Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’

CBS Notices Obama Administration Playing Politics With Nuclear Waste Disposal, NBC and ABC Silent

By Kyle Drennen | April 01, 2011 | 12:32

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

Since Japan's earthquake and following nuclear crisis, the CBS Evening News has done two reports on the Obama administration blocking use of the Yucca Mountain storage facility in Nevada to safely dispose of U.S. nuclear waste. Meanwhile, NBC and ABC have ignored the controversy.

The first CBS report on the issue came on March 22, when Evening News anchor Katie Couric declared: "The crisis in Japan has renewed the debate over nuclear power in this country. Today a federal appeals court heard arguments in a lawsuit over what to do with spent fuel rods." Correspondent Jim Axelrod explained: "An estimated 66,000 metric tons of spent fuel are stored at 77 sites around the country. That's more than 145 million pounds....Plans to make Yucca Mountain in Nevada a long-term storage site were scuttled by the Obama administration a year ago, after 20 years of planning costing $14 billion."

In a follow-up piece on Thursday's Evening News, correspondent Armen Keteyian went further in laying blame on the Obama administration: "There was one site designed to hold all of our nation's nuclear waste and it's right here in the high desert of Nevada, at a place called Yucca Mountain. Today, the federal government won't let our cameras anywhere near it. It's shut down, locked up, caught up in what critics charge is nothing more than pure politics."

Fill-in anchor Erica Hill teased Keteyian's report at the top of the broadcast: "Why did plans to bury nuclear waste inside Nevada's Yucca Mountain get killed? Was it safety fears or politics?" Keteyian described how the, "Obama administration kept its campaign promise....And shut down Yucca Mountain. Now the Nuclear Regulatory Commission must decide if it wants to restart what is already a 25-year, $14 billion project, in the face of tough opposition, like that from Harry Reid, the Democratic Senate majority leader from Nevada."

Keteyian also pointed out the political background of the head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under Obama: "A former staffer for Senator Reid, Greg Jaczko, now chairs the NRC. Jaczko recently came under fire after shutting down the agency's safety review of Yucca Mountain and after key safety recommendations were redacted, cut out, from a long-awaited NRC report."

In the March 22 report, Axelrod noted: "The head of the NRC may not see a pressing problem, but the states now suing did not want to take that risk before Japan's disaster and certainly don't want to now."

On Thursday, Keteyian challenged Jaczko: "Critics charge that you were simply doing the bidding of your former boss, Senator Harry Reid, a fierce opponent of this project."

Keteyian concluded his piece: "The NRC inspector general and Congress are now investigating the decision to shut down the safety review. Still, nuclear waste is scattered across 35 states, and Yucca Mountain sits silent and empty."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Here is a full transcript of Keteyian's March 31 report:

6:30PM ET TEASE:

ERICA HILL: Why did plans to bury nuclear waste inside Nevada's Yucca Mountain get killed? Was it safety fears or politics?
    
6:38PM ET TEASE:

HILL: And when we come back, it was supposed to store all of America's nuclear waste, so why then is this desert facility now deserted?

6:40PM ET SEGMENT:

HILL: For more than 50 years a debate has raged over where to store radioactive nuclear waste in this country. And that debate has been reignited by the crisis in Japan. The solution was supposed to be here at a place called Yucca Mountain in Nevada, but the multibillion-dollar storage project has been shelved and as chief investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian explains, a congressional committee wants to find out why.

ARMEN KETEYIAN: Nuclear waste – the radioactive guest on the doorstep of many of America's most populous cities. Nearly 70,000 tons from 104 reactors often piling up within 50 miles from cities like New York, Chicago, and San Diego.

There was one site designed to hold all of our nation's nuclear waste and it's right here in the high desert of Nevada, at a place called Yucca Mountain. Today, the federal government won't let our cameras anywhere near it. It's shut down, locked up, caught up in what critics charge is nothing more than pure politics.

Gary Holis and Darrell Lacey are key officials in Nye County, Nevada. They want the waste at Yucca Mountain for the jobs and money it would bring.

DARRELL LACY [NYE COUNTY NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY PROJECT OFFICE]: The people in this area are all fairly comfortable with Yucca Mountain. Many of them have worked at Yucca Mountain.

KETEYIAN: Four previous presidents funded safety reviews of the project but last year the Obama administration kept its campaign promise.

CAMPAIGN AD: Barack Obama opposes opening Yucca.

KETEYIAN: And shut down Yucca Mountain. Now the Nuclear Regulatory Commission must decide if it wants to restart what is already a 25-year, $14 billion project, in the face of tough opposition, like that from Harry Reid, the Democratic Senate majority leader from Nevada.

JEFFREY LEWIS [PH.D., NUCLEAR SAFETY EXPERT]: If the U.S. government wanted to do Yucca Mountain, it would have had to shove it down Harry Reid's throat.

KETEYIAN: A former staffer for Senator Reid, Greg Jaczko, now chairs the NRC. Jaczko recently came under fire after shutting down the agency's safety review of Yucca Mountain and after key safety recommendations were redacted, cut out, from a long-awaited NRC report. Three NRC staffers formally protested the decision to derail the safety review, charging it caused 'confusion, chaos, and anguish'. Today, Jaczko told us the safety report was preliminary, a draft, and that he had nothing to do with the redactions.

Critics charge that you were simply doing the bidding of your former boss, Senator Harry Reid, a fierce opponent of this project.

GREGORY JACZKO [PH.D., CHAIRMAN, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION: It was a difficult decision and – because it is such a controversial program – but, again, it was one that was made in, I believe, in the best interest of the agency.

KETEYIAN: The NRC inspector general and Congress are now investigating the decision to shut down the safety review. Still, nuclear waste is scattered across 35 states, and Yucca Mountain sits silent and empty. Armen Keteyian, CBS News, Nye County, Nevada.

— Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.
 

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Nuclear Power
  • Pollution
  • Congress
  • Armen Keteyian
  • ABC
  • CBS Evening News
  • NBC
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

How does "planning" cost

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Fri, 04/01/2011 - 1:13pm.

How does "planning" cost $14B? Looks like that is the entire budget from later statements. Big spending government is the definition of waste. Complete BS this modern tyranny.

So that is $14,000 millions right? How could they even spend that much? Use existing tunnels from a mine! Where is the $ going to???

We could have our house paid off & retirement fully funded if not for this pyramid scam of a government. Individual responsibility & freedom!

-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.

  • Login to post comments

It wasn't just planning.

Submitted by Blorg on Fri, 04/01/2011 - 1:50pm.

The actual number is closer to 10 billion. This amount was spent over more than 25 years. First to evaluate nine sites to narrow them down to three sites to be characterized. Then to develop plans and to characterize the three sites. The three site idea was scrapped by Congress as too costly and only Yucca Mountain was characterized. The money at Yucca went for scientific studies, drilling a tunnel through the mountain, documenting the results, reviews of the results by multiple science groups, quality assurance, and writing and defending a License Application as required by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.

The License Application is available for review at:
http://www.nrc.gov/waste/hlw-disposal/yucca-lic-app.html

As for Jaczko, he got onto the NRC when Reid held up Bush's judicial appointees. Obama made him Chairman. Jaczko has no real life experience in the nuclear industry. His highest degree is from the Univerisity of Wisconsin-Madison; one of the top ten party schools in the country.

  • Login to post comments

Reprocessing

Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 04/01/2011 - 3:24pm.

Having Yucca Mountain is good - only Finland has a permanent waste storage facility like it - but here's a shocking idea:

Ever wonder why the French, who (again) get 78% of their power from nukes, AND has a nuclear weapons program, only have enough nuclear waste to fill a typical hall closet? 

Because at Le Havre, they reprocess waste! 

Why the hell can't we?

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

  • Login to post comments

Info on reprocessing of nuke

Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Fri, 04/01/2011 - 4:33pm.

Info on reprocessing of nuke waste on link below. Seems you can make more fuel from it. It is used in a "fast" reactor which they have not perfected yet.

“we believe that up to 90 percent of commercial spent fuel could be recycled before going to Yucca Mountain”.

http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/2006/july/article3.html

-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.

  • Login to post comments

Is it just me,

Submitted by johnsonl on Fri, 04/01/2011 - 4:17pm.

or is the MSM spilling a bit of the water that they're carrying for the annointed one? Could it be that some of the faithful are casting a critical eye on the socialist savior?

  • Login to post comments

Simple CYA. They want to file

Submitted by Reaver on Fri, 04/01/2011 - 7:07pm.

Simple CYA. They want to file some stories like this now so that later in the year when the campaign is in full swing and these news groups are being accused of being part of the committee to re-elect the president they will reference these and say “see, we did some hard hitting reports too.”

“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.” ~ William F. Buckley, Jr.
  • Login to post comments

Government Waste

Submitted by Huapakechi on Fri, 04/01/2011 - 5:05pm.

Since there is monumental and insurmountable opposition to using the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste storage for its' intended purpose, do ya think we could use it to permanently sequester the very politicians who are blocking the exploitation of this nation's energy resources?

  • Login to post comments

Nuclear waste

Submitted by deadeyedan on Fri, 04/01/2011 - 9:43pm.

As noted before, the Congressional Democrats of a couple of years ago did away with funding the mechanism at Argonne National Laboratory that was designed to do exactly what the French do at LeHavre, leaving us with permanent arguments over Yucca Mountain, therefore another constant reminder of how "horrible" nuclear power is.

The MSM has been hiding this of course, since they are complicit with the environmental lunatics who have been ignoring how safely we have operated reactors both on land and on ships.

Climategate; the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution - deadeyedan

Liberalism - government of the people, by the theories and for the ideologists - deadeyedan

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Goldberg: Scandal Reporting Needs to Focus on Hard News, Not Political Spin
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use