Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • NBC Fails to Report Its Own Scoop That AG Holder Approved Investigation of Fox's Rosen
  • Video: Bozell's Prediction Pans Out, Media In Full-on 'Move On' Mode in Obama Scandal Coverage
  • The Long Hike: Media’s 13 Years of Bullying Boy Scouts Over Gays
  • Only CBS Notes IRS Official’s Leave, Yet ABC and NBC Have Time to Show Obama’s Prom Photo with ‘Foxy’ Friend
  • Hearing on IRS With Lerner Taking the Fifth? Newspapers Had No Front Page Story Thursday
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away

NBC's 'Today' Wonders Why Americans Are 'Obsessed' With Breasts, Then Shows Breasts 54 Times

By Kyle Drennen | July 18, 2011 | 15:52

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

Monday's NBC Today decided to devote a six-minute segment in the 8 a.m. ET hour to America's "obsession" with breasts, with co-host Ann Curry declaring: "...they have become an object of sort of undue fascination." As the report was teased throughout the broadcast and during the segment itself, 54 pairs of breasts appeared on screen, with some images repeated.

Update:  It turns out that in the 9 a.m. ET hour, the show also featured a fashion segment with several female models displaying different types of bras.

The irony of doing a segment filled with images of breasts while asking why people were obsessed with them seemed to be lost on NBC reporters and pundits as they decried the amount of attention given to that part of the female anatomy. Fill-in co-host Lester Holt referred to it as a "tempest in a C cup." Correspondent Amy Robach reported: "Just how much are breasts on the human mind? A quick Google for them, paired with 'boobs' and the slang word starting with a 'T,' turns up almost a billion hits."

Following Robach's report, Curry discussed the topic with a panel women and wondered if the fascination was unique to America: "Are they a bigger obsession in this country than they are in other countries?" Anthropologist Natalia Reagan argued: "I think they are for a few reasons. One of them, obviously, there's a lot of rules restricting what can be shown on television and what can even be said on television about breasts."

Curry interjected: "So the conservative, kind of maybe almost...puritanical nature." Reagan replied: "Yes." Glamour magazine editor-in-chief Cindy Levi agreed with that observation: "I do think that that's probably true. You know, that the more conservative society, probably the more, sort of, obsessed we become about those things."

In her report, Robach noted recent incidents in which women were criticized for being too revealing: "For all of our cartoonish emphasis on the breast, showing too much of one is no laughing matter in some quarters." Mentions included Janet Jackson exposing a single breast during the Super Bowl halftime show and the controversy surrounding a low-cut dress worn by Katy Perry during a Sesame Street appearance.  

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Here is a full transcript of the July 18 segment:

8:19AM ET

CURRY: This morning we're kicking up a special series, 'Breast Obsessed in America.' Guy or girl, a lot of people are thinking about them more than they are probably willing to admit. Well today, national correspondent Amy Robach has the story. Amy, good morning.

[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Obsessed in America; Why Are We So Fascinated With Breast?]

AMY ROBACH: Ann, good morning to you. Billions of dollars are dedicated to bras, lifts and augmentations, all in pursuit of an ambiguous ideal. How did we work ourselves into this state of obsession? Well, take a look. In our first days, few body parts are more important than the breast. Initially, a means of survival, our developing minds turn breasts into something very different.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: The human animal is unique in that the breasts have become sexualized. You don't see male chimpanzees going for the female who has bigger breasts.

ROBACH: Just how much are breasts on the human mind? A quick Google for them, paired with 'boobs' and the slang word starting with a 'T,' turns up almost a billion hits, more than 4 times the yield for a search on the brain. At New York's Museum of Sex, curator Sarah Forbes explains that Americans are easily identifiable by their bedroom appetites.

SARAH FORBES: Throughout the world, we have different body parts that we think as the ultimate sexual object. In some places, it's more of the hips and the curves of the body. Here it's the breasts.

ROBACH: While always an attraction in American culture, breasts and breast size, seem to take on new prominence after World War II.

ANDREW TREES [AUTHOR, "DECODING LOVE"]: The '50s was a boom time, consumer culture was exploding, people were affluent, they were getting richer, they felt really good. You could probably correlate breast size with prosperity.        

ROBACH: While it would be easy to characterize the American breast obsession as a male-driven phenomenon, that's simply not the case. Women have been just as responsible at keeping the focus at chest level.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN B: These things are power!

FORBES: Women are seeing busty images and they're wanting to emulate that. So we're kind of perpetuating this idea of what the perfect breast is. Even though chemically, biologically, we're not taught to think that only large breasts are what's attractive.

ROBACH: In pursuit of perfection, breast augmentation has become a booming industry in the U.S. Over a quarter of a million women a year undergo the surgery. One that is not without complications.

LAURA BERMAN [SEX THERAPIST]: Little girls that are growing up in our society are watching us do this to ourselves. And what is that doing to the way they feel about their own bodies?

ROBACH: For all of our cartoonish emphasis on the breast, showing too much of one is no laughing matter in some quarters.

TREES: We've drawn this arbitrary line where suddenly when you expose the nipple, all hell breaks loose, and you know, that's a desecration of, I guess, the Super Bowl halftime show and it's appalling.

ROBACH: Recently, Sesame Street pulled a guest appearance by Katy Perry. Many felt she showed too much cleavage for such a young audience, the very people that might have the most uncomplicated relationship with breasts in the first place. And with clothing styles becoming tighter and more revealing, as Katy Perry found out, showing too much cleavage can be an easy mistake, but it's difficult to undo the impression it can leave on others. Ann.

CURRY: Alright, Amy Robach, thank you so much. Natalia Reagan is an anthropologist, psychiatrist Dr. Gail Saltz is a Today contributor, and Cindy Levi is editor in chief of Glamour magazine and Today's women's lifestyle contributor. Good morning to all of you.

NATALIA REAGAN: Good morning.

GAIL SALTZ: Good morning.

CINDY LEVI: Good morning.

CURRY: There are so many words for these, ta-tas, bujunkas, puppies, the rack, girls. We could go – got anymore you want to add?

LEVI: Twins.

CURRY: The twins, we go on and on about this. Beyond the biological reasons, which Amy talked about, I'm fascinated to think that – with this information that it's possible that during tough times, we – we are more likely or that the country might be more obsessed with larger breasts. Now what accounts for that?

NATALIA REAGAN: Well, there's an idea that basically in times of economic downturn, you would be more apt to like a woman that has a little bit more meat on her bones, perhaps breasts being an indicator of better fat reserves. So that woman is going to survive a famine. 'I want that woman on my team.' You know, she's going to be able to take care of the kids when things don't go right. And so basically you can see, you know, after – during the Great Depression, you've got Mae West, you've got Marlin Monroe, you've got Jane Mansfield, coming out of the war times, and then in the '60s, you've got Twiggy and so on, in fashion, I believe.

CURRY: Is that backed up by your experience?

LEVI: Yeah, we're coming out of, you know, probably 15 years where it really was sort of about the waif, right? These straight up and down boyish figures, which some women have naturally, but many women don't. And now the last couple of years, there's been a return to this sort of quote unquote, 'Mad Men' silhouette, which is more of an hour glass shape, curvier. You've seen a lot of celebrities, Katy Perry was in that video, but Sofia Vergara, Christina Hendricks from Mad Men, Kim Kardashian, you know, who have a little bit more 'va va voom' on top.

CURRY: It's so confusing for women, because, you know, if your body type is not the trend of the moment, it is a sobering experience. I mean, the psychological impact of this on women and girls has got to be deep.

SALTZ: Women measure themselves against these icons, and it does have a big impact. And it filters down from women to their daughters. And they try to be whatever they think is the best. Because we all – we all want to be powerful. We all want to be desired. We all want to feel we're the most. And these are the – so breasts are actually a big example of that. They represent power to women.

CURRY: But do they become – are they a bigger obsession in this country than they are in other countries? Natalia, what do you think?

REAGAN: I think they are for a few reasons. One of them, obviously, there's a lot of rules restricting what can be shown on television and what can even be said on television about breasts.

CURRY: So the conservative, kind of maybe almost-

REAGAN: That puritanical-

CURRY: Puritanical nature.

REAGAN: Yes. I think definitely that makes – I don't know about you, but I tried to catch a skin-o-max movie at night when I was a kid, just because I was curious. I had no idea what to expect. You know, and so-

CURRY: Thanks for revealing that on national television. What about you? What do you think?

LEVI: I don't watch skin-o-max. Thank you, thanks for asking. I do think that that's probably true. You know, that the more conservative society, probably the more, sort of, obsessed we become about those things. And fashion plays a role. And I think, you know, what you said hits it on the head. Our bodies shouldn't be fads, right? I mean, it's great to be able to, you know, buy the bras with the flying buttresses or whatever it is that you need in order to feel confident. But once you get into breast enhancement surgery, which is up 300% over the last 14 years, you have to start thinking, you know, let's call it a day here.

CURRY: It's a good thing that we are thinking and talking about this. Thank you so much, all three of you, for joining us this morning.

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Culture/Society
  • Sexuality
  • Amy Robach
  • NBC
  • Today
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Today

Submitted by jessieH on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 3:59pm.

That's what they are wasting time on? A stupid story about breasts? They will show anything to try to get ratings up. Hey, NBC, what about reporting some news, once in a while. Not your usual crap, but real news.

                                                                                                                                                                    

  • Login to post comments

Breasts Increase Ratings

Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 6:54pm.

I've noticed for a long time that any story about breast cancer or mammograms will always have a shot of a shirtless and braless woman, in a hospital gown being positioned in front of a mammogram machine. The top of the shoulder and enough back and side to prove she's got nothing on under the gown is what we see.

My question for news directors is; Why no comparable shot of men when talking about prostate or testicular cancer? I might volunteer just because I've always wondered how wide my eyes get when the Doc is giving me my annual torture.

President Obama is a Muslim (from his own lips), Kenyan (read it from his publicist) a homosexual (read it on a news magazine cover) and a Socialist (I'm alive and can see it for myself)
  • Login to post comments

More hypocrisy

Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:02pm.

When NBC de-sexualizes its prime time programming, only then will its reports on human sexualization have legitimacy. Don't commercialize sex through entertainment programming and then scrutinize the audience's obsession with it.

  • Login to post comments

Guess they are not concerned if kids are watching.

Submitted by Red Jeep on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:04pm.

When am I going to have breasts mommy? How big will they grow?

  • Login to post comments

Just what we need.....a bunch of boobs talking about breasts....

Submitted by nonncom on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:04pm.

LOL....

  • Login to post comments

Show'd 'em 54 times, eh?

Submitted by Gary Hall on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:04pm.

Sorry I missed that.

(;~> gary

 . . what's that? Oh, I thought he said "54 D."

  • Login to post comments

I think Hefner figured this out

Submitted by mandrake on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:11pm.

Hefner figured out this breast thing out sometime back in the 50's..no wait I think Howard Hughes also did that..this is news?

  • Login to post comments

Either slow news day for NBC

Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:14pm.

Either slow news day for NBC or desperation at NBC.

.

Or both.

  • Login to post comments

Is this why they call it the boob tube?

Submitted by deadeyedan on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:25pm.

There must be tit for tat somewhere in here.

Liberalism - government of the people by the theories and for the ideologists - deadeyedan

ClimateGate- the revelation that the pseudo-scientists of East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution - deadeyedan

  • Login to post comments

What a bunch of boobs!

Submitted by Newsbubba on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:30pm.

So these NBC cups are sitting around "wondered if the fascination was unique to America?"

Ladies.  Turn on any Spanish channel you choose if you want to see ta tas.  After that check out Italian TV or films.

Geez, who taught you "reporters" how to do research?  Barack Obama?

For the record, NBC, CBS, etc are perfect if you want to look at boobs.  If breasts are what interest you, check out Fox News!  Those babes could have a calendar that would outsell the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue!  Not that I'm interested in anything but the news, but ....

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

Americans are obsessed because it's a titilating subject.

Submitted by VanPastorMan on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:33pm.

On a serious notes. The Bible speaks of this subject.
Song of Solomon 4:5 Your two breasts are like two fawns, like twin fawns of a gazelle that browse among the lilies.
Song of Solomon 7:7 Your stature is like that of the palm, and your breasts like clusters of fruit.8 I said, "I will climb the palm tree; I will take hold of its fruit." May your breasts be like the clusters of the vine, the fragrance of your breath like apples,
I got a newsflash for everyone.........The Creator made it so that men are attracted to the female form. Breasts are part of this form. Let's stop obsessing, and understand that sexuality expressed in the way God wants it to be expressed brings a lot of blessing into one's life. The following verses point us to this reality. Proverbs 5:18 May your fountain be blessed, and may you rejoice in the wife of your youth.Proverbs 5:19 A loving doe, a graceful deer-- may her breasts satisfy you always, may you ever be captivated by her love.

Liberals are funny when they aren't in power.  But when they have power they become dangerous. Rush Limbaugh
  • Login to post comments

Ratings time already?

Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:33pm.

Now every guy on NB will be watching the Today show tomorrow.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

And, NBC

Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:57pm.

will probably run an op-ed on O and the deficit, just because they think that everyone will tune in for the follow-up, Rad. 

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

Not every guy.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 5:13pm.

;)

  • Login to post comments

Chairs

Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 9:54pm.

Not me.  I find the "chairs" segment on Squawk Box far more fascinating. 

They haven't showed it in awhile, so I am kinda bummed about that. 

:o)

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

  • Login to post comments

Odd that this was on Drudge today.

Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:46pm.

Just scrolling down and for some reason, I had to click.

Fun fact from the article: "Between one to five per cent of the population are believed to suffer from the condition, which is clinically referred to as supernumerary breast tissue." This is also the roughly the same percentage as homosexuals in America. Not that there's anything wrong with either.

  • Login to post comments

oh hell, BK!

Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 5:19pm.

Dang it, BK, I was ready to swear off Wild Turkey 101 Bourbon for a while till I saw that site and the pictures, OH MY GAWD!

Now I'm stopping at the liquor store on the way home and picking up a fifth!  Gonna need at least that much to wash that outa my mind!

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

Jon

Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 5:45pm.

Just imagine how strange it must look feeding her newborns...

  • Login to post comments

Don't think it, don't think it......oh crap!

Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 6:11pm.

Ok. make that a liter.

-Jon

  • Login to post comments

LOL. Must be tough finding a proper-fittting bra

Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 5:28pm.

that doesn't wear out in a few days.

  • Login to post comments

hey we think of politicians

Submitted by jkwtrading on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:47pm.

hey we think of politicians as boobs.

  • Login to post comments

They do need to provide

Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 4:56pm.

They do need to provide something to attract an audience.

When the viewership falls, provide something that people will watch, and when you discover that Normal, Intelligent people still won't watch the crap you provide....

Show boobies!!!! Or maybe blow up a chevy pickup and call it 'news'.

End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.

If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?

  • Login to post comments

You needed to show the woman with the biggest pair of boobs

Submitted by cocodrie on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 6:23pm.

Mrs Carter - She had Jimmy and Billy.

 

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

  • Login to post comments

Keith Olbermann once considered breast reduction surgery,

Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 5:19pm.

but Michael Musto talked him out of it.

And to this day, Keith is proud to be a 38DD.

  • Login to post comments

They do need to provide, etc

Submitted by alvin on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 6:47pm.

The Factor does this most every night.

  • Login to post comments

Amazing!

Submitted by outamyroom on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 7:09pm.

You mean males are attracted to women's breasts? Who knew?

Timothy
  • Login to post comments

Oink

Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 7:15pm.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Simply put...

Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 10:38pm.

...enjoy.

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

  • Login to post comments

ChickaBOOMer: Putin's Smarmy

Submitted by StewartIII on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 8:52pm.

Putin's Smarmy
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2011/07/putins-army-by-agg44.html

  • Login to post comments

I love boobs.....

Submitted by notinstl on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 10:20pm.

they are on constantly on msnbc

  • Login to post comments

Very interesting. If you

Submitted by ant on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 10:37pm.

Very interesting. If you notice the sentence or two where they discuss breasts as a sort of "survival during tough times" indicator, men "may be looking to breasts more now as a survival of the fittest clue on fat reserves". They said it. Are they finally admitting that the messiah may be leading us to a future filled with lack of food and a need for primitive-instinctual necessities to survive 'hard times'? Hard to believe, but that's what it sounded like to me. Ahhh, leftist utopia.

  • Login to post comments

Boobs are great

Submitted by shawn. on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 10:47pm.

They feed babies and look great in t shirts and bikinis :-)

  • Login to post comments

I saw some documentary about

Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 11:18pm.

I saw some documentary about some 'lost tribe' somewhere in the Indian Ocean islands (or somewhere) , and the 'white men' were asking the 'natives' about what they liked in the way a woman looks. And guess what, boys and girls??? These 'noble savages' liked a good figure, nice features, shapely hips, proportioned appendages, and nice BREASTS!!!! Can you imagine that????

I like breasts...................you like breasts.................they like breasts...............we like breasts........... and women seem to like their breasts too!!! So some dopey TV network feels like they're breaking some kind of new ground by spending time on this????

Well, some of those hateful fags over on Donkeyface's show don't seem to like breasts too much, but they can go reproduce with their own kind all they want..........they'll be a dying breed.

  • Login to post comments

I hear ya Killa

Submitted by shawn. on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 11:19pm.

Breast are not the enemy ;-)

  • Login to post comments

They would rather

Submitted by Vonu on Mon, 07/18/2011 - 11:53pm.

Have us find breasts revolting?

Freedom is a vital component of human effectiveness and fulfillment.
  • Login to post comments

Boobs Huh???

Submitted by bigdaddy on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 5:28am.

What, did they have more pictures of BO's administration?

  • Login to post comments

Damn, one day I wished I had watched!

Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 10:16am.

I figured EVERY day NBC had PLENTY of boobs on that channel, but none that I ever wanted to see, lol!

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. BEN FRANKLIN
  • Login to post comments

Tit for tat?

Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 10:35am.

In keeping abreast with this totally befuddling phenomenon (and these nitwits are forever being befuddled at any-and-everything, much of which seems to bust forth before them "unexpectedly"...), they are proudly tittering on about their recent discovery.

...not all that unlike every generation's "tweens" who exalt and exult in their personal "discovery" of the mysteries and wonders of -- ahem! -- SEX.  Who woulda thunk??  We gotta let the world know about this!!

In other breathtaking and wholly "unexpected" news, the sun once again today rose in the East. Film at eleven, which will chronicle whether it continues to set in the West.

Stay tuned!!!

 

"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects... 

  • Login to post comments

Simple answer: Evolution

Submitted by gopcongress on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 11:41am.

Breasts have twofold purporses. First is the ease in which to feed newborn humans, though smaller size would probably have been more ideal.

Which leads to the second purpose: As primates evolved from four-legged to two-legged use of their bodies, the ability to be sexually stimulated also evolved from the rear end to the breast area. Simply put, breasts provide the stimulation that buttocks once provided.

"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER

  • Login to post comments

Evolution had nothing to do

Submitted by kbTexan on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 12:33pm.

Evolution had nothing to do with it. God designed us that way, and I for one am quite happy about that.

  • Login to post comments

I thought they were designed

Submitted by ant on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 1:39am.

I thought they were designed to help anchorwomen get jobs. It sure isn't based on intelligence.

  • Login to post comments

Well it's the best argument for intelligent design

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 2:05am.

I've seen so far.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Because they're there

Submitted by kbTexan on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 12:30pm.

We're obsessed with them because they're there.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
  • Robert Redford Blasts America's Belief System, Tech Advancements
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use