MSNBC: Rep. Cohen Compares Mike Pence to Goebbels, No Challenge From Ed Schultz
On MSNBC's Ed Show on Thursday, despite initially regretting his comparison of Republicans to Nazis, Democratic Congressman Steve Cohen later doubled down: "[Indiana Congressman] Mike Pence talked about government takeover of health care....he wants to be concise, careful, and consistent. Well, that's somebody...who lived in a previous century who worked for bad people, that's what he did." [Audio available here]
Host Ed Schultz offered no challenge to that statement as he wrapped up the segment, simply replying, "sure." In the question that preceded Cohen's attack on Pence, Schultz even tried to defend the Tennessee Congressman's Tuesday outburst on the House floor in which he claimed Republicans were using Nazi propaganda tactics in their opposition to ObamaCare: "I think a lot of liberals in this country admire you for calling them [Republicans] liars because the numbers are what they are....you're talking about a messaging machine that they definitely have followed to get their point across about health care, which you think is having an effect."
View video below
The interview actually started out seeming to be an opportunity for Cohen to apologize for his Tuesday comments, with Schultz asking: "Congressman, did you go too far there?" Cohen seemed hesitantly remorseful: "Well, apparently so because a lot of people, I guess, hold a strict liability rule on mentioning the Holocaust or anything....I've learned that lesson, I guess." However, he quickly added: "But everything I said was true and I think people agree that it was true. That there's been a message. It's been given over and over and over and it's a lie."
Shultz followed up: "But do you feel like you, you know, brought us to a point where there should not have been a comparison, because the Holocaust was so horrific, as opposed to a repeal on health care?...Are you sorry for making the connection?" Cohen was more affirmative in an apology: "I definitely am. And I'm sorry any Jewish people, my Republican colleagues, or anybody, got the wrong impression....I hate if I participated in anything that made my congress, which I'm greatly honored to be a member of, or my district, which I love, have any problems."
To be completely clear, Schultz then asked Cohen: "Would you say that you would not use that term again?" Cohen replied: "Never." Schultz noted: "Because, you know, the Tea Party has been criticized for carrying Nazi signs at rallies...now a Democratic Congressman goes out and you say you're sorry for that tonight. But if we're talking about tone in America, this can't be tolerated, can it?" Cohen agreed: "No. I'm not going to do it again. I've my learned my lesson."
However, only seconds later, Shultz was justifying the Nazi comparison and Cohen was comparing Pence to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels.
Here is a full transcript of the January 20 segment:
6:17PM ET
ED SCHULTZ: Welcome back to 'The Ed Show' and thanks for watching tonight. I have said repeatedly that if we want to change the tone in this country, I think it has to start with the lawmakers in Washington. Well today, Democratic lawmakers are in the spotlight, one in particular, because he brought up the Nazis while making an argument against health care repeal. Here's Congressman Steve Cohen on the House floor Tuesday night.
STEVE COHEN [REP. D-TN]: Politifact, non-partisan, Pulitzer Prize winning, 2009 St. Petersburg Times said the biggest lie of 2010 was the government takeover of health care. Because there is no government takeover. It's insurance. We heard in August of 2009, that there were death panels and killing grandmother. Everybody agrees now that was a big lie. Just like government takeover of health care is a big lie.
The nonpartisan, bipartisan Congressional Budget Office says it's going to cost us $230 billion the first decade. And $1.2 trillion thereafter. And they say, 'Well, they can have their opinion.' Those are facts. Those are nonpartisan facts of people we hire to give us the truth. And they don't like the truth so they summarily dismiss it. They say it's a government takeover of health care, a big lie. Just like Goebbels. You say it enough, you repeat the lie, you repeat the lie, you repeat the lie, and eventually people believe it. Like blood libel. That's the same kind of thing. The Germans said enough about the Jews and the people believed it and you had the Holocaust.
SCHULTZ: Congressman Cohen joins us tonight, here on the Ed Show. Congressman, did you go too far there?
COHEN: Well, apparently so because a lot of people, I guess, hold a strict liability rule on mentioning the Holocaust or anything. I'm Jewish and I passed a Holocaust commission in my state and worked on it 20 years. So, I've learned that lesson, I guess. But everything I said was true and I think people agree that it was true. That there's been a message. It's been given over and over and over and it's a lie. And I regret that it's taken away from the health care issue which I'm so passionate about that I participated in the special order, which is what I was doing late at night. I could have been out at a party or whatever, but I did the special order because I wanted to get the people who watch C-SPAN the information that you gave them on the little clip that you showed.
SCHULTZ: Well, I think you were very clear in your House floor message about exactly what they have been saying about health care and the government takeover. The CBO numbers and all that kind of stuff. But do you feel like you, you know, brought us to a point where there should not have been a comparison, because the Holocaust was so horrific, as opposed to a repeal on health care?
COHEN: No question. That's true. And that's something I didn't see and I guess, to some extent, I don't see still, I have to admit it, because what I was talking about was the message and the process of delivering the message, which I see antiseptically different from-
SCHULTZ: Are you sorry for making the connection?
COHEN: I definitely am. And I'm sorry any Jewish people, my Republican colleagues, or anybody, got the wrong impression. And Gabby Giffords and I were close, she was a member of my class, and I do think that the rhetoric should be toned down. And I hate if I participated in anything that made my congress, which I'm greatly honored to be a member of, or my district, which I love, have any problems.
SCHULTZ: Would you say that you would not use that term again?
COHEN: Never.
SCHULTZ: Because, you know, the Tea Party has been criticized for carrying Nazi signs at rallies and such stuff as that and the comparison of Hitler to the President, there's been plenty of criticism on that. And now a Democratic Congressman goes out and you say you're sorry for that tonight. But if we're talking about tone in America, this can't be tolerated, can it?
COHEN: No. I'm not going to do it again. I've my learned my lesson. And I do – when I was among the Tea Party people when they were protesting the health care, I walked among them for about 20 minutes and I saw those signs with President Obama looking as Hitler, et cetera. And it was disgusting. And, you know, it was a mistake. But, you know, when you do special orders, I never prepare and maybe that's a mistake. When I do my one minutes – I do my whatever, I speak from the hip.
SCHULTZ: Sure.
COHEN: And I guess I just went further – I obviously went further than I should have. And I've apologized to the American Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Defense, you name it. But I'm pleased to the message – the message I said was true that they've been lying and they've been doing it over and over and over again and that's been their game. And I don't think we have had a good message on our side to respond to it.
SCHULTZ: And I think a lot of liberals in this country admire you for calling them liars because the numbers are what they are. And this is hurting a lot of people if it were to ever go to a repeal, 32 million people. Plus the CBO conversation that we're having in this country. But you're talking about a messaging machine that they definitely have followed to get their point across about health care, which you think is having an effect.
COHEN: I think it started with Karl Rove and I think it started with weapons of mass destruction and then it went to government takeover of health care. And yesterday on the floor, Mike Pence talked about government takeover of health care and other people did. And Michele Bachmann was talking about socialist. And those are all – those are the buzz words that are false and shouldn't be used, but they continue using them. And I think Mike Pence said he's often – he wants to be concise, careful, and consistent. Well, that's somebody, who I will never mention again, who lived in a previous century who worked for bad people, that's what he did.
SCHULTZ: Sure. Congressman Cohen, I appreciate your time tonight. Thank you so much.
COHEN: Thank you, Ed.
— Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here.
- Kyle Drennen's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Making a point with trivia?
Submitted by Tomorama on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 5:50pm.
He is so stupid, but YET, he doesn't know it, he THINKS he is smart.
Goebells and Sgt Schutz and Cohen.............. MMMMM, very interesting, but stupid.
Anyone else remember the late 60's show?????????????????????
Oh no.. it started with WMD's - and Carl Rove???
Submitted by Gary Hall on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 6:26pm.
Former President Bill Clinton, on Larry King Live .. note the date here:
CNN LARRY KING LIVE Aired July 22, 2003
Bill Clinton - I think the main thing I want to say to you is, people can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks.. of biological and chemical weapons.. And what I think -- again, I would say the most important thing is we should focus on what's the best way to build Iraq as a democracy?..
We should be pulling for America on this. We should be pulling for the people of Iraq. We can have honest disagreements about where we go from here, and we have space now to discuss that in what I hope will be a nonpartisan and open way.
Rep. Cohen. Do you not have the courage to come right out and call President Bill Clinton a liar? ..to infer that he is a Nazi?
While you're at it, how about John Edwards, Sec. Cohen (1998 - Saddam has enough antrax to kill every human on the planet), Hillary Clinton, Al Gore.. and on and on.
(;~> gary
Could it be Cohen in confusing Mike Pence with Robert Gibbs?
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 6:31pm.
LOL - Sure seems like it to me, as Cohen's side of the aisle is about as fascist as there has ever been in America.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Here's a snip from an email I got from Steve-o
Submitted by TheDeuce on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 6:31pm.
Health Care Debate
"There has been considerable media attention regarding comments I made during Special Orders on the House floor as part of a colloquy Tuesday evening. While I received no comments or responses from my colleagues on the floor at the time or, for that matter from anyone until midday on Wednesday, someone posted a small portion of the speech on the internet. Taken out of context, I can understand the confusion and concern. In speaking about the Republican message of “government takeover of health care” that has been drummed into the heads of Americans and the media for more than a year, I referenced the non-partisan, Pulitzer prize-winning Politfact.com judgment that named the Republican message as the “2010 Lie of the Year.”
Do his comments on MSNBC mention anything about context? He makes the non-apology then continues to call out the GOP. This guy is a mess.
Give a liberal man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Oh, and you also get called an "a-hole" for not giving him another fish every single day for the rest of his life.
Obviosity
Submitted by vote24 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 6:40pm.
At this point it is so dam obvious that anything and anyone conservative will be attacked without mercy. And as conservatives we must celebrate with intensity, everything and everyone that the media skewers as nazis, dangerous,etc. because they show us so clearly who they FEAR as American types. Do not cower or retreat from any conservative representative or idea, due to their attempted slander. Stand more proudly than ever in their face as a true American. This gives them nowhere to run with their bias. Except down. The media compass is off by exactly 180 degrees. They now openly (nearly openly) embrace communism. Their treason must not go unanswered.
The rhetoric of the left has
Submitted by jkwtrading on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 7:20pm.
The rhetoric of the left has no meaning anymore..no one sees Pence like they do..but many people I know see the left just like they describe Pence. Most people I know could care less about any democrat or politician..as if there are no feelings whatsover for these people.
It appears to me the left is now into smaller field's of companionship.. their numbers are dwindling and a panic has set in.. their screeching is louder than even last year a sure sign panic has arrived.
a stock market sell down would unleash their real agony...
I also cannot help but notice the most inflammatory words are coming from people who could be jewish, or black.. the list is rather endless so i won't place it here, but writer after writer are on the jewish side. Krugman, Friedman, Cohen etc.. a concentration is forming of opposition of the left versus the right into these two groups.
Even Michelle Malkin, that's
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:10pm.
Even Michelle Malkin, that's a Jewish name I think.
Racist!!!
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:52pm.
Why does the left hate non-whites so much?
x-owner
Submitted by grammajane on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 7:22pm.
With the x owner of pmsnbc now in the white house we can expect even more bashing and bias reporting coming from the radical left in prime time. The campaign is already the main agenda which started in AZ and no matter who runs for the Republican Party, they will be violent, racist, and take away SS from the Sr's.. They have used this BS for the past 40 years and this time it will be worse
Time to stop defending
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:07pm.
Time to stop defending privatization. It's over. After the market meltdown, seniors are jittery about losing everything to Wall Street. Privatization is bad talk.
Hate to tell you there, Evan, but Social Security is in the red
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:27pm.
...right now, TODAY. Not some fictitious date far off in the future.
Not only that, but the IOUs are in the red today, too.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
So was said in the
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:41pm.
So was said in the 1950s.
So was said in the 1960s.
So was said in the 1970s.
So was said in the 1980s.
So was said in the 1990s.
But TODAY is the day?
I'm sorry, but you are not sufficiently intellectually equipped
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:10pm.
...to be posting here.
In the 1950s, this was the largest creditor nation on Earth. Now it is the largest debtor nation.
"Officially," we are $14 Trillion in debt. The cold, hard reality is, once you figure in all the unfunded mandates, the rest of the "off the books" garbage (the stuff the congress-critters didn't want people to see in the federal budget), and all the applicable interest involved, we are closer to about $113 Trillion in debt.
Last time I checked, that was more money than even God has.
The Chinese literally have this country by the short hairs, and if they so much as sneeze, well...
The so-called Social Security "Trust Fund" was raided in the 1960s. They have spent all of the money.
The only trace of it remaining today is an IOU tucked away in a rusty file cabinet somewhere in Virginia that isn't worth the paper it is written on.
Your precious seniors may be spooked today, but what do you think their reaction is going to be when their SS checks don't clear the bank, their electronic deposits don't get made, and they finally figure out that their own incompetent government has spent all of their money?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Americans are real clear
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:22pm.
Americans are real clear about how to reduce the deficit.
You know that, right?
America is floating in money. Federal taxes are the lowest in 60 years.
Are personal attacks the norm here? I'd like to know.
Trolls are considered fair game here, troll
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:37pm.
And that comes straight from the top.
America is floating in money. Federal taxes are the lowest in 60 years.
Damn, just exactly which government school did your abusive parents force you to attend, anyway?
America is floating in money? ROFL!
BTW - Welcome to NewsBusters, troll.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Echochamber; I get it. I
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:41pm.
Echochamber; I get it.
I don't get out much and didn't know anything about this place.
Not my style.
Enjoy.
No friends??? Not surprised.
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:51pm.
The only echochamber is in the vast vacancy of your head.
C-ya.
You are a funny little guy.
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:46pm.
Americans are real clear about how to reduce the deficit.
So, why haven't they done it genius?
See above.
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:47pm.
See above.
Ms Rad*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:11pm.
At least this little troll is polite. And tell me, isnt he cute.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.saynotocrack.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/baby-troll-dade.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.saynotocrack.com/index.php/2008/12/16/intelligent-debate-is-impossible-on-the-internet-part-final/&h=320&w=266&sz=15&tbnid=ELuHGANdtT4gwM:&tbnh=246&tbnw=205&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dpics%2Bof%2Bbaby%2Btrolls&zoom=1&q=pics+of+baby+trolls&hl=en&usg=__aA5669gV6BQZ6ZvaW0WePivm1m0=&sa=X&ei=sTw6Te3xL4PEgAeWleDgCA&ved=0CBoQ9QEwAA
cajun, yup, this looks like
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:16pm.
cajun, yup, this looks like Evan from under the bridge!
"See above" doesn't answer
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:08pm.
"See above" doesn't answer the question.
"See above" referred to your
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:22pm.
"See above" referred to your name calling.
But the answer is not a sound bite.
Polling shows that by a huge percentage, Americans want to address the deficit by taxing the ultrawealthy, back to more historic marginal rates.
Why hasn't that happened yet?
The ultrawealthy have a certain degree of power over our lives, I guess. Duh.
Well, "Evan"-escent---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:27pm.
My polling shows that most everyone here is just waaaaay too polite with you. That is why no one has pointed out that you are not only just an obvious liberal troll; you are also full of shit. How's that for some stimulating echoes in the chamber? You come across as an extremely unaware dilettante. Is that for effect? MD^^ I have to wonder what is
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:54pm.
^^ I have to wonder what is the purpose here.
Sigh.
Submitted by Radical1979 on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:00am.
Link or slink.
I'd also like to challenge that by taxing the "ultra wealthy" we could eliminate the deficit. Extremely wealthy people don't tend to have $100 million in their bank account. Take Bill Gates, his wealth is actually primarily in his Microsoft stock. The IRS doesn't take stock for tax payments. Trying to sell the stock would drive the price down hard, reducing it's value. So it's not a simple answer.
Try again.
Try again? Link or slink? If
Submitted by Evan on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:10am.
Try again? Link or slink?
If you truly wish to ever have an actual discussion, you'll have to separate yourself from this site.
Ok Evan*
Submitted by cajun2 on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:37am.
Lets meet at TownHall where you posted the same stuff as Guttermouth. They didnt like you changing your post name there either.
Did you miss us deddy? Are you have difficulty separating yourself from this site?
C2
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:36am.
He's gone now. Didn't last very long, did he?
Look for him 26cx
Submitted by cajun2 on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:44am.
He was at TownHall earlier this week posting the same wording he did here today. I could have linked but TH doesnt have tracking. It was the Chuck Norris thread and they had over 800 comments the last time I looked. I have no intention of searching pages looking to copy his posts. He went back to TH a few days later under another posters name and they went after him...LOL, It seems the posters at TH dont like libs stealing other members posts names. Where have we seen that before?...;-)
Thanks for the info, C2
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:47am.
He's a waste of time.
Evan-escent---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:31am.
FYI, that is the exact same, lame, tired, beat-up, old, worn out excuse-cum alibi used by every dumbass lib troll that ever skated the threads at NB's: "I come seeking debate. I wish to extol the intrinsic virtues of liberalism with paeans of the highest order. I wish to speak with fiery, soaring, yet somehow humble, oratory. I wish for argumentativeness in the extreme, but I wish our interchanges and intercourse to be not only uplifting but earth-shattering with revelations as to the goodness of the hearts and minds of my liberal comrades. I wish no animosity, even the tiniest amount, towards those of you who are too benighted to understand that I and my liberal brothers-in-bullshit wish only for your subjugation in mind, thought, and corporeal body." Liberal trolls like you, Evan, after all the required BS being generously spread, generally end up doin' the boot scootin' boogie right on outta here. Always fun to categorize the number of different ways you trolls attempt to attenuate the reasoning behind your leaving, as if it weren't really an escape attempt so as to get beyond the reach of the common sense hurled towards your head at warp speed. You trolls not only can't hang; you absolutely will not man up and admit why that is. You and your liberal nonsense just cannot, and will not, fly around here. QED. MD"America is floating in money"????
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:47pm.
PRIVATE businesses/citizens/enterprises may be floating in money, but that is not "America's" money. Our government is drowning in debt, (even the 0 does not dispute this), because of idiots such as you, that want nothing more than to live off of someone else's sweat, brains, and hard work.
Toughen up buttercup, IT'S NOT YOUR MONEY!!! Get over it.
And get a job!!
*laugh* ...your
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:53pm.
*laugh* ...your signature....
If we're lucky we get about 650,000 hours on this planet and then pfft..
And look at you.
Ah well. Take it easy, man.
Be happy that federal taxes as a percent of the GDP are the lowest in 60 years. Have a cocktail.
Peace out.
Evan
???
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:21pm.
Dude, seriously, think about cleaning up.
Drugs is so ninenties man,,, kick the habit.
DEBT as a percentage of GDP is my concern. Didn't change under Bush, but the 0...well.
Echochamber is fine, fun
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:36pm.
Echochamber is fine, fun sometimes, but you won't find yourself learning much.
Before I go, allow me:
Fewest federal employees adjusted for the population since 1957! Yay!
Lowest fed taxes in 60 years! Yay!
Some might look at those stats and say smallest fed gov in 60 years! Yay!
All good, right?
Enjoy.
When you say idiots who don't work, you don't talk to your grandma that way I hope.
ask yourself this:
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:45pm.
What isn't regulated by government?
And those "fewest federal employees since 1957" account for how much cost?
You're in over your head.
Smaller number of federal
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:58pm.
Smaller number of federal employees doing more work and more specialized work, of course.
But the backdrop is that they are fewer and cheaper now than before.
It's good! It's sure better than more of them getting more.
People ask for federal regulation, things tend to go very wrong without it.
Evan
Submitted by MrShy on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:28pm.
"Smaller number of federal employees doing more work and more specialized work, of course."
Oh God, you are both naive AND dumb.
Dangerous combo.
- Shy Grooves
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
*laugh*
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:59pm.
*laugh*
*laugh*
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:59pm.
*laugh*
Careful there, Evan.
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:05am.
You're starting to repeat yourself.
Can you provide some links
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:08pm.
Can you provide some links for these claims?
You mean from respected
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:16pm.
You mean from respected bipartisan sources like CBO?
Probably better for you
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:27pm.
Probably better for you to find it yourself radical.
I did under
"national debt by u.s. presidential terms"
"median tax rate family of four"
Fed debt v. gdp is tougher, found here:
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1258
Ah, the CBPP!
Submitted by 26CX on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:39pm.
Endorsed by Paul Krugman (from their website):
- New York Times columnist Paul Krugman
Yep, that's all the information I need to know about that site...
*laugh* as predicted
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:55pm.
*laugh* as predicted
On top of everything else
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:01am.
you're prescient, too? Amazing.
Evan
Submitted by Radical1979 on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:04am.
That's not how the game is played here. You make the claim you back it up.
Uh, Restless: Debt as a
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:12pm.
Uh, Restless: Debt as a percentage of GDP under George W. Bush increased by 20%. That fact is everywhere you care to look for it.
Uh, evan
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:19am.
Notice.
Notice the 8% increase from 2000 to pelosi, and the 28.5% increase since.
As I said, you're in way over your head.
C-ya.
2000 5,628.7 58.0 3,409.8 35.1 2001 5,769.9 57.4 3,319.6 33.0 2002 6,198.4 59.7 3,540.4 34.1 2003 6,760.0 62.6 3,913.4 35.1 2004 7,354.7 63.9 4,295.5 37.3 2005 7,905.3 64.6 4,592.2 37.5 2006 8,451.4 65.0 4,829.0 37.1 2007 8,950.7 65.6 5,035.1 36.9 2008 9,985.8 70.2 5,802.7 40.8 2009 11,909.8 84.5 7,551.9 53.6 2010 13,561.6 93.59,022.8
Can't get it to format correctly, but the bold numbers are W's, the bold and italicized are pelosi's.
Let's make the mere mention of "Nazi" a felony.
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:24pm.
It has become increasingly obvious that it is long past time for the enactment of a federal law explicitly banning the terms Nazi/Communist/Fascist--and any word or phrase associated therewith e.g. Goebbels, Sophie's Choice, Holocaust, Krupp, five-year plan, Long March, gulag, tractor worship, etc.--including related references, inferences, analogies, metaphors or similar comparisons or figures of speech no matter the purpose of same or how peripheral or tangential to, indirectly conjoined with, or disconnected from, the person, event, or political phenomenon which is the subject-matter of the author's written or oral commentary containing the proscribed terms.
Of course Glenn Beck will be forced to find suitable material to fill the gaping void created by the prohibited usage of the offending language, but I suppose he can now devote even more time to peddling gold.
Jer
I can ban see why you would want it banned
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:39pm.
Liberals are usually of using, advocating, and pursuing all of the above.
Restless...I think YOU should be charged with a felony
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:51pm.
for egregious post mangling.
;-)
Jer
Damn, it sounded so good in my head.
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:31pm.
Hey, my thought processes are impeccable! My typing, not so much. :)
~I hope you're being facetious, Jer.
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:41pm.
.
Okay...I'll settle for a misdemeanor.
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:49pm.
And community service for first offenders.
Jer
Funny how ALL (both sides)
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:47pm.
Funny how ALL (both sides) political talk show hosts sell *GOLD* to their frightened audiences.
Frightened for opposite reasons! Nazis! Socialists!
The gold companies get it. *laugh*
BOTH sides???
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:34pm.
Nazis = socialists.
So tell us, Evan, what is your job over at Georgie Soros' place?
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:17pm.
Is it:
What?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Hope you just pasted it in
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:34pm.
Hope you just pasted that in from somewhere and don't actually think about that stuff.
Sorry, troll, but I custom made it just for you
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:50pm.
...from dead scratch.
It seemed to fit.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Such things in your head.
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:52pm.
Such things in your head.
'Nother NB Troll, Dave?
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:56pm.
'Nother NB Troll, Dave?
This is something of a new
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:08pm.
This is something of a new use of the word troll to me: someone with whom you disagree.
I'm more used to another definition, but now I realize what it means here—you just want to be left alone.
I was thinking discussion forum, but as I've said I'd never heard of this site, and it seems more of a rant forum. Always a place for those.
I use the term more as a
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:09pm.
I use the term more as a synonym of rabble-rouser, actually. From what I've seen, you're not so much interested in discussion as you are posting talking points.
Tip: Link or slink on this site.
CBO ok?
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:17pm.
CBO ok?
Are you unsure how to link
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:20pm.
Are you unsure how to link something?
Based on sentiment here I
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:31pm.
Based on sentiment here I expect the CBO to be rejected as a respected nonpartisan source.
I know the linking game.
These data are easy for anyone to find. First he/she has to care.
Lead a horse to water and all that.
Some tips below.
Am I wrong, you accept a nonpartisan respected source like CBO?
Sure. To a point though.
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:39pm.
You have to remember that the CBO only hypothesizes based upon the information they're given. They could know it to be erroneous; they could even know the correct data but they're instructed to prepare a report based only on the information provided. They can be gamed. By both sides.
Depending on the subject, a reasonable position would be to link the CBO and another independent analysis that mirrors it; not an article that highlights the CBO's analysis, but another firm that closely agrees with it. Or, if it helps your point -disagrees with it.
"reasonable"? "helps my
Submitted by Evan on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:03am.
"reasonable"? "helps my point"? *laugh*
Are you reading this thread?
Why are you not calling me names?
So you have someone asking
Submitted by Radical1979 on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:11am.
So you have someone asking you to back up your assertions, he gives you the methodology to do it, and you laugh? And you ask to be called names?
Gee, and you wonder you're called a troll here?
I read the part where you
Submitted by bkeyser on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:17am.
I read the part where you said you were interested in a dialog. Is that not the case? If not, just let me know and I'll leave you be.
~
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:14pm.
but as I've said I'd never heard of this site
Only about twentyelebenteen times today. Overkill, dude. Overkill.
I think...four times? Truly
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:35pm.
I think...four times?
Truly I'm shocked. Places I've been before, members wanted discussion and wanted new members, isn't it kind of more fun that way? But it's fine if this is fun for you.
Speaking of four
Submitted by 26CX on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:43pm.
Haven't you said four times that you were leaving? Just can't tear yourself away, huh?
Well, convos continue
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:51pm.
Well, convos continue tonight, but I won't be back again. I'm not a flouncer; I'll make it stick. Just trying to communicate, finding my reception here to be thought provoking. You'll have it all to yourselves. Different strokes.
Okay
Submitted by 26CX on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:54pm.
See ya.
Strictly speaking, no. But
Submitted by Evan on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:21am.
Strictly speaking, no. But good night, 26CX. Good night all.
Bye!
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:23am.
Make sure you tell all your friends!
Access Denied
Submitted by Free Stinker on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:31am.
"Access Denied" - Beautiful words when applied to Trolls. :-)
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Goodbye, Sweet Toughermutt!
Submitted by Blonde on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:44am.
Catch you on the flipside.....AGAIN!
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Evan
Submitted by MrShy on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:28pm.
I was thinking discussion forum, but as I've said I'd never heard of this site, and it seems more of a rant forum. Always a place for those.
Okay, Mr. Above the Fray, what politics blog site where ideologically opposed (as you and most of us are) members engage each other is really neat and nice and a skip through the park with lots of daisies coming up?
Please supply a link or name of a site. We'd love to visit that one.
- Shy Vinyl
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
I was wondering if I should
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:44pm.
I was wondering if I should do that, was thinking about it.
I've tried it both ways: light mod and name calling, etc., and not. The name calling was ridiculous, sandlot, waste of time and depressing. The "not" was no personal attacks, period. Mostly period. That one attracted lawyers who work in the DOJ, scientists, health researchers, union organizers—people who can blow me out of the water. Amazing information traded.
And now (why I ventured here, anywhere), some of the folks from the name callers have ventured to "not", and are lowering it. Ugh. Bah. Go away.
I'm not sure I trust members here. In fact I really have no reason to. I've met just one person with an olive branch all day.
Evan
Well Evan, when you come on a
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:53pm.
Well Evan, when you come on a conservative website spouting liberal platitudes and refuse to back them up, what do you expect?
You start it, we finish it.
I expected nothing. I knew
Submitted by Evan on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:13am.
I expected nothing. I knew nothing about this place. Now I know what it is. Enjoy.
Evan
Bye!
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:17am.
Make sure you tell all your friends!
No. In retrospect, I'm glad I
Submitted by Evan on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:19am.
No. In retrospect, I'm glad I was sufficiently circumspect to protect myself.
The name calling was ridiculous-sandlot-waste of time---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:00am.
and depressing. So, Evan-escent, did it ever occur to you to act-comment-or post in a manner that would avoid bringing same down upon your pointy little head? Generally speaking, a crap magnet attracts what it was designed to attract - comments certainly designed to be less than complimentary. MDSorry if I've offended; it
Submitted by Evan on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:17am.
Sorry if I've offended; it wasn't my intention, and I tried to be nice in someone else's house. Good luck.
Evan
Bye!
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:20am.
Make sure you tell all your friends!
Evan? Dear? Huh???
Submitted by MrShy on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 2:51am.
I was wondering if I should do that, was thinking about it.
I've tried it both ways: light mod and name calling, etc., and not. The name calling was ridiculous, sandlot, waste of time and depressing. The "not" was no personal attacks, period. Mostly period. That one attracted lawyers who work in the DOJ, scientists, health researchers, union organizers—people who can blow me out of the water. Amazing information traded.
And now (why I ventured here, anywhere), some of the folks from the name callers have ventured to "not", and are lowering it. Ugh. Bah. Go away.
I'm not sure I trust members here. In fact I really have no reason to. I've met just one person with an olive branch all day.
Does anyone have a clue what he/she is rambling on about?
I asked you, oh dear, sweet, put-upon Evan, to show us a site like this one -- where a liberal is going at it with conservatives on a conservative site, or vice verse -- that's more "civil" and kinder and rosier than what you're experiencing here with us. (We've just been brutal with you, haven't we? /sarc)
Alas, as with all the other rebuttals and requests to "link or slink" that you're getting from my esteemed NB brethren here, you are coming up empty. In this case, you not only dodged the request, you posted four wasteful paragraphs of blather.
EDIT: and I added "she" because, I dunno, there's something in the style of writing -- yes, call me out on that... Shy the sexist. :p
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
~Harrumph!
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 12:05pm.
I say, what do you mean there, sirrah?!
(you told me too..)
bk,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:58pm.
Yep, it appears so.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Jer, Just how the Hell am I supposed to bust NAZI plants...
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:33pm.
...if I can't even use the term?
LOL - Just wondering.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
In that case, Dave...
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:56pm.
Just shoot 'em on sight. No questions asked. If you happen to make a mistake...well, what the hell. Three day suspension without pay, and then back to busting troll ass.
Jer
Jer,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:00pm.
LOL - Yeah, but if I miss, I might hit J.
And that would just seriously piss her off.
Wouldn't want those boots after me. :-O
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Should be a Texan
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:13pm.
If you were Texan, missing would not be a worry. :)
R1,
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:22pm.
LOL - Hey, I was being purely hypothetical.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dave
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:39pm.
;)
Um, what makes you think I'd be close to that?
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:57pm.
And if you ever winged me, even in the ass...well, shall we say, your time on this planet would be severely limited.
:)
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
J- me and caj in the room
Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:00pm.
J-
me and caj in the room
LOL - No sh*t, J
Submitted by Dave. on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:00pm.
Why do you think I posted the above?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
:)
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 11:07pm.
Um, because you're smarter than the average bear, Boo Boo?
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Glen Beck, are you kidding?
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:36pm.
Glen Beck, are you kidding? Keith Olberman would be left sputtering wordlessly for at least 45 minutes of his 60 minute show.
I have often wondered if Jer and---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:59pm.
balboa were, speaking of "conjoined", Siamese twins . Maybe they are only cousins. MDnot just Gold*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:53pm.
Having seen a number of commercials meant for your age group, I have seen commercials for bubble bath, toys, cell phones, condoms, T-shirts, Pop-Tarts, and pizza. Those new apps for the I-phones just get you guys so riled up!
New apps???
Submitted by Evan on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 8:59pm.
New apps??? What have you got
Apps
Submitted by 26CX on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 9:21pm.
Perhaps one of these will be intriguing enough to catch your fancy.
"Evan" must be short for---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:46pm.
evanescent; as far as this troll's thought processes are concerned anyway.
MD
Ever wonder what its like on the short bus?
Submitted by Kuso Jiji on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 10:52pm.
Just watch the Ed show.
Not surprised
Submitted by scarebear83 on Sat, 01/22/2011 - 1:42am.
I'm not surprised seeing as how Ed called Glenn Beck the new Che Guevara like 2 days ago.