Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 11, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'
  • Time's Mark Halperin Concedes: GOP 'Would Be Creamed' by Media for Not Passing a Budget
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now

Politico's VandeHei Takes NAACP to Task for Labeling Tea Party Racist

By Kyle Drennen | July 21, 2010 | 17:11

Change font size:  A |  A
Kyle Drennen's picture
Jim VandeHei, MSNBC Appearing on Wednesday's Dylan Ratigan Show on MSNBC to discuss the Shirley Sherrod controversy, Politico co-founder Jim VandeHei pointed out the NAACP's role in fueling racial accusations: "If you think about this, where this thing started, the NAACP comes out and makes this charge against the tea party movement."

VandeHei rejected the NAACP's claim of racism in the political movement: "It's a very, very diffuse group. You cannot say that they are racist anymore then you can say the Republican Party's racist or the Democratic Party is racist, so it creates this culture and it's a dangerous topic, it's a dangerous fire to light, and then when it happens this is the outcome."

Explaining how the NAACP charge led to the accusations against Sherrod, VandeHei observed: "I'm not defending Breitbart. But conservatives are outraged, they feel like 'listen, you're – because I'm part of the tea party movement you say, therefore, I'm racist.' And so what Breitbart's arguing is 'I want to push back.'"

Opposite VandeHei was Washington Post writer Jonathan Capehart, who tried to excuse the civil rights organization: "The NAACP went to great lengths to say they were talking about racist elements within the tea party movement....Very nuanced thing here. He's not broad-brushing the movement." VandeHei countered: "...very nuanced but very explosive. They knew exactly once you make that statement, whether you're trying to add nuance to the statement or not, you know exactly what's going to happen when you make that charge."

Here is a transcript of the July 21 exchange:
4:18PM

JIM VANDEHEI: Can I talk about the NAACP for one second.

DYLAN RATIGAN: Go for it.

VANDEHEI: Because I do think they're getting off the hook a little bit.

RATIGAN: I agree with you.

VANDEHEI: If you think about this, where this thing started, the NAACP comes out and makes this charge against the tea party movement.

RATIGAN: Yeah.

VANDEHEI: We've probably written more stories about the tea party movement than any other organization. We've really tried to study this group. It's a very, very diffuse group. You cannot say that they are racist anymore then you can say the Republican Party's racist or the Democratic Party is racist, so it creates this culture and it's a dangerous topic, it's a dangerous fire to light, and then when it happens this is the outcome. So conservatives-

JONATHAN CAPEHART: But Jim-

VANDEHEI: I'm not defending Breitbart. But conservatives are outraged, they feel like 'listen, you're – because I'm part of the tea party movement you say, therefore, I'm racist.' And so what Breitbart's arguing is 'I want to push back.' Now I'm not saying what Breitbart did was right because clearly it wasn't right and the outcome was awful for this woman, but both sides, I think, come off looking very, very bad and that's why Joe Biden and – and Steny Hoyer both said they didn't agree with the NAACP's charge.

RATIGAN: Go ahead, Jonathan.

CAPEHART: Jim, but here's the thing. The NAACP went to great lengths to say they were talking about racist elements within the tea party movement and even Ben Jealous said point blank that he did not say – think that the entire tea party movement was racist. He wanted leaders of the tea party movement to disavow those racist elements. Very nuanced thing here. He's not broad-brushing the movement.

VANDEHEI: Very nuanced, but Jonathan – but very nuanced but very explosive. They knew exactly once you make that statement, whether you're trying to add nuance to the statement or not, you know exactly what's going to happen when you make that charge, whether it's elements
or how nuanced they're trying to be.

CAPEHART: So then-

VANDEHEI: Especially – this is a terrible issue to be talking about.

CAPEHART: But then we can-

VANDEHEI: And it's the reason that Barack Obama does not want to talk about it. Barack Obama has tried very-

CAPEHART: But then we can never have a conversation about race if – I mean, you have – it's all about nuance.

VANDEHEI: I feel like we've been having a conversation p about race for a long, long time in this country-

CAPEHART: We always will.
Share this

About the Author

Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Kyle Drennen on Twitter.
  • NAACP
  • Racism
  • Tea Parties
  • Jim VandeHei
  • Jonathan Capehart
  • Dylan Ratigan
  • MSNBC
  • Politico.com
  • Kyle Drennen's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)
  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Let me be very succinct and just say: Can you expect anything
    2 min 38 sec ago
  • Times up, NL..
    2 min 45 sec ago
  • All legal precedent...
    8 min 34 sec ago
  • No. I don't think I will.
    8 min 51 sec ago
  • NL207, So, my when son and
    9 min 37 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
  • Newt Gingrich: As President I'll Repudiate 40% of Obama's Government on Inauguration Day
  • Ann Coulter's Full Address to CPAC
  • NYTimes Reporters Packing in 'Conservative' Labels at CPAC
  • Full Video of Rick Santorum at CPAC
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.