On Wednesday, MSNBC anchor David Shuster made a bold prediction about Sarah Palin’s political future: "I've said it before, I'll say it again, Sarah Palin will never recover from this...No matter what people say, no matter what these polls, she has no future." [audio available here]
Shuster made the comments in the 4:00PM ET hour, following a debate between Democratic strategist David Goodfriend and Republican strategist Chris Wilson about the impact of Palin’s resignation as governor of Alaska. Co-anchor Tamron Hall was somewhat skeptical of the declaration: "I don't know that the answer to that absolute." However, she then added: "But I mean, you're a very smart and wise man that I trust on these things."
The accuracy of Shuster’s predictions are unreliable at best. On May 8, 2006, Shuster appeared on MSNBC’s Countdown and told host Keith Olbermann: "I am convinced that Karl Rove will, in fact, be indicted." Shuster was referring to Rove’s role in the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation and an indictment failed to ever come.
Shuster began the debate between Goodfriend and Wilson by wondering: "The key question is, who is suffering more in all of this? Sarah Palin or a bitterly divided Republican Party?" At one point, Wilson argued that by leaving public office, Palin would have "the opportunity now to regroup, to be able to pay off some of her legal fees and be able to go and re-engage with the public, let them – cause us to remember why it is we liked her so much during the presidential campaign, which is the case." Shuster responded by claiming: "Well, let’s be clear, I think a lot of people did not like her during the presidential campaign."
Later in the segment, Shuster questioned Wilson further: "But Chris, what about the whole idea that Republicans are supposed to – what about the idea that Republicans are supposed to stand for conservatives values in terms of getting things done? You start a job, you finish it." Wilson replied: "Right, like Barack Obama did as Senator for Illinois?" Shuster ignored that response. Wilson also went on to point out Shuster’s anti-Palin bias: "And you know, as I listen to your commentary here, it's really difficult to understand why 51% of the American people may think she's been treated unfairly by the media."
Coming to Shuster’s defense, co-anchor Tamron Hall called for Palin and her supporters to "stop whining" about unfair media coverage: "When Hillary Clinton talked about the media, it was Sarah Palin who said stop the whining. When is she going to stop the whining and when are people who support her, maybe even like yourself, going to take her advice that she gave to Hillary Clinton?"
Shuster concluded the debate by asking Goodfriend: "Have we been too tough on Sarah Palin?" Goodfriend remarked: "Well, you can't help but feel a little sorry for her. On the other hand, if you become a vice presidential candidate on the national ticket, you know, if you can't stand the heat, you better get out of the kitchen." Hall agreed: "Right. Thank you."
Hall again portrayed Palin as a whiner: "...the media part annoys me, because I do think she's a tough woman and I think she can handle it. And I think it doesn’t serve her justice to make her this damsel in distress, when she, and I keep saying this, is the pitbull with lipstick. They need to stop making her the victim. She can take it. She can fish and gut animals." Shuster agreed: "Yeah, and in fact it sometimes – sometimes truth – sometimes the truth is tough. Maybe you don’t like – sometimes people don’t like hearing it, but the truth can be very tough."
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
4:38PM SEGMENT:
DAVID SHUSTER: The key question is, who is suffering more in all of this? Sarah Palin or a bitterly divided Republican Party? Here to face off are Democratic strategist David Goodfriend and Chris Wilson, Republican strategist. Chris, for Palin to talk about this again and keep this going again, that cannot be good for the GOP, can it?
CHRIS WILSON: I don't think it has an effect on the GOP, but if you want to talk about the way the American people are responding to it, Gallup had new numbers out yesterday that show that actually they’ve responded pretty well. In fact, 70% of Republicans say they would somewhat consider voting for her for president. You have two thirds that think that-
SHUSTER: Right, but let's be careful, though, about the Gallup. Most people said it would have no impact, but actually more people said it was – it made them less favorable, 17% to 9% who said more favorable. So it did cost her, even though most people don't care.
WILSON: Two thirds say they think she should stay a public figure and out front for the Republican Party, but the interesting thing, I thought, since where we are today, is that more than half said they felt like she had been unfairly treated by the media. And so I think all this comes together and you've got to think that now through, well, should we interpret what she’s doing or take her at her word? And I would suggest to you it's worth probably taking her at her word, in that the reason she did this is for personal reasons, she wants to get her family out from underneath the scrutiny that they’ve been under, probably regroup a bit, and if we want to go forward and talk about 2012, this is not an inexpensive process. This isn't a woman that comes from money. She hasn't made a lot of money over the course of her career and this gives her the opportunity now to regroup, to be able to pay off some of her legal fees and be able to go and re-engage with the public, let them – cause us to remember why it is we liked her so much during the presidential campaign, which is the case.
SHUSTER: Well, let’s be clear, I think a lot of people did not like her during the presidential campaign, but David Goodfriend let's get to that point.
WILSON: That’s just untrue.
SHUSTER: If Sarah Palin was concerned about running up the cost and her state having to pay for all of her travel while she was in office, why then, didn't she resign after the presidential campaign when she was making all the trips to Washington and everywhere else, instead of governing from Alaska?
DAVID GOODFRIEND: David, I believe you're asking me to explain Governor Palin's actions, and I cannot.
SHUSTER [LAUGHING]: Yeah, okay.
GOODFRIEND: But a lot of times – a lot of times, what might seem as irrational behavior to some of us, is perfectly rational if we know what's really going on behind the scenes. And my Republican colleague alluded to the fact that Governor Palin really doesn't have a lot of money to speak of, and she has an enormous amount of legal bills and probably, I would guess, is feeling a lot of pressure in that department. There really is one thing I have to say though, we're not talking about the – the big elephant in the room, the elephant representing the Republican Party, and that is Mark Sanford, perhaps the luckiest man alive right now. If it were not for the Sarah Palin story, that absolutely big-footed the scandal swirling around him, we’d still be talking about that governor. And I will also say this, I just have to say this, because in my private practice, I deal with a lot with Alaska native corporations. They're really good folks and there are a lot of good causes up there. I’m hoping that this will be better news for the people of Alaska, that they can actually have a real focus on their issues now.
TAMRON HALL: Well Chris, David and I don't have a private practice, but we do practice TV. Let me ask you, you said it doesn’t – you don’t think it really matters to the GOP – or impacts the GOP – I don’t want to word it wrong. But you've got Steele commenting on her, Boehner commented on her, then you toss in the Republican voters out there, they seem to like her. She does affect the GOP. She is your leader right now if we go by some of the popular polling from Republicans.
WILSON: Well, there are three people right now that are out front if you want to look at 2012, and it’s Romney, it’s Huckabee, and it is Palin.
HALL: No, no, but the polling shows that she – at least the recent polling – shows she leads those two. I can imagine you can say there's a trifecta of leadership-
WILSON: It’s within the margin of error.
HALL: But let's just go to the top of the triangle.
WILSON: Right, it’s within the margin of error.
HALL: She's – if you’re going to go with the poll that she’s popular-
WILSON: Right.
HALL: She’s at the top of the triangle, she’s your leader, so – so does affect the GOP.
WILSON: I think it's difficult to say that she is the leader right now, because she is still the governor of Alaska.
HALL: By polling.
WILSON: But look, I will say that as we come out and as she is able to go reintroduce herself to the American people, because the fact is, is once she joined the Republican ticket, was the only time that John McCain led Barack Obama. So let’s be candid there, she did have a positive impact. She attracted the biggest crowds, she actually exceeded Barack Obama's crowds for most of the case – course of the campaign. And I think once she's able to re-engage Republican voters, she very well may become the leader. And she does not have-
SHUSTER: But Chris, what about-
WILSON: -the financial position-
SHUSTER: -the whole idea that Republicans are supposed to – what about the idea that Republicans are supposed to stand for conservatives values in terms of getting things done? You start a job, you finish it.
WILSON: Right, like Barack Obama did as Senator for Illinois?
SHUSTER: You get where you are because of self-reliance, not because somebody gives you something. And now, Sarah Palin, essentially, to be elevated to the national stage she was given that by John McCain and she’s asking people to give her that again, if she runs in a couple years, based on 2 ½ years in office?
WILSON: I don't really think Sarah Palin’s asking for anything. And you know, as I listen to your commentary here, it's really difficult to understand why 51% of the American people may think she's been treated unfairly by the media. I would say as we look forward to her future, she’s got the ability to go and reintroduce herself to the American people, get out from under the scrutiny of the – of the media and be able to address them directly. Be able to earn a living, be able to pay off legal bills-
HALL: Hey Chris-
WILSON: And be able to campaign full time without having to worry about a paycheck.
HALL: We're almost out of time, I know we’re almost out of time, our producer’s going to kill me. But you talk about her being mistreated by the media. When Hillary Clinton talked about the media, it was Sarah Palin who said stop the whining. When is she going to stop the whining and when are people who support her, maybe even like yourself, going to take her advice that she gave to Hillary Clinton?
WILSON: I'm quoting Gallup numbers, I’m not quoting Sarah Palin’s comments here. 51% of the American people-
HALL: But I mean these – I said people. I said people.
WILSON: -feel that way.
HALL: But Sarah Palin says it, too, that she feels that she's been mistreated.
WILSON: Well, I’m not talking about her, I'm talking about what the American people feel-
SHUSTER: Hey, David Goodfriend, have we been too tough on Sarah Palin?
GOODFRIEND: I’m sorry?
SHUSTER: David Goodfriend, have we been too tough on Sarah Palin?
GOODFRIEND: Well, you can't help but feel a little sorry for her. On the other hand, if you become a vice presidential candidate on the national ticket, you know, if you can't stand the heat, you better get out of the kitchen.
HALL: Right. Thank you.
SHUSTER: David Goodfriend, Chris Wilson, well said. Thank you very much. And Tamron, I've said it before, I'll say it again, Sarah Palin will never recover from this.
HALL: No, you know, I-
SHUSTER: No matter what people say, no matter what these polls, she has no future. At least-
HALL: I, you know, I don't know that the answer to that absolute, but I mean, you're a very smart and wise man that I trust on these things, but David, I – the media part annoys me, because I do think she's a tough woman and I think she can handle it. And I think it doesn’t serve her justice to make her this damsel in distress, when she, and I keep saying this, is the pitbull with lipstick. They need to stop making her the victim. She can take it. She can fish and gut animals.
SHUSTER: Yeah, and in fact it sometimes – sometimes truth – sometimes the truth is tough. Maybe you don’t like – sometimes people don’t like hearing it, but the truth can be very tough.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Shuster's Future?
July 9, 2009 - 15:02 ET by DoktorFrankenA fidiot from MSNBC talking about someone's future. Oh, the irony.
Shuster's Future
July 9, 2009 - 17:01 ET by urbuggenmethink he needs to look at what the rating are for the network he is on ... tak about no future
Squirrels!
July 9, 2009 - 15:06 ET by AgentAmericanSquirrels don't do to well in traffic, therefore, Shuster has no future either.
The more and more Obama's numbers drop, the more and more unemployment rises, and the more and more the "stimulus" is misused, the proportionate the behavior of the scum in the media turns more and more myopic.
This candy ass matters not.
2010: A GOP Hill
Sarah....
July 9, 2009 - 15:07 ET by Prester John....will be making so much money from speech making it will make Schuster's head spin.
She may not be nominated for the presidency, but she will be one very rich woman.
Because Shuster ...
July 9, 2009 - 15:11 ET by SentryDanBecause Shuster said it, it will be so. Sorry, but from what I know about Shuster, he couldn't predict rain if it was falling on his head.
He can't see into the future any better than I can. He needs to crawl, and fast, back under his rock before someone comes along and beats him with a stick.
Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It was bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces.
For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor that the protected will never know.
Also remember folks, that the way to SUPPORT THE TROOPS is to support their mission. Anyone who says that they support the troops but don't support their mission is lying about supporting the troops. And if you want to know, yes I do have a dog in the fight, he is a United States Marine.
If Sarah Palin Has No Future
July 9, 2009 - 15:20 ET by GothampcWhy is everyone breaking their necks to get an interview with her?
If anybody should know about not having a future, it's Shyster
July 9, 2009 - 15:29 ET by SickofLibsShyster, just keep repeating to yourself:
"The boss replaced me with Fat Ed. The boss replaced me with Fat Ed. The boss replaced me with Fat Ed."
The 'talkers' like
July 9, 2009 - 15:37 ET by MidAmericaThe 'talkers' like shuster will make sure Sarah has a future. Everything she says will be slammed by the likes of shuster but never the less she will be talked about by everyone. They have made he a celebrity. Celebrities can always draw a crowd.
In my opinion, Palin doesn't
July 9, 2009 - 15:39 ET by Another Dead KennedyIn my opinion, Palin doesn't have much of a political future, but my reason is different than Shuster's. It all comes down to the primaries. Palin will no doubt be going up against half a dozen or so career politicians, men who have been in this business for 30+ years. They consider themselves to have paid their dues, and they're not going to be happy with the thought of a young, comparatively inexperienced woman coming in and taking their hopes of the presidency away from them. I think they'll be brutal in the primaries.
That being said, the possibility of a Senate seat is much more likely, but I don't think she's aiming that low. We all know she wants the presidency. I'm thinking she'll get a radio show, perhaps a show on Fox News. We'll see.
→ May be right Kennedy
July 9, 2009 - 15:52 ET by Cool ArrowBut I'll buy her book.
And though I think the TV show is a bit much, (who's watching Huckabee?) I'd like to see a commentary similar to the three minutes Brit Hume throws in weekly.
As for the other hopefuls, we could use a few statesmen right now, but I don't see more than a couple of them. And I'm not so sure about them either.
I think someone is out there
July 9, 2009 - 15:57 ET by Another Dead KennedyI think someone is out there who we haven't thought of yet for 2012. There's still a lot of time for a smaller-state governor to gain attention, a stubborn senator who votes against all others on an important bill to gain the national recognition to become a front runner. Sarah Palin is too important to conservatives to disappear. If nothing else she's great for a rally or fund raising, but I think a radio show is in her immediate future. Unless she's really just hunkering down to study up big time for 2012. She's going to have some big competition.
I believe...
July 9, 2009 - 17:10 ET by ontheright...that the groundswell of the grassroots uprising is going to neuter the 30+ somethings. Those career politicians who toe the D.C. line only to maintain power while thumbing their collective noses at the general populous, are going to be in for a rude awakening, and soon...2010 comes to mind.
I'm not Nostrodamus, but I can read the writing on the wall.
"We'll See" is correct
July 9, 2009 - 15:53 ET by BlondeIt's all speculation at this point, but we may very well see Palin, in the short term, as a "King Maker".
I wouldn't believe Shuster if he said the sky was blue.
I hope he fails, too.
B, I'm with you. I'm
July 9, 2009 - 16:12 ET by Another Dead KennedyB, I'm with you. I'm liking Shuster less and less every day.
Dammit, this site is corrupting me!!!
Luuuuke....
July 9, 2009 - 18:22 ET by BlondeCome on over to the Dark Side!
I hope he fails, too.
Blonde, Why would anyone
July 10, 2009 - 08:56 ET by CacciatoBlonde, Why would anyone running for office want someone as toxic as Palin associated with their campaign?
She will never be a king maker.
ILTK
July 9, 2009 - 15:59 ET by jdlybrandCould you not say amost verbatim the exact same thing about Barack Hussein Obama a couple of years ago? Where is he now?
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
Bad example
July 9, 2009 - 16:01 ET by StarAZCould you not say amost verbatim the exact same thing about Barack Hussein Obama a couple of years ago? Where is he now?
Now WE have no future.
You could say that for sure.
July 9, 2009 - 16:10 ET by Another Dead KennedyYou could say that for sure. I think the difference is that Democrats are weak. Edwards and Clinton should have knocked him out of the way before the primaries even began, but it had been so long since the Dems in congress had accomplished anything, they knew they couldn't risk making him look bad in case he became the nominee. Obama's a phenomenon, just like Palin. If this experiment doesn't work, I don't know that the American public will try it again with Palin. But again, we'll see.
Yes, we'll see
July 9, 2009 - 16:17 ET by jdlybrandNo matter, it will be very interesting.And looking back on my first post; sorry about the grammer or lack there of.
"almost exactly verbatim the same thing" (red face)
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
First lesson I learned on NB
July 9, 2009 - 16:22 ET by Another Dead KennedyFirst lesson I learned on NB - never comment on anyone's spelling or grammar skills. It will always come back and bite you in the a$$.
(Unless they're really asking for it!)
→ Kennedy
July 9, 2009 - 16:40 ET by Cool ArrowI'm just hoping for a Jimmah Carter repeat, complete with the handsome cowboy (or more preferably, a certain Montana girl) ridin' in on a white horse to untie us from the railroad tracks.
Hey, my wife is a Montana
July 9, 2009 - 16:55 ET by Another Dead KennedyHey, my wife is a Montana girl!
→ Good for you
July 9, 2009 - 17:08 ET by Cool ArrowI'm probably talking about the other Montana girl, though I understand the confusion given its sparse population.
Kdw don't make me freaking
July 9, 2009 - 18:19 ET by kangarooKdw don't make me freaking laugh, you are the first to be the spelling grammer police, wether we ask for it or not sheeeeeeeeesh lol roflmfao.
You are part of the few who
July 9, 2009 - 18:32 ET by Another Dead KennedyYou are part of the few who "asked for it" pahuber.
I honestly don't know
July 10, 2009 - 01:02 ET by Gary P JacksonI honestly don't know exactly what this means, but watching Sarah's twitter account this weekend, I saw it more than double in followers since Saturday!
In fact, as I was doing some research for my latest blog entry, that is analyzing the media's total lack of understanding, as well as explaining why Sarah will be whatever she wants to be, I found something interesting.
Again, I have no idea what this means, but Sarah has more people following her on twitter than Jindal, Huckabee, Pawlenty, Romney, and Rick Perry, combined, with more left over!
And her tweets are generally about work. (or praising the troops, or praising Alaska! )
She'll do what Reagan did between 1976 and 1980. She'll eat a lot of rubber chicken, give a lot of speeches, talk policy, especially energy independence, and end up getting a lot of conservatives elected.
You older guys remember 1976-1980. Reagan was finished, done, washed up. He was also stupid, lazy, you name it, he was called it by the left and the Rockefeller wing of our party.That bunch needs new material.
I wouldn't count out Sarah Palin for a second. Especially when she goes into attack mode, which she can now, but couldn't as Governor because of all of the ethics BS
http://thespeechatim...
Shuster on future of Clinton, Edwards, Franks, Spitzer...
July 9, 2009 - 15:45 ET by Gary HallSurely, it's a safe bet that Shuster made the same statement about the future of Bill Clinton, John Edwards, Barney Franks, Ted Kennedy, Spitzer... etc.
Right?
(|~/ gary
Who the Flying Fubar is
July 9, 2009 - 15:49 ET by mattmWho the Flying Fubar is David Shuster to say anything about anyone? This is so typical of the media elite who try to make reality by speaking it into being.
These people are dangerous retards. (No offense meant to any intellectually challenged individuals out there)
Matt
July 9, 2009 - 20:43 ET by DoktorFranken''Who the Flying Fubar is David Shuster to say anything about anyone?''
I believe that MSNBC created Shuster from various excremental solids and fluids that came from Bathtub Boy hisself, Mad Dog Keith. Hence his nickname, Scheiße Shuster.
My apologies to our friends in the Germanic speaking countries.
Hummmm,,,,
July 9, 2009 - 15:51 ET by jdripperAnyone who works for MSNBC, has trouble stringing together two grammatically correct sentences, has a face made for radio and a voice made for a deaf mute class should not talk about anyone else's future.
Jack
"If at age 20 you are a conservative then you have no heart. If at age 30 you are a liberal then you have no brains." Sir Winston Churchill
Do ya' think...
July 9, 2009 - 15:53 ET by jdlybrand... there's some kind of office pool or contest each day at MSNBC to see which anchor can be most outrageous. My money is on Shuster. It's almost like he's got some kind of mental condition. And I mean seriously!
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
I made money on Shuster!
July 9, 2009 - 16:57 ET by IamTinmanAnd I've parlayed it on Chris Mathews before spring sweeps. I'd put a few bucks on Keith, but I believe his own venom has immunized him. Maybe a wooden stake?
Like...
July 9, 2009 - 15:59 ET by StarAZLike this snide little twit has a future.
Shuster has no present.
July 9, 2009 - 17:33 ET by ThalpyShuster has no present.
ACTOR NOT ANCHOR
July 9, 2009 - 16:48 ET by jm1656please use the former
Palin
July 9, 2009 - 16:59 ET by Nearly NobodyBloggers if you think she is all done make a post with her name on it and watch the hit count go off the charts. I have changed my mind. As the libs like to say about every Joe Blow they drag out of the gutter. She is a rock star!!
Conservative Blogs Central
It is so obvious...
July 9, 2009 - 17:15 ET by PA Conservativethat Soros and his pals at MSNBC are crapping their pants over Palin. Olberterd and Shitster have been in an absolute froth since she announced she was resigning. All out attack mode since Friday. They clearly have their marching orders from Soros and the administration as to how they want to play the "Palin situation". I wish they knew what clueless aholes they all really looked like. I'm embarrassed for them.
PAC
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends,
it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to
institute new government...
shuster....
July 9, 2009 - 17:29 ET by pantryman.......is such a blowjob......
Who has a more promising future
July 9, 2009 - 17:46 ET by ArminiusSarah Palin or David "Mr. Lispy" Shuster? Shuster's demotion from Fox News to MSNBC indicates that Shuster doesn't have much of a future.
Sarah Palin ‘Has No Future’
July 9, 2009 - 18:11 ET by CTAnd David Shuster does???
Please, this asshat is beneath contempt.
→ CT
July 9, 2009 - 18:15 ET by Cool ArrowRealistically, Palin stands to make only $20 million in the coming year.
Maybe it sux to be her, but I'd be wearing shades.
THAT was a great song
July 9, 2009 - 18:19 ET by BlondeAnd a perfect sentiment, here.
I hope he fails, too.
→ Blonde
July 9, 2009 - 18:26 ET by Cool ArrowWhether she sets herself and family up comfortably for life, or builds a war chest and comes out swinging, I hope the best for her.
Personally, I want to see her at the plate.
CA
July 9, 2009 - 18:42 ET by BlondeGo check out Big Hollywood.
There are two excellent articles about Palin there (one by John Zeigler). I posted both earlier.
After reading articles and listening to what she's had to say, I suspect Palin is going to come out swinging, but in a way all her own. I think she's going to become a political superstar (the way Hillary was before she was eclipsed by The One)....and promote conservative candidates and ideas. Fundraising is key....and as the BH article said....Palin is the "belle of the ball". Plus, she'll be building political capital for later, if she needs (or wants) it.
I, for one, would love to see her stump here in Florida for Marco Rubio, a fabulous young conservative, in his primary race agains the RINO Charley Crist. I truly believe Palin will be able to affect real "change" (for a change, sorry) if she chooses to promote true conservative candidates/positions. My money is that this is going to be her course.
I hope he fails, too.
→ Thanks, Blonde
July 9, 2009 - 18:48 ET by Cool ArrowI did click on you Ziegler link earlier and enjoyed it.
Sarah has also committed to campaign for our Gov. Rick Perry.
Looks like she's going to be pretty busy for somebody who is so much the has-been.
NB better recompute. FOX News just quoted Obama's gap at -8.
Personally
July 9, 2009 - 18:48 ET by jdlybrandI share your sentiments. Palin 2012.
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
Just keep thinking
July 9, 2009 - 19:00 ET by Tom in NCJust keep thinking that Shyster and maybe in 2016 we can look forward to seeing you with a trash can on your head like James Carville after Bush was elected in 2000
MSNBC?
July 9, 2009 - 19:27 ET by BufordBeside the folks on this site, the 13 viewers of MSNBC are the only people who knew what he said. Who cares?
I'll keep my freedom my money and my guns, you can keep the "CHANGE".
Shyster, you have a lot of gall
July 9, 2009 - 20:56 ET by RukusSarah has lot better future than the guy your drunck ass killed with your car! Hypocrite!
Gary
I want my country back!
What a D!CK - For a bunch
July 9, 2009 - 21:53 ET by ParalegalGoddessWhat a D!CK - For a bunch of people who think she is a waste of time and space they sure do spend A LOT OF TIME talking about her. If she's so over, why are you wasting your time.. Oh wait, I know --- because if you actually paid attention to your "leader" you'd realize what an ass he is.
These guys are just hoping
July 10, 2009 - 01:13 ET by RR GOPThese guys are just hoping that if they keep laying it on Palin will stay away...that is, they think their strategy's been working and they just want to make sure.
Of course I have not great insight into Mrs. Palin, but I can't help but to think she'll be back in a big way and looking for some pay back.
She had already gotten a lot of this before the RNC convention and she knocked Barry's proverbial block off with her speech.
She's dealt with stuff like this for years in Alaska, so I'm not buying into the whimping out aspect.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
HMMMMM
July 10, 2009 - 08:19 ET by rick007These liberal assholes ain't seen nothing yet. Wait till shes completly free from from office and she gets to the national scene.
This woman is gonna turn all the MSM idiots into Drunkin Kennedys. LOL
She will win the people with he honesty.
You don't have to be worldly to know that if you have a dollar you can't buy a 2 dollar item.
If you have untaped energy in the ground and you retrive it then you don't have to purchase it from the Saudies.
You don't try to barter with the Russians or Chinese while begging for a loan from them.
Has anybody seen the photo of "O" Dumbo checking the young chicks rear at the G8? He was wishing the M's was small like that.