Early in Saturday’s CBS Evening News, anchor Jeff Glor reported: "Tonight there are new allegations of torture by the CIA. Newsweek magazine is reporting that a secret 2004 report reveals that interrogators used mock executions to intimidate prisoners."
Glor went on to talk to Newsweek reporter Mark Hosenball, who claimed: "And in the case of one detainee that we know about, somebody named Abdel-Rahman al Nashiri, who was an alleged architect of the USS Cole bombing, this report alleges that at some point CIA interrogators, whether contractors or CIA staff officers, brandished a gun in front of this guy in an effort to frighten him and also took a power drill in front of him and turn turned it on and went ‘bzzz,’ implying therefore that they were going to use it on him."
Meanwhile, neither the Saturday nor Friday Evening News programs made any mention of reports that ACLU attorneys defending Guantanamo detainees illegally showed terror suspects photos of CIA personnel in an effort to implicate interrogators in acts of torture. On Friday, the Washington Post reported: "The Justice Department recently questioned military defense attorneys at Guantanamo Bay about whether photographs of CIA personnel, including covert officers, were unlawfully provided to detainees charged with organizing the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, according to sources familiar with the investigation."
Later in the Saturday broadcast, Glor introduced another story about the possible release of a Guantanamo detainee in the wake of torture allegations: "One of the youngest detainees at the Guatanamo Bay prison could be returning this weekend to Afghanistan, where he was arrested seven years ago for allegedly throwing a grenade at American soldiers. Mohammed Juwad’s big break came when a U.S. military lawyer made a highly unusual choice."
Correspondent Lara Logan described that "unusual choice": "Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Darrel Vandeveld could not keep silent....He was a military prosecutor in Guantanamo until he decided to speak out against the corruption of justice he found there." A clip was played of Vandeveld claiming: "Silence in the face of evil is collaboration with evil."
Vandeveld went on to argue: "Our fighting men and women who are putting themselves in harm’s way, they’re not fighting for rigged, kangaroo trials." Logan added: "That’s exactly the kind of trial Colonel Vandeveld says they were getting at Guantanamo. And he should know, he was the lead prosecutor in seven cases."
After Vandeveld found records in which Juwad claimed to be tortured, Logan explained: "He couldn’t ignore the violations of law he discovered, critical evidence that was missing, lost, or withheld....That led Vandeveld to make the most agonizing decision of his life. In September 2008, he resigned from the military commissions." Logan then asked Vandeveld: "So your conscience is clear?" He replied: "My conscience is not clear. I prosecuted Mohammed Juwad for too long. I participated in the commissions for too long."
At the end of the story, Logan briefly mentioned the Pentagon’s response that: "Vandeveld’s statements are proven to be unsubstantiated." The report concluded with Vandeveld declaring: "If you do the right thing you will forever be grateful you did it, no matter what happens to you."
Here is a full transcript of Logan’s report:
6:46PM TEASE:
JEFF GLOR: Up next on tonight’s CBS Evening News, a young Guantanamo detainee could be leaving for home after a military prosecutor chose to help the defense.
6:49PM SEGMENT:
JEFF GLOR: One of the youngest detainees at the Guatanamo Bay prison could be returning this weekend to Afghanistan, where he was arrested seven years ago for allegedly throwing a grenade at American soldiers. Mohammed Juwad’s big break came when a U.S. military lawyer made a highly unusual choice. Our chief foreign affairs correspondent Lara Logan has more.
DARREL VANDEVELD: Information about how he was captured and executed.
LARA LOGAN: Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Darrel Vandeveld could not keep silent.
VANDEDVELD: Silence in the face of evil is collaboration with evil.
LOGAN: He was a military prosecutor in Guantanamo until he decided to speak out against the corruption of justice he found there.
VANDEVELD: Our fighting men and women who are putting themselves in harm’s way, they’re not fighting for rigged, kangaroo trials.
LOGAN: That’s exactly the kind of trial Colonel Vandeveld says they were getting at Guantanamo. And he should know, he was the lead prosecutor in seven cases. When Darrel arrived there in may 2007 he was fresh from the battle field in Iraq.
VANDEVELD: I wanted to punish them. I wanted vengeance.
DAVID FRAKT: I would characterize him as a true believer.
LOGAN: Major David Fract was the defense attorney in the case that would ultimately compel Darrel to risk everything. Mohammed Juwad was accused of throwing a grenade at two U.S. special forces soldiers in 2002, injuring them severely. At the time, this Afghan boy was 16 or 17 years old. His case was prosecuted aggressively by Vandeveld. So it was clear to you that he was guilty.
VANDEVELD: I had no doubt in my mind, based on what I received, that he would be convicted.
LOGAN: But a chance discovery would reveal that important evidence in the case had been withheld.
VANDEVELD: I saw something that floored me.
LOGAN: In the evidence file of an unrelated trial, Vandeveld discovered Juwad had made a statement to military investigators, a statement that was backed up the U.S. guard force at his prison.
VANDEVELD: He had been hooded and slapped, that he had been shackled, hooded, and thrown down stairs.
LOGAN: And you knew nothing about this as the prosecutor in his case?
VANDEVELD: I knew nothing about the existence of the statement.
LOGAN: How is that possible?
VANDEVELD: The evidence was in a state of chaos.
LOGAN: By law, Vandeveld had to share his discovery with the defense. He now believed Juwad was tortured, even though he had no intelligence to offer and he did not believe Juwad could be convicted.
FRAKT: I think that he was just as appalled by what he found in those records as I was.
LOGAN: Frakt says that discovery changed Darrel Vandeveld forever. He couldn’t ignore the violations of law he discovered, critical evidence that was missing, lost, or withheld.
VANDEVELD: The rules are applicable to everyone. There is no exception. There are no different forms of justice.
LOGAN: That led Vandeveld to make the most agonizing decision of his life. In September 2008, he resigned from the military commissions. So your conscience is clear?
VANDEVELD: My conscience is not clear. I prosecuted Mohammed Juwad for too long. I participated in the commissions for too long.
LOGAN: The Pentagon, in a statement to CBS News, said ‘Vandeveld’s statements are proven to be unsubstantiated.’ He received a poor evaluation report, which effectively ends his military career.
VANDEVELD: If you do the right thing you will forever be grateful you did it, no matter what happens to you.
GLOR: That’s Lara Logan reporting.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Allegations schmallegations
August 24, 2009 - 14:57 ET by mattmHow come we never hear:
"Tonight, there are new allegations that Obama hates white people."
or
"Tonight, there are new allegations that Democrats want to Nazify America."
or.........Oh yeah, I forgot....it's the media....forget I said anything.
Oh, well.....
August 24, 2009 - 15:12 ET by motherbeltOh, well.....
Shameful people
August 24, 2009 - 15:17 ET by jdlybrandWe have an Attorney General who drops charges against ACORN thugs dressed in paramilitary uniforms with billy sticks outside a voting precint; but God forbid we not follow the 'rule of law' against those who would just as soon cut our throats as look at us. I personally hope they burn in the hottest part of H E Double Hockey Sticks!
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
Shameful indeed!
August 24, 2009 - 16:03 ET by motherbeltThey should be ashamed, but they only care about honor in dealing with our enemies. And they are beyond stupid, if they think any of this will make our enemies treat our soldiers one bit better. They are more likely to torture them, now that our President has let it be known that we will release terrorists for hostages.
Hell You Said!
August 24, 2009 - 16:11 ET by GeneralAlMr. Riley, don't be afraid to mention HELL on NB! We all feel as though we're there right now with this token President of the left! I only wish the idiots who voted for this goon would have seen the proctologist before voting! I'm sure he would have been able to provide them with the proper device for removing their Cranial Structure from their Rectal Orifice!
Hell yeah General
August 24, 2009 - 18:03 ET by jdlybrandI was just toning down my rhetoric so as not to be considered a teabagging, astroturfing, racist, sexist, homophobic, white, swastika bearing, brown shirt wearing, intellectually retarded, angry, Nazi mobster. Come to think of it... I've never held so many titles in my lifetime. :-)
I forgot xenophobic... whatever the hell that means.
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
"VANDEVELD: The rules are
August 24, 2009 - 15:23 ET by jdhawk"VANDEVELD: The rules are applicable to everyone. There is no exception. There are no different forms of justice."
The hell there isn't. These are terrorist. They do NOT get the same rights as American citizens. IMHO, they should be taken out and shot. That would not only take care of the immediate problem of what to do with them, but send a message to those that want to do the same to Americans in the future.
Meanwhile, more than a third of those detainees at Gitmo that have been released have returned to terrorism killing our young men and women in uniform.
"IMHO, they should be taken out and shot."
August 24, 2009 - 19:37 ET by Indiana JoeActually, that's exactly what should have been done to begin with. They were "enemy combatants" NOT "in uniform." I think the Geneva Convention is pretty clear on that point, no?
Would have saved us a lot of trouble.
"Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1
Speaking of torture...
August 24, 2009 - 16:11 ET by Prester John...I don't suppose anyone has heard that any of our MSM or ACLU types have bothered talking to those women in Afghanistan who had their fingers cut off for daring to vote, have they?
(crickets chirping)
I put this link on NBs and
August 24, 2009 - 15:47 ET by bigtimerI put this link on NBs and elsewhere a week or so ago regarding the ACLU and their involvement.
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
CIA Quandary
August 24, 2009 - 15:49 ET by slickwillie2001I'm kind of torn on these CIA issues. This is the same CIA remember that put working against President George W. Bush over doing their jobs, so now that they are being used as a diversion/punching bag by the Bamster's White House thugs, I want to say –"how's that working out for you?"
On the other hand, we need a competent CIA to help keep us safe.
I concur. Sadly many at
August 24, 2009 - 20:29 ET by BDI concur. Sadly many at the Agency will see this persecution by the Obama Admin as a peculiar form of self-flagellation. Masochism of the worst form since it harms the nation.
But they cannot help it since most in the Agency see themselves as more diplomat than Intelligence professional.
Persicute the B******s!
August 24, 2009 - 16:05 ET by GeneralAlObviously, the Tele-Prez Messiah is going to persicute all the agents who dared go after his Muslim brothers! With Comrade Eric Holder carrying out his every wish, he'll probably call for the death penalty against these agents. Once again, folks, we have change we can believe in! The Chicago political machine is now the Washington political machine. Its to bad the supporters of this madman have only limited intelligence or we'd be able to count on defeating the Communist Loon in 2010!
I have a somewhat related
August 24, 2009 - 17:24 ET by TruthMattersI have a somewhat related question....why are Obama, Schumer, and the other democrats irritated with Scottland and Lybia about the PanAm Bomber release when they are vowing to close Gitmo and release terrorists themselves?
I think it's mostly faux
August 24, 2009 - 20:13 ET by celatorI think it's mostly faux anger on the part of Obama and Schumer. Obama surely knew this was coming because Hillary was commenting beforehand. These people are so feckless, I believe nothing they say.
They knew we would be outraged, and had to cook up the appropriate words. A lot of the victims were from Syracuse U, (my alma mater) which has a history of having a lot of NYC students (though, in the case of the victims, I do not know). So Schumer had to say something.
And the irony you point out is spot on.
No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.
Found a fresh link....I just heard on Fox that
August 24, 2009 - 17:30 ET by bigtimerI just heard on Fox that Cheney got the memo's he has been asking to be released from the CIA released...rather convenient now is the time isn't it, when they are going after a whole heck of a lot of the CIA agents that intimidated any of the poor terrorists, with Holder and crew leading the way, and more memos in that regard being released, along with a Special Prosecutor...this was planned so no one would pay attention to the importance of what Cheney has been saying all along about the lives that have most likely been protected and saved are in these reports.
Infuriating to put it mildly.
I looked and Drudge and googled about 10 minutes ago, nothing yet, but there will be soon.
edit~found this....you can be sure we will be seeing the Cheney's again when this all heats up...come on Liz...Dad goes without saying.
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/torture/cia-will-release-torture-docs-cheney-requested-will-also-release-report-on-tortures-effectiveness/
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
Another Smoke Screen
August 24, 2009 - 19:04 ET by kilrodThis gitmo terror torture bs is just another smoke screen to divert people away from crap&Tax and health care. If Lara "wee wee" Logan is on the story you can bet there is something greasy about it. Unfortunately for the CIA guys they are going under the bus. With this bunch of thugs in power, dark days are ahead. Stay ready so ya don't have to get ready.
kilrod
If an unborn child cannot trust you, why should I,??
"... ACLU attorneys
August 24, 2009 - 19:31 ET by Indiana Joe"... ACLU attorneys defending Guantanamo detainees illegally showed terror suspects photos of CIA personnel..."
Well, as long as they weren't photos of Valerie Plame, who cares?
"Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1
Oh Dear! I is... I is.... I is verklempt agains. I... So mean...
August 24, 2009 - 20:00 ET by JWFOh dear, more news about how we threatened terrorists (probaly neked). Someone fired a gun in the room next door. Tehn teh terrorists thinks - oh mama jihads, I is next. Someone elses has teh power drillies and goes bzzzz bzzzz and the neked terrorists goes - Oh dear, someone might build a dog house fer meh puppies. Someone elses lies down in the long hallways and acts dead like a dead nekked terrorists and another teh terrorists says - ohhh teh zombies!
Perspective time boys and girls! Here is what happened to terrorists that were not threatened with teh scariness and teh CIA boogeyman denyin' the sugar in teh Cheerios.
These terrorists were not threatened or tortured.
These terrorists were not threatened or tortured in any way.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
JWF... I heard the same
August 24, 2009 - 20:02 ET by bigtimerJWF...
I heard the same thing this morning about the big bad terror tactics....I can guarantee that the majority of the American people are going to laugh, or yawn, but no one else is going to care but the usual suspects, ACLU, Code Pink and ilk, leftists in the msm/congress...which they will pray the majority of the msm can carry on a daily 24/7 witch-hunt...
To keep our silly little minds off of OCARE, C&T and Amensty...for the time being.
Newsflash: NOT going to work!
Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh
I is not terrorists and you spoilt meh party.
August 24, 2009 - 20:48 ET by JWFI wuz gonna spent teh rest of teh nights showing all teh lucky terrorists. Now someone with the bigtimings ruined meh party. Now no more going back to edits the postings.
No CIA's even talked to these terrorists.
No terrorists got a drop of water on their faces here.
Nobodies with the power drills goin' bzzzzt for these terrorists.
The terrorists..., oh piffle. Go look at all the happy terrorists that did not have to worry about the big bad CIA yer owns selfeses.
Got War Porn?
If there was any place Bush screwed up as CIC, it was here
August 24, 2009 - 20:37 ET by R D HelmFirst of all, these illiterate camel-scrubbers were caught out-of-uniform, and in combat with American soldiers, in a time of war-a war THEY declared, not us.
This unassailable fact makes them, by every accepted definition, WAR CRIMINALS.
As such, just as we did during the Battle of the Bulge (remember what we did to Otto Skorzeny's crack German commandos who were caught in American uniforms during and after that battle???) they should be interrogated on the spot (and I don't give a damn what the methods used would be, or whatever threats that may be used against the family members of these cretins) and once they have extracted whatever information they can, these WAR CRIMINALS should be thrown up against a wall and shot.
I'm talking BOOM!, DRT (Dead Right There).
And I'll tell you something else, too. If it were up to me, these enemy-coddling TRAITORS in the MSM, who have been doing nothing but giving aid and comfort to our enemies in this war since day one, should all be rounded up, tried for at least sedition, if not out-right treason, and thrown up against the exact same wall as the WAR CRIMINALS.
These illiterate 7th Century throw-backs declared war on civilization 14 centuries ago, and on this country directly when they illegally seized our embassy in Tehran three decades ago.
We have been playing paddy-cakes with these primitives ever since.
We are at war with these people. Western society as we know it is at stake, our nation is at stake, and our enemies are laughing at us.
Some have said (including me at one time) that we are going to have to eat a city or two before the American people finally wake up to what is really happening in this war.
You know what I think now? If these turban-sporting, robed weird-beards somehow manage to nuke an American city or two, my guess is, we would probably surrender.
-Dave
Part of the New Government Health Care Plan?
August 24, 2009 - 22:04 ET by AmmoMan..."took a power drill in front of him and turn turned it on and went ‘bzzz,’ implying therefore that they were going to use it on him."
Maybe they were trying out the latest "policy" on health care?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,541970,00.html
Hey, it is the Government, why use a scalpel when a sledgehammer (er, I mean drill) will suffice.
No mention of this, either, *Warning* Graphic Content
August 25, 2009 - 10:38 ET by sic721So, all the CIA did was 'threaten' those poor, misunderstood terrorists. Liberals and the msm conveniently forget to mention what these 'people' are trained to do. From Court TV's "Smoking Gun" May 24, 2007(graphic content):
"Torture, Al-Qaeda Style-Drawings, tools seized from Iraq safe house in U.S. military raid" LINK
THESE are the 'people' Obama and liberals sympathize with?
A generation which ignores history has no past -- and no future.-Robert A. Heinlein