At the top of Wednesday’s 3:00PM EST hour on MSNBC, anchor Norah O’Donnell declared: "Well, the back and forth between Rush Limbaugh and RNC Chairman Michael Steele continues. A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows the GOP's approval is sinking fast, only 26% of those polled give the party a positive rating." O’Donnell spoke to Jennifer Skalka, editor of the blog Hotline On Call, and asked her about Rush: "Rush Limbaugh, today, really upped the ante, for the first time, saying he wants to challenge Barack Obama to a debate on his show...What's he doing? Is he walking into the trap that the Democrats, including President Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, set? Which is to try and anoint and make Rush Limbaugh the face of the Republican Party."
Skalka replied: "Well, you kind of get the feeling that Rush Limbaugh is enjoying being the face of the Republican Party, whether or not that hurts the chairman of the RNC and congressional Republican leaders, Rush Limbaugh is another big personality." O’Donnell followed Skalka by wondering: "But politically speaking, when we showed the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, that the party's approval ratings are 26%. And they've done polling that shows Rush Limbaugh is very unpopular with the independents. How does it hurt the Republican Party to have Rush Limbaugh as the face in many ways?"
In a segment near the end of the hour, while discussing the issue with Democratic strategist David Goodfriend and Republican strategist John Feehery, O’Donnell reiterated the idea that Limbaugh was somehow falling into a Democratic trap: "...are the Democrats just licking their chops? I can just only think as soon as I was told what Limbaugh said on his show today, that he challenged the President to a debate, I can only imagine they were laughing at the White House, that he's taking their bait."
Following the earlier segment with Skalka, O’Donnell spoke with correspondent John Harwood about the latest poll numbers: "Our new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows Democrats are winning the public opinion race and Republicans are losing the tug of war...The president's favoribility is his highest ever, 68%... On the flip side, just 26% view the GOP positively. Their all-time low...It's pretty bleak for the Republicans right now, isn't it?" Harwood replied: "Well, it's very bleak. And I got to tell you Norah, I don't think this Rush Limbaugh thing could be working out much better from the point of view of the White House and Rush Limbaugh. Just everybody except actual Republican politicians..."
Here is the full transcript of the segment at the top of the hour:
3:00PM TEASE:
NORAH O'DONNELL: Plus, is Rush ready to rumble? The conservative talker issues a new challenge today for President Obama as the chatter heats up on who's really in charge of the GOP.
3:00PM SEGMENT:
NORAH O'DONNELL: And we just mentioned it, who really is leading the Republican Party? Well, the back and forth between Rush Limbaugh and RNC Chairman Michael Steele continues. A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows the GOP's approval is sinking fast, only 26% of those polled give the party a positive rating. Jennifer Skalka, the editor of Hotline On Call, joins me here now. Jennifer, how many Republican leaders are now worried that Michael Steele is the chairman of their party, that he's a loose cannon when it comes to being on television?
[ON-SCREEN GRAPHIC: IS GOP SINKING FAST?]
JENNIFER SKALKA: Well I haven't heard anyone come out personally and say that he's a loose cannon, but there's certainly a lot of rumbling going on behind the scenes and in the conservative blogosphere in particular. I can tell you that in my recent past life as a reporter with the Baltimore Sun I covered Michael Steele's Senate race and he is known for foot-in-mouth moments, so this is nothing new. He -- he compared embryonic stem cells research during that campaign to Nazi medical experimentation in front of a collection of Jewish leaders in Baltimore and spent three days apologizing for that. So -- so Marylanders know well that, you know, he's a big personality and sometimes he definitely says things he probably shouldn't say.
O'DONNELL: So this is not new, him sort of having foot-in-mouth disease, as some -- as some might say. But anyway, Rush Limbaugh, today, really upped the ante, for the first time, saying he wants to challenge Barack Obama to a debate on his show. Rush says he's not the leader of the Republican Party, but he wants to debate Barack Obama. Let's listen.
RUSH LIMBAUGH: If you want bipartisanship, I mean, what are we -- what better definition of bipartisanship could there be than you coming to debate me on these issues of the day? This is not, Mr. President, a cheap trick just to get an interview.
O'DONNELL: What's he doing? Is he walking into the trap that the Democrats, including President Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, set? Which is to try and anoint and make Rush Limbaugh the face of the Republican Party.
SKALKA: Well, you kind of get the feeling that Rush Limbaugh is enjoying being the face of the Republican Party, whether or not that hurts the chairman of the RNC and congressional Republican leaders, Rush Limbaugh is another big personality.
O'DONNELL: But politically speaking, when we showed the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, that the party's approval ratings are 26%. And they've done polling that shows Rush Limbaugh is very unpopular with the independents. How does it hurt the Republican Party to have Rush Limbaugh as the face in many ways?
SKALKA: Well, I think it hurts them, obviously, in attracting new, younger, more moderate voters into the fold. But remember that the conservative base, in many ways, abandoned the party in the last presidential election and Rush is still enormously popular with the base. He gets them very excited. And we're seeing that in their defense of him in this Michael Steele squabble.
O'DONNELL: Let's play Michael Steele, because he was on the Today show this morning and responded to questions about who really is in charge, let's listen.
MICHAEL STEELE: There are a lot of opinions out there. Some come from people who are notable. Some from people who are not so notable. And my job is to try to balance that. I wasn't that effective at it this week. But, you know, I've been I'm 30 days on the job and we'll get -- you know, we'll move forward. And that's what I'm about at this point.
O'DONNELL: He's 30 days on the job, he's says he's made some mistakes. But the bigger question a number of Republicans here in Washington are raising is, there's no political director at the RNC, there's no finance director, that person just recently left. There's almost nobody left at the RNC, except a couple of consultants that are advising Steele. He says he's doing it to clean out the party and restart it anew, but is that part of the problem?
SKALKA: Well, I think part of the problem is that he's show-boating on television instead of doing some of the internal reorganizing that members want to see him doing. You know, he's got a big task ahead of him, from fund-raising to revamping the online operation for the party. There are some pretty -- pretty big tasks ahead and I think there are folks who want him to get to it and stay off the air for now.
O'DONNELL: No doubt, and our poll certainly shows that. Jennifer Skalka, for the Hot Line, thanks so much.
SKALKA: Thanks, Norah.
O'DONNELL: And it's the tale of two parties. Our new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows Democrats are winning the public opinion race and Republicans are losing the tug of war, if you will. The president's favoribility is his highest ever, 68%. Two-thirds of Americans are more hopeful about his leadership. 60% approve of his job in the Oval Office, and 49% have a positive view of the Democratic Party. Another near record high. On the flip side, just 26% view the GOP positively. Their all-time low. Respondents blame President Bush and congressional Republicans for the most partisanship in Washington. 56% think the GOP's opposition to Obama is politically motivated. And Republicans lose by nearly 30 percentage points on the question about which party would do a better job of leading the country out of recession. Let's get right to CNBC's John Harwood. John, you're a genius when it comes to the polls. It's pretty bleak for the Republicans right now, isn't it?
JOHN HARWOOD: Well, it's very bleak. And I got to tell you Norah, I don't think this Rush Limbaugh thing could be working out much better from the point of view of the White House and Rush Limbaugh. Just everybody except actual Republican politicians, who've got to get support from voters out there. But look, in these numbers, yes, the Republican Party brand is extremely low. It's rock bottom right now. However, there are also some warning signs for President Obama and his agenda, which may be one of the reasons why they're so eager to talk about Rush Limbaugh. When you ask people in this poll, 'does government do too much or should they do more to solve our problems?,' 51% say government should do more, but 40% say government's doing too much already. You've also got 60% in this poll, 61% actually, saying they're concerned that government's going to spend too much, which is why you saw President Obama out there today with this event about defense contracting, making the point that he's going to clamp down on excessive spending. 'Yes, we're going to spend a lot of money, but I'm going to cut down on waste and make Joe Biden the sheriff,' and all that stuff. So it's a very good time for Barack Obama, generally speaking, but there are some blinking yellow lights there.
O'DONNELL: You know, when you talk about that, it is interesting, 51% want the government to do more. One other thing I thought was interesting, given that there's a health care summit there at the White House tomorrow, that 49% said they're willing to pay higher taxes so everyone can have health care insurance. Seems like a high number to me, except if you look back to the Clinton years, when they tried to do health care reform, and that number was at about 66%. Does that suggest a waning of support? I mean, how would you rate that number, that 49% say 'yeah, I'll pay more taxes'?
HARWOOD: Well, you've also got in the mid-40's people saying they won't. And what I think it tells you is that for all Barack Obama's popularity, which is considerable, he hasn't suspended the laws of polarization in this country. You still have some pretty serious division. Now, Obama's doing well personally among independents, extremely strongly, of course, among Democrats. But he's got some fights here and you look at the reaction of some people to his budget, Olympia Snowe, one of the people that made the difference on the stimulus package, saying that the budget Obama has come out with 'falls woefully short' on the issue of fiscal responsibility. That is another one of these warning signs. He's going to have to get Olympia Snowe, and Susan Collins, and Arlen Specter, and maybe some more people, and a lot more on things like health care, where you're really trying to form a new national consensus. It's not going to be easy. This new President's carved out a very, very large job for himself.
O'DONNELL: And on that, of course, we asked about the current partisanship, or lack of bipartisanship, in Washington, and here's what we found. Only 14% believe there's bipartisan cooperation. 79% say same partisan divide. 29% blame the Republicans for it. 14% blame the Democrats. The President ran on a message of change.
HARWOOD: Exactly. And that's one of the ways, I think, Norah, in which the President's outreach, even if it didn't result in votes, is benefitting him. He is making Republicans look like their playing politics by opposing him, even if they make the argument that they're having principled objections to his plan. But again, the desire for bipartisanship is something that's real, it's been consistent in American politics except when you get to voting time when people do tend to fall, in most cases, along party lines and whether Barack Obama can change that, in terms of the distribution of votes on some of these very contentious issues, energy, health care, reform, entitlement reform, still remains to be seen.
O'DONNELL: Brilliant as always. John Harwood, good to have you on, thanks so much.
HARWOOD: You bet.
—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
These guys can keep
March 5, 2009 - 15:16 ET by ApacheThese guys can keep talking. But just a little more of this Obama character and Americans will carry Limbaugh into the Whitehouse and force him to be president as they force Obama out. MSNBC is more corrupt than a Chicago politician.
Apache... Now that's
March 5, 2009 - 15:31 ET by bigtimerApache...
Now that's Change I can believe in!
MSM and the DNC sinking
March 5, 2009 - 17:22 ET by TruthMongerMSM and the DNC sinking fast because of Limbaugh - we know what this is really about:)
this is how they've chosen to circle the drain i guess
That must be why Rush is on Richard Milhouse Obama's enemy list
March 5, 2009 - 16:22 ET by jazbo(Sorry for insulting Nixon, folks).
Those who believe in nothing will believe anything.
→ Milhous
March 5, 2009 - 16:27 ET by Cool ArrowNixon kept me out of Vietnam by two days.
Love him.
Obama - Change you can bereave in
MSNBC now pretends to care about the GOP???? Huh??
March 5, 2009 - 16:34 ET by bpjamWell, having three of four people who are all liberals talking about how successful their plot to destroy the GOP in their own public opinion polls is going is not exactly a news story - it's the war room.
Maybe the guys at MSNBC could figure out why THEY are so unpopular. THAT would be an interesting story. But since they spend more time conspiring with the Clinton War Room guys to destroy Rush Limbaugh, they aren't paying attention to the fact that they have rapidly become a gigantic liability to NBC and to GE. But at least, like suicide bombers, they will have given their careers up for a good cause - defeating the Republican efforts to oppose The Messiah.
Obama Akbar!!!!
Sinking Fast
March 5, 2009 - 19:49 ET by allanfWhat happened to Bush or Palin or McCain as scapegoats. Boy these guys all hit the same theme at the same time.
Every time
March 5, 2009 - 15:19 ET by UpNorththe DJIA takes a nose dive, the dems release a new poll, totally distracting people from seeing what's going on.
And no, folks just want the government to work, to govern as little as possible, and get out of the way of people who actually create jobs, make payrolls, and employ their neighbors. They don't care that the "President's carved out a very, very large job for himself". That's his choice, a bad one, but his. Universal healthcare will be a nightmare, his defunding the military will be a disaster. If hoping those policies fail is "unpatriotic", call me unpatriotic.
Upnorth... it seems clear,
March 5, 2009 - 16:14 ET by celatorUpnorth... it seems clear, as you say, that this is a set up distraction to focus people's attention on something other than the disasterous economic results Obama's policies have created.
But what's really interesting is how ALL the Old Media is using exactly the same timing, words, phrases, and talking points to create the distraction. It's clear they are repeating something written from one source, without checking, without any balance, as though they were trained seals working for a piece of fish.
That "sameness", which makes them look like they are following orders, is what is most revealing of all.
The Government cannot give to anybody anything which the government does not first take from somebody else. Dr. Adrian Rogers
Yup,
March 5, 2009 - 20:11 ET by UpNorthCelator, the talking points orginate in Rahmbo's office, go out to Stephie, Carville, and the forehead, Begala. From there, they probably get e-mailed to everyone else. How else to explain the sameness of the talking points?
Meanwhile, the Obamunist stands on the balcony of the White House and fiddles as American investment burns.
Molon Labe!
Here is a good question.
March 5, 2009 - 15:23 ET by ApacheHere is a good question. Let's just give them that Rush is the face of the Republican Party. Let's just assume that's fact. Why is it that Dems can't find a citizen who can stand up and be the face of their party? Is that just against their ideology?
It isn't against their ideology
March 5, 2009 - 15:28 ET by sherylsimsIt's just that in order to get deep enough into the mind set of the Democrat thought process requires one to become mentally impaired and then they are just a big angry walking joke.
→ Good question
March 5, 2009 - 15:29 ET by Cool ArrowBut Rush is the voice of conservatism. I know he'd cross the street to pour a glass of water on Arlen Expectorant if he was on fire, but it would be strictly a humanitarian act he'd perform for anyone.
Obama - Change you can bereave in
The Face of the Dems
March 5, 2009 - 16:02 ET by exLibWell, here are some prior examples:
The Jersey Girls, Anti-war mom what's her name,
Ann Coulter did an entire book on it. The faces of the Democrat Party tend to be "attack-proof-victims".
The Dems would NEVER put forth a normal, healthy, stand-up person as a "face" of their party, becaus then they would have to seriously debate issues. The media totally covers them on this.
Someone mentioned Oprah as the private citizen...
March 6, 2009 - 04:47 ET by jawebster1who most represents the face of the Dimocrat Party. At least she campaigned for the Messiah. Rush never campaigned for McCain. Rush is the voice of Conservatism, not the Republican party which unfortunately includes the likes of McCain, Collins, Snowe, Specter and Lindsey Graham. (There are others...remember Lincoln Chaffee?) RINOs all! Jim Webster
Oh what a bunch of pure BS
March 5, 2009 - 15:28 ET by bigtimerOh what a bunch of pure BS from all of these pathetic creatures...by the way, I am sick of hearing about this poll, of course real repubs are dissatified with their party, they have been for a very long time, what was your first clue you dim-wits, you had better just be worrying about your leftist future with O leading the way who is destroying this country...just wait until Cap and Trade takes place, plus the nationalization of health care...
Btw....Norah thinking she knows when someone is brilliant just makes my day...perfect example is her calling Harwood such...by the way speaking of Harwood, O's numbers are not 68% any more at all, in fact with a margin of error the last I saw somewhere yesterday they would be in the upper 50's...guess it is just what poll you decide to pull out of your hat for your agenda.
For me this is just becoming comical when it comes to the left and their tactics...
Here is a good article from The American Spectator that I read and also heard Rush mention .....speaking of brilliant leftists.
bt.....I only hope...
March 5, 2009 - 16:01 ET by BEGRUNTthey keep poking the stick in the lions cage.......because the lion has just had about enough of this stupidity.
"Blago got in touch with his inner dirt bag"
Dennis Miller
Howdy Begrunt... ...So do
March 5, 2009 - 16:07 ET by bigtimerHowdy Begrunt...
...So do I friend, so do I!
NORAH O'DONNELL'S GREATEST JOURNALISTIC QUESTION
March 5, 2009 - 15:34 ET by Sgthulka"Did you bring any protection?"
Norah O’Donnell is a lying Marxist propagandist
March 5, 2009 - 15:34 ET by R D HelmI don't believe her, or that so called "poll."
When the revolution comes, Norah O’Donnell and the rest of the MSM liars need to be rounded up and packed off to North Korea.
And no, I am not kidding.
-Dave
Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.
R.D, I'm with you all the
March 5, 2009 - 18:16 ET by obxrayR.D, I'm with you all the way. I blame just about all that is going on on the MSM.Demwit's are who they are but the msm is not informing.They know that a majority in this country do not pay attention.If it does all go down someday, they are the one's in my sight.
IS GOP SINKING FAST?
March 5, 2009 - 15:44 ET by JTPI would rather go down with Captain Rush than hang on to the floating garbage drifting aimlessly with these rats.
"I need more cowbell!" SNL
good little girl
March 5, 2009 - 15:44 ET by candanceKeep that drumbeat going just like they want you to. I am always amused that every time Democrats need a distraction Rush mysteriously pops up in the news.
Beating on a comment Rush made six weeks ago just to keep the controversy going. Why can't we all just moveon.org
Rush - STOP, don't walk into it!
March 5, 2009 - 15:45 ET by SickofLibsThose wily, clever trappers Emanuel and Obama.
Obama is also an world class fisherman, as he knows all about those bobbing floaty things that go up and down every day, you know like the stock market.
Only problem is that Idiot & Co. tied an anvil to the bobber.
O'Donnell, take your "they've done polling" crap and shove it.
Complete BS, besides
March 5, 2009 - 15:48 ET by SlicksterComplete BS, besides independents are a waste of time, drones who cannot make a decision.
Yep
March 5, 2009 - 15:54 ET by doug1950These are the same jackasses that hold up the line at the grocery store because they can not decide because of the magnatude of the decision, on paper or plastic. The great 10-15% of the unwashed as we call them at our house. They like to refer to themselves as "free" thinkers. Problems is they do not think at all, but are controlled by polls and emotions. A pox on their houses!
→ Lieberman's the worst
March 5, 2009 - 16:00 ET by Cool ArrowThat whiney little twit suddenly is shocked to hear Hillary Clinton loves Hamas more than Israel, even though it's been reported she called her husband's campaign manager a "jew-bastard"
No evidence she ever called Hamas a bunch of "ragheads".
But Joe Lieberman is appalled.
Who didn't see that coming?
Obama - Change you can bereave in
MSNBC ought to recognize
March 5, 2009 - 15:50 ET by ConservativeRexMSNBC ought to recognize something that's sinking. They ought to tend to their own cooking as my late beloved Meemaw used to say. They have enough worries to be able to worry about what Rush is up to.
Any weak kneed jellyfish we lose because of anything that Rush has said we need to be shed of anyway.
I don't buy anything any liberal is saying. They think they are clever with their "divide the Republicans" strategy. They are just clever by half.
Rush is a Conservative, Newt is a Republican, there is a difference. But, liberals are just plain liberals in any common party.
CR... Right you are when
March 5, 2009 - 16:01 ET by bigtimerCR...
Right you are when it comes to the liberal party....I will throw in the so-called critters that have thought it cool to register as Independents in the last decade, the majority of those are liberals, which the left love to use in their polls too, or by their phone banks, the Washington Journal and the lines for callers are a perfect example, the have demsm repub, and Independents lines, 99% of the time all on the I lines are screeching leftists too...
Btw...I registered as an Independent over 30 years ago now...I didn't register that way because I thought it was cool to do and I didn't want the leftist liberal label pinned to me, like these nimrods are doing now...it is aggravating.
Why are Liberals so concerned about the Republican Party?
March 5, 2009 - 15:52 ET by The Smokin FrogFor people that won lock, stock, and barrel, they are so very concerned about the Republican Party and Conservatives and Rush Limbaugh. And they should be. One day the electorate may actually educate themselves enough to realize that they elected a bunch of crooks, liars, cheats and thieves to 'rule' them. What will happen then? When liberty and freedom are gone, what power will they have to reverse their selfish debacle? Hopefully we won't wait as long as Germany did under Hitler to defend ourselves. Hopefully we will be willing to fight to protect the Republic that so many died to give us. The common, average, liberal citizen today, is a pathetic excuse for a 'neighbor'. Neighbors care for each other. Neighbors don't live in complete covetousness of what others have.
I thank God every day for Rush, and I pray for his protection as well. The liberal establishment are haters to the core and we have not seen the limit yet, that they would go to to destroy their perceived enemies and this Republic.
TSF Protests!
Thank you liberal media!
March 5, 2009 - 16:04 ET by KHalpernI am so touched that liberal media outlets are concerned about the image of the GOP and conservatives. Just think how worse off they would be if MSNBC weren't looking out for them.
I think the word "brilliant"
March 5, 2009 - 16:06 ET by Karinis tossed around too much these days. Even the Weekly Standard used it to describe some zero speech. Come on, TWS, they don't do a thing for me!
Anyway, that poll they're dragging out...I follow Rasmussen, and they do a generic dem vs. rep poll. The gap used to be huge. 6/2008: Dem 47%, Rep 34%. Now: Dem 41% Rep 39%.
Soooo ...
March 5, 2009 - 16:16 ET by Crash... what's the congressional approval rating!?
Note to the hee haw gang on the left: Rush doesn't hold public office ... the Dems are "in charge." Rush has no constituents and he is not a representative for the GOP. Rush is a SUPER COLOSSAL, MEGA SUCCESSFUL conservative commentator who's analysis of the news is dead on, pinpoint accurate most of the time. And the phrase "Drive by Media" is a classic.
I agree that the GOP needs to weed out losers like the three traitors who voted with the fascists democrats. Linsey Graham and McCain can take a hike too. Next time I'll say what I really mean.
BTW, F-ck the "independents", they helped elect a man without an ounce of executive experience because they liked the word "hope" ... BRAVO!!!
"A man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument." Hilmar von Campe
sorry guys and gals
March 5, 2009 - 16:31 ET by soosanWe can all be mad, but instead of sounding like the anger management candidates that the media paints us, we should be thinking strategically about how to wrestle back countrol of our country. BTW I still think Rush is acting like he's in charge of conservatism/Republicanism - he's not. He is an entertainer with conservative beliefs - he isn't the reincarnation of William Buckley. Some of you folks sound as enamored of Rush as the Libs do of Obama. Let's plan on winning on 2010, not bickering in front of the folks who will cast the votes. You can't hear anyone elses voice over Rush's - that better not be all we have in our arsenal or we're toast.
You can't hear anyone elses voice over Rush's
March 5, 2009 - 16:59 ET by Prester JohnThat's the problem, there aren't any other voices on our side who is willing to get out there other than Ron Paul.
Who in the GOP is forcefully putting froth any sort of alternative to Obamamania? They are all too busy goveling before the MSM.
Oh sure, there are people like Coburn, Cantor and Pence, but in the current enviornment the MSM will only pay attention if forced to, but aren't leaders supposed to lead?
The MSM and our side are focusing on Rush because 1) the Clintonistas in the WH are looking for revenge from what happened in the 90s and 2) there is no one else out there.
"The Truth is treason in the empire of lies"
www.campaignforliberty.com
Prester... Right you
March 5, 2009 - 17:09 ET by bigtimerPrester...
Right you are...plus I posted somewhere else with your same sentiments here about the Clinton team and Rush yesterday...quite a bit here and there...they want him/others silenced and have been working on this for years now...Soros and his various groups, money and connections have been the big step up to achieving all their goals...this is also being done to attempt to justify what the FCC does with the Durbin Amendment he got passed...on and on it goes.
This fight against Rush has the left with their agenda trying to kill two birds with one stone.
You win in 2010 by standing
March 5, 2009 - 17:05 ET by fitzfongYou win in 2010 by standing for your principles in the face of a socialist takeover. You don't win by watering down your ideology just to appeal to a collection of limp "undecideds". We tried that in 2006 and 2008 but the ideological freelancers were swayed by emotional appeals. When you let yourself get taken in by style over substance, you fail to realize that you've been used. As soon as they've gotten what they want from you, you get dumped...and the fall is hard. There comes a time when the so-called "independents" have to pay the price for letting their emotions overcome their intellects. Unfortunately, we're all stuck learning the hard way for these emotional infants in the so-called "middle".
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Sorry,
March 5, 2009 - 20:21 ET by UpNorthbut I'll listen to anyone who can articulate why we shouldn't blindly follow the dems and 0 down the primrose path. If that's Rush, and if a few folks are convinced conservatism is better than socialism by listening to Rush, so much the better. That's a few more people than we had last week. If he wasn't effective, do you really believe the dems would go to the trouble they've gone to, to demonize him and R's in general?
Rush is not acting like he's in charge, I doubt you listen to him. He's just acting like what he is, a commentator. He has the right to comment, and the wherewithal to comment, via his show.
It's not so much that the
March 5, 2009 - 16:30 ET by Trix RabbitIt's not so much that the RNC is sinking fast as it is that MSNBC is stinking strong.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
this makes about as much sense
March 5, 2009 - 16:37 ET by katainkentas a cat being concerned the canary cage is open.
If Rush is so bad for
March 5, 2009 - 16:52 ET by ckc1227If Rush is so bad for Republicans, why is the other side so desperate for Republicans to distance themselves from him? Hello, is this thing on?
Hey Norah, in case you haven't noticed it, this country is under assault by your new communist president. How about getting a clue.
ckc... Buying two or
March 5, 2009 - 17:02 ET by bigtimerckc...
Buying two or three vowels wouldn't even help her get a clue.
Or even 4, BT.
March 5, 2009 - 17:11 ET by ckc1227Or even 4, BT. :)
Meanwhile, the Dow down again today, and her genius leader is telling people our problems are being caused not by the current mortgage crisis, but by health care costs.
The Wish of The Dim Bulbs
March 5, 2009 - 17:08 ET by DelsaThey are the MSM so what they say must be true and there is only one side presented so?????
Who can prove them wrong? Who can stop them?
Madcow from MSNBC said it when she said, "Once SOBama's socialist agenda is passed, and it will be...".
Is SOBama going to far, pushing for too much too soon? NO!
HE is pushing NOW because HE will NEVER have another chance.
We as Americans are really screwed. We are loosing our income and our homes. And now we will live under a glistening pecked Chavez wanna be.
How Sad fo us all. GOD help us all!
The GOP is sinking? Egads....
March 5, 2009 - 17:05 ET by dborschjr68Well, then as an independent Conservative, I guess I should think about becoming a liberal and joining up with the Dems, right? It seems to be the only thing to do to save myself, once the Dems completely destroy the GOP. I mean, if the MSM says it's looking poorly for the GOP, then it must be true.
Yeah, it would be better for me to swear allegiance to the sure-bet winning party than to ally myself any further with those loser GOP boneheads. Thanks, MSM, for showing me the way! I owe ya one, there.
“You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.” -Winston Churchill.
F**K Socialism. -Me.
I actually don't disagree with the 26% approval rating...
March 5, 2009 - 17:10 ET by gopcongress...that the republicans are currently showing. Frankly, I may even be one of the 74% at times, because I think the GOP is currently too far to the LEFT of where it should be. I would wager that if they actually conducted the poll in a fair and unbiased manner, they would find that more people are becoming conservative WITHOUT regard to party.
In fact, virtually EVERY poll is worded to promote the LIBERAL agenda. Instead of asking why Obama has sunk at a GREATER RATE in ratings than virtually EVERY president in recent history, they keep on blasting the 65% approval rate. All the other polls are similarly biased.
In my own polling across the country, I find that actual, man on the street type polling tells me quite the opposite. In more cases than naught, people are hip to the idea that the Mainstream Media is, for all intents and purposes, a subsidiary of the Democratic/ Green/ Socialist/ Communist party. Once my site is up in June, I will be able to provide far more detailed information on this aspect.
Suffice to say that what you see in the polls is not a real poll, but a direct manipulation and, frankly, bastardization of the reporting process. Pure and simple.
______________________
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist—The progression is clear as day.
It's NBC. They Make Their Poll Numbers Up.
March 5, 2009 - 17:23 ET by farstar99This is just another lie.
polls
March 5, 2009 - 21:34 ET by soosanthe only thing that is going to keep Obama from continuing to sink in the polls is the perception that the mean spirited Rush is victimizing him. hello.
Oh, please. That is the
March 6, 2009 - 09:17 ET by fitzfongOh, please. That is the lamest, most tortured, amateur hour analysis I've read in some time. With thousands of people losing jobs in the private sector every week due to Obama's socialist market interference, the last thing anyone is going to be concerned about is how "mean spirited" Rush Limbaugh is to Obama. Give it a rest.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Norah
March 5, 2009 - 17:47 ET by NorthCoasterNorah, you Leftist tool! You've swallowed the Party Line hook line and sinker. Are you in on any of the strategy planning calls, so that you coordinate your story with Carville, Begalla, Rahm and Stephanopoulis? No? Well it sure sounds like the party line to me! you read the talking points so well, that one would think that you were a participant in the planning!
What Polls?
March 5, 2009 - 17:49 ET by GeneralAl68% approval rating for the Obamessiah? Where are they taking this poll, in Harlem or at DNC headquarters? Did you notice that there was no mention on Congress's numbers? I subscribe to the idea of NBC [Never Believe Commies!].
Norah O'Clueless!
March 5, 2009 - 18:46 ET by blazermaniacThe only ratings going down are the ones at PMSNBC! Any NBC News/Wall Street Urinal Pollisn't worth a grain of salt. Pretty much everyone of these idiots polled are LIBERALS!
Remember: "Conservatives are RIGHT". "Liberals are WRONG".
It's disgusting how transparent their lies are
March 5, 2009 - 19:45 ET by Lord ErondThis incessant repeating of the lie that "Rush is the face of the Republican party" is starting to make me PUKE. Rush is the face of CONSERVATIVES, which does not always equate to the Republican party, Nora, you frigging wh--re. Maybe they're equated in the twisted liberal minds of fascists like Klinton and Rahm Emmanuel but given a choice, conservatives would rather vote Republican than for the party of baby killing, fiscally irresponsible, tax loving morons. But by all means, keep repeating that lie because we know that Rahm has a leash around your neck like some pathetic bitch in heat begging for it's bone. Keep crouching and licking your master's hand, you and the rest of that pathetic collection of Obama sucking apologists.
"Wherever there is a jackboot stomping on a human face there will be a well-heeled Western liberal to explain that the face does, after all, enjoy free health care and 100 percent literacy."
Norah , you need a new set
March 5, 2009 - 20:33 ET by obxrayNorah , you need a new set of knee pads.
So only the left has the
March 5, 2009 - 21:36 ET by rbosqueSo only the left has the right to free speech???
Notice that the left thinks only what they say is important and slams us if we dare stop them from mouthing off.
This is nothing but a distraction from the out-of-control stock market.
There is only one reason...
March 6, 2009 - 04:37 ET by jawebster1we are talking about Rush and not the economy. The media is on the side of the Dims. Our country is going to hell in a handbasket and all the liberal media (msm) wants to do is mischaracterize what Rush said. I see what's going on. Socialism is on the way and for that reason I have sold my remaining stock portfolio. Let's have the debate. Socialism vs. Capitalism. Which works better? Hint: USA vs USSR; West Germany vs East Germany; South Korea vs North Korea; Reagan vs Obama. How are Cuba and Venezuela doing right now? Hannity said it best. 2008 is the year honesty and integrity in the main stream media died. Jim Webster
Cheerleaders for Socialism
March 6, 2009 - 07:26 ET by adamsmithThese "journalists" are really nothing more than cheerleaders working for the socialists. The average person on the street knows nothing about Rush Limbaugh and doesn't really care. Unfortunately for Carville, Stephanopolous, Begala, and Obama, if anyone gets curious enough to listen to Rush, and he makes more sense to them than socialism does, it's a losing proposition to the socialist power grabbers. This is an interesting time for the U.S. historically...Hannity is right on this one: journalism officially died in 2008................