CBS’s Smith: Is Sotomayor Confirmation ‘All Theater’?

Photo of Kyle Drennen.
  • Bookmark and Share

Harry Smith, CBS While discussing the Sotomayor confirmation hearings with former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, CBS Early Show co-host Harry Smith wondered: "Senator Lindsey Graham said, ‘unless you have a meltdown, you're going to get confirmed.’ So is this all theater then, or is this a process that should literally be paid attention to?"

Gonzales responded by describing the importance of a Supreme Court seat: "This is a lifetime appointment. She will be making decisions that will affect the lives of millions of Americans for decades. And so I think the members of the Senate have taken an oath of office to the Constitution and to the American people to ensure this is a person that should serve on the Supreme Court. So it's more than theater. I think it's – it’s a learning experience, a teaching experience."

Earlier, Smith asked Gonzales if Sotomayor’s assurances of objectivity would be enough for Republicans: "Because she pledged her fidelity to the law. She said, ‘my personal and professional experiences help me to listen and understand with the law always commanding the result in every case.’ Is that going to make any difference to Republicans? What she says and her track record?"

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Gonzales replied: "Not that one single statement. The next few days, I think, Republicans are going to really inquire into the comments that she's made in the past, in terms of the ‘wise Latina’ comment. I think there’s – they have a serious question that she, in fact, can be impartial."

On Monday, Smith saw no liberal activism in Sotomayor’s record and downplayed her controversial "wise Latina" comments.

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

7:16AM SEGMENT:

RUSS MITCHELL: Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is braced for tough questions from Republicans this morning in her second day of Senate confirmation hearings. Yesterday in her opening statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Judge Sotomayor sought to blunt concerns she'd be an activist judge.

SONIA SOTOMAYOR: In the past month, many senators have asked me about my judicial philosophy. Simple, fidelity to the law.

MITCHELL: Republican senators say they plan to try to raise doubts about her impartiality, but most concede she will likely be confirmed.

LINDSEY GRAHAM: Unless you have a complete meltdown, you're going to get confirmed.

MITCHELL: And if confirmed, Sotomayor becomes the court's first Hispanic justice. It is now coming up on 7:18. Here's Harry.

HARRY SMITH: Alright, Russ. Joining us now to discuss how Judge Sotomayor did on her first day is former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Good morning, sir.

ALBERTO GONZALES: Good morning.

SMITH: Did you get a chance to watch?

GONZALES: I watched part of it, yes.

SMITH: Yeah, and what did you think?

GONZALES: Well, yesterday was really a day of speeches. I think you had an opportunity to see the road map, I think, Republicans intend to follow in questioning Judge Sotomayor. And obviously, it's the first time that the public has heard from Judge Sotomayor, with respect to some of the comments that have been troubling to some Republicans. And so I think the next two days will be – will be quite revealing. We'll see what happens.

SMITH: Because she pledged her fidelity to the law. She said, ‘my personal and professional experiences help me to listen and understand with the law always commanding the result in every case.’ Is that going to make any difference to Republicans? What she says and her track record?

GONZALES: Not that one single statement. The next few days, I think, Republicans are going to really inquire into the comments that she's made in the past, in terms of the ‘wise Latina’ comment. I think there’s – they have a serious question that she, in fact, can be impartial. In one speech she talked about the fact that ‘impartiality is an aspiration, perhaps it's an unrealistic aspiration.’ And I think that is troubling to some Republicans.

SMITH: Should she – can she divorce who she is from the judgments she makes while sitting as a judge?

GONZALES: I used to be a judge. I know that we're all affected by our experiences. As – a good judge, I believe, comes to the bench very sensitive to those biases. And when they – when they analyze a case, they try to set those biases aside and make sure that they're applying the law. That should be the reality in every case, not an aspiration.

SMITH: Senator Lindsey Graham said, ‘unless you have a meltdown, you're going to get confirmed.’ So is this all theater then, or is this a process that should literally be paid attention to?

GONZALES: This is a lifetime appointment. She will be making decisions that will affect the lives of millions of Americans for decades. And so I think the members of the Senate have taken an oath of office to the Constitution and to the American people to ensure this is a person that should serve on the Supreme Court. So it's more than theater. I think it's – it’s a learning experience, a teaching experience.

SMITH: I want to talk about Dick Cheney and this news of the last couple of days that he actually – it's not clear. Asked the CIA to keep quiet a notion of trying to find a means to which to assassinate certain members of – of Al Qaeda. The CIA – Leon Panetta basically dis – dismembered the program as soon as he learned about it a couple of weeks ago. But there's this notion that there was this sort of secret program that was kept under a cloak on purpose. Did you have any knowledge of it?

GONZALES: Well listen, it's very difficult to talk about classified activities in an unclassified setting. I believe that General Mike Hayden, who was the most previous recent head of the CIA, and was head of the National Security Agency in 2001, has come out and said that no one ever told him never to go brief the Congress when there was legal requirement to do so. And so my experience in dealing with the last administration was that we tried to work as hard as we could with Congress in making sure they understood what was going on within the executive branch, subject to the need to protect the national security of our country.

SMITH: Alberto Gonzales, thank you for your time this morning. Do appreciate it.

GONZALES: Thank you, Harry.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Can she be impeached when

Can she be impeached when it becomes evident that she has lied during her confirmation hearing? I am not able to watch so I don't know what she is saying about the 2nd Amendment. But I figure it is the standard lib answer until it actually comes time to defend it then it becomes a collective right of the milita.  

Semper suprene nitens

North Carolina now has the worst government money can buy. 

rickl... You haven't

rickl...

You haven't missed anything, I've watched the hearings this morning...typical spin coming from her on everything, from the Ricci case, to the 2nd Amendment, she's been coached well.

...and no, they would never impeach her...unfortunately.

Btw...did you know according to Lawrence O'Donnell she gives out that maternal warmth for all to see, that's why they gravitate towards her, blah blah blah...he really is blind. I paraphrased there, but it was such a ridiculous statement in stead of being angry, I laughed..you just about have to anymore to keep your own sanity with these leftist nuts.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

BT

I figured she would give the standard lib answer about hunting. Then they turn around and say well you can't hunt with a handgun so what good are they. For one thing a hangun can be carried to kill snakes while hunting. There maybe some states that let you hunt with a handgun.   

Semper suprene nitens

North Carolina now has the worst government money can buy. 

It's all a Dog and Pony

It's all a Dog and Pony Show in the long run...and the CIA BS is a cover for Pelosi, plus of course to hurt the very people that have protected us etc etc etc.

Anybody catch Liz Cheney this morning on Morning Joe...she was absolutely the best...poor ol' Eugene Robinson probably still doesn' know what hit him...she stayed on for a few segments too...there was no screaming and all that BS....she lets nobody talk over her, made all her points succinctly, Mika did a pretty good job as well as far as letting everyone voice their opinions...along with her own...Liz handled them all with class...I love this woman's knowledge and quick wit...the msm just cannot out-do her, in any way, shape or form.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

bt-- I briefly caught the

bt-- I briefly caught the Fox ticker yester saying Liz Cheney will be running for public office soon.

Any ideas what that might be?

Obama Lied... Jobs Died.

Top of the Morning or

Top of the Morning or evening to ya Jack...

No I don't, we'll have to wait and see, whatever it is, I will be a happy camper...she was asked that again by Mika this morning...she said she is busy with her five kids and helping her dad with his book, but left it very open to running for something....hehehee

The msm will never be able to get her down...ever...she out-smarts them at every turn.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Jack

I was listening to John MCaslin and Melanie Morgan on the Washington Times Show this AM. They said the same thing. I don't know where her residence is so I have no idea what she'd run for.

Semper suprene nitens

North Carolina now has the worst government money can buy. 

It's CBS and other network "news" shows that are the theatre.

Those who believe in nothing will believe anything.

Theater of the Absurd. And

Theater of the Absurd. And about as insufferable as a Mime show.

Obama Lied... Jobs Died.

All Theater? As In pre-Scripted? Of Course It Is!

I couldn't help but notice how, when democrats ask a question, Sotomayor's answers seem to 'flow' with no discernable hesitations or pauses.

On the flip side, in answering Republican questions, there is a LOT of hesitation, uhs, ahs, and general slowness and careful choosing of words.

This is called "being coached up".

The difference is as striking as say, Obama WITH teleprompter and Obama "off the cuff", sans teleprompter.

"The human race divides itself politically into those who want to be controlled, and those who have no such desire."-Robert A. Heinlein

Here's how Harry thinks

Here's how Harry thinks this out in his brain:

  1. Hmm... Sotomayor makes a great progressive leader.
  2. The American people undeniably want more "progress" in America.
  3. This being absolutely true with no opposing evidence, one can only assume that Americans want her at her job faster.
  4. Thus, by the power vested in me by Holy Obama and Myself, Sotomayor should be permitted to skip over all those confirmation processes.
  5. But wait, I need to be more subtle about this.  I need to make it sound as though this is the opinion of the American people.
  6. Ah, I know... I'll ask it as a rhetorical question but it will be so subtle, people won't notice... and by the way, what does "rhetorical" mean?  Well, hey, if I don't know what it means, then probably neither do our viewers.  Ignorance is bliss.
  7. Brilliant... absolutely brilliant.

The Liar's Paradox

Ask an honest man whether he's telling the truth, and he will say "of course!" Ask a liar whether he's telling the truth, and he will say, "of course!" The answer is the same in both cases, which means that the answer proves nothing. Assurances mean nothing.

The same is true of bias. A reasonably objective person thinks he has his bias under control. But a very biased person thinks the same thing. Assurances mean nothing.

The questions is not answered by assurances. You can only give inductive evidence by revealing past experience.

On the other hand, this is a media that had Sarah Palin as a first term governor, and Barack Obama as a first term senator. They explained that Obama's inexperience didn't harm his qualifications for president, but Sarah Palin's inexperience did.

In other word, look for no logic in the media.

KC... Exactly. Nothing

KC...

Exactly.

Nothing like their double-standards all the time.

Do as we say...not as we do.

...and of course the SRM carries that message, if not take a lead on it in the first place.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Doubled Over

Hey BT! Saw your earlier post also. Palin-Obama is the perfect example of media double standards. Perfect and there is no defense, absolutely none. As to Liz Cheney, she is something else, as quick and right as the VP but in a new and attractive package. She will go far. I kinda expect some dumb-ass lib to announce an impeachment movement against her. They might as well start early, right?

Howdy jaywl.. Don't know

Howdy jaywl..

Don't know if you caught the show this morning, but I just put two links to it on the CIA thread where we were talking about this earlier...getting Robinson was really, truly priceless.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Theater

It is theater and she is the star actress. She is not only adhering to the script as she has been told to, dancing around the plain meaning of her prior words from the bench and in the unguarded moments that has made her the essential activist judge, but she has assumed the voice and inflection of the late Carl Sagan. Her words have that drawn out vowel emphasis that made him so recognizable. She says issuuuue the cooouuurt must deeeciiide. It sounds sooo phoney to me. It is phony because one can hear her real voice on the famous tapes and in a few moments of banter today. She sounds obviously coached to do this. Quite unlike Roberts in his testimony without notes or hesitation.

True enough.  I'm

True enough.  I'm fascinated by the fact that, when answering a Republican question, she comes across as a rather dull knife.  It's clear she's been coached on the tactic to use, but she can't quite muster the mental acuity to actually sell the tactic.  She certainly can't be classified as the "best candidate" for the SCOTUS.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

The, so called, republicans

The, so called, republicans are going to ask a few softball questions to fool their constituents then vote to confirm her then Barry Sotero AKA B. Hussein Obama will have the democrat/liberal bigot like himself that he wants.