration for those who succeed as Branson has, i just have no tolarence for hypocrites.
Obviously
Submitted by pockets64 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:57pm.
Obviously he stole it. That's the only way rich become rich. Oh, and the Paris Hilton way. But her family stole it and gave it to her. /sarc
Certainly after achieving the level of success Branson has achieved he can sit back and let his earnings make his money for him. He can afford to make space ships. But I guarantee you he will not be giving free rides on those birds!!
Every businessman worth a tinker's damn
Submitted by HockeyKid on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:22pm.
understands the value of intangible assets such as customer good will, corporate reputation, etc. Branson trying to brand capitalism as some kind of blind, profit-at-all-costs system is disingenuous at best. And Lauer is just hearing what Lauer wants to hear (what else is new?).
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Easy for him to say
Submitted by mustango on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:27pm.
You know, it's so easy for people like Branson to tell other people not to worry about making money when he's already made his. I think we should ask his employees if they care whether his company remains healthfully profitable.
So by this clowns'
Submitted by gfrrman on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 2:42am.
logic, Branson should be THE BIGGEST employer in the world and magically stay in business WITHOUT MAKING A PROFIT???-------gubment. Put up or shut up.....'givitaway-givitaway-givitawayNOW'!!!!!
g
BS BranSon
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:35pm.
Sir BS BranSon,
It's real easy for you to say that, you have billions and you can afford to say stuff like that because you can afford to be like that. But Capitalism will NEVER be about caring about others, it's about creating capital, which is what you earn. What you DO about it is another matter entirely and that's called Compassion if you care about the people and the planet(erroneously so).
Otherwise you could be like Warren Buffett and expect to demand to be taxed more but never volunteer to give more.
-Jon
Classic Doublespeak
Submitted by Edward Lee on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:29pm.
Capitalism is Socialism
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
If you endorse something that is the exact opposite of something widely considered to be a good thing, define that thing as its opposite to advance your agenda.
Branson is lying through his teeth...
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:47pm.
...and Matt Lauer is a brainless dumbass for buying it.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
"..not motivated by profits".
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:12pm.
Yeah. It's called "communism".
Capitalism can be described as a series of mutually beneficial exchanges or decisions. I'd be interested in where we find these "angels" who will be willing to perform labor and produce products solely for the benefit of others in an equitable manner on an ongoing basis. And, who will keep track?
Williams Is A Lightweight
Submitted by rammingspeed on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:20pm.
Brian Williams is an annoying moron. He's Ed Schultz without the screaming and name calling. But know this: People in this country are rejecting him. Even stone-assed Marxists understand it's stupid to say "capitalism...without profit." Can you say "oxymoron" Williams?
MSNBC practices a capitalism not driven by profits.
Submitted by no tingly legs on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:38pm.
Of course it's not intentional. It's just caused by lousy ratings which is, in turn, caused by lousy content presented by lousy "talent".
"Post-capitalism"
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:04pm.
Branson and Buffett are what we might term 'post-capitalists.' Capitalism provided the business environment in which they became incredibly wealthy.
And now that they a extraordinarily rich, they want to change the rules in order to make the world a (theoretically) better place. An economic sustem that has no impact on their life style, but impacts everyone elses.
Naturally, they gain the attention (and adoration) of the MSM, as well as the progressive political candidates to whom they donate $ milliions.
They are hypocrites.
Good points, but...
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:00pm.
I'd call that "entrenchment", not post-capitalism. But that's just me.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Capital Gains
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:05pm.
There is no capital without profit (gains). Don't eat the seed corn.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
so who is getting the extra $10?
Submitted by mom_rox on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 3:34pm.
I noticed yesterday that the Virgin Mobile monthly plan my son currently has at $25 is now $35 for new users.
You first have to make the money
Submitted by c5then on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 3:51pm.
in order to use it on philanthropic ventures. Without the ability to make large amounts of capital, there wouldn't be any Bransons or Buffets or Gates, etc. etc.
Who is John Galt?
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
ROFLMAO!
Submitted by MightyMouth on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:23pm.
Whaaateeever pal! LOL!!
Question for these 'giving' 1%ers...
Submitted by vrwc13 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 5:03pm.
...just whose money should be spread amongst the masses, yours or ours?
v
The burden of life is from ourselves, its lightness from the grace of Christ and the love of God. - William Bernard Ullanthorne
Liar
Submitted by Kleenex on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 5:55pm.
He's a liar pure and simple. We have to start calling people what they really are.
Our economy runs on the
Submitted by rbosque on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 6:33pm.
Our economy runs on the profit motive, if not then the system would collapse. Last I checked, Mat Lauer and the other weasels working for the networks all cash in their paychecks.
Nobody gets pissed when THEY make 10's of millions of dollars and live in the Hamptons. The open market seems to worrk fine for them....
Why doesn't the headline
Submitted by cristo on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 7:13pm.
Why doesn't the headline read, "Branson signs over his billions to the 99%"
A modern-day Eugene Lawson
Submitted by EllisWyatt on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 10:49pm.
"My motives were pure. I wanted nothing for myself. I've never sought anything for myself. Miss Taggart, I can proudly say that in all of my life I have never made a profit!"
Her voice was quiet, steady and solemn: "Mr. Lawson, I think I should let you know that of all the statements a man can make, that is the one I consider most despicable."
"Elections have consequences" ... unless the Republicans win
"Dissent is Patriotic" ... when it's against conservative policies.
Useful idiot, never heard of
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 12:51am.
Useful idiot, never heard of him, pass the the salt.
lol, this reminds me
Submitted by gfrrman on Fri, 12/02/2011 - 2:52am.
of an older repeat of S. Park I saw recently(if one is a fan of such)
..."I vote turd sandwich...."
...."NO, it's GIANT DOUCHE"...
Take your pick!!!
g