CBS’s Smith to RNC Chair: ‘Room For Moderates’ In GOP?

Photo of Kyle Drennen.
  • Bookmark and Share

Harry Smith and Michael Steele, CBS On Thursday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith talked to Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele about Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter switching to the Democratic Party: "Alright, so you see red states going to blue, though, in this last presidential election...You look at percentage-wise, lower numbers of people who declare themselves to be actual Republicans...Where does the future of your party lie?...Is there room for moderates?"

Smith began the interview by asking Steele: "Olympia Snowe mourned his [Specter’s] loss earlier this week. Rush Limbaugh said he was dead weight, good riddance. Who's right?" Steele was unequivocal: "Rush. I'm sorry, I'm not weeping here. I'm sorry. You know, look, Harry, in 2004, when Senator Specter ran for re-election...he whined and moaned and groaned and convinced the White House, and Senator Rick Santorum, and the Republican leadership at that time, to save his seat, to help him get re-elected. So all this, you know, rank-and-file crazy noise about conservatism, he didn't mind it in 2004 when his seat was on the line."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Smith followed up: "So this -- this choice...from your view is a middle of -- about political expedience, and not about-" Steele interjected: "Oh, my goodness, yes...Oh, this has nothing to do with philosophy and principle and all those wonderful-sounding words. It has -- is cold, crass, political calculation by a Senator who could not get re-elected through a nominating process in the Republican Party."

In response to Smith’s question about there being "room for moderates" in the Republican Party, Steele explained: "Absolutely. There's room for everybody who wants to be a part of a party that believes first and foremost in the value of the individual to make decisions that empower him or herself to run their businesses, raise their kids, go to the schools of their choice, and then basically work their way towards the American dream...this notion that somehow, you know, because we're conservatives our doors are closed and we only take certain types of people is just crazy. This has not -- never been the nature of this party."

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

7:11AM SEGMENT:

HARRY SMITH: We want to talk with Republican National Chairman Michael Steele right now this morning. Good morning, sir.

MICHAEL STEELE: Hey, good morning, Harry. How are you, man?

SMITH: Pretty good. I want to first talk about Arlen Specter, his defection to the Democratic Party.

STEELE: Yeah.

SMITH: Olympia Snowe mourned his loss earlier this week. Rush Limbaugh said he was dead weight, good riddance. Who's right?

STEELE: Rush. I'm sorry, I'm not weeping here. I'm sorry. You know, look, Harry, in 2004, when Senator Specter ran for re-election, he had -- he was challenged in the primary by Pat Toomey, former Congressman Pat Toomey, and he whined and moaned and groaned and convinced the White House, and Senator Rick Santorum, and the Republican leadership at that time, to save his seat, to help him get re-elected. So all this, you know, rank-and-file crazy noise about conservatism, he didn't mind it in 2004 when his seat was on the line. So here we are in 2008, after he cast a, I think, a debilitating vote on the stimulus bill, it went against core principles-

SMITH: So this -- this choice-

STEELE: -and the party said that's enough.

SMITH: -from your view is a middle of -- about political expedience, and not about-

STEELE: Oh, my goodness, yes.

SMITH: Okay.

STEELE: Oh, this has nothing to do with philosophy and principle and all those wonderful-sounding words. It has -- is cold, crass, political calculation by a Senator who could not get re-elected through a nominating process in the Republican Party.

SMITH: Alright, so you see red states going to blue, though, in this last presidential election.

STEELE: Yeah.

SMITH: You look at percentage-wise, lower numbers of people who declare themselves to be actual Republicans.

STEELE: Yeah.

SMITH: Where does the future of your party lie?

STEELE: Well, the future lies down the road a bit. I mean, look, I'm not going to sit here with, you know, pie-in-the-sky talking about, you know, how wonderful things are. They're not. This party-

SMITH: Right. Is there room for moderates?

STEELE: Absolutely. There's room for everybody who wants to be a part of a party that believes first and foremost in the value of the individual to make decisions that empower him or herself to run their businesses, raise their kids, go to the schools of their choice, and then basically work their way towards the American dream. You know, this notion that because-

SMITH: There are folks in your party, though, who would say -- who would-

STEELE: But wait, Harry, let me make this point.

SMITH: Okay.

STEELE: But let me make this point, this notion that somehow, you know, because we're conservatives our doors are closed and we only take certain types of people is just crazy. This has not -- never been the nature of this party. This party has been-

SMITH: But the -- but the larger conversation that's going on in the party is it's not conservative enough and there are people within your own party who say, 'you know what, John McCain was part of the problem. He was too moderate. That's part of the reason we lost this election.'

STEELE: Well, look, I think that's more -- using terms to reflect an attitude, or a process, in which the Republican Party moved away from certain core principles. We moved away from valuing, you know, frugality, and government expenditures, and the growth of government, by growing the government 40%, by spending on bridges to nowhere, raising the debt of this nation. So yeah, we had a direct hand in that. And the core base Republicans of this party, and conservatives across this nation, looked at that and said enough was enough. Look, they didn't reject our value for life. They didn't reject our value for economics, you know, our views on the economy, and our views on war and peace, in the last two election cycles. What they rejected, the voters rejected, was our failure to lead, and to stay to, I think, our core principles.

SMITH: Alright, Michael Steele, thank you so much for joining us this morning, do appreciate it.

STEELE: Thank you, Harry.

SMITH: You bet.

STEELE: Alrighty.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Okay...Here we go...

More of the MSM trying to paint the Republican party as nothing but a bunch of intolerant, ignorant, backward, bigoted, right-wing extremists who are only interested in having others in the party who think exactly alike.

To the MSM, if you're anti-abortion, you're anti-woman...if you're anti-gay marriage, you're a bigoted homophobe...if you're anti-illegal immigration, you're an isolationist immigrant hater...And the list goes on...

Nothing that anyone says or does will ever change how the MSM portrays conservatives and Republicans...Their minds are made up, and this will never change... 

"...peace is the highest aspiration of the American People. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it, we will never surrender for it, now or ever." President Ronald Reagan~ January 20, 1981

Hey Hairball,

Is there room for people who aren't flaming gay marxist America hating goose-stepping socialist weenie morons in the the party you propagandize for while posing as a journalist?

Hmmm.... let me think...

Nope.

I'm going to go with

No, and its a "Oh hell no!" kind of no.

 

btw side note: good interview by Steele. Seems to be improving 

I have only ever made one prayer to God, a very short one: O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it - Voltaire

...

He was good there.  Hope he keeps it up.  Just say what you believe.  That's what I want.  None of this namby-pamby, politically-correct self-censorship and correction to not offend lefties.  The left is allowed to offend all that is decent, good, and right and they get away with it.   Enough!

Defector and Eugenia...Right on!

Steele does seem to be improving, thank heavens. And you're right, Eugenia...No more pc answers and responses...The MSM will hate Repubs/conservatives no matter what, so say what you think and believe and forget being pc... 

"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan

Does anyone remember them

Does anyone remember them asking questions even remotely like this when Lieberman left the democrat party?

n2sooners, what I see happening is...

That the next defector will be Joe Lieberman - from being an indy to becoming a Republican. Let's face it - Specter has been nothing but a RINO all along and I agree with El Rushbo - good riddance and don't let the door hit you on your a** on the way out!

Lieberman is just waiting for the opportune moment to spring his announcement and I believe it's going to be later this year. Remember, he still has an major axe to grind with his former party and this would be the perfect scenario for him. His move to become an indy was only part of his strategy - he's not done moving yet!

I'll bet a steak dinner on it - excuse me while I fire up the grill...

"Inferior people should not be employed." - Firesign Theatre

Or when Corado's

Or when Corado's ex-senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell switched parties after the '92 revolution. All we got was the "white male temper tantrum" routine...

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Harry Smith and others of

Harry Smith and others of his ilk do their daily diligence for the leftist party to do their best to rid the repub party of the real patriots in this country and the real back-bone of the 'R' party ...the conservatives.

Good luck fools, and if any of the big wigs behind the scenes in the 'R' party don't have a clue yet, they will reap what they sow.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Re moderates

We do need to make room for 'moderates', depending on how you define them. But Specter was much more than simply a moderate. He worked to sabotage the Republican Party and conservative initiatives. He put his own personal glorification above any sense of party and purpose and unity. Like McCain sometimes, he seemed to enjoy poking the Republican Party and conservatives in the eye.

Let's hope that his day yesterday in the spotlight was his last. I believe he will find that the democratic party is far less tolerant of strays in the Senate than the Republicans have ever been.

Exactly right sw... I don't

Exactly right sw...

I don't care if 'moderates' depending on how you define them as you say join, what I do care about is them thinking they control or are ever going to control the 'R' party...by forcing us to change or leave the party.

There is a real fight going on inside the party and the conservatives will win...well, they had better, or a new party will have to be formed, something will have to change.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

...

If the day comes that the republican party even remotely considers dropping or loosening the prolife stance from the platform, I'm outta there. 

Hi Eugenia... You won't

Hi Eugenia...

You won't be alone...not by a long shot!

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Eugenia...I can't imagine...

that ever happening...Championing a pro-life stance is one of the absolute bedrock principles of the party, and I just can't see that changing...I think if it did, there would such a mass exodus of folks, there would be no more Republican party. 

"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan

Finally we get the Man of Steele

Wow! Steele gives an interview that doesn't make me cringe.  Keep it up, Michael! This is why I supported you in the first place.

Liberal: remove all that's Right, and this is what's Left.

A Conditional Apology

to Steele that becomes whole hearted if he sticks in this mode...

Dear Harry, Voting with

Dear Harry,

Voting with Republicans 40% of the time doesn't make you a "moderate" Republican, it makes you a Democrat. As such, no, there is no room in the Republican party for Democrats.

By the way, how come you never hear the phrase moderate Democrat, or hear folks like Harry ask if there is room in the Democrat party for "moderate" Democrats? I mean, wasn't it the Democrat party that ran Lieberman out...a man who is just about as liberal as they come, except on one issue...national security?

What Harry Smith said is not media bias...

..... it is true. The majority of hard core conservatives want to kick out the RINO"s and return the Republican party to their conservative roots.

It is admirable that some folks want to stick to principles rather than get votes, hopefully it won't backfire on them in 2010 and 2012.

 

He had my vote

It's a legit question

One of the main arguments being made about the Specter defection is the tolerance of moderates in the party.  These are the words from Olympia Snowe in Politico...

"You haven't certainly heard warm encouraging words about how [the GOP] views moderates,” said Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe, one of the few remaining moderate Republicans in the Senate.

Snowe said the party's message has been, “Either you're with us or you’re against us.”

 

Now, I don't think there's any question that Spector's decision was soley based on political survival.  But, when a member of the GOP who gets reelected with 70% of the vote says this is a problem... why is Harry Smith being criticized for asking the question?  He shouldn't be.

Hey Harry, is there room

Hey Harry, is there room for any moderates at CBS???  "Where does the future of your network lie"?

 

 

 

The Democrat party and its

The Democrat party and its media friends are overplaying their hand.  They really believe the country has forever turned away from conservatism.  I don't believe it for a second.  It was not all that long ago that Bush was re-elected (maybe he's not a pure conservative, but that is definitely what the public perception was) and Republicans picked up seats in both congressional houses, sending Daschle back home.  Once again, they're claiming that tax cuts "didn't work," when they most certainly did work for most of Bush's term in office.  And the reason that the number of people who call themselves Republican has dropped is because the R's were not conservative enough, and they lost some of their base.  Leftists are misrepresenting reality (what else is new) when they portray this drop as the country moving to the left. 

 

The most successful war America has ever waged is quickly becoming President Obama's war on capitalism.

PrarieSky

Here is the long and the short of it. If the American public knew what Conservatism is and the basics regarding the Right Wing of the Republican Party, they would discover that the overwhelming majority of them are Conservatives and would be mostly comfortable in associating themselves with the Republican Party AND it's political candidates.

The democrat party's entire existence is TOTALLY DEPENDENT upon the complicity of the MSM to 24/7 misinformation campaign to the American public about who they are and their campaign to falsely identify Conservatives.

In short, it is this simple. WE ARE SIMPLY LOSING THE INFORMATION WAR and in turn losing the souls of the American people.

Now, there are certain voting groups that we will NEVER win and I am torn as to whether we should even make any further attempts at winning them over. As popular as Conservatism was and how the word "liberal" was a dirty word, mainly during the 1980's, ceratain groups still thought of the Republican Party as nothing but a group of rich white men. The latter definition has now been successfully hung on us thanks to a "Liberal Worshipping MSM". The moment that ANY Political Conservative shows ANY signs of becoming politically popular, the MSM immediately grabs the gasoline and does their liberal duty of burning them to death; i.e. Sarah Palin, for one. 

The ONE and ONLY answer is for us to formulate an absolutely killer information campaign defining Conservatism, not in another month, not next week, not tomorrow, not today BUT YESTERDAY! Don't worry about advertising this candidate or that candidate. Forget all that for now. Start the campaign by featuring every day Americans, testifying as to who they are, what they believe in and why the define themselves as Conservatives. This campaign should run 24/7 with the actors changing regularly. In due time, the Conservative candidates will emerge and the American public will recognize them for who they are and what they stand for, the commonality that we all know that Americans truly share as natural Conservatives.

Now, I know that something like this would be expensive but if we direct the funds at this rather than at the skeletons of Conservative candidates that have been burned to death by the MSM, I sincerely believe that we will prevail in the next to elections.

The American people are mostly CONSERVATIVES but other than Evangelical Christians they mostly do not know it. EVIDENCE: CHAIRMAN OBAMA, COMRADES REID AND PELOSI!    

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.