Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike
  • Bozell Column: Obama And 'Overreach'
  • Three Labor Unions, Including Teamsters, Want ObamaCare Repealed; When Will Media Report?

Matt Lauer Says It's 'Fair' to Grill Christie on Sending Kids to Private School But Never Challenged Obama

By Kyle Drennen | June 24, 2011 | 15:18

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

In an exclusive interview with New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on Friday's NBC Today, co-host Matt Lauer played a clip of a woman attacking the Republican as hypocritical for sending his children to private school while cutting funding for public schools. Lauer agreed with her premise: "I thought it was a fair question."

Lauer sympathized with the woman and argued: "...what she was asking you was – she clearly sends her kids to public schools and she's saying, 'Governor, I understand you send your kids to private schools, but is it possible, though, then you don't understand how these cuts are going to affect families,' like her's on a daily basis. Why isn't it a fair question?"

In the clip, Christie told the woman: "First off, it's none of your business. I don't ask you where you send your kids to school. Don't bother me about where I send mine." Lauer worried: "...you became known as a guy who speaks in blunt terms, sometimes to a shocking level....Is that a little blunt, even for you?"

While Lauer thought it was perfectly fair to question Christie's decision to send his kids to private school, the Today co-host never leveled the same criticism at President Obama. On January 5, 2009, as Malia and Sasha Obama were headed to their first day at the elite Sidwell Friends School in Washington, Lauer talked to psychiatrist Gail Saltz and Vanity Fair's Maureen Orth about how the first daughters would maintain a sense of "normalcy" once their father was sworn in as president.

Lauer never described the decision to send the Obama girls to private school as controversial, but he did ask Orth a question about the First Lady: "Do we have a sense of the mothering style of Michelle?"

During a town hall meeting about education reform on the September, 27, 2010 Today, Obama was asked about his daughters attending a private school. However, the question did not come from Lauer, or any NBC journalist, but rather from a woman in the audience.

That woman, Kelly Burnett, didn't necessarily criticize the President, but simply wondered: "As a father of two very delightful and seemingly very bright daughters, I wanted to know whether or not you think that Malia and Sasha would get the same high-quality, rigorous education in a DC public school as compared to their very elite private academy that they're attending now?"

On Friday, Christie completely refuted Lauer's assertion that the question was "fair," or even relevant:

It's nonsensical. I mean, to think as the governor you don't understand every cut that you make and the effects that it has on people is nonsensical. And the fact is, wherever I send my children to school – because my wife and I decide that we want our children to go to Catholic school because it helps reinforce the values we're teaching – has nothing to do with it. I'm a product of the public schools, I went to the public schools in New Jersey my entire life. And so the idea to think that as governor somehow that makes my ability less powerful because my children don't go to them.

Because let me tell you this, Matt. You know what my skin in the game is on the public schools? I pay $38,000 a year in property taxes and my kids don't go to the school that uses most of that money. But that's my responsibility as a citizen, to help to fund good, free public schools in my state. I'm not complaining about it, I'm not asking her for any money to send my kids to parochial school. So it's none of her business.

The interview began on a positive note, as Lauer praised Christie's ability to pass major cost-cutting reform legislation on a bipartisanship basis: "Governor Chris Christie is celebrating a very big win this morning. He just persuaded the Democratic-controlled legislature in his state to pass historic pension and heah care reform that he claims will save his state billions of dollars."

However, Lauer quickly found a negative way to spin the accomplishment: "It comes with a cost, okay? I mean when you look at your situation in New Jersey right now, teachers don't like you, the public employees unions, they hate you right now. Your approval rating, 47% of the people in New Jersey disapprove, right now, of the job that Chris Christie is doing in the state. Simply go with the territory?"

On Thursday, Lauer similarly touted low approval ratings for other Republican governors and claimed voters may be feeling "buyer's remorse." What he left out of his reporting on Thursday and Friday was Obama's equally low poll numbers.

Here is a full transcript of Lauer's June 24 interview with Christie:

7:00AM ET TEASE:  

MATT LAUER: Today exclusive. He's one of the most talked about politicians in the country and he's fresh off a huge win in his state. What can Chris Christie's victory in New Jersey teach lawmakers in Washington? He'll join us live and we'll ask the question, is he or isn't he?

7:11AM ET SEGMENT:
                
LAUER: If you thought the presidential buzz was loud already, just wait. New Jersey's Republican Governor Chris Christie is celebrating a very big win this morning. He just persuaded the Democratic-controlled legislature in his state to pass historic pension and heah care reform that he claims will save his state billions of dollars. Governor Chris Christie is with us exclusively. Governor, congratulations.

CHRIS CHRISTIE: Thank you, Matt.

LAUER: It's huge. I mean this reform, according to your estimates and other estimates, will save your state something like $130 billion over the next 30 years. You said this about it, quote, 'It's an example of bipartisanship that the President and the Congress can only aspire to.' So is this something that could only happen at the state level?

CHRISTIE: No, no, it's not. But what you need to do is everybody needs to take risk, everyone needs to bring skin in the game. And I have to tell you, I would not have been able to achieve this for New Jersey without the Senate President Steve Sweeney and the Speaker of the Assembly, Sheila Oliver. Everybody came together, put aside party.

LAUER: Okay, so take me – let's look at the bigger picture. You know exactly what's going on in Washington right now. So specifically, what can the President and what can members of Congress learn from what you've just accomplished in New Jersey?

CHRISTIE: Well first, the President can show up. I mean, you know, you can't negotiate through a secondary person. And with all due respect to the Vice President, the President's got to show up. And I spent hours and hours and hours, Matt, with the Senate President and the Speaker personally in my office over weeks negotiating this.

LAUER: But when you say the President has to show up, both sides need to be willing to really grab compromise. Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, just walked away from the table in the last day because he doesn't want to consider raising taxes. Was that the right move?

CHRISTIE: Well listen, if that's what they needed to do to get the President in the room, then so be it.

LAUER: Based on your experience, is that what you would – is that what Chris Christie would have done in a similar situation?

CHRISTIE: Well, no. I'm the governor, so I would be the one trying to get dragged into the room. But I didn't have to be dragged into the room, Matt. I knew this was my responsibility. And so did Steve Sweeney and Shelia Oliver that it was their responsibilities. We didn't send seconds into the ring. We got into the ring ourselves, we battled it out, we came to compromise, we convinced our colleagues and we did it.

LAUER: It comes with a cost, okay? I mean when you look at your situation in New Jersey right now, teachers don't like you, the public employees unions, they hate you right now. Your approval rating, 47% of the people in New Jersey disapprove, right now, of the job that Chris Christie is doing in the state. Simply go with the territory?

CHRISTIE: Yes. You earn political capital in order to spend it to achieve big things. And what makes what happened in New Jersey different than what's happening in other places is we did it in a bipartisan way. This is not just a Republican plan or a Democratic plan, it's a bipartisan plan where we compromised to put the people first, Matt. This is the – the taxpayer's going to be saved over $130 billion over the next 30 years. We needed to bring equity and shared sacrifice to this.

LAUER: This took a long time. This was a year-long process. During that time you became known as a guy who speaks in blunt terms, sometimes to a shocking level. I've always admired that from you. I really have. But I listened to a comment you made recently and even I was surprised. This is an exchange you had with a voter over cuts in education. Let me play it, okay?

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: ...schools, you send them to private schools. So I was wondering why you think it's fair to be cutting school funding to public schools?

CHRISTIE: First off, it's none of your business. I don't ask you where you send your kids to school. Don't bother me about where I send mine.

LAUER: Is that a little blunt, even for you?

CHRISTIE: No, it's not, because her point is completely ridiculous. I shouldn't be able to make decisions about budgetary issues that relate to public schools because my children go to private school? That was the question.

LAUER: No, no, no, but no-

CHRISTIE: And it's none of her business where I send my kids to school, Matt.

LAUER: I thought it was a fair question, and I'll tell you why. Because what she was asking you was – she clearly sends her kids to public schools and she's saying, 'Governor, I understand you send your kids to private schools, but is it possible, though, then you don't understand how these cuts are going to affect families,' like her's on a daily basis. Why isn't it a fair question?

CHRISTIE: It's nonsensical. I mean, to think as the governor you don't understand every cut that you make and the effects that it has on people is nonsensical. And the fact is, wherever I send my children to school – because my wife and I decide that we want our children to go to Catholic school because it helps reinforce the values we're teaching – has nothing to do with it. I'm a product of the public schools, I went to the public schools in New Jersey my entire life. And so the idea to think that as governor somehow that makes my ability less powerful because my children don't go to them.

Because let me tell you this, Matt. You know what my skin in the game is on the public schools? I pay $38,000 a year in property taxes and my kids don't go to the school that uses most of that money. But that's my responsibility as a citizen, to help to fund good, free public schools in my state. I'm not complaining about it, I'm not asking her for any money to send my kids to parochial school. So it's none of her business.

LAUER: Alright-

CHRISTIE: And when it's none of your business, it's none of you business, Matt. That's it.

LAUER: Well, let move on to something else. You had lunch recently, or a meeting recently, with Rudy Giuliani. What did you guys talk about? Don't say, 'It's none of your business.'

CHRISTIE: No, no. You sure?

[LAUGHTER]

CHRISTIE: Listen, what we talked about was his future, my future. And talked about governing.

LAUER: Did he say, 'Are you running, because I'm considering it?' And, 'If you're running I don't think I can win in this area and I don't want to get involved'?

CHRISTIE: No, he didn't say exactly that.

LAUER: Did he say something similar to that?

CHRISTIE: Listen, what – listen, we had a conversation. He again asked me about what I was going to do. And I told him, 'There's no different answer because I'm here at lunch with you than there is everything I said publicly. I'm governor, want to be governor, I'm not running for president. That's that.'

LAUER: So, no, no, no. We haven't heard – I haven't heard 'no' this often since I asked the homecoming queen to the prom. So-    

[LAUGHTER]

CHRISTIE: Matt, I had the same experience, baby. I feel your pain.

LAUER: So it is no?

CHRISTIE: It's no.

LAUER: Even though it looks like there's some things coming up. You're going to speak in Iowa next month before a crucial straw poll. You recently met with some campaign donors out there. So is your mouth saying no, is your heart still considering yes?

CHRISTIE: No, listen, I got invited by Governor Branstad to come out and speak about education reform, which is something I feel passionately about. And he's a friend. So I'm going to go out and do it. Some folks from Iowa wanted to come to New Jersey. Anybody who wants to come to New Jersey, Matt, I'm in, babe. Let them come. And we sat, we met, we talked about it. But I was very clear with them too, I care about the future of our country and I want us to have the best possible candidate in our party to run for president. But it's not going to be me.

LAUER: Thank you for being here.

CHRISTIE: Good seeing you, Matt.

LAUER: Governor Chris Christie. By the way, I want to tell you that he's going to be David's guest on Sunday morning on Meet the Press. Good luck with that.  

CHRISTIE: Thank you.

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Double Standards
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Budget
  • Education
  • Chris Christie
  • NBC
  • Today
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

You Have To Love The Talking Heads

Submitted by Bourbeau on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:29pm.

They fawn over the Clintons, the Gores, and the Obamas and what "private" schools they send their kids too and never challenge their decision making. When it comes to Republicans, it doesn't matter what they do, they likes of Lauer will find a negative spin. The correct answer to that woman was exactly what the governors said, "It's none of your business." He pays his taxes; he supports the public school system; and he chooses to take his hard earned salary and dedicate a portion his children's Catholic educatin. Bravo to you governor for standing up for your rights as a parent to bring your children up the way you and your wife see fit.

  • Login to post comments

So true Bourbeau!

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:44pm.

"When it comes to Republicans, it doesn't matter what they do, they likes of Lauer will find a negative spin."

And the same with many women: When it comes to men, it doesn't matter what they do, a woman will find a negative spin." Even if you complement them...

That may be because pop-culture trains women to hate men (well, unless they are g*y. rich, or on TV), and likewise, the LSM is trained to hate conservatives. It has the same effect. Finding negatives where it is largely positive.

-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.

  • Login to post comments

Maximus

Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:47pm.

Except for conservative women. I love and respect my husband and the other men in my life. It's the liberal women who can't deal with real men. Their loss!

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

You Have To Love The Talking Heads

Submitted by Bourbeau on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:29pm.

They fawn over the Clintons, the Gores, and the Obamas and what "private" schools they send their kids too and never challenge their decision making. When it comes to Republicans, it doesn't matter what they do, they likes of Lauer will find a negative spin. The correct answer to that woman was exactly what the governors said, "It's none of your business." He pays his taxes; he supports the public school system; and he chooses to take his hard earned salary and dedicate a portion his children's Catholic educatin. Bravo to you governor for standing up for your rights as a parent to bring your children up the way you and your wife see fit.

  • Login to post comments

"....That's one reason it was

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:05pm.

"....That's one reason it was so startling back in 2000 when Time magazine's Tamala Edwards, during a live televised debate at Harlem's Apollo Theater, asked Al Gore about the propriety of sending his own son to private school while opposing any effort to extend the same choice to African-Americans without his financial wherewithal. As CNN's Jeff Greenfield would note later in the same debate, Mr. Gore "bristled" when Ms. Edward's put the question to him."  [emphasis added]

(h/t Cool Arrow)

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by well99 on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 9:49am.

Wish I had saw that.It would be worth the cost of a ticket.

  • Login to post comments

$38K on property tax!

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:35pm.

$3166/month on property tax - Ouch! What is the rate there? Here in TX it is high at about 2.1% of appraised market value. So that would be a $1.8M house. That is criminal theft IMO since it is like a 50 yr. mortgage you never get to pay off. What type of private property right is that if they take it from you? I don't think this is what was intended 200 yrs. ago.

-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.

  • Login to post comments

Outrageously high property taxes were . . .

Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 4:00pm.

. . . one of the factors in Christie's election. Because of it, many high income taxpayers have left NJ for neighboring states, and the loss of tax revenue to NJ was measured in hundreds of millions of dollars.

Christie's answer to Lauer -- like his similar response to the woman's question -- was perfect and true.

As for the excuse that Obama's children go to the exclusive Sidwell Friends school for security purposes, I would like to know how much less on the children's personal security is spent on Sidwell Friends vice the DC public school they would've attended. 

And which is the more lucrative terrorist target:  Sidwell Friends where the children high-ranking US government and foreign diplomatic people attend, or that public school down the street from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.?

Democrats won't publicly admit that DC schools -- with some of the highest per student spending in the nation and a teachers union that resisted Michelle Rhee's reforms -- are crap.

  • Login to post comments

Highest in the nation baby

Submitted by stunned on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 4:23pm.

My 4 bedroom house, 2 bath on less than 1/3 of an acre in semi-rural NJ-90 minutes outside NYC goes for 10,000 a year. Sixteen years ago the taxes were 6.000 but this is a Blue Blue state. The MSM keeps harping on Christie's popularity? It is a miracle he got elected and remains so popular.

My brother's suburban home 45 min outside of NY 2 bedroom, one bath on a 50 by 100 foot lot goes for 7,000. Some of my neighbors on the newer section of street with a big familyroom pay 14,000 and they are not Mc-mansions either. LOL this is why so many folks I've known live south of the mason-dixon line or west of the Mississippi today. We will be joining them as soon if our jobs disappear or we retire and we and all my friends are planning for their kids to go to college far far away so they will be more comfortable settling down somewhere else.

tired of liberal lies

  • Login to post comments

And Getting Higher

Submitted by Question_Assumptions on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 6:35pm.

My 5 bedroom, 2.5 bath, half-acre (1970s house with addition, not a McMansion) about an hour from NYC has property tax of over $9,000 a year and it was closer to $6,000 a year when we moved in in 2001. That's still on the low side in NJ. Retirees can't afford it. And I've talked to people online in the Midwest that have entire house payments, mortgage and property tax, lower than my property taxes.

That said, the problem is that a lot of the people who leave New Jersey because of the high taxes move to other states where they proceed to vote Democrat and push for more government programs and services, much as an earlier generation fled New York City for New Jersey and Connecticut and did the same thing there. It's like locusts, eating a field bare and then moving on to the next field to eat it bare. They are either too stupid, too clueless, or too in denial to realize that the reason why New Jersey has outrageous taxes is because of the people they voted for.

  • Login to post comments

QuestionAssumptions

Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:28pm.

I'm in Pennsylvania. About 20 years ago I78 was built and we got an influx of New Jerseyers fleeing high cost housing and high taxes. They brought both with them.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

I sent three young men to a

Submitted by Joe C Camel on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:40pm.

I sent three young men to a private Christian school for years. That is my decision, like Mr. Christi's. The fact that my taxes still go to support public education did not cause me concern. It is used to support all those illegal aliens that use our system daily and don't pay for it. The press just does not get it as usual. The real scam is summer school and the funding for it. Look how it is funded in your state and the dollars they get for it. It will enlighten you very quickly, and show the waste that goes on.

  • Login to post comments

Really, it is more

Submitted by Smartypants on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:47pm.

Really, it is more hypocritical for Democrats, who endorse big government education programs and are in bed with public school teacher's unions, to send their kids to private schools than it is for most Republicans to do the same. Democrats are supposed to wholeheartedly endorse the public education establishment; they are part of it, in fact. Media goons like Matt Lauer see hypocrisy in only one direction, and it's always aimed at Republicans. Further, it is always Republicans who do not understand the impact of their decisions. The Democrats force through, unilaterally, a massive healthcare bill the impact of which cannot fully be determined by even the most talented of experts and the media largely acted as cheerleaders for the effort. Yet, people like Lauer see fit to question whether or not Christi understands the impact of budgetary cuts. It is as if spending more money has no negative impact.

 

 

  • Login to post comments

On behalf of the teachers

Submitted by forest on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:47pm.

On behalf of the teachers unions, Obama wiped out the program that allowed some kids to escape the terrible schools in DC. That' should make the question more appropriate for him.

Christie and some NJ Democrats reigned in spending across the whole system because it was unsustainable. It's not even close to what Obama did.

  • Login to post comments

→ Lauer's a Protector monkey

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:47pm.

Lauer didn't even question Obama's motives for refusing to step in when underprivileged black kids were being kicked out of Obama's kids' school.

It was disgusting, but one of many disgusting Obama decisions that the MSM refused to drill down into.

  • Login to post comments

If we're going to open that door...

Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:50pm.

...then lets find out what grades Obama got in school. What he and Michelle eat for dinner every night. How do his children spend their spare time? What movies do they see?

I guess it's only good to pry into the lives of the GOP huh.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

"I haven't heard 'no' this

Submitted by d1carter on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:58pm.

"I haven't heard 'no' this often since I asked the homecoming queen to the prom."

So, Lauer was a metrosexual in high school as well...?

  • Login to post comments

I'd say that...

Submitted by C-townGiant on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 4:29pm.

...your comment is an insult to metrosexuals everywhere.

You metro-racist!

http://baseballwithasideofpolitics.blogspot.com/
  • Login to post comments

LOL!

Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:07pm.

.

_____________________________________________________________ I'm not too drunk to dance! It's just that people keep stepping on my hands!
  • Login to post comments

LOL - I didn't realize d1 was a metrophobe

Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:21pm.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Obviously Chris Christie doesn't believe in child abuse

Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 4:31pm.

...which is exactly what turning a child over to the clutches (claws?) of the government to be "educated" is.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Lauer's...

Submitted by PJRyan on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 4:47pm.

...brats go to P.S. 109??

Christie is unpopular with leeching scum who want a free ride for their gross incompetence!! It's inconceivable!

  • Login to post comments

If Christie had only replie...

Submitted by vyger on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:20pm.

True my approval rating is that level, but compared to Obama I'm on top of the world!

  • Login to post comments

Where does/did Lauer send his

Submitted by Soldat44 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 5:32pm.

Where does/did Lauer send his children?

'One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church'
  • Login to post comments

Didn't o'drama kill...

Submitted by USMC8411 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 6:24pm.

The voucher program for poor kids while his kids, as noted, are very well taken care of? Christie took one helicopter trip to his son's game, while o'drama visits his native country of Ireland. Moochelle goes on a safari trip to her native Africa with her children.

WE PAY THE BILL.

As for Lauer... He had 1 failed marriage. 1 Failed engagement. He married a model called "Jade". When their 3rd child was on the way, they separated and she filed for divorce. They have since "reconciled". They named the kid Thjis which rhymes with lice, yet he attacks Palin for the names of her children and for Bristol's failed relationship to that jerk.

Public schools are a democrat ripoff scam, stealing from our children, teaching them everything but the 3 r's. Christie has every right to tell that Busy-nobody where to go and how to get there!

Great comments Bourbeau!

  • Login to post comments

Bigger question for Obama no one dare ask?

Submitted by Don L on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 6:43pm.

"As a father of two very delightful and seemingly very bright daughters, I wanted to know whether or not you think that Malia and Sasha would get the same high-quality, rigorous education in a DC public school as compared to their very elite private academy that they're attending now?"

A good corollary might have been: As the nations foremost advocate of abortion and even post-abortion involuntary euthasia, I wonder, as the father of two very delightful...daughters, how would you have responded (though helpless under law) had Michelle sought to kill them via abortion?

Don L
  • Login to post comments

Hypocrisy cuts both ways

Submitted by T D on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:23pm.

If Gov. Christie doesn't have to answer for where he sends his children neither does Pres. Obama. Lauer is a hypocrite.

Those of us who thought the question for Obama was fair (or any question to liberals about how their private lives go against their public policy initiatives) are hard pressed to agree with Gov. Christie that where he sends his children to school isn't a fair question.

Kyle, how does NewsBusters feel about the propriety of asking Pres. Obama about where he sends his kids to school? Or how the Obamas eat, vacation, confront high gas prices, get their medical care, etc., as compared to what they propose as public policy? Do you think Gov. Christie is right in saying this is no business of the voters?

It's a fair question for a voter or journalist to ask someone who makes government policy why they have shielded themselves from the consequences personally of that policy. Now, in his original statement Christie went on to say that he sends his children to parochial schools so that they will get religious instruction that they can't get in public schools. That's a good answer that shows a basic weakness in the public school system.

But to say it's not a voter's business how he lives his private life in an area where he is making policy for how most voters have to live their private lives is not good argument--it's bluster. Unfortunately, it shows that Gov. Christie is combative even when he doesn't need to be. An unforced error.

  • Login to post comments

T D

Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 7:36pm.

Christie is paying for his kid's education. Also, the woman caller implied he cannot do his job for public schools when his children are in private schools.

As far as Obama, when his vacations cost the taxpayers money (as his do) and he is trying to force Americans into a medical program he will have no part of, but WE WILL BE FORCED into, it is our business.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Radical1979

Submitted by T D on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 3:06pm.

I see your point. But, can't the same be said for Obama on health care? His point is that he will privately pay for the best health care for his family. And you can too under Obamacare if you're rich enough. That's the rub. The average person doesn't have those resources.

If Christie is right that if no tax payer money is involved no one has a right to question a politician on how his personal life is shielded from public policy he implements, then these are non-issues for every politician, including President Obama..

  • Login to post comments

The only standards Matt Lauer and his ilk have...

Submitted by jawebster1 on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 3:32am.

are "no standards". They should get paid royally for the free propaganda they give day in and day out to the Democratic Party.

Jim Webster
  • Login to post comments

Just a wee point Jim

Submitted by Rukus on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 8:24am.

"...to the Democratic Party."

It's the Democrat Party, not Democratic, they are any thing but...

Otherwise I am with you buddy!  : )

_____________________________________________________________ I'm not too drunk to dance! It's just that people keep stepping on my hands!
  • Login to post comments

I Don't Get It

Submitted by Rhymes With Right on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 7:40am.

Here's a man who wants to make school choice available and affordable for all, making precisely such a choice on where to send his children to school. But when Obama and other liberal Democrats, who oppose school choice and want to trap millions of kids in public schools with no hope of getting out, send their kids to private schools nobody blinks, despite the fact they are taking doing themselves the very sort of thing that they oppose letting every other American do. Seems to me that they are the folks who should be questioned.

But then again, what do I know -- I'm just a public school teacher, not a big-time journalist.

Blogging at rhymeswithright.mu.nu
  • Login to post comments

Matt Lauer can best be

Submitted by buddyc on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 8:21am.

Matt Lauer can best be described as:

toilet paper (he cleans up for democrats)
shoe shine boy (he makes sure they look clean and polished)
tool (he is used by democrats in their work)

  • Login to post comments

Lauer

Submitted by jessieH on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 10:37am.

THe guy is a two-faced liberal with a press pass. Nothing more. He wouldn't know a fair question if it bit him in the ass.

                                                                                                                                                                    

  • Login to post comments

Matt Lauer has been in touch

Submitted by AngryInOhio on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 5:40pm.

Matt Lauer has been in touch with his feminine side for a long time, his "journalistic" style is more girly than Couric's.

Apathy is killing this Country
  • Login to post comments

So true Kyle. Lauer had his

Submitted by cadolfan on Wed, 06/29/2011 - 2:15pm.

So true Kyle. Lauer had his tail between his legs.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use