NBC's Curry Sees Doom for GOP in 2012 in Wake of Herman Cain Controversy
Updated [11:22 ET]: More analysis and full transcript added.
At the top of Thursday's NBC Today, co-host Ann Curry reported on Herman Cain's campaign blaming Rick Perry for dredging up sexual harassment allegations against the Republican front-runner and then wondered: "Will this intra-party fight hurt the Republican Party's chance of taking back the White House?" [Audio available here]
Later, in an interview with Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus Curry touted the back and forth among the GOP primary candidates as a "serious feud" and asked: "Do you think this scandal has affected your party's ability to unseat Barack Obama?" [View video after the jump]
Update:
Curry began the interview by worrying: "The question is how is the party and how is Herman Cain's candidacy? Let me ask you straight out. Can Herman Cain's candidacy for president survive the claims of sexual harassment from three women and now also this eyewitness?" Priebus began to explain that vigorous tough primary fight can help the party, but Curry stopped him: "But let me interrupt you, this – what's happening here though is – seems to be something else. There seems to be a intra-party conflict, a rivalry."
Curry went on to suggest that Priebus was somehow in charge of telling the GOP campaigns how to conduct themselves and what tactics to use: "Let me get your rules of the road as an RNC chair. If a rival campaign did leak this, does this cross the line in terms of the party and how things are done and not done?"
Here is a full transcript of the November 3 interview:
7:01AM ET TEASE:
MATT LAUER: The story involving Herman Cain has taken a dramatic new turn, another woman coming forward.
ANN CURRY: No kidding, that's right. As we just mentioned now, a third woman claims she made – that Cain made suggestive – sexually suggestive remarks and gestures to her back in the 1990s This as the Cain campaign blasts Rick Perry's camp, saying his operatives set off the whole firestorm. Will this intra-party fight hurt the Republican Party's chance of taking back the White House? We're going to talk with the Party's chairman straight ahead and ask that question.
7:05AM ET SEGMENT:
CURRY: Reince Priebus is the chairman of the Republican National Committee. Reince, good morning.
REINCE PRIEBUS: Hey, good morning, Ann. How are you?
CURRY: I'm okay.
PRIEBUS: Great.
CURRY: The question is how is the party and how is Herman Cain's candidacy? Let me ask you straight out. Can Herman Cain's candidacy for president survive the claims of sexual harassment from three women and now also this eyewitness?
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Cain Controversy; Third Woman Claims Candidate Was Sexually Inappropriate]
PRIEBUS: Well, I mean, it depends on the veracity of the claims. And you know, I'm not the referee, Ann, here. You know, primaries are tough and I just happen to believe that primaries are good for the party. I think that when you have the horsepower on your side of the aisle, like we have on the Republican side, they work.
You know, I come from Wisconsin and, you know, we have a new governor there that you know very well, by the name of Scott Walker. He came through a very tough primary. They work. And, by the way, you look at Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, they fought it out all the way through the end of June before a national convention. And guess what? It worked out pretty well for him. He took a super majority to congress, a 60-vote majority to the United States Senate-
CURRY: But let me interrupt you here and ask you-
PRIEBUS: So primaries work, Ann.
CURRY: But let me interrupt you, this – what's happening here though is – seems to be something else. There seems to be a intra-party conflict, a rivalry. Kind of almost a serious feud. You've got – which do you believe? Do you believe Cain is right in pointing the finger at the Perry campaign or do you think the Perry campaign is being honest in saying that it had nothing to do with this leak?
[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: GOP vs. GOP; Party Chief on New Fight Between Cain and Perry]
PRIEBUS: Listen, I'm not going to get in the middle of it. You know, and it's not my job to be the referee. My job is to make sure the-
CURRY: You are the head of the RNC, however, in some ways you are.
PRIEBUS: Well, yeah, of course I'm the head of the RNC, but as part of the RNC is that we don't pick winners and losers in presidential elections. My job, Ann, is to make sure that we have a Republican National Committee that's ready to go and we have a nominee. My job is to make sure that we put a good nominee on the ballot and that we defeat Barack Obama and save this country from an economy that's just not on track. And that's really what Americans want. Now, whether – who that nominee is going to be, that's anybody's guess. But getting into-
CURRY: Does this scandal – interrupting you, I'm so sorry for that, I know that's bad behavior, but let me just sort of get these questions in – do you think this scandal has affected your party's ability to unseat Barack Obama?
RIENCE PRIEBUS: Absolutely not. I mean, if you look at the polling, and you look at where Americans are at in this, in this country, they, number one, believe by 80% that this country is on the wrong track. They believe that this president hasn't delivered on his promises, and guess what? The President came to America. The President came to us as the great uniter. And now he's out campaigning as the great divider, pitting everyone against everybody, Republicans versus Democrats, rich versus poor. The economy couldn't be in any worse shape than it is right now.
And, you know, I think Americans are ready for a change. I mean, that, we know, is a constant. This issue and other issues are going to come and go, but at the end of the day, Americans are not going to believe that this president delivered on his promises or that the economy is in any better shape today than it was four years ago. It's worse.
CURRY: Let's get back to the issue at hand. And specifically now, you know the Perry campaign is also pointing the finger at the Romney campaign. So let me just get your rules of the road here.
PRIEBUS: Yeah, and I didn't even – I didn't even know that. So you're telling me information. So, there you go.
CURRY: Well, there you are. Well, a lot of this broke over the last 24 hours. Let me get your rules of the road as an RNC chair. If a rival campaign did leak this, does this cross the line in terms of the party and how things are done and not done?
PRIEBUS: You know, I don't think so. I mean, I think – and first of all, I don't know what's true and what's not. And it's not our job to be the Sherlock-
CURRY: But does it cross the line, in your view, if, in fact, it happened?
PRIEBUS: We're not the Sherlock Holmes of the – we're not the Sherlock Holmes of the presidential primary field. We've got 21 candidates, Ann, that filed in New Hampshire. What we are, are people who are trying to put the party together to rebuild our Republican National Committee, to get prepared for a president who's campaigning nonstop, all the time, raising money every single night. And we're going to be prepared with a nominee that's intelligent, articulate, and can earn the trust of the American people, to save this economy from a president who hasn't delivered and who just continues to give speeches but doesn't follow through. I mean, that's really where we're at in this country.
CURRY: Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, I'm sorry we're out of time but we really appreciate your joining us this morning. Thank you.
PRIEBUS: You bet. Thank you, Ann.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Trying to Curry favor?
Submitted by east tennessee john on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:24am.
Ann, I'm sure anything that in your limited mind gives hope to BO is a good thing and do you really care about what happens to the GOP?
Curry's Limited Mind -- Incredible Curry Quote
Submitted by libBuster on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:01pm.
I know its in vogue to insult the intellect of people you disagree with. But in Curry's case it may be justified. This from Ladies Home Journal:
She was warm and earnest, but also a little spacey; Al Roker once called her "our ambassador from Planet Zebulon." And she had a kind of ditzy, girlish innocence. In 1998, when I interviewed her for this magazine, a Today staffer told me how they were going to cover picture hanging on the show, and they were all discussing it. "Yes!" Curry piped up. "It's so important to be well hung." "We all started snickering," the staffer said, "and Ann was going, 'What? What? What did I say?'"
Incredible.
You mean you dream
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:24am.
of doom for the GOP. Don't worry, as we keep growing our debt, starting new unconstitutional wars and demonstrate astounding examples of crony capitalism, your days in control of this country are numbered.
Keep dreaming.
Wishful
Submitted by okie-pastor on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:27am.
Wishful Thinking!
Interestingly, this would have worked years ago. But now, thanks to websites like newsbusters and others, the public is aware of liberal bias and are skeptical about what's reported about republicans.
The only way...
Submitted by Upland_Patriot on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:34am.
Barrack O'Bummer wins is if conservatives stay home in droves and not vote his sorry a$$ out! The only GOP candidate that I could not vote for at this point is Huntsman, I mean, what's the difference?
Ann, repeating it over and over
Submitted by IgnatzJFahrquar on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:39am.
does not make it so. Although, the "head-in-the-sand" position fits you, and the rest of the Liberal Media quite well.
This fool woman can't see the
Submitted by jessieH on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:43am.
This fool woman can't see the lies she spews, how can she see anythig else?
Ha ha!
Submitted by MightyMouth on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:55am.
All this crap is way toooo early! I can't wait for the October 2012 surprise.
Let's see what could it be....
The GOP front runner is on video saying a 'cuss' word.
The GOP front runner is a racist or an Uncle Tom (either works for the MSM).
The GOP front runner had a massage at 'Happy Endings Massage and Mufflers shop'.
Obama invades Iran or even better... Israel.
Obama discovers unobtainium... a replacement for fossil fuels.
Hillary and Obama solve the 'middle east problem' by invoking eminent domain on Israeli settlements in Jerusalem , the new capitol of Palestine .
Darth Cheney comes out of retirement to run as VP
(actually I kind of like the last one)
The short answer: Too early to tell
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 10:58am.
Ann Curry: "Will this intra-party fight hurt the Republican Party's chance of taking back the White House?"
I think that's a legitimate question. Afterall, Cain said the revelation of the settlement/agreement was racially motivated, and then a day or two later, he blamed Perry's campaign for the publicizing of it. Condoleeza Rice warned against throwing the Race Card, and it turns out she was right; if a member of Perry's team did release this information, the MSM will use Cain's own race card on Perry. Very messy.
Ann Curry: "Do you think this scandal has affected your party's ability to unseat Barack Obama?"
Since we still don't know the nature of the sexual harassment accusations, this "scandal" question is rather premature. Curry has apparently skipped ahead a few pages in the script.
I think the best response for Republicans when questioned about Cain and the impact of the revelation, is to throw questions back at the interviewer and let them stumble for 'facts.'
Dose she and the media she
Submitted by TerryWest on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:13am.
Dose she and the media she represents really believe the gossip about Cain
( even if all turns out to be true) would really erase the costly failures of the Obama experiment?
Dose she really have that low of an opinion of the American people that they would dis regard the reality's we live and are informed about day to day over tabloid coverage and conjecture about Cain and some scrabbling between candidates?
Sanity Is In Short Supply In Washington Circles
Submitted by Avitar on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:22am.
OK they hope that this will bump off Herman Cain and take Rick Perry with him. That boosts Obama how exactly? If they do not have something on Romney even he will beat the horse Obama. Newt Gingrich will eat Obama as a light snack. They may think that all of the rich contributors Newt’s Solutions has had might drat him down, if so they have believed their own propaganda.
If not Herman Cain at the top of the ticket picking him up as number 2 would give the President candidate something to work with in taking the Senate and tying down the house. The question that the MSM needs to ask is who can Obama beat? He after all before beating John McCain had won every election by scandal and when the other guy did not have a scandal as in an Illinois legislative seat Obama lost.
I know the guy is a pretty radical black racist but still someone should interview the guy who beat Obama in Illinois.
Libs' Imaginary Friends...
Submitted by Annie Ashe Fields on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:41am.
...These people see things that aren't there - REPEATEDLY.
To this day, I remember Paula Jones’ bad perm. We all still live in the fresh hell of Anthony Weiner’s weiner picture still in our minds’ eye We remember the testimony that Bubba dropped trou and said ‘Wanna kiss it’?
In short, we had faces, names, quotes and witnesses who backed them up. We have witnesses now who say they saw something in a restaurant and a talk-radio station hallway but won’t give specifics. Unlike the original complainants, these ‘witnesses’ are not bound by any legal covenant. Note, too, the venues we are talking about: a restaurant and a radio station hallway are public places; not a hotel room or other private place… These people, Cain’s accusers & so-called witnesses are just throwing out fire-bombs of innuendo. And speaking of throwing firebombs of innuendo…
…We have the reporters in the initial Politico story not giving details about exactly what happened, in, as they themselves have framed it, some gentlemanly effort to protect the woman… Content, evidently with the result, which is to slander the reputation of the #1 GOP Presidential candidate, which is the only possible result from publishing with such a thin story if you have zero publishing standards but 110% agenda. (Parenthetically,didn’t Politico get some Soros money a few months back? I know Media Matters did. Duh. But didn’t Politico?)
Cain has accused Perry of doing this, based on the reasonable conclusion that since someone with knowledge of the 1990′s settlement went to work for him 2 weeks ago. 10 days ago the story bubbled then hit the front page Sunday night.
This morning I awake to see that Drudge has some stories that Rahm Emmanuel may have had a hand in this.
Okay… I’m not suggesting that this was coordinated between the two, but if you can’t follow the money the second best thing is benefit. Who does this benefit?
For GOP it would be Perry, of course, because it must be killing them, just fricking vexing to them that their guy, who started with so much heat, can’t get out of the cool basement of single digits.
For Democrats the natural beneficiary to taking Cain down a peg or two would be Obama, of course, who has been campaigning all along like Romney is going to be their opponent.
CONSIDER: They’ve spent campaign money already putting out ads & talking points as though Romney is their guy. Ferkryssakes! What do you think this whole OWS thing is? It’s an effort to foment civil unrest, next summer, during the conventions, after having spent the winter painting Romney as a Wall Street guy – their named enemy.
I’d bet my HOUSE it’s not just the polls we see on television & the internet that have Cain #1. I’d bet these campaigns have internal polling – always far more accurate & detailed – that shows Herman Cain’s support far, far, far, far, far stronger than anyone’s previously suspected and each campaign looked at it like good campaigns do and said, ‘Where’s his soft-underbelly? What’s the biggest balloon on these numbers we can prick to deflate this Cain train and stop it’?
LIKABILITY.
Cain’s support rests largely on a huge amount of good-will. Ephemeral good will.
Make him a philanderer and…
Look – Obama can’t – CAN’T - face a strong black man in the General Election. It’ll look like the 98-pound weakling punk-ass kid, clutching his trust-fund paid Harvard degree getting a finger-wagging scolding from his grandfather telling him to quit his nancy-boy whining, man-up, and get the frickin’ job done.
He’ll lose, and he knows it.
Therefore, based on all the foregoing, I, for one, believe the internal polls told them the Cain train was coming and Rahm was set loose – and Perry planted the story.
Sigh… This is going to be a long Primary.
Cain is not nominated
Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:41am.
If the media succeed in their attack on Cain the media will eventually use the fact that Cain was not nominated as proof that Republicans and/or Conservatives are too racist to elect a black man.
Accusers should be questioned.
Submitted by iamsaved on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 11:49am.
I read somewhere that the two women who accused Cain of sexual harassment and received a settlement are now doing nicely in their professional careers.
Has anyone asked them how many other sexual harassment suits they have filed? Was there a pattern? And I'm curious as to what constitues "sexual harassment". The definition has broadened so much over the years that's it's not possible to tell in many cases what the actual offense was.
There are many women in the federal government who's careers became successful after one or two sexual discrimination lawsuits gave them promotions into fields they didn't qualify for along with back pay. A nice spring-board that's not available to males, especially white males.
Ann Curry is a journalistic legend...
Submitted by KyWriter on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:21pm.
...in her own mind. In actuality, she is a simple-minded liberal mouthpiece with little intellectual capacity.
"...simple-minded liberal
Submitted by MightyMouth on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:35pm.
"...simple-minded liberal mouthpiece with little intellectual capacity"
Pretty much describes the average liberal who has time to vote but never seems to have time to check out the MSM talking points. Kinda like zombies, except shooting them in the head doesn't work because they have zero brain activity. That would suck, shoot a Zombie in the head and it still comes after you!! OMG!
That is a nightmare.
Submitted by KyWriter on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:57pm.
So how does one dispatch a liberal zombie? Probably shoot him in the leg; that would cut off the tingle (at least for Chrissy).
Even better...
Submitted by MightyMouth on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:11pm.
Throw a food stamp coupon in a group of liberals and watch them eat themselves. BTW if you REALLY need food stamps... go to Church, you will get much more than food. To take care of a Zombie like Chrissy you need to do his coffee wrong causing his intern to fall through a trap door into hell... wait... that won't get rid of Chrissy... even low ratings won't... The ONLY way to get rid of Chrissy is not watch his 'show'. haha!
You know what s*cks?
Submitted by Annie Ashe Fields on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:06pm.
I used to LIKE Ann Curry.
I thought she got a raw deal when she got passed over for Meredith Viera.
You know what else?
I HAVEN'T WATCHED THEM SINCE THE LATE 1980's.
Know why?
Because I couldn't take the saccharin level of when Katie Couric was elevated to some kind of tragi-god, which led to the on-air colonoscopy...
I SERIOUSLY don't want to know my morning news bunny that well.
I'm missing something here
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:42pm.
I didn't know where to ask this, forgive me if this wasn't the right place.
I've been trying to look around for it, but so far, I haven't seen anything that says irrefutably that Perry's campaign was behind this so-called sex harrassment leak about Cain, is there any proof of it?
Why would the Cain Campaign make the comment that it was the Perry Campaign that did it?
I might not be looking in the right places.
-Jon
It's circumstantial but compelling...
Submitted by Annie Ashe Fields on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:10pm.
A guy with knowledge of the Cain settlement wen to work for Perry 2 weeks ago.
10 days ago the story started simmering.
Politico went with it Sunday PM.
Hope that helps.
Compelling maybe
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:26pm.
But it wouldn't be the first time that Cain(or his camp) shot himself in the foot. Bachmann's all but out of the game after she did it twice.
Given the way he reacted to the N*word head thing, if it turns out it's just circumstantial that leads to nowhere, he's going to lose credibility. He needs to be real careful.
-Jon
I see our main stream media is focusing their attention...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:56pm.
on Herman Cain rather than on the violent "Occupy Wall Street" mobs in Oakland and other places.
I've also noticed that the main stream media is no longer comparing the "OWS" mobs to the well behaved "Tea Partiers".
Perhaps it is because it has become obvious to everyone that the "OWS" mobs can be more accurately described as more like urine smelling "Pee Partiers" than "Tea Partiers".
Getting out of control
Submitted by jon_torlin on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:09pm.
I'm almost convinced too that this is a distraction too on the part of someone on the Dems side to make it look like something the GOP candidates did to each other.
The stuff happening in recent hours of the OWS is extremely troubling but not surprising in that it's getting really bad(according to headlines on Drudge) that as someone pointed out, could lead to someone declaring an emergency that could lead to some martial law action. Or worse.
-Jon
This kind of diverson will
Submitted by MightyMouth on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:28pm.
This kind of diverson will continue for the the entire election cycle. Nothing really matters until the 2 months before the election. I am on record as giddy to see the 'October Surprise' by the Dems. If the Republicans fall for it this time then they should be defeated! I am stocking up for the Republican defeat. They are such dumbass, whimps and dickless (sorry for that). Obama 2012 more of the same!!
Back when Obama and Clinton
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 12:56pm.
Back when Obama and Clinton were locked in a vicious Democrat primary campaign against each other did Curry ever ask, ""Will this intra-party fight hurt the Democrat Party's chance of taking back the White House?"
No?
Didn't think so.
This explains the rise of Fox News, talk radio and...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 1:06pm.
popular sites on the internet. People need a place to go to see good and honest reporting and they know they will never find it coming from the main stream media.
And then there is Vera Baker ......
Submitted by jmigyanka@msn.com on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 5:30pm.
.........Barack Obama Cheating Scandal, Affair with Vera Baker?
http://socialmediaseo.net/2010/05/01/barack-obama-cheating-scandal-affai...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1076695/Obama-hit-affair-smears-...
Reince Priebus...
Submitted by jdripper on Thu, 11/03/2011 - 7:08pm.
is a joke.
Jack