CBS Wonders: Will Nobel Prize Become Obama’s ‘Poison Chalice’?

Photo of Kyle Drennen.
  • Bookmark and Share

Maggie Rodriguez and Bob Schieffer, CBS On Friday’s CBS Early Show, Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer wondered about negative political fallout from President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize win: “one European commentator who said ‘will this become a poison chalice?’ In other words, is this going to hurt the President rather than help him?...is this going to widen the part of partisan divide rather than bring people together?”

Schieffer spoke with Early Show co-host Maggie Rodriguez, who asked: “Clearly a surprise to everyone, including the White House, for the President to be awarded this less than nine months into his term. And already some people are questioning whether he deserves it.” Schieffer expressed that skepticism: “My first reaction was, ‘what?!....It’s almost as if they’re saying ‘we’re giving you the Nobel Peace Prize for winning the election.’...I can’t recall anybody who won this prize for his aspirations. People usually get it for results.”

During 11AM CBS breaking news coverage of the President’s acceptance speech, anchor Jeff Glor got more Scheiffer reaction: “Is this more a commentary on the current administration and the current president or the previous administration, Bob?” Schieffer replied: “It’s almost as if the committee today was giving Barack Obama a prize for not being George Bush.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Schieffer went on to repeat some of his concerns about the award:

This, I am afraid, is going to widen the political divide in this country, not bring it closer together. And you can already see that. The Republican National Committee has already put out a strong statement saying this will just remind people that the President has not backed up strong rhetoric with any kind of action. And now the Democratic National Committee is responding by saying the Republicans are aligning themselves with the Taliban. Now it begins. And I think this is not going to help the President. It’s not.

Glor went so far as to treat the prize-winning as a scandal in need of damage control: “Bob, how quickly or easily do you think the White House and the President can tamp down the controversy and all the questions we’ll hear this weekend?” Schieffer advised: “ I think what they have to do is just go back to business and get back to doing and    facing all the problems and trying to resolve the problems that are on their plate right now. There’s really not much they can do about this besides what they’ve already done, I think.”

After getting Schieffer’s reaction, Glor turned to White House correspondent Chip Reid: “Chip, any indication when the President’s going to accept this award?” Reid glowingly remarked: “Yeah. He is going to go to Oslo, we believe it’s December 10th, to accept the award. And I think he will do it with the same sense of humility that he just gave us here.”

However, Reid quickly added:

I think he’s got to do that because Bob is absolutely right. You really risk increasing the partisan divide in this town if he goes out and crows about this, because there really is a pretty good argument that this is aspirational, not based on accomplishments at this point. And we all know the – I mean, Ronald Reagan – conservatives have long complained that Ronald Reagan never got a Nobel Peace Prize for helping bring the Cold War to an end, but Jimmy Carter and Al Gore and now Barack Obama have gotten Nobel Peace Prizes. So they believe it’s a very political thing. So, they certainly don’t want to widen the political divide with this.

In contrast to CBS coverage, ABC was far more congratulatory as Good Morning America co-host Diane Sawyer proclaimed that Obama had won: “the Olympic gold of international diplomacy.” During breaking news coverage of the President's speech, World News anchor Charles Gibson declared: “The Nobel Committee feeling that he has inspired a new sense in the world.”

On NBC’s Today, co-host Matt Lauer shared the skepticism of Schieffer: “We’re less than a year into the first term of this president and there are no -- I'm not trying to be, you know, rude here -- no major foreign policy achievements, to date.”

Here is a transcript of Schieffer on the Early Show:

MAGGIE RODRIGUEZ: Just one of the questions I’d like to ask our chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer, host of Face the Nation, who joins us this morning. Good morning, Bob.

BOB SCHIEFFER: Good morning, Maggie.

RODRIGUEZ: Clearly a surprise to everyone, including the White House, for the President to be awarded this less than nine months into his term. And already some people are questioning whether he deserves it.

[ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize; Good or Bad for Him Politically?]

BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, include me in that group that was surprised by this. When your folks rousted me out of bed at 5:00 this morning, which I guess I found out about it before Robert Gibbs told the President about it, when your folks called, I mean, my first reaction was, ‘what?!’ I don’t think anybody expected this. The Nobel Committee, I find interesting, said they awarded this for changing the tone of American politics. It’s almost as if they’re saying ‘we’re giving you the Nobel Peace Prize for winning the election.’ President Bush was very unpopular in Europe and it is almost as if this is more of a comment on the previous administration than it is on the new one. We very seldom have people who – I can’t recall anybody who won this prize for his aspirations. People usually get it for results. I mean, even the President’s most fervent advocates would admit that while he’s launched many initiatives, all of these things are still works in progress. So apparently the reaction in Europe was one of surprise and I think it’s going to be one of surprise here. One thing that interested me, Maggie, was the remark of one European commentator who said ‘will this become a poison chalice?’ In other words, is this going to hurt the President rather than help him? And I must say, when you see the reaction that we got to the United States not getting the Olympics from people on the conservative right, you have to wonder is this going to widen the part of partisan divide rather than bring people together?

RODRIGUEZ: Right. Another interesting question is the point that Bill Plante raised. The President today will be meeting in the war council to decide the number of troops to send or not send to Afghanistan. He’s just won the peace prize. Do you think that will affect the decision on Afghanistan?

SCHIEFFER: I think this will have nothing to do with the President’s decision on what to do about Afghanistan. I think where the impact is going to be is the political reaction in this country from both sides. That’s where I think you’ll see the impact, Maggie.

RODRIGUEZ: Alright, Bob Schieffer in Washington. Thank you.

SCHIEFFER: You bet.

RODRIGUEZ: And of course it will be really interesting it see how the President handles this when he comes out and speaks about it.

SMITH: I have to say, I was in the office this morning and on the computer screen pops up ‘President Awarded Nobel Prize’ and I thought ‘well this is’ – was like some spam or a joke, right.

RODRIGUEZ: I thought the same thing.

SMITH: This is so crazy.

Here is a transcript of Schieffer during CBS breaking news coverage:

JEFF GLOR: So, there he is, President Barack Obama, the surprise winner of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize award. The President said this morning he was surprised and he is humbled, but he will accept the award. He called the Nobel Peace Prize a ‘call to action that all nations must take responsibility for bettering the world’ as he sees it. Bob Schieffer joins us from Washington now. Bob, we’ve been talking about this, this morning. You know this is a stunner on both sides, for both Republicans and Democrats. Is this more a commentary on the current administration and the current president or the previous administration, Bob?

BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, I think what this is, is a reflection of the general dislike for George Bush and the previous administration in Europe. It’s almost as if the committee today was giving Barack Obama a prize for not being George Bush. I think the President had a very difficult assignment this morning out in the Rose Garden. He had to appear humble but at the same time not embarrassed for receiving this award. It reminds me of the old politician’s prayer, ‘Lord, protect me from my friends, I can take care of my enemies myself.’ This, I am afraid, is going to widen the political divide in this country, not bring it closer together. And you can already see that. The Republican National Committee has already put out a strong statement saying this will just remind people that the President has not backed up strong rhetoric with any kind of action. And now the Democratic National Committee is responding by saying the Republicans are aligning themselves with the Taliban. Now it begins. And I think this is not going to help the President. It’s not.

GLOR: Bob, how quickly or easily do you think the White House and the President can tamp down the controversy and all the questions we’ll hear this weekend?

SCHIEFFER: I think what they have to do is just go back to business and get back to doing and    facing all the problems and trying to resolve the problems that are on their plate right now. There’s really not much they can do about this besides what they’ve already done, I think.

GLOR: Alright, Bob Schieffer joining us from Washington. Want to shift back now to Chip Reid, who’s at the White House. Chip, any indication when the President’s going to accept this award?

REID: Yeah. He is going to go to Oslo, we believe it’s December 10th, to accept the award. And I think he will do it with the same sense of humility that he just gave us here, and I think he’s got to do that because Bob is absolutely right. You really risk increasing the partisan divide in this town if he goes out and crows about this, because there really is a pretty good argument that this is aspirational, not based on accomplishments at this point. And we all know the – I mean, Ronald Reagan – conservatives have long complained that Ronald Reagan never got a Nobel Peace Prize for helping bring the Cold War to an end, but Jimmy Carter and Al Gore and now Barack Obama have gotten Nobel Peace Prizes. So they believe it’s a very political thing. So, they certainly don’t want to widen the political divide with this.

GLOR: Alright. Chip Reid joining us from the White House. Chip, we’ll see you again tonight. There will be more about the President winning the Nobel Peace Prize on your local news and on this CBS station and of course on tonight’s CBS Evening News with Katie Couric. For now, I’m Jeff Glor in New York. Have a good day.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Laugh or throw up

I didn't know whether to laugh or throw up while listenting to that fellow Gibbs today. As he tried to explain this fiasco away he sounded as though Obama were a candidate for Miss America. "He just wants world peace, no nuclear weapons---blah, blah, blah". America sinks further into the abyss every day. Sad.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Will the real Miss America please stand up?

What goes around comes around.

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
- P.J. O'Rourke

They always worrying about

They always worrying about their little vonderboy.

Vill he scrape his knee? Oh no! Vot does it all mean for our little vonderkins?

That people don't revolt in the streets is a source of constant amazement to me.

___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums: http://ubama.org/chu...

In and of itself, it isn't a big deal

I think the whole episode is just comic relief. We conservatives are all laughing at this, more than anything else. It's an example of liberal absurdity. It only has serious meaning if Obama takes it too seriously. What the hell, let the guy enjoy it. Looks good on the resume.

We don't need a bunch of

We don't need a bunch of "Euro Trash" trying to dictate how the American people should think and act. h/t to Charles Krauthammer for the term Euro Trash.

Tipping Point

I'm hoping this will break the back of the resistance to making jokes about the Bamster. The comedic potential here is just too enormous for the late nights, SNL, the fake news shows and the standups to ignore. Once that boundary is crossed, there is no going back.

I am also looking for a real Bamster imitator, Steve Bridges style. Armisen on SNL is really weak.

One Joke Too Far

Every good comedian knows to shut up before going one joke too far.

So when you get an award and people go 'hey he didn't even do a lying power point presentation movie' or 'even need the scissors jack' ... WTF has he done? You knwo you are cooked.

Just goes to show...

..what the real value of that prize is worth. NOTHING!

(overheard on the supermarket checkout line: "Mama, I want a Nobel Peace Prize!"   "Sure son, here let's add it to out shopping cart, along with the Enquirer and a pack of gum.")

Besides, didn't the nomination have to be submitted no later than February? So someone submitted his name earlier than 20 or so days into his administration? THAT makes sense!

For what other awards has his name already been submitted?

I get the ugly feeling that the Nobel organization is trying to influence American politics by sending us a message. To which my reply is "Butt out of our business!" After all, didn't you get your start from the fortune Nobel made from DYNAMITE?????? 

But seriously, I'm going to go out and buy myself one of those prizes for my work in hoping that everyone will play nice this month. I don't have to actually DO anything about it, just hope for it. Such cr#p!

John, the real intent of the

John, the real intent of the Nobel Peace prize has been suspect for years now (Arafat??? Gore??? Carter???), but this clears the air. It's worthless, as you say.

The tragedy is that there are individuals who really do put their lives on the line, who have made strides toward peace in various parts of the world, whose efforts really have saved lives. Obama ain't one of them.

We will never hear of these people, or their efforts, or their bravery. Their efforts will never be known to the rest of the world.

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

One of the other blogs

One of the other blogs suggested we all go nominate The 0 for a Heizman trophy now. Not that the Nobel peace prize has really been that relevant, but now it's a complete joke. Maybe next he will win a Best New Artist Grammy and disappear from the face of the earth like all the other winners have.

Hey Al Gore won an Oscar

But I draw the line at the Heisman Trophy.

Obama should start wearing Tim Tebow shorts.  Maybe he'd get a clue about earning a win.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

I am still can't get over

I am still can't get over this. The nomination dead line was ten days after the inaguration, he could not have done anything of note short of finishing polishing his throne. Something's wrong.

→ ForeverOnTheRight

Greater things were accomplished in Six Days.

But he's moving up. 

Closing Gitmo

The only thing I can think of (mentioned this elsewhere here) is that on the second day, Gawd said....I mean DuhOne said "let the base known as Guantanimo be closed in one year's time, so it shall be" as he gave several strokes of a pen.  That affects everyone....in a bad way.

-Jon

  Can't wait to

  Can't wait to see obama,dressed in those dorky Nobel Prize clothes (you know, the ones where they dress up as Fred Astaire). 

 The picture of him receiving his medal should be brought up and ridiculed just as much as the Mission Accomplished banner has been.

Ego restored

The ego is restored annnd, LIFT OFF! Opie goes to Oslo.

Obama being used

President Bush was very unpopular in Europe and it is almost as if this is more of a comment on the previous administration than it is on the new one.

If this is the case, Obama would be wise to decline the prize. No matter how much he hates Bush or he thinks America or the world hates Bush, being used by the people who are anti-America should smack some sense into him. For one thing, he should have a shred of patriotism as a president. For another thing, he is a president, for Pete's sake. Being used as a plaything by European socialists should offend him. It's not dignified at all and he shouldn't have wanted a part of that.

But then again, he is Barack "I am sorry that America was bad" Obama.

           The

           The new Nobel category is for failure. I think obama has earned it.