Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 18, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • New CNN Host Pushes Stronger Gun Laws, Mental Health Database
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun
  • New Liberal Study 'Lends Credence to Conservative Charges' of Bias; Dramatic Media Tilt Toward 'Gay Marriage'
  • Senate Amnesty Supporters Boast Marco Rubio ‘Neutralized’ Limbaugh, Fox News
  • NBC Praises Bloomberg’s ‘Great Idea’ of Forcing New Yorkers to Store Rotting Trash in Apartments

Gay Rights Activist/MSNBC Anchor Contessa Brewer: Support for DADT 'Doesn't Make A Lot of Sense'

By Kyle Drennen | December 01, 2010 | 17:56

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

During Wednesday's 12PM ET hour on MSNBC, anchor Contessa Brewer attacked those who want to maintain the military's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy: "...the Marine Corps and Catholic chaplains, who say they support the policy on moral grounds. It doesn't make a lot of sense...if it's homosexuality that they have a problem with – they're basically saying, 'Yeah, just keep lying about it.'"

Later in the hour, Brewer interviewed Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman about his support for repealing the policy. She labeled Arizona Senator John McCain as the villain preventing repeal: "So John McCain has been one of the most formidable foes when it comes to repealing this policy....Both Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen support repealing this policy. Have you talked with Senator McCain? Is he willing to give?"

Moments later, Brewer dismissed a recently released Pentagon study on the issue as irrelevant: "...there's a logic problem with the survey at any rate, and here it is. If it's wrong to ban gay people from serving openly in the military, it doesn't matter how people feel about it, it's wrong." She likened repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' to civil rights: "I mean, you can make some of these same arguments that were made against integrating the military, what, 60 years ago? I mean, you know, people have – and may still have attitudes that it hurts unit cohesion to serve with people of a religion that opposes their own or with someone whose racial background is different."

In response, Lieberman concluded: "I feel that the country is ready for this repeal, the military is ready for it, and I sure hope that the members of Congress are ready for it." Brewer replied: "Well, me too."

At the end of the interview, Lieberman proclaimed: "We can get this done, it's the right thing to do for our values and it's the right thing to do for the military, because the military needs the skills and courage that gay and lesbian Americans bring to our services every day." Brewer didn't try to hide her support: "Senator, you're preaching to the choir here."   

In July, Brewer spoke at a gay rights fundraiser in Kentucky. She has frequently promoted the gay rights agenda on air and in September warned of "consequences" for politicians who did not support repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.'

Here is a transcript of Brewer's December 1 reporting and commentary:

12:07PM ET

CONTESSA BREWER: The next step for 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' is up to Congress. The newly released Pentagon survey shows 70% of service members believe killing the policy would be positive, mixed, or of no consequence at all. But time is running out for those advocating its repeal.

ROBERT GATES: The finding suggests that for large segments of the military, repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' though potentially disruptive in the short term would not be the wrenching traumatic change that many have feared and predicted.

BREWER: Some troops in the field are pushing back, including the Marine Corps and Catholic chaplains, who say they support the policy on moral grounds. It doesn't make a lot of sense, really, that they – if it's homosexuality that they have a problem with – they're basically saying, 'Yeah, just keep lying about it.'  

(...)

12:17PM ET        

BREWER: Lawmakers are lining up to duke it out over the defense bill, specifically over the House proposal to repeal 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.' The Pentagon says letting gays and lesbians serve openly in the military would not be a problem in the long-term.

ROBERT GATES: But in summary, a strong majority of those who answered the survey, more than two-thirds, do not object to gays and lesbians serving openly in uniform.

BREWER: I'm joined now by independent Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut. Senator, good to see you today.

JOE LIEBERMAN [SEN. I-CT]: Thanks, Contessa. Good to be with you.

BREWER: So John McCain has been one of the most formidable foes when it comes to repealing this policy, but he has said in the past that he would listen to the military's survey results, he would listen to its commanders. Both Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen support repealing this policy. Have you talked with Senator McCain? Is he willing to give?  

LIEBERMAN: Well, I've talked to – Senator McCain and I, as you probably know, are really good friends, we've talked a lot about this issue over the years, and I can't say I've made much progress. But I haven't talked to him since the report was issued yesterday, and we've got two days of hearings in the Armed Services Committee coming up Thursday and Friday. The report is very important and very encouraging. Look, to me the basic idea here is you shouldn't deny somebody the right to serve their country because they're gay if they're otherwise qualified and willing to fight to defend America. And once you reach that conclusion, then the only other question is will somehow gays in the military hurt our military effectiveness? And yesterday's report says that, in a very big survey of the troops and their families, that the judgement is no, it won't hurt military effectiveness, so I hope Senator McCain will decide to support the repeal. I'm not counting on it, but it would be a great development.

BREWER: Senator Lieberman, fundamentally, it seems that there's a – there's a logic problem with the survey at any rate, and here it is. If it's wrong to ban gay people from serving openly in the military, it doesn't matter how people feel about it, it's wrong. I mean, you can make some of these same arguments that were made against integrating the military, what, 60 years ago? I mean, you know, people have – and may still have attitudes that it hurts unit cohesion to serve with people of a religion that opposes their own or with someone whose racial background is different. I mean, I just don't get how a survey result should influence this argument in any way.

LIEBERMAN: Look, as a matter of principle and morality, you are absolutely right. That's why I voted against the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' when it first went into effect 17 years ago, in 1993. So –  but the survey was done just to test the proposition, and here's the most important number, I think, on that whole survey. 92% of our troops, including over 85-89% of combat troops in Iraq and Afghanistan said – of those who said they believe they serve with somebody who is gay or lesbian – those numbers, 85, 92% said it had no effect on military effectiveness.

And of course that's the great story of the American military, it's one of the great integrating institutions in our society. There was a lot of anxiety obviously about African-Americans, and now, of course, African-Americans serve in the highest positions in our military and everybody's over that concern. I'm totally convinced that the same will be true if we repeal 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.' In fact, these numbers on the survey yesterday show that the same is true, that people in the military know they're serving with gay soldiers and they just judge them not by their private sexual orientation but by the fact that they're good soldiers. That's America, and so I feel that the country is ready for this repeal, the military is ready for it, and I sure hope that the members of Congress are ready for it.

BREWER: Well, me too. And the Armed Services Committee, you said, is meeting on Thursday and Friday. You have a lame duck session chance at repealing this thing, but was it a mistake for the Senate Democrats not to tackle this before the midterm?

LIEBERMAN: There was an attempt to tackle it but the votes weren't there and it fell aground on practical nonsense here. I'm convinced, Contessa, that we have more than the necessary 60 votes to take this defense authorization bill, which we have to pass to do right by our soldiers. Forget what 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' says to our community. If they have time to do that, it would be, to me, outrageous. If we don't adopt the defense authorization bill, which would be the first time in 43 years we haven't done this, and our troops need us to do this, and we don't repeal 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' because of the clock, we can get this done, it's the right thing to do for our values and it's the right thing to do for the military, because the military needs the skills and courage that gay and lesbian Americans bring to our services every day.

BREWER: Senator, you're preaching to the choir here. Thank you, sir, I appreciate it.

LIEBERMAN: It's been a pleasure. Thank you.

 

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Homosexuality
  • Military
  • MSNBC Live
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

They say "stay out of my

Submitted by Ashrak on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:03pm.

They say "stay out of my bedroom" which is exactly what DADT amounts to.  They oppose DADT. They want everything all out in the open. Sheesh.

What makes no sense are the positions these folks take that paint them into a corner over and over and over again. 

That an individual right exists requires that some policy positions be removed from the table of debate.
  • Login to post comments

Brewer is confused? Well, blow me down!

Submitted by Slyrr on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:04pm.

That's OK Ms. Brewer. The stuff that you think 'doesn't make sense' would fill every warehouse in the country and then some.

Heck, common sense doesnt' make sense to you.

We forgive your deplorable lack of vision and intellect.  If only you weren't demonstrating it in front of a camera each day.

If a Liberal/Democrat politician/media figure wants to put their arms around you, or pat you on the back, all they're doing is looking for a good place to stick a knife.
  • Login to post comments

Sweet Contessa, just stick to

Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:07pm.

Sweet Contessa, just stick to what you do best - looking purdy.  

  • Login to post comments

I concur.

Submitted by Newsbusterbrown on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:18pm.

I concur.

“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

  • Login to post comments

The words coming out of her mouth

Submitted by Boudin on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 8:09pm.

Ruin her looks, stupidity aint never purdy

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

The Cuntessa is really hung up on this one....

Submitted by nonncom on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:14pm.

I want to know.....who really gives two shitpickels one way or the other.....is either stance going to stop homosexuals from entering the service?....they're like ufo's.....they've always been there, but most have gone unnoticed....

  • Login to post comments

agreed

Submitted by sometimesright on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:59pm.

who cares? how will things change? they will continue to serve and serve well.  i guess activists want to be able to wave their agenda around like a flag.

"Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first." Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Lean Forward.

Submitted by Newsbubba on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:52pm.

When I joined the military, it was against the law to be queer (there were no gays then).  While I was on active duty, they made being gay optional (but don't tell).  I decided to retire before they made being gay mandatory.

There have always been gays in the military.  Most were more interested in serving their country and performing their mission than they were in jumping up and down and shouting "I'm gaaaaaayyy!"

I have a really bad feeling that by doing away with DADT we are going to see a lot of gays who will join just to flaunt their gayness.  That will not be good, for them or the services. 

Perhaps it will speed up Obama's plan to totally destroy our fine military so that we won't be a threat to the rest of the world.

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

No offshore drilling

Submitted by malthus on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 2:14am.

Medved had the perfect example of this on his show today. He gave a fellow who plays for the same team extra time to argue for gays in the military. At the end of the conversation the big boy began to mock Michael for sounding gay to which there were the obvious denials. An intelligent conversation ended in homosexual taunts. Transfer this conversation to a military base and I will show you a fellow headed to the emergency room. And when that happens, guess who will be demoted?

  • Login to post comments

agreed

Submitted by pratsha45 on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 11:54am.

I was in the military just four months ago and there were lot's of gay folks. They did their job and didn't really bother anyone - DADT isn't fair becuase it doesn't apply to straight people too - they can talk about their families and relationships but gay folks can't - nice 'free country' we live in, eh?

  • Login to post comments

A 3 week wonder making claims

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 6:58pm.

A 3 week wonder making claims and spouting crap.  So they threw you out for outing yourself?

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

Contessa the brainless

Submitted by Herbster on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:21pm.

Contessa has always been pro-homo.  Unfortunately, her "argument" holds about as much weight as a helium balloon.  This woman has the IQ of a head of broccoli.  At least she didn't cry this time.  Hopefully, COMCAST will sweep MSNBC clean of all the enablers.

  • Login to post comments

if you don't agree with

Submitted by sometimesright on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:27pm.

if you don't agree with legitimate data and surveys then why even put them on your friggin' program? careful contessa, your liberalism is showing.  she calls herself an anchor? hahahahaha

"Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first." Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

She's an anchor in the way

Submitted by misterbee241 on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:17pm.

She's an anchor in the way Gunga Dan Rather was - fake but true.
 

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

which is worse?

Submitted by wizardjr on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 6:41pm.

I'm not sure which is worse - stupidity or ignorance...?

What these TV news mumblers, sitting in their rent controlled NYC apartments sipping the 'right' wine while reading their Maya Angelou screeds really don't have a flaming clue about the military. This woman compounds it with grand mal stupidity.

  • Login to post comments

Best quote from the report

Submitted by larrybob on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:07pm.

The study's available on the defense department website. http://www.defense.gov/dadt

Best quote from the report (bottom of page 6)

As one special operations force warfighter told us, “We have a gay guy [in the unit]. He’s big, he’s mean, and he kills lots of bad guys. No one cared that he was gay.”

  • Login to post comments

And for those of us like myself ...

Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:13pm.

who say "Don't repeal, ever" this quote backs up my argument to a tee. So long as he doesn't put his personal agenda above that of his unit, he's perfectly suitable for service. But the moment he decides that it's more important to him to be able to openly display his homosexuality than it is to defend his squadmates to the death, he becomes unfit.

  • Login to post comments

Then remove all the other

Submitted by misterbee241 on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:15pm.

Then remove all the other sexual offenses from the UCMJ too.  Let's not be selective.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

deleted

Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:19pm.

never mind...

  • Login to post comments

Why on earth would you say

Submitted by pratsha45 on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 11:58am.

Why on earth would you say that?  So you go down a list of people allowed to serve their country...let's see.......White folks, black folks, jewish folks, tall people, brown-haired people, angry people, kind people, women, men, gays folks, New Yorkers, WAIT! Did you say Gay people!? Oh my God.....not that, they're horrible I tell ya!


C'mon already, let's grow up and be mature about equality and freedom in this country.

  • Login to post comments

Hey, 3 week wonder

Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 7:09pm.

Which service were/are you in pratsha45?

You obviously don't know that gay people can serve, and do serve in the US Armed Forces. As long as they don't place their personal agendas above that of the service and perform adequately while in uniform, they can remain so. It's when they break unit cohesion that they are discharged.

Oddly enough, just like white folks, black folks, jewish folks, tall people, brown-haried people, etc. It would behoove you to actually read comments before accusing the author of being immature about them.

  • Login to post comments

by the way, larry and bob

Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:20pm.

after 54 weeks, congrats on your first post...

  • Login to post comments

BK, LOL - Are we sure that this isn't Larry Bud...

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 8:38pm.

...Melman, trolling from the grave?

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

LOL Dave! Could be, could be.

Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 8:43pm.

LOL Dave! Could be, could be.

  • Login to post comments

Immoral

Submitted by misterbee241 on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:14pm.

Homosexuality is immoral.  Having a dark skin isnt.  But liberals like Brewer cant see the differrence.  All  morality is the same to them.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

ban bible & torah and bullying -- leviticus 20:13

Submitted by MACDONALDBANK1 on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:19pm.

http://www.macdonaldbank.com/religion2012.html

  • Login to post comments

Welcome to NewsBusters, troll

Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 8:33pm.

Can't help but notice you failed to mention banning the Qur'an, which takes bullying (not to mention outright murder) to stratospheric levels.

Are you afraid the camel-washers will come after you for dissing their 17th Century violent political takeover manual?

You sure as hell don't having a problem offending Christians and Jews.

Ever noticed what the camel-washers do to homosexuals? 

BTW: You may not be aware of this, but this is the United States of America, not the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (at least not yet, anyway) - we don't ban books here.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

No matter how many times you

Submitted by Guttermouth's Return on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 9:07pm.

No matter how many times you edit your post, I doubt this poster will respond.  

  • Login to post comments

Contessa "kettle-ass" Brewer

Submitted by mostlymoderate on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 7:38pm.

Contessa "kettle-ass" Brewer is wrong about this.  DADT was imposed to keep the military from turning into a gay-rights parade.  People can be gay but they are not supposed "flame" all day about how gay they are, who they want to do, how hot some guy is in their shorts, etc. etc.  We have all witnessed the occasional gay person that is overly gay that makes us uncomfortable.  We don't want it in the military.

Be gay, just shut up about it and I promise not to tell you about my wife's t1ts.  Deal?

  • Login to post comments

Practically I don't think

Submitted by redfish on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 10:47pm.

Practically I don't think DADT makes sense, because the army shouldn't be dismissing someone when we're in the middle of a war just because they were outed as gay. The Pentagon has realized this, and in practice, they haven't been dismissing gay service members unless they've created a problem. Repealing DADT will do nothing but formalize this practice into law.

But I think the whole debate over the issue has been been dishonest, and shaped by dishonest motives. The reason gays are seen as an "issue" is the same reason men and women in the same barracks are seen as an issue. There are many approaches to try to a solution, and repealing DADT will in my opinion will be one step to a better solution, but people who call supporters of it bigots need to come out and declare that opponents of co-ed barracks are also bigots, because its the same issue, really.

I think all of these gay rights issues are discussed dishonestly generally. For example, if I have a friend in a completely Platonic relationship and we decide we want the benefits associated with marriage (tax benefits, SS benefits, visitation rights), we'll still be denied a marriage license. Does that mean people are bigoted against Platonic relationships between male friends? No. Now, people have to understand the lack of marriage for males in romantic relationships is no more bigoted, because its the exact same situation -- when you're two people of the same sex whether you're having sex or you're not isn't the government's business and isn't even considered as a factor. So why are we talking about this as a gay 'human rights' issue? It's not. It's not even a gay issue at all. That's right: same-sex marriage isn't even really a gay issue.

People have to stop letting the Left define the debate.

  • Login to post comments

redfish

Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:22pm.

Are you currently or have you served in America's Armed Forces? Because the tenor of your post doesn't indicate any real comprehension of the issue.

Gays are not being discharged becuase they've been outed; they're being discharged because they're incompatible with military service. Those that are compatible are not being discharged as is evidenced by the number of known gays that are actively serving.

This issue is that gay activists have put their agenda above that of the good order and discipline of the military and there combat missions. Any service member or wannabe service member that enlists -it is an all-volunteer force, remember- with pre-conditions that elevate their personal agenda above that of the service is unfit to serve. Plain and simple.

But your issue seems to be more about generally promoting the gay agenda than the specific issue of repealling DADT.

  • Login to post comments

I'm not in disagreement with

Submitted by redfish on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:39pm.

I'm not in disagreement with you, I said above that the repeal of DADT would basically be formalizing what the military already has in practice. Current rules still allow a service member to be discharged if outed, but the military is choosing not to do that.

The biggest problem I see is in how the rules are changed: if changed by the court system, they could tie the hands of commanders in dealing with these issues, subjecting them to the threat of discrimination suits.

  • Login to post comments

DADT exists

Submitted by bkeyser on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:42pm.

as a way to prequalify someone for service. Like it or not, the military does this on every level and homosexuality is just one rung of the ladder. My son tried to enlist in the USMC just this year and was disqualified because he had a minor orthoscopic surgery five years ago to remove a little scar tissue from his shoulder. He was 13 at the time and has had absolutely zero problems with the shoulder since.

But beyond that, when he first encountered the recruiter while still a senior in High School, it was important that he was still actively in school and not a post-graduate. Why? Because a post-graduate would be more likely to be looking for a job and not becoming a Marine, whereas a student would be more likely to want the Corps. That was a pre-qualifier and not based upon anythign other than the Corps looking for the best candidates. This is no different than an airline looking for pilots without a tendency to drink or a cab company looking for hacks with a good driving record. It's about finding the best people for the job. Being gay doesn't necessarily disqualify someone, but "only serving if _____" is a pre-condition that the service doesn't, and shouldn't offer.

The repeal of DADT would create a protected class of service members. It would alienate some current service members and many would chose another career. All so that a very small minority could serve during a lengthy economic downturn with high unemployment nationwide and during active combat missions. Bad idea. Don't repeal. Ever.

Just as a frame of reference, I'm a USMC Veteran, Sgt, 0811, 1986-1992.

  • Login to post comments

DADT cannot---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 12:47am.

be explained any simpler, yet more profoundly, than bk just did. (post #26)

If you CAN NOT sublimate yourself to the military mission, you have NO business being in the military.

The whys and wherefores of why you CAN NOT do so, are immaterial.

Gays, with an agenda, disagree.

They are wrong. 

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Right, MD.

Submitted by Newsbubba on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 12:33pm.

The military is NOT a democracy.  You know the rules going in, and if you don't like them, don't join.

If you want to be "embraced for who you are," join the Peace Corpse, like Prissy Chrissy Matthews.

Thanks for your service, BK.

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

Ok Cowtessa allow me to ask

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:17pm.

Since men and woman are currently separated in the military for living quarters including showers.

Where do you recommend putting these folks?  For many of the same reasons, men and women currently sleep and shower separately.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Contessa. So hot. So very

Submitted by Van Halen on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:37pm.

Contessa.

So hot.

So very dumb.

  • Login to post comments

The question then becomes

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:52pm.

Is she hot enough to counter her stupidities?

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

Hb, nope, not by a long shot.

Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 12/01/2010 - 11:59pm.

Every time she opens her mouth, stupid falls out of it. 

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

If it doesn't matter on the

Submitted by Cowboy on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 1:15am.

If it doesn't matter on the job, than not talking about it isn't lying, is it?

  • Login to post comments

Of course, those proponents

Submitted by jdhawk on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 2:17am.

Of course, those proponents of rescinding this policy of DADT, don't realize the radical agenda of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transexuals  (LGBT).  For example, they have demanded that the rest of us create separate bathrooms, changing areas, and shower facilities for transexuals.  As, they are sensitive and deserve separateness while "transitioning."  You can imagine the ridiculous burden this would put on our Navy and other services to accomodate these demands.

LGBT wants and has gotten the rewrite of insurance policies to provide for adding a penis or turing a penis into a vagina for transexuals.  This is the policy in the city of San Franciso.  Our military medical and VA medical capability are maxed out due to the casualties coming out of the two war zones. We can't afford the burden and additional expense of such operations.

LGBT doesn't give a damn that they have the highest risk, due to their sexual behavior, for contracting all manner of sexual diseases including AIDS.  Can you imagine having your son or daughter go off to war only to come home with AIDS contracted from an emergency blood transfusion?

LGBT doesn't give a damn if war fighters exit the military due to DADT ending and LGBT serving openly.  Our success on the battlefield in  fighting two wars is furthest from the minds of these people. 

The US is at war.  This is no time to take up this legislation.  We should be coming up with more and better ways to send the terrorists to their "heaven" as soon as is practical.   

What I would like to see is no LGBT serving in any of our military services.  We don't need them.  In this time of war they are a distraction that our military shouldn't have to put up with.

  • Login to post comments

           I was in the

Submitted by pratsha45 on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 12:03pm.

           I was in the military in just four months ago and served for four years on multiple commands, ships, continents, and areas of operation (AORs).      At no point and in no location during my time in the military did I come across a command that was completely heterosexual - there were gay people at every single command in every single country I was in.   

      Regardless of how you feel about them, they did their job and did it with honor for the country and deserve our respect for defending our liberties - liberties that they, like the non-integrated 'negroes' before them, are denied on a daily basis through ignorance and bigotry.    The news media and movie industry paint a negative picture of the gay community as effeminate and "fabulous" when a lot of the gay folks I was friends with were actually quite "normal" in every sense of the word and at least two of them were former high school football players!

  • Login to post comments

The news media and movie

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 7:03pm.

The news media and movie industry paint a negative picture of the gay community as effeminate and "fabulous" when a lot of the gay folks I was friends with were actually quite "normal" in every sense of the word and at least two of them were former high school football players!

Coulnt be that they themselves have themselves to blame for their image.

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

I was in the military in just

Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 12/02/2010 - 7:12pm.

I was in the military in just four months ago and served for four years on multiple commands, ships, continents, and areas of operation (AORs).

I'm not buying it- what branch and for what country? What was your MOS? Rank?

  • Login to post comments

The only people I have heard equate---

Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 12/03/2010 - 2:48am.

the militant fight for Gay Rights, to the Black Experience, have been G, or L, or B, or T.

pratsha's "military speak" sounds a bit disjointed.

MD 

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: You'd Better Believe This Is Obama's America
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Susan Rice, Back for More
more cartoons
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • Rand Paul: ‘I Want to Go From 5% of the African-American Vote to At Least 20-25%’
  • Chris Cuomo Claims He’s ‘Completely Divorced From Ideology’ While Talking Up ‘Advocacy Journalism’
  • CNN 'New Day' Review: Chris Cuomo 'Can Make a Lost-Kitten Story Sound Like a Mass Murder'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use