Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 22, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • After Terrible Storm, ABC Devotes 10 Minutes to Crime, Botox and Entertainment, Skimps on IRS
  • ABC and CBS Ignore Obama Administration Investigating FNC's James Rosen
  • NBC's Gregory Scolds GOP for Comparing Obama to Nixon
  • CBS Highlights Ex-IRS Staffer Who Declares There Were No Politics at Cincinnati Office
  • Monday's Amnesia: CNN Covers Powerball Jackpot Winner as Much as IRS, AP, Benghazi Scandals
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News

Networks Pile On Cain: Will 'Bizarre' Response to Harassment Claims 'Derail' His Campaign?

By Kyle Drennen | November 01, 2011 | 11:21

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

All three network morning shows on Tuesday led with Herman Cain's response to allegations of sexual harassment in the 1990s and even speculated the scandal could end his candidacy, with NBC Today co-host Ann Curry proclaiming: "Damage control. Herman Cain changes his story....Will the controversy and his reaction to it derail his presidential campaign?"

On ABC's Good Morning America, co-host George Stephanopoulos announced: "24-hour flip-flop. Republican front-runner Herman Cain now admits he's been accused of sexual harassment and settlements were paid. His bizarre series of conflicting interviews.... what will it mean for his campaign?"

On CBS's The Early Show, correspondent Jan Crawford noted that Cain, "spent most of the day repeatedly trying to shoot down these allegations, but sometimes, his story did change. All of this is coming just as several new polls show his him solidifying his standing as the leader of the Republican pack."

Today co-host Matt Lauer remarked that Cain was "finding out the hard way about the attention that goes along with being a front-runner." On Good Morning America, Karl explained that Cain "says the whole story has come to light because he is now leading in the polls."

Crawford reported: "The allegations have created a media firestorm, and come as Cain is rising in the polls....Others have gone further, alleging that like then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, Cain is the victim of a high-tech lynching." She then added: "But the reporter who broke the story denies he had any agenda other than the truth."

Cain's fron-trunner status certainly seemed to play a role in the amount of media coverage of the controversy. On Monday, all three network morning shows as well as all three evening newscasts featured stories on it. ABC's Nightline also did a segment on the allegations against Cain.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Here is a full transcript of the November 1 coverage on Today:

7:00AM ET TEASE:

ANN CURRY: Damage control. Herman Cain changes his story on those claims he sexually harassed two women back in the 1990s. Will the controversy and his reaction to it derail his presidential campaign?

7:01AM ET TEASE:

MATT LAUER: I think it's fair to say that Herman Cain kind of came out of nowhere to become a force in the GOP presidential race and it seems now he's finding out the hard way about the attention that goes along with being a front-runner.

CURRY: That's exactly right. He spent much of the day on Monday addressing questions about sexual harassment allegations he faced nearly 20 years ago, and Cain only seemed to add to his problems as he spoke out in his own defense. What does it all mean for his campaign? We're going to get perspective this morning from NBC's Tom Brokaw straight ahead.        

7:02AM ET SEGMENT:

CURRY: But let's begin with the presidential – Republican presidential contender Herman Cain and his response to allegations – accusations of sexual harassment. NBC's senior investigative correspondent Lisa Myers is in Washington with more on this story. Lisa, good morning.

LISA MYERS: Hey Ann, good morning. The political storm which has engulfed Cain's candidacy shows no sign of abating. In fact, his efforts at damage control seemed to compound his problems as his story continues to shift.

[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Cain's Controversy; Candidate Changes Story on Harassment Claims]

HERMAN CAIN [SINGING]: Amazing grace will always be my song of praise.

MYERS: Herman Cain insists he's not changing his tune, but by Monday night was offering new details about an incident that may have prompted what he says were false accusations of sexual harassment.

CAIN: Once I referenced this lady's height and I was standing near her and I did this saying, 'You're the same height as my wife,' because my wife is five feet tall and she comes up to my chin. This lady's five feet tall and she came up to my chin, so obviously she thought that that was too close for comfort.

JUDY WOODRUFF [PBS NEWSHOUR]: Was there any behavior on your part that you think might have been inappropriate?

CAIN: In my opinion, no, but as you would imagine, it's in the eye of the person who thinks that maybe I crossed the line.

MYERS: NBC News has confirmed that two women accused Cain of inappropriate sexual conduct while he was CEO of the National Restaurant Association, accusing him of unwanted advances and sexually suggestive comments. At least one woman received a financial settlement. Cain's first response to the allegations on Sunday? No comment.

CAIN: I'm not going to comment on that.

MYERS: Then came an emphatic denial Monday at the National Press Club.

CAIN: I have never sexually harassed anyone.

MYERS: Cain first said this about a settlement.

CAIN: I am unaware of any sort of settlement. I hope it wasn't for much, because I didn't do anything.

MYERS: Then on Fox, he seemed to change course.

CAIN: And yes, there was some sort of settlement or termination.

MYERS: And on PBS he said this.

CAIN: I was aware that an agreement was reached. The word "settlement" versus the word "agreement," you know, I'm not sure what they called it.

MYERS: And even after the PBS taping...

CAIN: Can you remember everything about an incident from 12 years ago? I know that there was an agreement, whether it was a settlement, agreement, or whether it was termination paper, I don't remember what it was called, so that choice of words, I'm not going to say that it's changing my tune.

MYERS: Through it all, Cain claims the accusations are related to his rise to the top of many polls.

CAIN: I told you this bull's eye on my back has gotten bigger.

MYERS: Cain and his staff repeatedly referred reporters to the National Restaurant Association, but that group isn't talking, calling it a personnel matter that allegedly took place 15 years ago. Cain says he thinks enough has been said about this matter, and it's time to move on, but Ann, with all the inconsistency, it's hard to see that's happening quite yet.

CURRY: Alright, Lisa Myers, thank you so much.

Here is a full transcript of Good Morning America's coverage:

7:00AM ET TEASE:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: 24-hour flip-flop. Republican front-runner Herman Cain now admits he's been accused of sexual harassment and settlements were paid. His bizarre series of conflicting interviews. Cain calls it a witch hunt, insists he did nothing wrong. But what will it mean for his campaign?

7:01AM ET SEGMENT:

STEPHANOPOULOS: We begin with the latest on Herman Cain and the first crisis of his soaring campaign. He spent yesterday responding to allegations that he acted inappropriately with female employees when he headed the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s. Did the damage control do the trick? ABC's Jon Karl covered it all from Washington yesterday. And, Jon, boy, interview after interview after interview and the story changed a little bit every time.

[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Frontrunner on Defense; Cain "I've Never Sexually Harassed Anyone"]

JON KARL: Well, that's right, George. And Cain is making no effort to hide from the allegations. In that blizzard of interviews and public appearances he is offering new details of what happened, some of them conflicting, and insisting he did nothing wrong. In interview after interview, Cain has been adamant, he's never sexually harassed anybody.

HERMAN CAIN: The only thing that I could be guilty of saying in a group of men and women is paying a compliment to the woman.

KARL: But Cain is now acknowledging that two women had accused him of sexual harassment when he was CEO of the National Restaurant Association in the late 1990s.

CAIN: I made a gesture. 'You are the same height as my wife.' And brought my hand – didn't touch her – up to my chin. And said, 'You're the same height as my wife because my wife comes up to my chin.'

JUDY WOODRUFF [PBS NEWSHOUR]: And what about the other woman?

CAIN: The other one, I never knew that there was a claim, formally or otherwise. Totally have no idea.

KARL: At first, Cain said he knew nothing about a cash settlement with the other accuser.

CAIN: As far as a settlement, I am unaware of any sort of settlement. I hope it wasn't for much because I didn't do anything.

KARL: But now, he says he knows about payments made at the time by the Restaurant Association.

CAIN: We ended up settling for what would have been a termination settlement, quite frankly.

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN: What would that be about?

CAIN: Maybe three months' salary or something like that.

KARL: He says the whole story has come to light because he is now leading in the polls.

CAIN: I told you this bull's eye on my back has gotten bigger. We have no idea the source of this witch hunt, which is really what it is.

KARL: A lot of conservatives seem to agree.

RUSH LIMBAUGH: Herman Cain, obviously, is making some people nervous.

KARL: Cain has been married for 43 years and has 2 adult children. His wife, Gloria, rarely appears in public. But Cain told ABC News she's solidly behind him.

CAIN: She has been 200% supportive of me to date. She's been 200% supportive of me for 43 years.

KARL: And Cain doesn't appear to be letting the controversy get to him. At the close of his National Press Club appearance yesterday, he agreed to sing a little.

CAIN [SINGING]: I'll never know why Jesus came to love me so.

KARL: After a stressful and chaotic 36 hours or so, the Cain campaign believes it has weathered the storm and can quickly move beyond this controversy. In a message sent to supporters via Twitter late last night, Cain said quote, 'I am blessed to have such great supporters. Thank you all for your support and prayers today and throughout my campaign.' And there it stands, George.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Okay, there it stands for now, a lot will depend on whether we hear anything more from the National Restaurant Association. But in the meantime, Jon, no polling yet on how this might affect his campaign. But do you have any sense from the other campaigns what this might mean?

KARL: Well, privately the other campaigns all say this is an indication that Cain has just not been vetted enough to really be running for President of the United States. But, George, publicly, each and every one of these campaigns has decided to stand back from this. Not saying anything about it. And I see no indications that they will come out and attack Cain over this. But they do believe that there are other issues out there. And they think this is just a sign that he's not ready to run for president.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Okay, Jon Karl, we will see you. Thanks very much.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Here is a full transcript of The Early Show coverage:

7:00AM ET TEASE:

CHRIS WRAGGE (voice-over) (teaser): Herman Cain fights back, saying he never sexually harassed anyone, but the GOP presidential front-runner admits financial settlements were made with two of his accusers.  So what does this mean for his campaign and how will it impact the rest of the field? We're going to go live to Washington for the very latest.

7:01AM ET SEGMENT:

ERICA HILL: We begin today with GOP presidential front-runner Herman Cain, who is strongly denying charges of sexual harassment. He says he was accused of inappropriate behavior 12 years ago, and that the women involved did receive money.

Political correspondent Jan Crawford is in Washington with the latest on what has become a major distraction to the Cain campaign. Part of that distraction, Jan, yesterday was the changing message. Good morning.

JAN CRAWFORD: Well, that's right, Erica. He spent most of the day repeatedly trying to shoot down these allegations, but sometimes, his story did change. All of this is coming just as several new polls show his him solidifying his standing as the leader of the Republican pack.

[CBS News Graphic: "Cain Controversy: GOP Frontrunner Denies Harassment Allegations"]

HERMAN CAIN (from speech at the National Press Club): I have never sexually harassed anyone.

CAIN (from interview on Fox News Channel): I've never sexually harassed anyone.

JUDY WOODRUFF (from interview on PBS's "Newshour"): Was there any behavior on your part that you think might have been inappropriate?

CAIN: In my opinion, no.

CRAWFORD (voice-over): The accusations against Cain date back to the 1990s, and were brought to light Sunday on the Politico website. The story says two women at the National Restaurant Association, a group Cain then led, complained he engaged in sexually-suggestive behavior. The women eventually were paid a settlement, a claim Cain initially denied.

CAIN: I am unaware of any sort of settlement. I hope it wasn't for much, because I didn't do anything.

CRAWFORD: But later acknowledged on Fox News-

CAIN: And yes, there was some sort of settlement or termination, and I don't even know what the contents of that was, since it was found baseless.

CRAWFORD: The allegations have created a media firestorm, and come as Cain is rising in the polls.

CAIN: I told you this bull's eye on my back has gotten bigger. (audience laughs) I have no idea- we have no idea the source of this witch-hunt.

CRAWFORD: Others have gone further, alleging that like then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, Cain is the victim of a high-tech lynching.

NIGER INNIS, CONGRESS OF RACIAL EQUALITY: You have a high-ranking black figure who dares to break away from the liberal orthodoxy, who dares to challenge the Republican elite, as well.

CRAWFORD: But the reporter who broke the story denies he had any agenda other than the truth.

JONATHAN MARTIN, POLITICO: I was doing my job, and reporting a story about a candidate for president of the United States who had serious allegations lodged against him.

CRAWFORD: Despite the controversy swirling around him, Cain was able to lighten the mood at his National Press Club appearance.

CAIN (singing): I'll never know why Jesus came to love me so.

CRAWFORD (on-camera): Now, Cain said the story was designed to force him out of this race. He vowed that it wouldn't. His chief of staff told me that his supporters- Cain's supporters, were really rallying behind him, Erica. Online donations yesterday was up 75%, he said. But the question is, how long that will last if there are more disclosures?

HILL: Jan Crawford in Washington this morning- Jan, thanks.

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Political Scandals
  • Herman Cain
  • ABC
  • CBS
  • Early Show
  • Good Morning America
  • NBC
  • Nightline
  • Today
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

In the NFL...

Submitted by DumbCanuck on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 11:26am.

...The refs would throw a flag for piling on.

"There... Are... Four... Lights!"

  • Login to post comments

Are the Morning Shows Important

Submitted by libBuster on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 11:40am.

Are these left wing morning shows still influential in shaping public opinion? Viewership is down. I wonder if ABCs "The View" or Jon Stewart have greater impact in creating liberal chic.

Can Ann Curry or Erica Hill possibly matter? Those two are quintessential back benchers.

  • Login to post comments

No

Submitted by grammajane on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 11:46am.

remarks about Fast and Furious, Sylonder, or Corzine loosing millions of tax-payers money.........oh no, let's just try and ruin Cain. After all, he is a Conservative Black man and needs to be treated like Clarence Thomas.

  • Login to post comments

Erm, uh

Submitted by HockeyKid on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 11:49am.

and just how does ABC's Jon Karl know what "the other campaigns" are saying privately? Are we supposed to believe he has a Magic Eye to see into everyone's private matters? If we accept that premise, then why doesn't he just tell us what Cain knows and what the accusers know to be the truth? I mean really, Jon, you could serve the world so much better if you made proper use of those superpowers of yours.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

  • Login to post comments

Changing story?

Submitted by pockets64 on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:03pm.

I didn't see the story undergo changes. Maybe more details here or there. Details that don't incriminate.

Still sounds like a big story about nothing. Too bad they can't give Obama the same front-runner scrutiny.

  • Login to post comments

Some details change, some elude

Submitted by StarAZ on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:33pm.

First, you don't get severance or what would "amount" to it for resigning...was it hush money or a nuisance payoff. Nondisclosure of what? He can't remember one name even now--didn't someone tell him--maybe this "general counsel" person? I don't believe they paid thousands in trade assn money without the board being involved--it doesn't work that way. What does his sense of humor have to do with it? Also what does Bill Clinton, Sarah Palin, Clarence Thomas, or anyone else have to do with this? They are thrown on the pile in every discussion. And for these mild dissenting remarks--I am sure I will be called every name in the book. Instead of jumping on me--give your guy some more donations...

 

 

  • Login to post comments

StarAZ,

Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:54pm.

If the media had your restraint then there would be no issue to discuss. but we are talking media and specifically liberal media bias.  It is seems obvious this is a personal issue with you and hope you faired well over time.

Being poor and under educated my first two full time jobs were minimum wage jobs working in offices full of women and by todays standards I was constantly harassed.  I even lost one of the jobs because when layoffs came, and I quote, "being a male you have an advantage getting another job".  From inappropriate proposals from bosses to being grabbed I've seen it all and understand that if I didn't have the confidence of having the physical ability to repel an unwanted advance that I would have been very intimidated and would have had to quit.  I don't wish to make light of the situation but please realized that most of the animosity here is towards the media and the attacks made on the complaints are generally just a disgust over how the media has portrayed the complaints especially compared to how such things would have been handled if there was a 'D' beside Cain's name.  Remember the waitress sandwich and Sen. Kennedy - remember the media response.

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

"Also what does Bill Clinton,

Submitted by Smartypants on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 2:10pm.

"Also what does Bill Clinton, Sarah Palin, Clarence Thomas, or anyone else have to do with this? "

The purpose of this website is to expose and discuss liberal media bias, which is abundant for all who are paying attention.  The individuals you mention, specifically Bill Clinton and Sarah Palin, are relevant because the media treatment of their cases was so much different than what it has been so far for Cain.  Clinton's scandal was being swept under the carpet by most of the media, as was the John Edwards affair, until the story was broken by a more conservative media outlet.  Even then, Clinton was largely defended by the media until the evidence became so overwhelming that they could not reasonably defend him.  Clinton's accusers were raked over the coals by the press, even a couple of women who alleged rape against the President.  In contrast, Cain is being treated like he is guilty of something w/o most of the facts even being exposed.  Clarence Thomas is relevant because, like Cain, he is a conservative who happens to be a minority; the media made much about ridiculous throw away comments that he may or may not have said years earlier.  His accuser was placed on a pedestal.

 

 

  • Login to post comments

Clinton was a different time

Submitted by StarAZ on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 4:36pm.

It is hard to compare--in my opinion. Clinton parsed the words down to be not a direct lie--the meaning of is and that stuff. Cain is relying on Not to my knowledge or I did not harass (maybe meaning threaten to fire if someone did not come across, I don't know). Yes, the media is piling on and that may be bec the media is lib and Cain is a conservative. Granted. I just see so many issues being tossed into this mess that it makes no sense anymore. Even if he did say something like how about it baby, does that make him unfit to be president? Not even sure on that. My take is that he was one of those old-timey Washington type men who thought his little comments were funny and entertaining. Two women did not share that view and went to the trouble and career suicide to take it further. One commenter on another site talked about "the two girls." That is about where I came in. I give up--think whatever you want.

 

 

  • Login to post comments

Clinton?

Submitted by well99 on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 5:00pm.

This is the same one that committed perjury?Well done on that parsing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSDAXGXGiEw

  • Login to post comments

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Submitted by liberalsarefunny on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:32pm.

The libbies are terrified on this guy...

  • Login to post comments

There a few facts being left out here.

Submitted by stage9 on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:37pm.

1) The News Media is made up of liberals.
2) Liberals conduct their lives based upon amoral relativistic standards. Lying and truth then are synonymous.
3) Liberals always lie.
4) Never believe a liberal.

"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge

  • Login to post comments

Alinksy Rules 4, 5 and 6 on display

Submitted by Chad B on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:40pm.

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

“The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”
-Saul Alinksy

The networks are in on the game.

The 5th column comes out in full force.

  • Login to post comments

Anatomy of a liberal smear.

Submitted by Phryj1 on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:48pm.

The way it works is a typical sleazy, tabloid-esque liberal media outlet comes out with a story that Cain was accused (not convicted of, just accused) of sexual harassment. The story is worded in such a way as to cast aspersions on Cain and make the accusations seem legitimate. Naturally, DemSM outlets pick it up and run with it without even the slightest hint of scrutiny, skepticism, or criticism. Basically, the usual liberal hack 'journalism' left-wing rags always resort to because they know liberal policy is a miserable worthless failure and liberal ideas are just pointless and stupid and should be ignored at all cost, so they have to smear any conservative that's a threat to their insane and reckless ideological agenda.

If Cain had made any mention of a settlement, in braindead liberal bizarro world, that's the same thing as admitting guilt, and the 'news' media would have all reported it as such.

At the very bottom of this is the fact that nothing actually happened and the investigation into the harassment claims exonerated him.

But don't expect a single liberal media outlet to actually report that fact. Lies of omission are the liberal media's favorite weapon, because, being the cowardly and dishonest scumbags they are, they can hide behind them and claim said lies aren't actually lies.

Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.

  • Login to post comments

It would be bizzare only...

Submitted by KyWriter on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 12:59pm.

...if the networks didn't pile on.

  • Login to post comments

It happened in the 90s.

Submitted by Immortal Fish on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 1:08pm.

It happened in the 90s. Wasn't that just after our current President had stopped smoking dope and around the same time our current President was sitting in Wright's pews?

  • Login to post comments

Huh ?

Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 11/01/2011 - 2:24pm.

According to Cain, he told one of the women "You are the same height as my wife".

Does the MBM think that this will make me not want to vote for Cain?

 

   /// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 ///    خال

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
  • The folly of 'do something' liberalism (Patriot Update)
  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
  • Oops! CNN Commentator Falsely Accuses Okla. State Rep While Trying to Score Liberal Points on Tornado
  • Sen. Whitehouse Blames GOP For Okla. Tornado, Storms, Rising Seas, Etc.
  • On Leno: Kids Ask Obama the Darndest Questions
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use