Nets Claim GOP Plan for 'Deep Cuts' in Medicare Led to 'Seismic' Dem Win in NY Special Election
All three network morning shows on Wednesday cheered Democrat Kathy Hochul winning the special election in New York's 26th congressional district and framed the outcome as a rejection of Republican plans to reform Medicare. On NBC's Today, news reporter Ann Curry proclaimed: "The race hinged on Hochul's opposition to a Republican-led plan to make deep cuts in Medicare." [Audio available here]
On ABC's Good Morning America, news reporter Josh Elliot declared Hochul's win to be "a seismic event in the political world" and a "shocking upset." Like Curry, he declared: "The GOP candidate lost after backing that Republican plan to cut billions from Medicare." In reality, the Republican budget plan increases Medicare spending from $563 billion to $953 billion ten years from now. That’s an increase of nearly 70%.
View video below
CBS's Early Show did a full report on the election results and used a sound bite from Hochul herself to claim the GOP plan would cut funding to Medicare: "And now, she [Republican Jane Corwin] wants to cut Medicare to pay for more tax breaks for multi-millionaires." Correspondent Nancy Cordes failed to correct the record, instead contending: "Hochul hit her Republican opponent with ad after ad, tying her to the House Republicans' plan to turn Medicare into a voucher system, and it worked....By the end of the campaign, voters said Medicare was their top issue, even more than jobs and the federal budget." The Siena College poll that Cordes cited actually showed voter concerns over Medicare were statistically tied with their concerns over jobs and the deficit.
Speaking to Republican New York Congressman Peter King, Cordes argued: "Democrats have seized on an issue that they think is a winner for them, Medicare, and the polls seem to show that they're right. It was the number one issue in this race in New York. What does that say to you?"
Unlike the news briefs on Today and Good Morning America, Cordes concluded her Early Show report by at least mentioning an alternative explanation for the Democrat's victory: "Now, what many Republicans will argue today is that this race was not a referendum on anything, that it simply came down to the fact that there was a third party candidate, a Tea Party candidate, who siphoned off about 9% of the vote, primarily from the Republican."
Here is a full transcript of Cordes's May 25 report:
7:01AM ET TEASE:
ERICA HILL: We are also going to check in on politics this morning on 'The Early Show.' Democrats celebrating an upset win today, taking a key congressional seat in western New York. So what could it mean for 2012? We'll take a look.
7:12AM ET SEGMENT:
HILL: Looking now at politics here in the States, Democrats this morning hoping a special congressional election in New York State is a sign of things to come in 2012.
CBS News congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes is on Capitol Hill this morning with last night's surprising results. Nancy, good morning.
NANCY CORDES: Good morning, Erica. This race was widely seen as the first big popularity test for the Republican's new Medicare plan. They spent millions of dollars defending it and their candidate in upstate New York, but they lost anyway, and they say this race doesn't mean anything.
[CBS News Graphic: "Upstate Upset: Dem Wins Key Special Election In NY"]
KATHY HOCHUL (from campaign speech): Thank you very much. (crowd cheers and applauds)
CORDES (voice-over): What's surprising about this win for Democrats is where it happened: in the heavily Republican suburbs of Buffalo and Rochester in upstate New York, where GOP Congressman Chris Lee won re-election with 74% of the vote in November, before shirtless photos he sent to a woman on Craigslist surfaced, prompting the married congressman to resign. George Bush won big in this district- so did John McCain. But in this race, the Democrat, Kathy Hochul, hit her Republican opponent with ad after ad, tying her to the House Republicans' plan to turn Medicare into a voucher system, and it worked.
HOCHUL (from campaign ad): And now, she wants to cut Medicare to pay for more tax breaks for multi-millionaires.
CORDES: By the end of the campaign, voters said Medicare was their top issue, even more than jobs and the federal budget. The Republican, Jane Corwin, struggled to change the subject.
[CBS News Graphic: "Top NY-26 Special Election Issue: Medicare: 21%; Jobs: 20%; Federal Budget Deficit: 19%; Margin of Error: +/- 3.9% Pts.; Source: Siena College Research Institute"]
JANE CORWIN: If it's not a perfect plan, and I'm sure it isn't, we need to, you know- I'm open to modifying it or changing or improving.
REPRESENTATIVE PAUL RYAN (from press conference): This is the path to prosperity.
CORDES: All but four House Republicans voted in favor of the Medicare plan, put forth in a budget proposal by Congressman Paul Ryan. But now, some Republicans are looking to put distance between themselves and the plan. Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown announced his opposition this week, saying, 'We can work inside of Medicare to make it more solvent.'
CORDES (from taped interview): Democrats have seized on an issue that they think is a winner for them, Medicare, and the polls seem to show that they're right. It was the number one issue in this race in New York. What does that say to you?
REPRESENTATIVE PETER KING: If that's true, and it could well be, we're going to have to make our case better on Medicare. We have to show as Republicans we're saving Medicare.
CORDES (on-camera): Now, what many Republicans will argue today is that this race was not a referendum on anything, that it simply came down to the fact that there was a third party candidate, a Tea Party candidate, who siphoned off about 9% of the vote, primarily from the Republican. But what Democrats plan to do either today or tomorrow here in the Senate is to hold a vote on that Medicare plan and the budget that encompasses it, to try to tie more Senate Republicans to it as well. Erica?
HILL: Nancy Cordes on Capitol Hill this morning- Nancy, thanks.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Hey the liberal nitwits have to grasp at something!
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 12:08pm.
They've lost so much recently it may help to quell their current state of mental anguish. Doubtful but just a thought;)
The "Tea Party" Candidate
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 12:16pm.
Was a faux candidate, a democrat plant.
I notice how that was prominently mentioned. /s
The media is in full tilt spin mode. They're going to take off shortly if they don't keep those ground ties on really, really tight.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
The Tea Party
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 7:49am.
better get it's a$$ in gear to make sure this doesn't happen again.
And the dems are so proud they pulled this off. Not proud of fighting a fair election on the issues, proud of using all means possible, fair and unfair, to win an election.
DOH!!
Submitted by MightyMouth on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 12:19pm.
It's new frickin york. What else would you expect!!
and no mention of the...
Submitted by PJRyan on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 12:30pm.
...judgeship, recount results in Wisconsin, I assume.
As predictable as clockwork
Submitted by Mary Louise Turner on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 12:36pm.
The make believe media are at it again! These Obama-philes are so in love with the Democratic Party that they conveniently forget that Democrats had to cheat in order to win this election (i. e., placing a fake tea party candidate). Democrats can't win on their tired old ideas, so they resort to dirty tricks (e. g., double voters, dead voters). So this reaction is as predictable as clockwork...
Do as they do
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 12:35pm.
Once again, the Democrats win by fraud. I would recommend the Republicans do the same, i.e., any race that looks like it will be close put a phony candidate up (just like the Democrats do, plus send a letter to the DNC asking how to best do it, keep copies) under the Reparations Party or the Obama Peoples Party or something similar. Run ads saying things like "I support Obama, vote for me!", or "I support reparations, vote for me!".
How does a 70% increase equal
Submitted by forest on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 1:00pm.
How does a 70% increase equal "cut billions from Medicare"? One of the parties did actually cut billions from Medicare - the Democrats did that as part of Obama's HC law. They crossed the line between spin and telling demonstratable lies here. Disgusting.
Anyway, In spite of all of this, the case for Medicare reform is still make-able if they do it right. 1. Medicare will definitely go bankrupt and doctors will continue to bail out of the program if we do nothing. 2. The Democrat plan is to do nothing and allow it to fail - killing old people in the process 3. The solution is to give people choice and control over their accounts rather than letting the most financially irresponsible entity in human history to continue to dictate all terms and steal money from the program.
"How does a 70% increase
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 3:34pm.
"How does a 70% increase equal 'cut billions from Medicare'?"
That's a figure for the first 10 years of the plan--it chops up Medicare starting after 10 years (and I suspect Drennen knew this when he wrote that).
Seismic? Not even close
Submitted by Uncle John on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 1:59pm.
I live in the district. This had nothing to do with alleged fears over Medicare and everything to do with a poorly-run Jane Corwin campaign and four-time loser Jack Davis pretending to be some kind of conservative and siphoning votes that would have gone to Corwin. No one voted for Hochul who wouldn't have voted for her anyway. Any spin to the contrary is total crap.
This will be repeated
Submitted by Boudin on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 7:40am.
If folks dont educate themselves and their friends and neighbors on the candidates. This is a plan of attack by the dimwits, water down the field.
"It's all nonsense," writes Charlie Cook
Submitted by Red Jeep on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 2:15pm.
"In this Republican-leaning 26th District fight, there is one Democrat, one Republican and, oh, yes, a wealthy, abortion-rights, economic protectionist, former Republican, former Democrat, current tea partier, who ran for Congress in 2004, 2006 and 2008—spending a total of $5.2 million of his own money—and has already spent at least another $1.7 million in this race for Congress.
If anyone can find a race next year with a similar configuration, be my guest and apply the “lessons learned” from this race to that one. But implying that the outcome of this race portends anything about any conventional race next year amounts to cheap spin and drive-by “analysis” of the most superficial kind, which is sadly becoming all too prevalent in Washington. There are a lot of folks in D.C. who would be well-served switching to decaf." (Bold, mine.)
The meaning of this race according to Cook: "For those who live outside the boundaries of the 26th District, the significance is this: If Democrats capture the seat, they will need a net gain of 24 seats to capture a majority and if Republicans hold the seat, Democrats will still need 25 seats. That’s it. Any grander conclusions are specious."
http://nationaljournal.com/columns/off-to-the-races/charlie-cook-beyond-...
I love how they're portraying this.
Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 2:21pm.
I love how the Democrats, and the liberal press (but I repeat myself) are portraying this. The Democrats gain a single seat in the House and it's a "seismic" event. Two years previous, the Republican gain a MAJORITY in the House (which they still maintain, by the way) and it's not a big deal to these same Democrats and their liberal media occultists.
As a matter of fact, ABC didn't even blame the Democrats for their losses in 2010. According to ABC, it was the fault of an "anti-incumbency" fervor in America, combined with "Republican-allied outside groups" which "skewed the playing field dramatically."
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
"The Democrats gain a single
Submitted by CO2Maker on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 2:33pm.
"The Democrats gain a single seat in the House and it's a "seismic" event."
"That's not a knife. THAT'S a knife!" — Crocodile Dundee
"You call that an orgasm?" — Tipper Gore
Cobra,
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 2:50pm.
Weren't the voters throwing a tantrum when a Republican won Kennedy's seat.
Any victory for the democrats
Submitted by okie-pastor on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 3:12pm.
Considering how much they have been getting spanked lately,
Any victory for the democrats these days is a "seismic" event. Lol
2012 elections will shut them
Submitted by jessieH on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 2:43pm.
2012 elections will shut them up, for a little while, at least.
It's their job, they must
Submitted by okie-pastor on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 3:08pm.
It's their job, they must spin everything to help Obama.
The winner actually ran on a conservative message and beat the republican by four with a fake tea party candidate.
While we know this, the main stream media hopes their audience won't!
That's totally dishonest, Drennen
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 3:31pm.
"In reality, the Republican budget plan increases Medicare spending from $563 billion to $953 billion ten years from now. That’s an increase of nearly 70%."
Ten years from now is when the cuts to Medicare--which strip it to the bone, turn it into a voucher system, and leaves seniors with a massive new burden few will be able to afford--are scheduled to kick in, under the Ryan plan.
Demcrats won't be happy until
Submitted by okie-pastor on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 3:58pm.
Demcrats won't be happy until the government (controlled by democrats) completely runs the health care system.
I am anxiously awaiting a supreme court decision on obamacare.
Pastor
Submitted by Model850 on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 4:29pm.
Made a slight change to your statement:
"until the government (controlled by democrats) completely RUINS the health care system."
whistling past the graveyard again
Submitted by wizardjr on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 5:29pm.
There were so many factors in that election that picking Mediscare is just silly.
Not at all. Hochul made it
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 7:29pm.
Not at all. Hochul made it the centerpiece of her campaign, and she won. It's the only reason she was even competitive in this district.
Elected on the strength of a vicious lie.
Submitted by Boil It Down on Thu, 05/26/2011 - 3:46am.
Kathy Hochul's mama must be so proud. I'd feel like it was a very hollow victory if I were her. I hope Ryan's video is dynamic enough to expose these lies. -bidn-