Reacting to a speech by Republican Party Chairman Michael Steele during Tuesday’s 3:00 EST hour on MSNBC, anchor Norah O’Donnell declared: "In case you missed it, we compiled the greatest and the best of Michael Steele. Some people said that a lot of the cliches he used in his speech you could string them together and it would make a bad Hallmark card." An edited clip of Steele’s speech was played, highlighting his calls for Republicans to turn the corner.
A laughing O’Donnell turned to Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons and Republican strategist Phil Musser to discuss the future of the GOP: "Alright, Phil, did you get the point that the honeymoon is over, the navel-gazing is done? There was a lot of this emphasis on turning the page, which is all well and good, but there was no prescription for change in what the Republican Party's going to do. Isn't that a problem?" Musser shot back: "Well, I think Michael Steele is making an important point that you can only be on defense for so long, and with all due respect to your setup, which keeps us on defense, you know, that I think that the Republican Party has acknowledged their sin, certainly paid the measure of price for it and are now in the process of moving forward with proactive ideas."
Not satisfied with mocking Steele, O’Donnell next decided to accuse him of going after President Obama’s children: "Well, let me ask, is moving forward -- does moving forward, including essentially using the President's own children, Malia and Sasha, as part of a political argument? I mean, listen to what he said today." A clip was played of Steele criticizing Obama for revoking funding for the Washington D.C. school voucher program: "While the President sends his kids to a private school, he is at the very same time taking away opportunity scholarships from poor Hispanic and African-American kids right here in our nation's capital."
Rather than debate the issue of whether the President was being hypocritical by sending his children to private school while denying other D.C. parents the same choice, O’Donnell turned to Simmons and asked: "Jamal, I mean, shouldn't the President's kids be off limits? Why do you need to use his kids in order to make the argument about charter schools?" Simmons replied: "They absolutely should be off limits. Except for making fun of Jenna Bush sticking her tongue out back in the Bush years, Democrats pretty much left President Bush's daughters alone."
Later, O’Donnell opened up yet another line of attack against Steele, citing a Washington Times article that reported that Steele was paying RNC staffers substantially more than their predecessors: "...on a day that clearly the Chairman is trying to turn the page and he's saying 'everybody, let's start fresh,' I think what he's trying to do. There's a story in the Washington Times...It says this, quote, 'Steele brought along long-time,' this is about his staff and questions about salaries, 'Steele brought along long-time personal assistant Belinda Cook and gave her a salary nearly three times what her predecessor made."
O’Donnell then asked Musser: "Doesn't that kind of -- I mean he criticized the President for profligate spending and it looks like he's got huge salaries at the RNC." Musser pointed out the absurdity of the comparison: "Look, you can't compare the spending that's going on in the Obama administration to a couple of staff salaries that are disclosed, you know, publically at the RNC."
Here is the full transcript of the segment:
3:34PM SEGMENT:
NORAH O'DONNELL: And RNC Chairman Michael Steele says the nation needs the Republican Party now more than ever. But without a clear leader, has the Grand Old Party really turned a page, as Michael Steele suggests? Well, let's bring in Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons and Phil Musser, Republican strategist and former executive director of the Republican Governors Association. Alright, welcome to both of you.
PHIL MUSSER: Hi, Norah.
O'DONNELL: In case you missed it, we compiled the greatest and the best of Michael Steele. Some people said that a lot of the cliches he used in his speech you could string them together and it would make a bad Hallmark card. Listen.
MICHAEL STEELE: We're going to take the President head-on. The honeymoon is over... I have news for them. We are not going to be silent. We're going to speak up and we're going to show that we have the courage of our convictions... We are declaring an end to the era of Republicans looking backwards... the era of Republican navel-gazing, done... Introspection, ladies and gentlemen, is now over. The corner has been turned... You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong... We are going to speak truth to power.
O'DONNELL [LAUGHING]: Alright, Phil, did you get the point that the honeymoon is over, the navel-gazing is done? There was a lot of this emphasis on turning the page, which is all well and good, but there was no prescription for change in what the Republican Party's going to do. Isn't that a problem?
PHIL MUSSER: Well, I think Michael Steele is making an important point that you can only be on defense for so long, and with all due respect to your setup, which keeps us on defense, you know, that I think that the Republican Party has acknowledged their sin, certainly paid the measure of price for it and are now in the process of moving forward with proactive ideas. And Michael Steele's job is to help get that messaging environment more focused and move that debate forward, and that's what he's trying to do today. And it was received pretty well by the RNC members, it may not be on TV-
O'DONNELL: Well, let me ask, is moving forward -- does moving forward, including essentially using the President's own children, Malia and Sasha, as part of a political argument? I mean, listen to what he said today.
STEELE: While the President sends his kids to a private school, he is at the very same time taking away opportunity scholarships from poor Hispanic and African-American kids right here in our nation's capital.
O'DONNELL: Jamal, I mean, shouldn't the President's kids be off limits? Why do you need to use his kids in order to make the argument about charter schools?
JAMAL SIMMONS: They absolutely should be off limits. Except for making fun of Jenna Bush sticking her tongue out back in the Bush years, Democrats pretty much left President Bush's daughters alone. The real problem here, Phil, is you can't beat something with nothing, and right now the Republicans aren't offering the country anything positive about where they want to take the country and what they want to do. Even when you take a look at the upcoming Supreme Court fight, what you have are Republican Senators, and the Republican Party, already organizing against prospective Democratic candidates to oppose them. But we don't even know who the name is yet, they're already ready to say no. You've got to have something positive to offer.
MUSSER: Yeah, I'm not sure that's totally true. I think that the -- I think the rebirth of the Republican Party is starting to happen in the states. I mean, take what Tim Pawlenty's doing today in Minnesota, okay. He vetoed about $2 billion in new DFL proposed taxes last week and he sent the DFL legislature home, essentially, and he's going to balance the budget and constitutionally meet his responsibilities in Minnesota. It's a model for leadership that Republicans nationwide need to emulate. And also look at Mitch Daniels in Indiana -- what I'm saying is-
SIMMONS: Your model for leadership was a veto-
MUSSER: No, my-
SIMMONS: -not a proposal. Where's the policy about how to move the country forward, get us out of the ditch that George Bush put us in?
MUSSER: Well look, I mean, the bottom line is the Democrats are in power a part of what he's saying here is that a two-party -- Michael Steele is saying -- is that a two-party system is healthy, Jamal, because we need to be an organized loyal opposition. You guys are the running the show here. This is now your turn, okay. George Bush is gone. You cannot run against him anymore-
SIMMONS: Americans want you guys to offer solutions.
MUSSER: And so what -- and so what -- what Michael Steele is saying is it's time to take that playbook and look forward and be -- and be loyal and respectful in that opposition
O'DONNELL: Let me ask you on a day that clearly the Chairman is trying to turn the page and he's saying 'everybody, let's start fresh,' I think what he's trying to do. There's a story in the Washington Times, this is not the New York Times, this is the Washington Post [Times]. And let me read from it, It says this, quote, 'Steele brought along long-time,' this is about his staff and questions about salaries, 'Steele brought along long-time personal assistant Belinda Cook and gave her a salary nearly three times what her predecessor made. Cook's son also landed a job at the RNC. Steele hired another family friend, Angela Sailor, to be the Party's outreach director to a salary of $180,000, more than double her predecessor's compensation.' Phil, I had Senator Inhofe on here to talk about -- about not closing down Gitmo, but then I asked him about this story. He said he hadn't seen, he said 'if that's true I'm going to look it up. That's a real problem and we're going to end it.' Doesn't that kind of -- I mean he criticized the President for profligate spending and it looks like he's got huge salaries at the RNC.
MUSSER: Look, you can't compare the spending that's going on in the Obama administration to a couple of staff salaries that are disclosed, you know, publically at the RNC. I have no idea about the specifics of this matter. I'll talk about Angela Sailor, someone that I know and have a lot of respect for, she's got a huge portfolio that centrally focused at addressing one of the principle challenges the Republican Party faces, how do we-
O'DONNELL: $180,000?
MUSSER: Worth every penny, okay. How about reaching out to the Hispanic community, reaching out more -- with a more cohesive message -- to the African-American community. Angela is spear-heading one of the kind of central efforts of coalitions outreach that is a hallmark of Michael Steele's campaign. You pay for good talent.
SIMMONS: Look, Angela Sailor's a wonderful woman. I've known her for many years. But let me just tell you, I worked at the Democratic National Committee. If I was getting $180,000 I would have probably never left.
[LAUGHTER]
MUSSER: I made $21,000 when I worked at the RNC-
O'DONNELL: Exactly.
MUSSER: Look, I'm going to defend -- I'm going to defend-
O'DONNELL: Well, let me just-
SIMMONS: But let's get to one more issue, Newt Gingrich is back. Newt Gingrich joins up with this new group today and we find out the faces of the Republican Party right now are Dick Cheney and Newt Gingrich. Michael Steele is not the face of the party.
O'DONNELL: Let me just show you quickly, let me just show you something, can we get this up there, the Gallup poll that shows the Republican support shrank among nearly all major subgroups in the last ten years. College graduates, down 10%. Down 9% among 18 to 29-year-olds, Midwest voters, moderate Republicans, and those earning between $30 and $75,000 a year. Phil, are you concerned about Republican shrinkage?
MUSSER: Yes, I am concerned about Republican shrinkage. I think any Republican with a right mind on their head has to be concerned about it, but also needs to understand the historical tides in this country and understands that we're fundamentally a center, center right country, and over time I believe that we are going to be able to kind of come back against that grain as Obama overreaches to the left and fundamentally the balance will shift. But, you know, are there-
SIMMONS: So you're betting on failure.
MUSSER: Are there -- are there-
SIMMONS: You're betting on failure.
MUSSER: I'm not betting -- I'm betting that the big government solution, which is essentially mortgaging the future of our country by borrowing and spending and taxing, you know, as far as the eye can see-
SIMMONS: Give us something to be for, okay.
MUSSER: -it's going to be an overreach.
SIMMONS: Give us something -- if you give Americans something to be for-
MUSSER: But I-
O'DONNELL: Guys, I've got to wrap this up. It was a great discussion guys, but I got to wrap it. Jamal Simmons and Phil Musser, great discussion.
MUSSER: I'll be for something next time, how about that Jamal?
SIMMONS: Okay.
MUSSER: Alright, man.
O'DONNELL: Thanks guys, I appreciate it.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
O'DONNELL: In case you
May 20, 2009 - 12:20 ET by SvenO'DONNELL: In case you missed it, we compiled the greatest and the best of Michael Steele. Some people said that a lot of the cliches he used in his speech you could string them together and it would make a bad Hallmark card. Listen.
Translation:
"Damn!! This was an effective speech! We must try and downplay its influence and effectiveness!"
Hey Nora, when you idiots in the Drive-bye media take time to ridicule things like Mr. Steele's speech, Sara Palin, Dick Cheney etc., we know it's got you folks on the left scared!
"Some people
May 20, 2009 - 12:39 ET by mattm"Some people said..."
They do this alot. "People say..." "Many insiders are saying..." etc. I wonder who they are...
mattm
May 20, 2009 - 12:46 ET by SvenIndeed!
This is a tried and true tactic Katie Curic likes to use: "Some people are saying..." with that constipated look on her face. I wish the conservatives on these panels would start asking: "So Nora, who are these people...specifically?"
Agree
May 20, 2009 - 13:51 ET by doug1950Just once I wish a smart conservative (notice I did not say Repub) would call Katy down on the use of that term.
"Katy, you really like to use that phrase, could you provide me with some names instead of just saying "some people"? Then when she could not, follow up with....
"Well, aren't you the one who got all pissy with Sarah Palin for not being able to list or name the publications she reads regularly?"
Conservatives besides Ari and Ann, Laura need to be able to think fast on their feet and hammer these hypocrites to the wall. Our leaders are about as effective as Biden at keeping their feet out of their mouths.
We learned in WWII flying over Germany with our...
May 20, 2009 - 16:10 ET by jawebster1bombers that we were going to draw a lot of flack. If any Republican doesn't draw flack from Liberals then he is not doing his job and he is not over target. OBTW, in case you missed it, Rush resigned from his job as "Titular Head" of the Republican Party today. He said he didn't ask for it, didn't want it and was hereby handing the job off to Colin Powell since he (Powell) knows so much about what Republicans want in their leaders. Jim Webster
O'Donnell has went to the
May 20, 2009 - 12:23 ET by bigtimerO'Donnell has went to the far-left side long ago....I can't stand to see her face, because I know the blather that is going to come out of her mouth.
These people are fearful of what is to come, and we all know it...that was a mighty big stretch she used there trying to include O's precious kids when it comes to the double-standard of what O has done with the D.C. vouchers...it is horrendous what the man has done for his lobbyists...let alone not having to twist his arm at all in the first place....he wants all education to be controlled by the govt...everyone knows that, especially the deep-pockets of the teachers union.
O doesn't give a rats rear about anybody else's kids, he could care less....as long as his children get the best....O'Donnell, that is called a double-standard, hypocrisy...something you really need to get your head out of your arse about so you can see the light, along with being able to smell the coffee.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
The Point Is....
May 20, 2009 - 12:52 ET by GeneralAlThe point is the shot was taken at Obama and not his kids! This is the same kind of journalist malpractice that they used on the chimp cartoon. Standard left wing distortion! Stretch the statement to mean something entirely apart from the real meaning! Barfffff!
Howdy GA... Right you
May 20, 2009 - 13:47 ET by bigtimerHowdy GA...
Right you are...and the point wasn't lost on me at all...I just got carried away there with the hypocrisy of it all.
Like I said, they all make me sick, but Norah is someone I refuse to even waste my time listening to anymore.
Both Brewer and her have become some of the rudest witches on msnbc...they must be in competition for raise...along with fame and fortune.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Unlike most Liberal women, O'Donnell has a very nice face. I...
May 20, 2009 - 16:01 ET by jawebster1agree with you that what comes out of her mouth is stupid. Makes you wonder why she is a Liberal in the first place. Most Liberal women are unappreciative of the way they look so they are haters which is understandable but what is her excuse? Was she dropped on her head as a baby? Jim Webster
Bt, I can't see any useful purpose for her...
May 20, 2009 - 16:29 ET by ThalpyBt, I can't see any useful purpose for her except that she's a great shill for the Democrat party.
whora and the GOP
May 20, 2009 - 12:32 ET by east tennessee johnYes Jamal, a model for leadership can be a veto, moron. Again, I ask, what's it to these dems if the GOP is going under? Maybe, just maybe, conservatism makes a come back? Afterall, not only do they have to fight the Dems, they have to contend with the fifth columnist rinos. Rinos die or go Dem, the real battle can begin, in earnest.
Go After the Media
May 20, 2009 - 12:32 ET by allanfIt is time for Republicans to start attacking folks like O'Donnell in a gentle but firm way. Unless viewers are told of the reporters bias, these questions are accepted at face value.
PMSNBC
May 20, 2009 - 12:43 ET by jessieHjessieH Ask Sara Palin if the president's kids are off limits. They( the dems.) tried to destroy her family.
So.......
May 20, 2009 - 12:45 ET by GeneralAlThe statements of the left just don't jive! If the answer for Republicans is to become like Democrats, then Americans want a one party system. That being the case, it would make the establishment of a Communist government much easier. They'd merely have to refer to the polls and say "They voted for this!"
I think the truth is they know that a Conservative platform wins for Republicans all the time. If the Republicans were doomed to destruction by moving to the right, the Liberals would be encouraging it!
Musser what the Republicans Need??
May 20, 2009 - 12:52 ET by actionRead the interview again. Musser is on the defensive during the entire interview. If he represents the virulent Conservatism that this country needs, no wonder the Republicans are in trouble. Why aren't the Repubs aggresive during these "interviews?" Always defending.. never attacking. When are we going to stop thinking that the Repubs are the answer to the Dems..they're not!! Republican does not equal Conservative! Time for a third party.
I have long since had
May 20, 2009 - 13:12 ET by Chris NormanI have long since had it with these so-called Republican "strategists" (who no one outside of the beltway has ever heard of) who have the nerve to speak for my party. These guys seem to cluster on CNN and MSNBC which really arouses my suspicions. If these bland liberal Republicans really are representative of the thought at the RNC we really are in trouble. However, I don't think they necessarily do, and they seem to exist more to give the answers and weak defenses that CNN and MSNBC want. Has anyone at NewsBusters ever investigated just who these "strategists' are and just where their loyalties lay?
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Here's a really bad Hallmark card:
May 20, 2009 - 13:33 ET by OxyCon"Change you can believe in"
"Hope"
"Yes We Can"
"We are the ones we've been waiting for"
"Audacity of Hope"
"Dreams of my Father"
Obama is walking, teleprompter talking, really bad cliche factory.
Bob the Builder
May 20, 2009 - 14:42 ET by ThermistoclesI cringe every time I hear "Yes we can."
I've watched way too many children's shows. This is an animated kiddie show where Bob and his crew of talking construction equipment fix everything. The slogan goes something like, "Can he fix it? Yes he can." The cheer on the show sounds so much like the Obama folks it's scary and funny at the same time.
Obama the animated series for children. Kind of like a toy with lead based paint.
Hey, don't diss Bob the
May 20, 2009 - 16:38 ET by motherbeltHey, don't diss Bob the Builder!
He's the ideal man...he never says "Later, honey!" never asks someone else to bring him his tools, and can build or fix anything in 20 minutes!
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
He's the ideal man...he
May 21, 2009 - 06:26 ET by Dan The Man 2He's the ideal man...he never says "Later, honey!" never asks someone else to bring him his tools, and can build or fix anything in 20 minutes!
Is that like saying some porn star is the ideal woman, she never says no and can fix things within a few minutes? LOL Both are fictional charaters.
I love Michael Steele!
May 20, 2009 - 13:50 ET by goldbarI love Michael Steele! He's exactly what the republican's need at this point. Go after Obama in a public forum and keep going after him. I was worried for awhile that he might be fired but give the guy a chance. GO MICHAEL STEELE!
→ Goldbar
May 20, 2009 - 13:57 ET by Cool ArrowGlad to see you still see the light.
I wouldn't go so far as to say I "love" him, but he's addressing the issues we care about.
"I was fighting a war in Iraq!" - Nancy Lugosi
Norah O'Donnell asserts:
May 20, 2009 - 15:19 ET by TENorah O'Donnell asserts: "Why do you need to use his kids in order to make the argument about charter schools?"
In one sentence O'Donnell has provided all the evidence needed to determine that she is not only a leftist tool but a very stupid leftist tool, to boot.
Obama's decision to stop funding the program that paid for Washington, D.C., children to attend private schools had nothing to do with "charter schools"! O'Donnell gets all of her "news" from her identically like-minded leftist useful idiots in the Washington/New York press corps, so she has no idea that Obama supported defunding the Washington, D.C., voucher program that provided kids, like Obama's kids, the opportunity to escape the cesspool of public schools and attend PRIVATE schools!
Be kind TE
May 20, 2009 - 15:33 ET by Cool ArrowYou wouldn't expect Obama's kids to go to an upscale school that also educates poor black children, would you?
Certainly wouldn't want evidence surfacing every year at graduation, that a superior, less expensive, alternative to public unionized teaching exists.
"I was fighting a war in Iraq!" - Nancy Lugosi
Ensign, are you for real
May 20, 2009 - 16:16 ET by NL207Ensign, are you for real here?
It all boils down to the
May 20, 2009 - 15:47 ET by SnappyIt all boils down to the same argument. With my liberal friends to what I see on the tv. The argument is always "stand for something" ie where is your plan? then when you offer one its immediatly shot down as not serious. Then you get rolled into the "be more centrist, the people want a middle of the road politician"...no, the "People" do not want a middle of the road politician, Democrats want Republicans to be middle of the road, or more precisely, they want them to be weak Democrats, not Republicans. Its insane, it would be the same if say, John McCain listened to the media and followed Democratic talking points in trying to win an election against a Democrat, wait a minute... I think that happened, but regardless you get the picture. I will never understand where they get off trying to tell Republicans how to be proper Republicans.
Sounds to me like Nora O'Donnell is...
May 20, 2009 - 15:54 ET by jawebster1a racist. I heard clips of Michael Steele's speech on Laura Ingraham's radio show. For the first time since he assumed his post, I was very, very pleased with what he had to say. I agree with him that no one likes Pelosi, but I disagree with him that no one knows who Harry Reid is because since he has become known, his popularity has plunged and contrary to what Steele said, we do understand Barney Frank. He speaks Liberalese which is very easy to interpret. Higher taxes, bigger government and save money by cutting back on our national security unless union jobs are involved. See, simple! Jim Webster
→ Webster
May 20, 2009 - 15:56 ET by Cool ArrowYou understand Barney Frank?
He suffers from Anderson Cooper Syndrome, so I don't understand half of what he says.
"I was fighting a war in Iraq!" - Nancy Lugosi
Doesn't Mel Blanc Jr. do
May 20, 2009 - 16:27 ET by Chris NormanDoesn't Mel Blanc Jr. do the voice for Barney Frank?
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Speaking of teabag cooper
May 20, 2009 - 16:28 ET by RESTLESS 1Link
"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
→ Ain't it sad Restless?
May 20, 2009 - 16:37 ET by Cool ArrowPlummeting ratings so bad, he feels he has to apologize.
But I can't help him because I never was one of his regular viewers.
"I was fighting a war in Iraq!" - Nancy Lugosi
Yeah, it's bringing a tear to my eye
May 20, 2009 - 17:13 ET by RESTLESS 1Oh wait, that's just sweat. :)
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
Barney Frank is a Liberal gay guy. What's so hard to...
May 21, 2009 - 03:33 ET by jawebster1understand about that? Instead of saying no one understands Barney Frank, Steele should have said no one believes Barney Frank. That would be more truthful and more to the point. Jim Webster
We Conservatives would win
May 20, 2009 - 16:12 ET by NL207We Conservatives would win this great public debate cold over Obama and his ilk if we could simply shut these media hacks up completely and talk directly to the people ourselves.
The problem has been and remains that no Conservative is allowed to present their ideas to the public at large through MSM news without this hostile editorial commentary they inject. The public does not hear what the Conservative speaker said, it hears a redacted version editted by the MSM or very often, an MSM report of what was said without any of the original content at all.
Ronald Reagan was the last Republican with the communication skills to pierce this news blackout. How long will it be before another Reagan comes?
There will never be another Reagan
May 20, 2009 - 16:26 ET by RESTLESS 1And I don't see anyone even close. How depressing is that?
"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
On the subject of good
May 20, 2009 - 17:01 ET by SnappyOn the subject of good speakers... I dont have a lot of info on political leanings on issues, but I have been very impressed with the schoolings that Liz Cheney has been giving the media on torture. A very concise well spoken and informed speaker who doesnt back down.
Snappy... Hear, Hear! I
May 20, 2009 - 17:16 ET by bigtimerSnappy...
Hear, Hear!
I hope she runs for something politically, we need her.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Excuse me while I rant
May 20, 2009 - 17:18 ET by danebramageShot back? Shot back?
This is exactly the problem. We're shot at and we don't shoot back. "With all due respect," "I think"...please, give me a break. These people give no respect and they're due none in return. A real man--a right proud American--would shoot the snark right back at these people. He would call them what they are right to their faces. He wouldn't do it hatefully, the way they do it, but rather matter-of-factly, because, as a matter of fact, he would be right. (Along this line, I think even Ann Coulter pulls her punches too much sometimes. This is not inconsequential stuff we're talking about here. These are life and death issues. Are we supposed to endanger our lives and freedom for the sake of comity with a bunch of evil, sneering liars?)
Who cares if they'll be mad and never invite us on their programs again? First of all, that won't happen. They need us, because no matter how much they wish it were otherwise, half the country would instantly recognize they were getting no play on national TV. Second, even if it did happen, that would just create a vacuum to be filled by conservative or truly non-partisan shows and hosts.
We need to stop pussy-footing around and start throwing hardballs right back at these "newscasters'" heads.
db... Couldn't agree
May 20, 2009 - 17:35 ET by bigtimerdb...
Couldn't agree more...been saying the same thing for years...
I'm still waiting.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Excellent point! Being on
May 20, 2009 - 19:07 ET by Clear thinkerExcellent point!
Being on the defensive side of things sucks, it's high time we went with offense. Like this... http://iamnotaracist.wordpress.com/
Seriously. Who the hell
May 21, 2009 - 02:16 ET by RR GOPSeriously. Who the hell wastes their company's money advertising on this and several other networks? I believe it's some kind of tax dodge, but still...
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).