Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 21, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled

On CBS, Laura Bush Calls Out Media for Liberal Bias

By Kyle Drennen | November 15, 2010 | 13:36

A  A
Kyle Drennen's picture

During an interview with former President George W. Bush and Laura Bush on CBS's Sunday Morning, correspondent Jim Axelrod wondered: "In terms of how you understand how you are perceived is there a liberal bias in the media?" Mrs. Bush quickly replied: "Yes. He doesn't have to answer, but I will."

Axelrod seemed surprised by her response: "Why do you jump in so quickly?" Mrs. Bush laughed and backed off slightly: "No, I'm only kidding. I really don't know." However, she observed: "I will say that I really do see for most Americans a great feeling of affection for George that you don't read about. Yes, I think there's sort a conventional wisdom that's put out by the press." Axelrod was still skeptical: "And that conventional wisdom tilts left?" Mrs. Bush replied: "Yes."

View video below

Axelrod put some that liberal bias on display throughout the interview. On the topic of Hurricane Katrina, Axelrod remarked that "'Failure to act' could have been the subtitle of the chapter" on that subject. He declared that: "This man [Bush] who saw decisive as his political brand....found his presidency undermined by his delay." Axelrod pressed Bush: "Why was Katrina the one event where you took too long to decide?"

Later, Axelrod concluded: "There was a common feeling that after Katrina, you could never fully regain the trust of the American people." Bush pointed out: "Katrina was just a part of a narrative that, you know, began to undermine me personally with some of the public – a lot of the public, for that matter." Axelrod acknowledged: "The long knives were out."

Axelrod also asked about the role of Dick Cheney: "The book is his chance to take on what he says are misconceptions, like the one about the shadow president. The question I always get the most is was Cheney running the place?" Bush discussed how: "Dick Cheney came to me and he said, 'if you want to replace me, do it.' Which I thought was unbelievably magnanimous." Axelrod asked: "Any part of you think, 'if I do this and replace him, that will put an end to, is Cheney running the joint'?"

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Here is a full transcript of the interview:

9:34AM SEGMENT:

JIM AXELROD: Mr. Bush writes about everything from running for president, to the stem cell debate, to 9/11, to the Iraq war. And the weapons of mass destruction that Saddam Hussein didn't have. You write about Iraq that, 'no one was more shocked or angry than I was when we didn't find the weapons. I had a sickening feeling every time I thought about it. I still do.'

GEORGE W. BUSH: Right.

AXELROD: What was sickening?

BUSH: Well, because – sickening is the fact that so many people felt that that was the only reason we went in to liberate Iraq. And so the case itself became undermined. And it frankly – the failure to find weapons of mass destruction, in some ways, let Saddam off the hook.

AXELROD: Didn't it undermine the legitimacy of the U.S. invading?

BUSH: Well, you know, that's part of the problem. I mean in some people's minds they said, 'wait a minute. If this was the main part of the case, we made a mistake.' I don't think – I don't agree with that. I think that the liberation of Iraq not only makes America more secure, it gives 25 million people a chance to live in a free society. And that free society over time will have a transformative effect in the Middle East.

AXELROD: And so the liberation, in your view, justifies everything?

BUSH: Well, I think in my view what justifies everything is the removal of a threat. In other words, the decision to leave him in power, in my judgment, would have been a decision that could have created enormous chaos in the world. In other words, one could envision a nuclear arms race between Saddam and Iran. And then they'd have been saying, 'wait a minute. The failure to act created enormous stress.'

AXELROD: 'Failure to act' could have been the subtitle of the chapter on Hurricane Katrina. This man who saw decisive as his political brand-

BUSH: I'm the decider and I decide what is best.

AXELROD: Found his presidency undermined by his delay. Why was Katrina the one event where you took too long to decide?

BUSH: I got caught up in the legal system. It's not excuse. I'm just giving you the facts.

AXELROD: You're the president of the United States.

BUSH: No, I know. But in this case in order to send troops into New Orleans, the law says that the governor must declare an emergency and request or I have to declare an insurrection. In retrospect. Now knowing what I know today, which is not exactly what you get to do when you're sitting there, I would have sent in troops quicker.

AXELROD: There was a common feeling that after Katrina, you could never fully regain the trust of the American people.

BUSH: I felt Katrina was a part of a very difficult period for my presidency. In other words, I said let's reform Social Security and the Republican congress didn't. Iraq was very difficult in '06. And Katrina was just a part of a narrative that, you know, began to undermine me personally with some of the public – a lot of the public, for that matter.

AXELROD: The long knives were out, which is when the White House can be at its loneliest. How does it work, Mrs. Bush? Do you offer a point of view, criticism, when you're in the heat of it?

LAURA BUSH: Sure. All of those things. But not a lot of criticism. There are plenty of critics already for who lives in the White House. And that's just not really our relationship. Did we talk about issues? Sure. But also, I knew when he came home late in the afternoon from the Oval Office that, you know, what he wanted to do was sit with me and work on the jigsaw puzzle that we worked on and watch baseball on television or football on television or some other sport and relax. We always have really just had the comfort of each other's presence. And I knew that's what he wanted when he was at home.

AXELROD: Not that she ever held back, when she felt he needed her unvarnished opinions.

LAURA BUSH: I mean, I knew-

BUSH: I can remember a few examples when you said I was going down the wrong road. Like, 'you better watch your language, buster.'

LAURA BUSH: Well, that kind of thing for sure.

BUSH: There's an old poster out west, as I recall, that said 'wanted dead or alive.' I remember when I said that and I got back and she said, it wasn't – you know, it wasn't a harsh tone. It was like, 'hey, you probably could put this a little better.' And of course I said everybody understood what I meant. I was a little defensive, I must confess. But I mean her point was you're the president. Yeah, your plain spoken, but sometimes your plain spokenness sends the wrong signals.

AXELROD: To this day she remains his biggest protector and quick on the draw. In terms of how you understand how you are perceived is there a liberal bias in the media?

LAURA BUSH: Yes. He doesn't have to answer, but I will.

[LAUGHTER]

AXELROD: Why do you jump in so quickly?

LAURA BUSH: No, I'm only kidding. I really don't know. But I will say that I really do see for most Americans a great feeling of affection for George that you don't read about. Yes, I think there's sort a conventional wisdom that's put out by the press.

AXELROD: And that conventional wisdom tilts left?

LAURA BUSH: Yes.

AXELROD: The book is his chance to take on what he says are misconceptions, like the one about the shadow president. The question I always get the most is was Cheney running the place?

BUSH: You know, we laugh because – and I'm sure Dick Cheney would laugh. And anybody who's in the White House would laugh because that's one of the myths that arise when you're the president. And I do, you know, Dick Cheney came to me and he said, 'if you want to replace me, do it.' Which I thought was unbelievably magnanimous. And-

AXELROD: Any part of you think, 'if I do this and replace him, that will put an end to, is Cheney running the joint'?

BUSH: That's exactly right. That would have helped eliminate the myth. But the problem in that logic is that I hate the job he was doing. Cheney is a friend. He did a great job as vice president. And it would have been incredibly self-serving and shallow to have made a decision about my vice president based upon some misperception. Yeah, this is a very dramatic picture. That is right after the 2001 inauguration.

AXELROD: Another misperception, he says, that there was some deep-seated rivalry with his dad.

BUSH: When people read this book, they're going to realize that my relationship with my father is based upon admiration and love and appreciation that he gave me the great gift, and that is unconditional love.

AXELROD: So that's another myth that can be disposed of that there was some Shakespearian drama being played out?

BUSH: Yeah, exactly, some kind of psychological drama being played out.
 

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Laura Bush
  • CBS
  • Sunday Morning
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

I don't even know why these imbeciles ask the question...

Submitted by krendler on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 1:56pm.

...when every single scrap of evidence out there - contributions by journalists to liberal politicians, polls, willingness to use the word "conservative" when describing somone versus the word "liberal" etc - show a massive bias towards the left. And it's not 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 but more like 10 to 1.

  • Login to post comments

The Bushes

Submitted by MrShy on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 2:10pm.

Man, these people are way too gracious and polite. Frackin' MSM. Vile. All of them.

- Shy W. Bush

Are Sannity-baggers racists??

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

I couldn't sell enough books

Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 2:08pm.

I couldn't sell enough books to want to put up with self-lefteous douchebags like this guy.

Barack_Must_Go.....

  • Login to post comments

The internet is destroying

Submitted by Ashrak on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 2:10pm.

The internet is destroying the media filter employed that has kept the charade alive so long.

The free enchange of ideas is a tyrant's worst nightmare.

The progressives are losing badly, and they know it.

That an individual right exists requires that some policy positions be removed from the table of debate.
  • Login to post comments

Yep...

Submitted by Paul G on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 2:23pm.

I bet Algore is sorry he created the internet now....

  • Login to post comments

And you, sir, would be correct!

Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 2:51pm.

Considering the internet was key in debunking ManBearPig's AGW scam.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

And Blonde...

Submitted by Paul G on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:12pm.

EVERY SINGLE thing the MSM, left wing columns, etc...their thoughts, ideas, 'plans'.  They tried, and ALMOST succceeded, but 'We' the American people are winning now...We just just gotta stay strong and united.  

And btw...GO GATORS!

  • Login to post comments

Good for Laura Bush!!! GW is

Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 2:15pm.

Good for Laura Bush!!! GW is trying to stay 'above it all'..........personally I think he could let loose with a few well-pointed statements once in a while, and still maintain his class and dignity. Of course, these sanctemonious dweebs in the MSM continue to feign surprise when someone informs them of their blatent bias................

  • Login to post comments

The lame stream media tilts

Submitted by MikeB on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 2:20pm.

The lame stream media tilts left?  They are practically lying on their side.  As for PMSNBC, they tilt so far left, they're almost standing on their heads.

Time and time again, studies have shown that there is a leftist "tilt" on the part of the propaganda media.  From what is and is not reported, to prominent labeling of Republicans caught in scandal, but no mention of the word Democrat in the same situation, to their editorial calls for more taxation instead of less spending, to the ratio of their contributions to politicians.  It goes on and on.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

But, but, but, that's impossible as everyone....

Submitted by Tomorama on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 2:55pm.

Just the arrogant way they are so taken aback when someone says that.

"but everone I know thinks we call it down the middle and everyone I know also KNOWS that the only network that shows bias is faux noise, hee, hee, hee"...... 

If they actually fairly reported on Obama, his numbers would already be below Bush, FACT.  

If you make poverty easy, you will have more of it. Benjamin Franklin
  • Login to post comments

I don't understand why Laura Bush backed off...

Submitted by PrairieSky on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:22pm.

of her initial "yes" answer...Her husband is out of office, and will never seek another, so what does she have to lose by answering that question honestly? This was her chance to go on the record and call a spade a spade, and instead, she coyly says "No, I'm only kidding. I really don't know..."?? Now, I admire Mrs. Bush enormously and I can understand her wanting to appear "above the fray", but come on...An honest "yes" and a diplomatic response of why she feels that way would not be inappropriate or less classy. The Bushes took all manner of total bs fired at them for 8 years, and in fact, President Bush is still a target, and they both refrained from getting down into the mud by responding to all that garbage, but now, I think that they should both feel free to respond, in an appropriate manner, to a question such as this one. 

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan 

  • Login to post comments

Why did she back off?

Submitted by rwnewsnut on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:44pm.

Because she is too nice.  She is too gracious. 

The press is living within their own echo chamber and they don't see it at all.  There was yet another example of the echo chamber in the earlier reported Andy Rooney story:  "Well, I surveyed nine of my friends, and eight of them said they liked Obama but didn’t trust Gallup poll." 

I can only hope Dick Cheney's book gets down in the mud and really unloads.

  • Login to post comments

"Too nice" and "too gracious"is right...

Submitted by PrairieSky on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 4:35pm.

Being gracious and nice are what we should all aspire to, but there are times when responding back to what one's enemies/detractors are saying about us is not only appropriate, but called for and wise. 

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan 

  • Login to post comments

Exactly PrarieS...unlike Killa,

Submitted by Paul G on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:47pm.

They, 'the Bushes' know they're talking to the 'enemy'. So why be nice? Do they REALLY think there's people that are gonna go."Hmmm ..they're nice people...they might be right..."

As much as I have disagreed with Bush...I disagree with him on his 'being Mr. nice guy' even more.

  • Login to post comments

Well, she DID say

Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:52pm.

Well, she DID say something..........even if she sort of poo-poo'd it in her next answer. I've got the same issues as you do with regards to GW ..........as I stated in my post. I think he could lay these guys to waste and STILL stay above it all, with the right statements........based on truth.

  • Login to post comments

Exactly...The Bushes are without a doubt...

Submitted by PrairieSky on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 4:38pm.

the classiest, most gracious people in the world and are rightly admired as such, but once, just once, I'd love to see one or both of them really come back, graciously of course, at one of the yutzes like Axelrod, and say what they really think. Karl Rove wrote in his book that one of the things that in retrospect that he wishes they had done differently, was to respond to and refute some of the more slanderous, untrue and misleading things that were said about President Bush, and how he handled some of the issues/problems that he faced while president. By taking the high road, and choosing not to dignify those things with a response, it allowed the lying looney left media to completely control the dialog and spread their bias and lies. I don't think there is any doubt that this policy of not responding back damaged Bush's standing with the American people. Rove thinks now that this was a mistake, and I think that President Bush likely does too. As they say, hindsight is 20/20.   

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan 

  • Login to post comments

Only gracious people

Submitted by texasborngranny on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 11:50am.

Only gracious people appreciate the graciousness of President and Laura Bush.

The democrats/liberals/progressives/socialists only see it as weakness.

  • Login to post comments

I agree...

Submitted by PrairieSky on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 4:29pm.

I think the "taking the high road" approach, while virtuous, is not always the smartest and best way to handle one's detractors. 

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them (our children) to do the same." ~President Ronald Reagan 

  • Login to post comments

Yepper..we've 'taken' the 'high road'..

Submitted by Paul G on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 5:02pm.

for 30-40 yrs....All of us..ANY of us here would LOVE to go on a Sunday show...JUST ONCE!........No beltway crap..no 'I don't care if I'm not invited to the next cocktail party crap'...........No, 'I hope I'll get invited to show my face next Sunday on this morning show'....

George Will has been doin a pretty good job...but I'm SURE...98% of us could/would do better.

  • Login to post comments

Always admired and respected...

Submitted by TempusFugit on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:17pm.

...Laura Bush. She's prettier, classier and dresses better than Michelle Obama and yet the press never fawned over her like the current FLOTUS. Oh yeah and Laura's butt doesn't have its own congressman

In Switzerland, they had brotherly love and five hundred years of democracy and peace, and what did they produce? The cuckoo clock! - Orson Welles
  • Login to post comments

and zip code

Submitted by doug1950 on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:27pm.

Just the shadow of her behind weighs 40 pounds.


  • Login to post comments

And has 4 full-time security

Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:54pm.

And has 4 full-time security people........with full salaries, perks, and benefits!!!

  • Login to post comments

By that woman a tarp

Submitted by Tomorama on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 3:56pm.

Maybe she has "toned arms" from all that "knife and fork work"....

Sure as hell "aint" from eating arugula...

If you make poverty easy, you will have more of it. Benjamin Franklin
  • Login to post comments

Another thing about Laura...

Submitted by TempusFugit on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 4:29pm.

...when she was involved in a fatal car accident she had the courage to take the consequences. Unlike a certain deceased liberal who left the scene and went to sleep. Hope that slimeball is enjoying hanging with Hitler, Stalin and Mao in hell

In Switzerland, they had brotherly love and five hundred years of democracy and peace, and what did they produce? The cuckoo clock! - Orson Welles
  • Login to post comments

Teddy the Swimmer was a

Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 4:36pm.

Teddy the Swimmer was a basically a fat lightweight, who's main claim to fame - besides being responsible for drowning that poor young woman - is drastically changing the racial and cultural make-up of our country. I'm sure that there are various 'cliques' in hell, and I don't think Kennedy has enough 'gravitas' to be hanging with the 'big boys'............................unless they needed some servant to serve them drinks.

  • Login to post comments

But that would be the punishment...

Submitted by TempusFugit on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 5:06pm.

...for the 3 biggest butchers in history. To be FORCED to hang with Teddy. He would be the Stewart to their Beavis and Buttheads; the biggest loser wanting to be cool enough to hang with the regular losers

In Switzerland, they had brotherly love and five hundred years of democracy and peace, and what did they produce? The cuckoo clock! - Orson Welles
  • Login to post comments

Bushes

Submitted by sarge329 on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 5:03pm.

The Bushes are far too classy and intelligent ( Harvard AND Yale for Mr. Bush, by the way ) to go down the road provided by the LSM. They have a sense of humor and patriotism ( W was in the Air National Guard. How did BHO serve his country? In what capacity did he serve? ) that goes far beyond anything demonstrated by members of the LSM. I'm not aware of any so-called " journalist " who served in the military in the last 30 years. They understand how business works. After all, W operated an oil & gas company in the past, and was involved in the Texas Rangers baseball organization. Foreign policy is not unknown to them. As governor of Texas, he had to deal with Mexico, not to mention all of the countries who shipped products to ports in Texas. How much foreign policy experience did BHO have prior to his ascendancy? Having said all of that, I wish to point out that I am not an apologist for Bush 41 or W. I don't agree with every-thing that either one did. But, if the LSM wishes to call themselves " objective journalists " , then they need to show ALL sides. That means, here is what happened, warts and all, without  any opinion from us. What are the odds of that happening? How about 50-50, meaning slim and none?

  • Login to post comments

I'm sure the President and

Submitted by marpel on Mon, 11/15/2010 - 6:12pm.

I'm sure the President and First Lady are plain TIRED of these leftist creatures coming at them with their accusatory liberal questions.  If I were either one of them, I'd make it a point to pack some heat and show them just a glisten of the barrell....LOL

"Deep within my heart lies a memory.  A song of ol' San Antone..."

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Leno: It’s Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to ‘See, I Told You So!’
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • The Guardian Glamorizes New ‘Assault on Wall Street’ Movie as Justice
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use