Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 18, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun
  • New Liberal Study 'Lends Credence to Conservative Charges' of Bias; Dramatic Media Tilt Toward 'Gay Marriage'
  • Senate Amnesty Supporters Boast Marco Rubio ‘Neutralized’ Limbaugh, Fox News

NBC's Curry Warns Minuscule Spending Cuts in Debt Deal Could Harm Economy

By Kyle Drennen | August 03, 2011 | 12:11

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

Appearing on Wednesday's NBC Today, CNBC Mad Money host Jim Cramer blamed the debt ceiling standoff for stocks falling on Wall Street: "All people can talk about is the whole slow down that Washington triggered, the 'manufactured crisis,' as the President mentioned..." Co-host Ann Curry wondered: "To what degree did the spending cuts called for in this bill have an influence in this perception?"

Cramer argued: "We've seen a trillion dollars lost in the stock market. Much of it is associated with companies that were doing well because of government – some people call it hand outs, I would say spending – and I think that, that is a huge part of the decline." Curry touted an over-the-top prediction: "One advocacy group, the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute, says the economy could lose 1.8 million jobs in the next year due to the cuts in this deal."

When she asked if Cramer agreed with the absurd assertion, he skeptically replied: "Too dark. I think that we're going to muddle through here. I'm not – that would be a setback to the 2008-2009 great recession. Not going to happen. Way too doom and gloom."

Despite Curry and Cramer fretting over the supposedly massive "cuts" in spending included in the debt deal, as Investor's Business Daily points out, in reality, spending will continue to rise and remain at above average levels.

Here is a full transcript of Curry's August 3 discussion with Cramer:

7:05AM ET

ANN CURRY: Jim Cramer is the host of CNBC's Mad Money. Jim, good morning.    

JIM CRAMER: Ann, good morning.        

[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: After the Debt Deal; Is This What the Markets Wanted From Washington?]

CURRY: The markets were rattled by the specter of not having a deal, a long wait. But then on the day the deal was signed, the markets still plunged, what, 2%.

CRAMER: Yes.

CURRY: Why is Wall Street not happy with this deal?

CRAMER: Recession. All people can talk about is the whole slow down that Washington triggered, the 'manufactured crisis,' as the President mentioned, has made it so that all of this business has slowed down. Jobless, probably not going to be so great. Sales, bad. We're hearing company after company saying Washington created a huge mess. Not going away.

CURRY: To what degree did the spending cuts called for in this bill have an influence in this perception?

CRAMER: We've seen a trillion dollars lost in the stock market. Much of it is associated with companies that were doing well because of government – some people call it hand outs, I would say spending – and I think that, that is a huge part of the decline. Suddenly realized the big sugar daddy's gone away.

CURRY: You mentioned jobs. One advocacy group, the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute, says the economy could lose 1.8 million jobs in the next year due to the cuts in this deal. Agree? Is that too much?

CRAMER: Too dark. I think that we're going to muddle through here. I'm not – that would be a setback to the 2008-2009 great recession. Not going to happen. Way too doom and gloom.
    

Story Continues Below Ad ↓


CURRY: Okay, but you did mention the jobs numbers.

CRAMER: Yes.

CURRY: And we know that the jobs numbers were not good in June. There supposed to – new numbers come out for July this coming Friday. Prediction?

CRAMER: July was a really tough month in this country. I don't see a lot of people getting hired. I saw a lot of layoffs. It won't be disastrous. Again, nothing's disastrous, it's just not so hot.

CURRY: Okay, let's talk about what else is not so hot in the economy. Manufacturing production barely grew in July. Consumer spending dropped in June for the first time in almost two years. Economic growth for the first half of the year was at its slowest pace since the recession ended. So are we now starting to see the outline of a new recession?

CRAMER: Yes. Plain and simple. If things don't pick up, they're trending down. This is, again, not a mass unemployment about to occur, not something that I would describe as being catastrophic, but we're slipping back. And unless we see some job growth in the near future, we're not going to be back to where we were a couple of years ago, but we're going to be down.

CURRY: Well, do you see anything that's going to create this – some job growth that you just talked about?

CRAMER: That's the problem, I don't. I don't have a catalyst. I never come on this show and say, 'Look, the world is coming to an end.' And it isn't this time. But I don't have anything good to tell you. I don't see any reason to hire because there is so much new regulation, so many difficulties coming from Washington. Our trade partners are also not doing well either, from China, Russia, India, Brazil, all raising rates, and Europe is just terrible.

CURRY: So is this the – then the – what we talked about earlier, earlier this year, the double dip concern, is that what we're talking about? Is this the double dip?

CRAMER: Double dip would imply that one dip would be as worse, equal to the other. This dip, and we are having one, is not going to be what I would regard as being nearly as horrible as what we had, just nearly.

CURRY: Alright, Jim Cramer, thank you so much and I really appreciate your perspective. We need good news. Please bring it next time.

CRAMER: I'm trying. I'm looking for it everywhere.

CURRY: Alright, you can catch Mad Money week nights at 6:00, 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time on CNBC.

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • National Debt
  • Recession
  • Stock Market
  • Congress
  • Economy
  • Jim Cramer
  • NBC
  • Today
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

Stuck on stupid.

Submitted by rbosque on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 3:14pm.

Stuck on stupid.

"It may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but you can fool enough of them to rule a large country"......Will Durant
  • Login to post comments

Manufactured lunacy

Submitted by deadeyedan on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 3:37pm.

So the occupant of the WH calls it a "manufactured crisis". The only way a genuinely free market can have a manufactured crisis is to have one contrived by an outside influence, i.e. government.

And who has been responsible, through the multi-trillion dollar "stimulus", the too-high-in-the-sky to be estimated health care debacle and the ever-expanding forkovers to the global warming superstition, for contrived interference?

Perhaps that's a "manufactured crisis"? Sounds like it.

Liberalism - government of the people by the theories and for the ideologists - deadeyedan

ClimateGate - the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution - deadeyedan

  • Login to post comments

Obama raised Federal spending

Submitted by deerjerkydave on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 3:39pm.

Obama raised Federal spending by 28% in just the last three years! By their logic the economy should be booming right about now.

This debt deal cuts Federal spending by a measly one tenth of one percent in the next year and they're crying like their leg was just cut off. And there's the liberal media pushing the liberal message while acting like they're objective. Talk about a Satan sandwich.

------------------------ 

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined.  Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James Madison
  • Login to post comments

GOP "deal" was to tweak down future spending

Submitted by lrgon on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 11:28pm.

No tangible slices were taken out of EPA, Departments of Energy, Education, DHS.. No real cuts were made to foreign aid programs, no scaling back to funds flowing to the US-hating United Nations.

The cuts are to some future spending curve drawn up in the imagination of dialecticians who have mastered the art of "the deal." The "compromise" works to the detriment of the American people since it is our economy that is on the line. A free economy free of bureaucracy is the last thing that dilecticians like the GOP "leadership" want for us.
http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Dialectician.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectician

The GOP is in the drivers seat in the House where all "bills for raising revenue shall originate." Quite an advantage to a constitution- thinking person! But to a Hegelian dialectic it is not a consideration since it locks him into a law and dialecticians are constantly doing "their own thing" outside the confines of the law.

After this latest round of raising the debt we have now found ourselves with a "super congress" that will be rubber stamping more deficits made to the future spending curve.

This brings us back to our fundamental premise and solution: The Constitution has to be obeyed not just read in Congress and we have to get more constitutionalists like Rand Paul and his father in congress elected who aren't practicing Hegelian dialecticians.

  • Login to post comments

"Much of it is associated

Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 08/03/2011 - 7:35pm.

"Much of it is associated with companies that were doing well because of government – some people call it hand outs, I would say spending..."

Call it anything they want, it's still an artificial economy not created by demand from the marketplace, but from government. I wonder how Curry would feel if the government artificially pumped up the economy by embarking on new massive defense spending for tanks, fighter jets, bombers, etc?

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • Rand Paul: ‘I Want to Go From 5% of the African-American Vote to At Least 20-25%’
  • Chris Cuomo Claims He’s ‘Completely Divorced From Ideology’ While Talking Up ‘Advocacy Journalism’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use