On Monday, CBS correspondent Wyatt Andrews reported on the beginning of confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor and declared: "To Democrats, Sotomayor is the perfect nominee. That a child of the projects would progress through Ivy League schools and later a 17-year career as a federal judge makes hers an all-American story."
The Early Show segment began with co-host Julie Chen citing poll numbers that showed the American people were not fully impressed with that "all-American story": "A new CBS poll finds that 23% of Americans have a favorable opinion of Judge Sotomayor [decrease from 33% in June], while 15% were unfavorable [up from 9% in June]. 6 in 10 are still undecided or have not heard enough yet [62%, up from 58%]. And 35% say it's very important to have another woman on the high court." An on-screen graphic of the numbers showed a shift from June, but Chen failed to note the change in people’s attitudes toward Sotomayor.
Andrews did acknowledge some of Sotomator’s controversial decisions and comments, including her decision in the New Haven firefighter case: "Republicans plan tough questions on why Sotomayor ruled to dismiss the discrimination claims of 18 white firefighters in New Haven, a dismissal the Supreme Court overturned." However, Andrews then remarked: "Most analysts predict her answer will be simple" and played a clip of CBS legal analyst Andrew Cohen arguing: "She's going to say that she was bound by existing precedent. She picked the best standard available to her. Many and most of her colleagues on the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed."
Andrews also cited Sotomayor’s "wise Latina" comments: "She will also be asked about the President's demand for judicial empathy and her now famous comment that ‘a wise Latina woman would reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.’ The question would be does this reflect an ethnic bias?" And cited M. Edward Whelan, President of the Ethics and Public Policy Center: "That is a deep and serious challenge to the very notion of the rule of law. So there's plenty in her record that, as I say, ought to cause real concern."
While concluding his report, Andrews described Republican opposition to Sotomayor as futile: "Sotomayor should easily have the votes to be concerned [confirmed], and so Republicans are not only mindful of that, but they're also mindful of the fact that much of the nation's 15% Hispanic population views Sotomayor with great pride. So Republicans have promised questions to her that are challenging but also professional and respectful."
Here is a full transcript of the story:
7:05AM SEGMENT:
JULIE CHEN: Senate confirmation hearings for President Obama's Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor begin today. A new CBS poll finds that 23% of Americans have a favorable opinion of Judge Sotomayor [decrease from 33% in June], while 15% were unfavorable [up from 9% in June]. 6 in 10 are still undecided or have not heard enough yet [62%, up from 58%]. And 35% say it's very important to have another woman on the high court. CBS News correspondent Wyatt Andrews has the very latest. Wyatt, good morning.
WYATT ANDREWS: Julie, good morning to you. A bit of history unfolds this morning. And for the first Hispanic nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, confirmation hearings are scheduled to begin here at the Senate Judiciary Committee. Now, Sotomayor herself is scheduled to give her first public comments, her opening statement this afternoon, but this morning is devoted to the speeches that will be given by members of the Judiciary Committee. In the physical layout of the room, the Republicans, seven Republicans, literally will speak from here on my right, and the 12 Democrats on this committee will speak from here on my left. To Democrats, Sotomayor is the perfect nominee. That a child of the projects would progress through Ivy League schools and later a 17-year career as a federal judge makes hers an all-American story.
PATRICK LEAHY: She's the most experienced judge in nearly 100 years to go on the U.S. Supreme Court.
ANDREWS: Republicans plan tough questions on why Sotomayor ruled to dismiss the discrimination claims of 18 white firefighters in New Haven, a dismissal the Supreme Court overturned. Most analysts predict her answer will be simple.
ANDREW COHEN: She's going to say that she was bound by existing precedent. She picked the best standard available to her. Many and most of her colleagues on the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed.
ANDREWS: She will also be asked about the President's demand for judicial empathy and her now famous comment that ‘a wise Latina woman would reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.’ The question would be does this reflect an ethnic bias?
M. EDWARD WHELAN [PRESIDENT, ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER]: That is a deep and serious challenge to the very notion of the rule of law. So there's plenty in her record that, as I say, ought to cause real concern.
ANDREWS: Sotomayor should easily have the votes to be concerned [confirmed], and so Republicans are not only mindful of that, but they're also mindful of the fact that much of the nation's 15% Hispanic population views Sotomayor with great pride. So Republicans have promised questions to her that are challenging but also professional and respectful.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Why rags to riches all the time?
July 13, 2009 - 11:06 ET by StarAZMaybe I am grumpy today (today?), but why is this sort of corny story always the issue? You can't have a brain, ambition, good organization, connections, and luck without having been poverty-stricken or discriminated against? I am sick of this treacly nonsense.
I agree Star. By the way
July 13, 2009 - 11:17 ET by rockyracoonI agree Star.
By the way I think she is a most if not the most polarizing unqualified, with deference to Ginsburg, justice to be nominated in my 47 year lifetime. And of course she'll sail through.
How anyone can stomach watching the alphabet network newscasts is beyond me.
I don't give a damn if Sotomayor was born in a barn...
July 13, 2009 - 11:27 ET by R D Helm...and spent the first five years of her life being raised by farm animals.
This woman is an anti-white racist, as well as an anti-2nd Amendment gun grabber.
As such, she has NO BUSINESS being on the SCOTUS.
Period.
-Dave
"Obama's health care 'reform' plan is to blow up the building in order to fix a leak in the roof." - Herman Cain
If she's all that, demote Roberts and make her Chief Justice
July 13, 2009 - 11:49 ET by SickofLibsNo other nominee since 1909 had more previous judicial experience? Total BS.
Any questions she gets that she doesn't want to answer, all she has to do is pull a Ginsburg and refuse to answer - the Rs won't do sh*t about it and they certainly won't risk be labeled racist (yet again).
This particular hearing will be a charade and total waste of time and money. The Emperor must get what he demands.
An All American
July 13, 2009 - 12:22 ET by DelsaAffirmative Action Story!
She has NO great academic creds! She is no great thinker! In fact, she can barely write!
For the first time in her life will interact with a man, Judge Thomas, who was NOT an affirmative action story.
For once, if she cares, she can speak to someone who knows what tough really is.
All this suggests that
July 13, 2009 - 12:50 ET by Chris NormanAll this suggests that Sotomayor should be the subject of a Lifetime TV movie - but not necessarily a Supreme Court justice.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
'demand for judicial empathy '
July 13, 2009 - 15:03 ET by JDWA new role for judges, employing empathy and not applying the Constitution. How does such a judge apply the law?
JDW
DAILY WAVE
When people fear their government there is tyranny.
When government fears the people there is liberty.
Why all this nonsense?
July 13, 2009 - 15:55 ET by RR GOPWhy all this nonsense? She's going to get appointed anyway.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).