Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'

CBS Repeats: Obama 'On A Hot Streak' As He 'Scores Political Victories' in Congress

By Kyle Drennen | December 21, 2010 | 13:25

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

On Tuesday's CBS Early Show, substitute co-host Russ Mitchell announced that "the lame duck session of Congress could hand President Obama yet another victory" with possible passage of the START nuclear arms treaty. Moments later, Mitchell declared that "The President seems to be on a hot streak."

Mitchell got analysis from Republican strategist Dan Bartlett and Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons. Bartlett hardly offered an opposing viewpoint, as he completely agreed with Mitchell's assessment of Obama: "It's a great streak he's on. He's on a hot streak....this is a narrative now that the President can stitch together going in to the new year....they've got a lot to crow about going into the new year." The headline on-screen throughout the segment read: "Obama's Rebound?; President Scores Political Victories During Lame Duck Session."

Turning to Simmons, Mitchell wondered: "By his own admission, the President said he took a 'shellacking' in the midterm elections. What did he do to turn this around?" Simmons argued: "You know, the one thing the White House has certainly done is they've become so much more disciplined....Right now he's targeted and people are starting to pay attention to him because they think he's focused on the issues that they care about, which is jobs and economy." On Saturday's Early Show, Mitchell claimed Obama was "the comeback kid."

Following up with Simmons, Mitchell asked: "What does he [Obama] need to do, in your opinion, to keep this momentum going?" Simmons explained: "What does the city on the hill look like for Barack Obama? He needs that kind of promising vision that we need to hear from....What are the things that the President is sort of drawing lines in the sand, he's not going to compromise with the Republicans over?"

Mitchell continued to push the idea that Obama was on a winning streak as he questioned Bartlett: "Dan, when you're on a roll like this, what do you think, is it easier to keep going or is it very easy to make a misstep at this point?"

Turning to the 2012 election, Mitchell queried: "What does the President have to do, what's the one issue he has to do to not ensure himself re-election, but put himself in a good position?" Simmons spoke of focusing on the economy, but also used the opportunity to take a shot at conservatives: "The one thing that will also benefit him, is once those Republican primaries get started you're going to hear a lot of people trying to go further and further right, appealing to that Tea Party base....people trying to appeal to the Sarah Palin voter will make Barack Obama look a lot better in comparison."

Mitchell didn't challenge Simmons's assertions, nor did he ever raise the possibility that Obama may not be on a political rebound.

Here is a full transcript of the December 21 segment:

7:06AM ET  

RUSS MITCHELL: Let's turn now to politics. The lame duck session of Congress could hand President Obama yet another victory. They are set to vote this week on the START treaty with Russia and supporters believe they have enough votes to pass it. Earlier they passed the tax bill, and overturned the military's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy. Joining us with their take are two CBS News political analysts, Republican strategist Dan Bartlett, and in Washington, Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons. Good morning to both of you guys.

DAN BARTLETT: Morning, Russ.

JAMAL SIMMONS: Morning, Russ.

MITCHELL: Dan, I'll begin with you. The President seems to be on a hot streak. What does this mean for him?

[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: New 'START'; Arms Control Deal Could Be Victory For Obama]

DAN BARTLETT: It's a great streak he's on. He's on a hot streak. And if you take the tax bill, you take the START treaty that looks like it's going to pass, you take the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' this is a narrative now that the President can stitch together going in to the new year that a lot of people, quite frankly, just a couple months ago, or 60 days ago after the election, didn't think was really possible. So they've got a lot to crow about going into the new year.

MITCHELL: Jamal, let me ask you about that. By his own admission, the President said he took a 'shellacking' in the midterm elections. What did he do to turn this around?

[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Obama's Rebound?; President Scores Political Victories During Lame Duck Session]

JAMAL SIMMONS: You know, the one thing the White House has certainly done is they've become so much more disciplined. If you take a look at presidential statements over the course of the last few weeks, he really hasn't talked about anything other than the economy, jobs, trade, those things, and national security. The AF-PAK review and don't – the AF-PAK review and then the new START treaty. He's been very focused. Unlike earlier in the presidency, where the President kind of went out on every single issue that came up. Right now he's targeted and people are starting to pay attention to him because they think he's focused on the issues that they care about, which is jobs and economy.

MITCHELL: Well, Jamal, what does he need to do, in your opinion, to keep this momentum going?

SIMMONS: Well, now I think where we need to go is the President has yet to really lay out a consistent sort of vision statement. Where does he want to go with the country? What does the city on the hill look like for Barack Obama? He needs that kind of promising vision that we need to hear from. And also, he has to layout his values. What are the things that the President is sort of drawing lines in the sand, he's not going to compromise with the Republicans over? Those will – that will help hold on to core Democrats who are looking at all this compromise, but they don't see a lot of context. So he's got to give vision and values so people know what it is he's standing for.

MITCHELL: Dan, when you're on a roll like this, what do you think, is it easier to keep going or is it very easy to make a misstep at this point?

BARTLETT: Well, this is a glimmer of hope if you're one of those skeptical and cynical people out there in the country who are worried that nothing gets done in Washington. The issues that he faces going in to 2011 are very substantial. So, the reason why he's having success right now is he's shown an ability to compromise. He was able to compromise on taxes. That was a signal I think a lot of independents across the country wanted to see in the aftermath of the shellacking. So going into the new year, I think setting a tone of not where he wants to fight, but where he wants to reach across the aisle and work with the other parties, that's what will get him political success going in to 2011.

MITCHELL: Very quickly to both of you. It's not too early to talk about the 2012 election. I see the first. Republican debate is set – already set for next October. Jamal, what do you think? What does the President have to do, what's the one issue he has to do to not ensure himself re-election, but put himself in a good position?

SIMMONS: Well again, people are focused on jobs and the economy. They want him to stay focused on jobs and the economy. The one thing that will also benefit him, is once those Republican primaries get started you're going to hear a lot of people trying to go further and further right, appealing to that Tea Party base. And whether Sarah Palin's in the game or not, she's certainly going to be a factor and people trying to appeal to the Sarah Palin voter will make Barack Obama look a lot better in comparison.

MITCHELL: Dan, what do you think?

BARTLETT: Well, the President can't control who he's going to run against. The two biggest issues that he has to worry about going into his own election is the economy and the war. On those two measures, if he shows discipline and focusing on job creation – the meeting he had with the leaders in the business community was an important signal to send that he gets it, that he understands that job creation is going to be out in the country. Afghanistan, really tough slogging going on there. How he holds his base together on that issue, whether the troop withdrawals start next summer as well as demonstrating to independents that he's going to do what's right for the national security interests of this country. Those are the two big issues that will shape the narrative of his re-election.

MITCHELL: And Dan, it's December 21, 2010, who's going to be the Republican nominee?

BARTLETT: Oh, gosh, I knew that was coming. Oh, it's way too early to tell. I think it's going to be somebody maybe who we're not even talking about. I bet it's not Sarah Palin. I know that's what everybody wants to hear, that it's her. But my guess is it's not going to be her.

MITCHELL: Jamal, do you agree with that?

SIMMONS: We'll see on the Sarah Palin question, although I think she's making a pretty good living doing what she's doing. You know, take a look at some of these other folks that are out here, like Mitt Romney and some others and we'll see. I'm not that good at picking Republican nominees. I'll stick with the Democrats.

MITCHELL: Alright. Wanted to give you a shot. Jamal Simmons in DC and Dan Bartlett here in New York. Thank you, both.
                
BARTLETT: Good to see you, Russ.

SIMMONS: Thank you.

MITCHELL: Happy holidays.

BARTLETT: Thank you.

 

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Taxes
  • Russia
  • Congress
  • Foreign Policy
  • Dan Bartlett
  • Jamal Simmons
  • CBS
  • Early Show
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Jumping the gun?

Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:36pm.

Isn't this just a case of premature exaltation?

  • Login to post comments

Hmm, well....

Submitted by StarAZ on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 4:02pm.

First "the press" said he was irrelevant. They said this by asking was he relevant. Then he was the Comeback Kid (started by Charles Krauthammer, thanks a lot), so they brought him back. Now he is smoking', on a streak... He is a press puppet!

 t

 

 

  • Login to post comments

So, the White House is now "more disciplined?"

Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:37pm.

I guess the mess that is the Stimulus Bill and the Health Care Reform act can then be attributed to an "undisciplined" White House.

  • Login to post comments

I don't like the START

Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:39pm.

I don't like the START treaty, I could care less about DADT - it shouldn't even be a priority, along with so many other things that these idiots waste time one...............and as far as this tax agreement goes, I don't like it either, and I hope that the next Congress just undoes the whole thing and makes some commone sense with it.

But as far as Boy Blunder being on a 'hot streak'??? What the hell did he have to do with ANY of this stuff?? You KNOW that he's trying to take credit -with help from his willing cohorts in the MSM - for things that he either disagrees with or wouldn't have touched if he didn't have to. I'm not buying into ANY of this BS...........and I'm pretty sure that a lot of other people feel the same way. Of course, we ARE talking about the MSM................they put him there, and they're joined at the hip with regards to having to continue to cover for him.............

FUBO IS FUBAR!!!!

  • Login to post comments

HOT SREAK????

Submitted by MrShy on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 2:19pm.

Or he misspoke.... and meant hot SEAT, right??

The only thing this fraud is on, is his way out the door.

It will be by way of a lame-duck last two years of his one-term presidency (which never should have been) ... OR, better, we start proceedings and serious investigations into the man and his corrupt, illegal past and associations in January and expose something.... anything. There's a ton of stuff to choose from on this POS.

- Shy Funk

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

It is true....

Submitted by jdripper on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:44pm.

The gutless Republican senators are selling out their nation and I have no clue why?  They are guaranteeing that the democrats will keep the senate and he will be re-elected big.  This is humiliating to be a Republican and see this gaggle of whimps caving in over and over.

Jack

 

  • Login to post comments

Obama is still in free fall; time will show

Submitted by rammingspeed on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 2:00pm.

I respectfully disagree. The lame duck garbage will be underfunded and blocked through court challenges and new legislation by the republicans. This looks far worse (for us) than it is, and the left- wingers know it. In fact, I believe that Obama's arrogance in passing this stuff will ramp up his opposition even more. The joy ride is over - people finally know that the democrat party is a neo-Marxist organization of liars and bullies, and the next elections will continue their downfall.

Call me naive or whatever, but I said in Feb '09 that Obama and his gang had succeeded only in awakening a sleeping giant. So far, I've been proven right.

  • Login to post comments

Easy to have a hot streak when you stack the deck

Submitted by Tom Paine on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:49pm.

How hard is it to have a winning streak with the compliant congress still in place until the end of the year.  Barry has the political equivalent of the Harlem Globetrotters going against the current crop of Republican Washington Generals, and yet the lib commentators marvel that he can ram through his agenda.  Let's see how it goes when the new congress comes to town next month.

  • Login to post comments

It Will Fail

Submitted by rammingspeed on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:51pm.

How stupid. All of this is going to be challenged after Jan. 1. A combination of defunding and newly introduced bills will stymie the lame duck crap. It will be neutered. All Obama did was recruit more members of the Tea Party with his arrogance and defiance. Obama's slippery slope just got steeper and slppery-er. The way it did right after his inauguration - and that was when he had all the momentum and the angels riding his shoulders.

Meanwhile, the MSM  is using this bs to help repair the damage done to the psyches of the 20% of Americans who are left wing fanatics.

  • Login to post comments

So, this is the MSM's idea of being impartial?

Submitted by Phryj1 on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:56pm.

Absolutely pathetic. First, they whine and complain about extending the tax cuts, then the lame duck leftist Congress rams some eleventh hour BS through, and they go right back to being Obama's cheerleaders. Sickening.

Mark my words, anything, and I mean ANYTHING positive that happens between now and Nov. 2012 will be credited to Obama by the MSM. These people have no shame or decency whatsoever.

Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.

  • Login to post comments

It seems that this kenyan's

Submitted by rbosque on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 1:54pm.

It seems that this kenyan's primary focus is destroying our country from within. With an never-ending army of willing accomplices, tools, and assorted mental patients, he's doing a number on us all right.

"It may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but you can fool enough of them to rule a large country"......Will Durant
  • Login to post comments

RINOS!

Submitted by iveseenitall on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 2:01pm.

What is it in the water the RINOS drink? From Bartlett, to Krauthammer, to McCain and all of them in between.--scheeze! Here we have the one of the worst presidents in history, a man who is destroying the nation, and all these "Republicans" can do is agree that he's "on a hot streak". The middle class, the backbone of our once-great nation, is being squeezed out of existence and all these clowns can think to do is give praise to an incompentent, narcissistic jackass who is taking us down the path to ruin. The Washington "insiders" need to be thrown out!

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

  • Login to post comments

Krauthammer is like Scrooge to me right now.

Submitted by Lipton on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 4:10pm.

I am so tired of his rants on Obama rising like a Phoenix.  Really?   I mean some voters Obama lost will never come back to him.  Frankly he wasn't the one out in front on DADT repeal.  He could have pushed more to get more mileage out of that, so I don't see how he is going to be helped a great deal by that. 

Yes if the republicans get the economy moving than we will have some issues.  People still blame Bush for the economic malaise, but my understanding is that the economy is still not going to be doing well.  We didn't actually get a tax cut.  Taxes won't be different than they are now, and business are still saddled with more regulations and higher taxes for Obamacare.  How is the economy supposed to recover. 

Is there a point where the rules change and the old conventional wisdom that the Washington elite clings to is no longer valid?

I'd like to thank Hollywood for renewing my interest in reading.
  • Login to post comments

Look, I am not going to be against Obama just to be against

Submitted by StarAZ on Wed, 12/22/2010 - 1:13pm.

But I don't get why Krauthammer is saying getting this bloated faux-stimulus through was so brilliant on the admin's part.  Maybe it's because this won't do much for the econ and then he can blame Obama for the brilliance or am I wishfully thinking. I don't see continuation of present tax levels and people not getting a tax increase (and some who still work getting a little relief in their paychecks by further gutting SS) will do much for this economy, which is slowly sinking. Maybe the scientiss studying cow farts are happy--but seriously, how many jobs did that create? I didn't see any call for methane researchers on CareerBuilder.

 

 

  • Login to post comments

I guess pasting a happy face

Submitted by Bruzilla on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 2:00pm.

I guess pasting a happy face on Obama is the price guys like Bartlett have to pay to get a little face time on network tV.  Too bad they're willing to pay that price.

"Strange women, lying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony." Peasant
  • Login to post comments

What a steaming pile of BS propaganda this is

Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 2:03pm.

Of course, all this really is is the Ministry of Statist Misinformation (MSM) trying to create the illusion amonst the dumbMasses that Herr Obamafuhrer's statist (they won't dare call it that) agenda is making major progress once again.

Okay, so he managed to get another huge spending bill through his dem-controlled congress under the guise of a "tax compromise," and he also got through this same dem congress his nod to the far-left military haters in the form of repealling DADT.

But that's all he got legislatively, as the "Big Kahuna" omnibus spending bill, the one that would probably have tipped us over as a nation had it passed, died on the dem-controlled Senate floor, and the back-door insertion of Scamnesty II didn't get through the dem-controlled congress, either.

The Obamafuhrer will get at least one more huge victory in pursuit of his statist coup between now and Jan. 5th, as he will have seized control of the Internet by that point, but you won't see that reported anywhere in the MSM.

Of course, the MSM is just waiting for Jan. 5th to come around, so they can start their "Party of No!" malarky (and that is all you will be hearing from them for the next two years) when the incoming repub-controlled House throws a big, hairy monkey wrench into the gears of the statist coup currently being pulled off by this fraudulent Kenyan Muslim POTUS impostor, hopefully stopping it dead in its tracks.

Jan 5th cannot get here fast enough for me.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Hot Streak of SH!T

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 2:15pm.

He had no choice or the tax rates skyrocket and in January he would be presented with the bill introduced by the GOP Senate.  If he signs that,  how would he look?  Ok, if he doesn't sign that how does he look?

Oh yeah Comeback Kid given zero options.  That sure does engender confidence and support.  Yup he's THE ONE awright.   Comeback Kid my keister!




hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Lame Duck Railroad Job

Submitted by freecitizen on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 2:23pm.

It's easy to knock off legislative accomplishments with a devil-may-care, lame duck congress completely unbeholden to the will of the electorate. There are no repercussions when you won't be returning in January.

Liberal: remove all that's Right, and this is what's Left.
  • Login to post comments

CBS: Rah, rah, rah!

Submitted by Mary Louise Turner on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 3:22pm.

I'm frankly surprised that the CBS clowns haven't donned cheerleader outfits and shouted, "Rah, rah, rah!" every time there's even a perceived chance of "Ears" winning.  It makes me sick...

  • Login to post comments

Hot Streak

Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 4:00pm.

The only time Obamugabe is on a "hot streak" is when he sits down.

  • Login to post comments

How much

Submitted by dmaley1714 on Tue, 12/21/2010 - 5:23pm.

more can the lame duck shove down the throat of America. On Jan 5th I hope the Repub's reverse all legislation form Nov 3rd until Jan 4th.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Leno: It’s Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to ‘See, I Told You So!’
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • The Guardian Glamorizes New ‘Assault on Wall Street’ Movie as Justice
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use