On Sunday’s CBS Evening News, political analyst John Dickerson brushed aside criticism from former Vice President Dick Cheney that the Obama administration was “dithering” on Afghanistan: “...it puts Cheney out there as a kind of boogie man the administration can point to. He’s not terribly popular outside of conservative circles...in some ways, Dick Cheney is a gift for the White House.”
Dickerson, who is a contributing writer for the left-leaning blog Slate.com, has also filled in for Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer twice in the last six months, on the October 18 and July 5 broadcasts. He was responding to a question from Sunday Evening News anchor Russ Mitchell, who cited Cheney and wondered: “Are you hearing other sentiments out there along those lines?” Dickerson claimed: “Well, there’s been some elite opinion about the pause in the President’s thinking.”
An October 9 CBS News poll showed that there was more than simply “elite opinion” on the subject: “President Obama has a slide in his approval ratings on his handling of the situation in Afghanistan. In April, 58 percent approved of his handling of the conflict; by August, that number had fallen to 48 percent. In the most recent survey it has hit its lowest level yet, 42 percent.” An October 18 ABC News/ Washington Post poll placed public approval of the President’s handling of Afghanistan at 45 percent, with 47 percent disapproving of his handling.
Dickerson went on to explain why Cheney’s criticism would be a “gift” to the Obama White House: “And also, it allows the administration to talk about the situation they inherited, and the neglect of the Bush-Cheney years. And that neglect is something not just Democrats talk about, but the generals who are fighting this war and trying to win it, talk about that same neglect. So in some ways, Dick Cheney is a gift for the White House.”
Here is a full transcript of the segment:
6:03PMRUSS MITCHELL: For some perspective on how today’s [Baghdad] bombings could affect Obama administration policy in Iraq and Afghanistan, we are joined in Washington by CBS News analyst John Dickerson. John, good evening to you.
JOHN DICKERSON: Good evening, Russ.
MITCHELL: Can this be seen as a big setback for the Obama administration in Iraq?
DICKERSON: I don’t think so, if it’s – of it’s just a kind of one-off. The way administration officials talk about it is in that way. What would worry them is if this were the beginning of a long string of attacks. But they hope that it’s just one big, ugly event and that things will settle back down again afterwards.
MITCHELL: Of course, the President still has to decide what to do in Afghanistan, send more troops, bring some home, stay the course. Will what happened in Iraq this weekend, in your mind, affect the Obama administration’s decision on Afghanistan?
DICKERSON: There are so many other things to think about on Afghanistan, the nature of the government there, the situation in the various parts of Afghanistan, that this is much further down the list and that’s what administration officials say. So this probably won’t have much of an effect on Afghanistan. However, if the President does decide to add more troops, it does make the environment in which he would have to make that case to the American people a little more difficult. These kinds of bombings remind people of just the carnage that’s associated with more troops overseas.
MITCHELL: Former Vice President Dick Cheney is accusing the Obama administration of dragging its feet on Afghanistan. Are you hearing other sentiments out there along those lines?
DICKERSON: Well, there’s been some elite opinion about the pause in the President’s thinking. The benefits for the White House of having Dick Cheney come out and use the word ‘dithering’ is, one, Senator John McCain came out and said, well, he wouldn’t use that word. And so it puts Cheney out there as a kind of boogie man the administration can point to. He’s not terribly popular outside of conservative circles. And also, it allows the administration to talk about the situation they inherited, and the neglect of the Bush-Cheney years. And that neglect is something not just Democrats talk about, but the generals who are fighting this war and trying to win it, talk about that same neglect. So in some ways, Dick Cheney is a gift for the White House.
MITCHELL: CBS News analyst John Dickerson, as always, thank you very much.
DICKERSON: Thanks, Russ.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
When hell freezes over...
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 11:44 ET by Thinking.ManThe Prestitues will be there to witness it. The lefturd theology of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC is going to save them or destroy them completely.
Of course if it does save them we will all be wearing chinese pajama's and singing about dear leader, they wont be around to hear it though, the press is always the first against the wall.
Your comment reminded me of
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 13:02 ET by ReaverYour comment reminded me of this quote - “If I had my choice, I would kill every reporter in the world, but I am sure we would be getting reports from hell before breakfast."
-General Sherman
I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me. - Hunter S. Thompson
Two comments
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 11:50 ET by KC Mulville"Senator John McCain came out and said, well, he wouldn’t use that word." Thanks again, Senator McCain, for giving the media their opportunity to dilute the conservative message.
"And so it puts Cheney out there as a kind of boogie man the administration can point to. He’s not terribly popular outside of conservative circles." Except that according to Gallup, conservatives occupy the largest circle, 40% of the electorate. Liberals only occupy 20%, half of what conservatives enjoy.
Dickerson has a long history of seeing only what he wants to see, and it's usually a complete distortion of reality.
→ My friends
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 12:00 ET by Cool ArrowJohn McCain would more likely refer to Obama's inaction as "circumspective reflection".
"Dithering" is such a hate-word, isn't it?
I think "analysis paralysis" doesn't quite describe the President's position either. I'm more of the opinion he doesn't think it's politically expedient to chap the pinkies when he's trying to push through health care.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Cheney
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 11:52 ET by cajun2For the first time in 8 years, I'm actually agreeing with Dick Cheney. Aint that a kick in the head.He makes a lot more sense than anyone in this administration.
Neglect?
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 12:00 ET by GeneralAl"And also, it allows the administration to talk about the situation they inherited, and the neglect of the Bush-Cheney years. And that neglect is something not just Democrats talk about, but the generals who are fighting this war and trying to win it, talk about that same neglect. So in some ways, Dick Cheney is a gift for the White House."
What kind of Kool-Aid did this guy drink? The neglect was orchestrated by the COMMUNIST DEMOCRATS! I'm sick of these lying cowards giving cover to this incompetent stock boy from Wal-Mart!
I have news for you , Miss Dickerson [A real man would not make such an outrageous claim!]! Cheney's popularity is on the rise, as is Bushes! Don't get too excited as your Tele-Prez has pushed the envelope too far and is on a steady decline as is his Communist Democrat Party!
→ And also
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 12:04 ET by Cool ArrowOur judges would have accepted "also too" as well.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
General,
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 18:53 ET by UpNorthyou've slighted a whole flock of very qualified stock boys from Wal-Mart. They at least know what their job is, and do it to the best of their abilities.
Hopefully, the benefits of Cheney, and a few others, pointing out the criminal deficiencies of this administration will set things rolling by 2010. That, and people waking up, finally, to how much the grandiose plans of the dems and their guy will actually cost them.
So when is this
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 12:26 ET by Six String SpiffSo when is this administration going to actually do something useful?
All this pissing and moaning about the last administration is ridiculous. Of course we can't expect anything else from the trillion dollar boy wander and his incompetent clown posse.
This guy is a joke. An absolute joke. Running around my state trying to prop up Deval Patrick while the country goes down the crapper. He's an absolute DISGRACE. He has ZERO respect for the office he holds which is proven every day by the way he behaves on his bash America tour. Who else can spend a TRLLION dollars and not have a damn thing to show for it except redundant road construction that 'creates jobs'.
This administration better wake up fast and stop bitching about Cheney and Bush.
THIS IS YOUR MESS NOW, OBAMA!
BE A BIG BOY AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT
Did Obama attend his inauguration? Did the MSM?
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 14:10 ET by Ten7sThe Afghanistan theater (and the entire GWOT) has been his responsibility for nine months. And the "mess" (to the extent that there is one) is due to:
Obama who (seven months ago) fired and replaced the TOP GENERAL in Afghanistan AND
Obama who (seven months ago) changed the STRATEGY for Afghanistan AND
Obama who (NOW) is not standing behind his General and his DECISIONS.
Hard to tell for sure...
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 12:53 ET by JPR1..but looking at that picture of Dickerson, my guess is he may well have the same disease as Olberman. He should see a doctor soon.
Dickerson: another boogie man gift for the Republicans in 2010!
Mon, 10/26/2009 - 12:55 ET by MightyMouth"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"