CBS: Junk Food Ban/Tax Needed to Prevent Cancer

Photo of Kyle Drennen.
  • Bookmark and Share

Julie Chen and Ezekiel Emanuel, CBS On Thursday’s CBS Early Show, correspondent Richard Roth reported on a new cancer study that found that obesity can increase the likelihood of getting cancer: "Aside from avoiding smoking, the report says that maintaining a healthy lifestyle is the most important thing you can do for cancer prevention. That means diet, physical activity, and weight management...The report recommends laws and policy changes by government, industry, and schools, from adding bicycle lanes to public roads, to banning junk food from vending machines."

Following Roth’s report, co-host Julie Chen spoke with Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, an oncologist and brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, and asked: "In light of this report, how big of a role do you think government should play in making sure Americans lead a healthier lifestyle?" Emanuel suggested: "...do you tax high fructose corn syrup in drinks that we know add calories and promote cancer?...we know that by better policies, we can encourage people to eat less and increase their exercise, which will have an effect, not just on cancer, but also heart disease and diabetes and other health-related activities."

Chen pressed Emanuel to be more definitive about the need for taxes on certain foods: "You say 'maybe do we tax them?' I mean, should we tax these manufacturers that are putting all these things in their products that make it taste good, but it's not good for us?" Emanuel replied: "There are other ways to do it besides taxing. But that is certainly one option that should be considered. In New York, they banned transfatty acids."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Emanuel even went on to compare taxes on junk food to the tax on tobacco: "You know, we've certainly gone a long way on the smoking front, and it's made a dramatic difference in this country. In 40 years we've cut the smoking rate in half. And we can do the same thing in terms of prevention, if we focus on diet and exercise." Chen went one step further, wondering if junk food should be banned all together from schools: "What about vending machines in schools? Should there be -- should we allow public schools to have vending machines?" On January 3, 2001, Chen was upset that junk food portions were being downsized: "So, I'm getting less chips, paying the same amount of money. Is that legal for them to do this?"

Agreeing with Chen, Emanuel declared: "...kids are not independent decision-makers. We know they're not the most rational people...And I think school is one place, I personally am disturbed that we allow these high fructose corn drinks, corn syrup drinks, and that we allow a lot of junk food in them."

Here is the full transcript of the segment:

7:00AM TEASE:

HARRY SMITH: Breaking news. A major study out this morning, one in every three cancer cases in the United States is actually preventable.

MARTIN WISEMAN: Together they, that is we, can help make reduction in cancer a reality.

SMITH: We'll tell you how you can stay cancer free.

7:02AM SEGMENT:

JULIE CHEN: First, a major new study out this morning says we can prevent cancer in our lives. Let's go to CBS News correspondent Richard Roth in London with the story. Richard, good morning.

RICHARD ROTH: Good morning, Julie. It's a joint study by leading American and British scientists. The authors are calling it the most systematic policy report ever on cancer prevention. And it's based on a review of existing studies about cancer risk and prevention. Aside from avoiding smoking, the report says that maintaining a healthy lifestyle is the most important thing you can do for cancer prevention. That means diet, physical activity, and weight management.

MARTIN WISEMAN [STUDY PROJECT DIRECTOR]: Your lifestyle, the ways of life that people follow are really dramatically important in determining their own cancer risk and, indeed, the different patterns of cancer that we found around the world.

ROTH: Overall, the study estimates about a third of the most common cancers in the U.S. could be prevented through lifestyle. It says that healthy eating, activity, and especially weight management, could prevent 38% of breast cancers in the U.S. and 45% of bowel cancers. Diet and exercise, of course, won't guarantee you won't get sick. Breast cancer survivor Jodie Cooper knows that.

JODIE COOPER: But it's very, you know, if it -- it's great if that helps prevent other cancers or cancers in other people. I think that's wonderful.

ROTH: The report recommends laws and policy changes by government, industry, and schools, from adding bicycle lanes to public roads, to banning junk food from vending machines. But it also stresses cancer prevention, like health generally, is hugely dependent on personal choices, including some very small decisions we all make every day from what kinds of food we bring home from the supermarket to where we go out to eat. And even to whether we get there by car or bike or on foot. Julie.

CHEN: So true. Richard Roth, thanks, Richard. Joining us from Washington is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, an oncologist and director of bio-ethics at the National Institutes of Health. Good morning, Doctor.

EZEKIEL EMANUEL: Thanks for having me.

CHEN: Thanks for being on the show. In light of this report, how big of a role do you think government should play in making sure Americans lead a healthier lifestyle?

EMANUEL: Well, we have to make options available, as the report said, whether you close off Central Park, or in Washington, Rock Creek Park, on the weekends and allow people to run or walk or ride their bike, that's important. Whether you encourage supermarkets that keep fresh vegetables in the inner city or make farmers' vege -- farmer's markets available. Those are government policies. Similarly, do you tax high fructose corn syrup in drinks that we know add calories and promote cancer? So those are government policies. And we know that by better policies, we can encourage people to eat less and increase their exercise, which will have an effect, not just on cancer, but also heart disease and diabetes and other health-related activities.

CHEN: You say 'maybe do we tax them?' I mean, should we tax these manufacturers that are putting all these things in their products that make it taste good, but it's not good for us?

EMANUEL: Well, I think that's a policy choice that we have to make. There are other ways to do it besides taxing. But that is certainly one option that should be considered. In New York, they banned transfatty acids. You know, we've certainly gone a long way on the smoking front, and it's made a dramatic difference in this country. In 40 years we've cut the smoking rate in half. And we can do the same thing in terms of prevention, if we focus on diet and exercise.

CHEN: What about vending machines in schools? Should there be -- should we allow public schools to have vending machines?

EMANUEL: Now you're asking me all these ethical questions and not medical questions.

CHEN: Well, let me turn to this, what-

EMANUEL: Well, the ethical-

CHEN: Yeah, go ahead.

EMANUEL: Well, from the ethical standpoint, you know, kids are not independent decision-makers. We know they're not the most rational people. We have lots of data on that. And so we need to encourage them and encourage healthy eating habits and healthy exercise habits. And I think school is one place, I personally am disturbed that we allow these high fructose corn drinks, corn syrup drinks, and that we allow a lot of junk food in them. They're used to raise money. But that doesn't seem to me to be -- that's a short of short-term gain, raising money, as opposed to a long-term harm of increasing obesity.

CHEN: Let me ask you about this, what about all the people out there who live right, they're not obese, and they still get cancer?

EMANUEL: Yes. I mean, as I think the report made quite clear, it's not a guarantee. There are lots of things that cause cancer. We know radiation and other things. So it's not -- diet isn't the only thing, but it is a very big component, about a third to 40% of cancers are related to diet and exercise. That's a very big component. And then smoking is another big chunk. So those three items, eating right and eating fruits and vegetables, exercising regularly, and not smoking, go a long way towards preventing cancer. It's not a guarantee, but it certainly reduces your odds of getting cancer dramatically.

CHEN: Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, thank you. For more information on this new cancer study, go to our website, earlyshow.cbsnews.com.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

....

Seriously?  Listen, in a free-market society, if folks don't want to buy crappy food, they don't.  Duh.

However, the government is hinting that THEY should intervene and make sure the crappy food companies, be it pop (soda) or trans-fats, be punished or penalized?  Are you kidding me?

Conservatives= if you don't like that TV show, don't watch it...if you don't like smoking, don't do it...if you don't like certain foods, don't buy them.

Liberalism= We're so gonna tax your a$$ off because you are an evil empire corporation who is forcing people to be slaves to your products.  (What?  Lunch at McDonald's?  Sure, sounds good.  Just don't leave your wrappers in my hybrid, my life-partner doesn't like that.)

 

Long live the Republic!  Conservatives unite!

They will do the same as

They will do the same as they did with tobacco.  Tax "junk food" to the moon to pay for "stop-eating-junk-food" programs. Force Pepsi and McDonalds to have disclaimers on the advertising that these products may cause serious diseases.

They fatten their coffers by reaping the fiscal benefits of behavior they are supposedly trying to decrease. 

At the same time that they want to tax obesity and its causes, they want to make obesity a medical disability, with all the attendant benefits.

And Emanuel says 

..kids are not independent decision-makers. We know they're not the most rational people...And I think school is one place, I personally am disturbed that we allow these high fructose corn drinks, corn syrup drinks, and that we allow a lot of junk food in them."

[Unless we're talking about sex.  Then it's OK to provide birth control, condoms, and confidential access to abortion....they're mature and rational enough to make those decisions....]

Hypocrites of the most disgusting sort.

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

Leave it to a bimbo who

Leave it to a bimbo who derives her employment and wealth from physically attaching herself to the boss to encourage government as a virus to curb behavior she rejects.  These Marxists will keep pushing until someone pushes back.

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill

Rights

What's free enterprise? 

JDW

DAILY WAVE

Whatever else you think, your mother and my mother are both mothers

An MSM/Ban Tax

How about a ban/tax on the MSM to prevent illiteracy?

Typical nanny question

How big of a role do you think government should play in making sure Americans lead a healthier lifestyle?

How about staying the f--- out of our lives?

Whats worse is that

Whats worse is that universal healthcare that Obama promises will only ENCOURAGE bad behavior, lack of exercise, and laziness.

If going to the doctor is free, why bother staying healthy?

Huh?

"If going to the doctor is free, why bother staying healthy? "

That is quite possibly the most moronic statement on health care I have ever read. Once you lose your health, you don't get it back. Free health care or not. Believe me I know!

you're thinking rationally

to think like a liberal, eliminate all ability to reason and base all life decisions on emotion only.

swing hard in case you hit it.

Mandrake....

I think you missed the sarcasm there....

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

Ah, the law of unintended consequence

anneftx  Many people (esp women) smoke to curb appetite.  Since the smoking rate has fallen the rate of obesity has gone up.  It's an amazing inverse correlation.  A bit like playing Wack-a-mole.

 When oh when will the electorate rise up and make a huge noise about govt's growing intrusion into our lives?

Fact

The primary cause of childhood obesity is genetic mutations. Secondary is probably diabetes. They grow into adulthood.

JDW

DAILY WAVE

Whatever else you think, your mother and my mother are both mothers

HARRIET SMITH: We'll tell

HARRIET SMITH: We'll tell you how you can stay cancer free.

A little oversell, there, Creampuff?

This is ludicrous - Emanuels' brother was the only oncologist they could come up with?

And encouraging supermarkets to sell fresh vegetables is a 'government policy'? What supermarket does this dope (or his housekeeper) shop at where fresh vegetables are a novelty?

Oh well, at least Harriet is dutifully getting his share of daily excercise - robust pumping of his blowup Obama doll twice daily.

They will have to pry my sugared donut out of my cold dead hand

 They will have to pry my sugared donut out of my cold dead hands!

If they want to tax my junk food then thay have to tax all the Botox in Nanny Pelosi's face .. her face makes me sicker than any biggie order of fries

"America is on the Short Bus to Socialism"

Watch Out

Watch Out folks. Already we have seen the writing on the wall. Even if they pass the so called universal health care it will give Govt. an excuse to control all our behaviour. They, as insurance companies have done, will use any method to deny healthcare to people who do not fit the APPROVED lifestyles. Drive an older car and you will be labeled as an environmental criminal. Eat a cheese burger and you will be denied treatment for Heart troubles, even if it is genetic. Most of these STUDIES are not worth the paper they are printed on. The correlations are improbable and offer nothing in any real way. It is easy to find correlations all cancer patients drink water. All cancer patients breath air. We can easily see that there is nothing worth further study with these correlations as they are meaningless. The problems with studies is that there is no way to have a real control group. Also the statistical correlations sited do not rise above the noise most of the time.

Real Science has been replaced by the latest CAUSE. Real Science and real research is not sexy. Oschner Hospital is a leading research hospital into the causes and treatment of cancer. I read the summary of some research they did over 10 years ago. The results they came up with are this. The biggest single reason that we are seeing an increase in the number of reported cancers is this: People are living longer. To explain it another way each time a cell divides it makes a copy of itself. Sometimes these copies are bad. Almost all the time the body destroys the bad copies. It is rolling the dice each time the cell divides that the bad copy won't be destroyed. When the bad copy is allowed to reproduce it is cancer. Well the longer you live the more times you get to roll the dice, the more times it is possible for cancer to occur. There are environmnetal factors to be sure. The environmnetal factors change the odds, slightly, each time the dice is rolled. However environmental factors do not outweigh the number of times the dice is rolled.

 

 

Look to the U.K.

The goverment in the U.K. is already doing this using the excuse that obese people are breaking the National Health Service. (No, trying to provide universal health care is breaking the N.H.S. but I digress) It has progressed to measuring the body mass index of children in grade school and sending "report cards" home to their parents, denying surgical procedures to patients until they loose weight and "food police" who walk around supermarkets and critique people's items in their shopping carts. Soon to be coming to America.

 

If stupidity got us into this mess,
then why can't it get us out?
--Will Rogers

Reaver... "and "food

Reaver...

"and "food police" who walk around supermarkets and critique people's items in their shopping carts. Soon to be coming to America."

The very first time someone tries this with me, I will warn them only once to get away from me. If they persist, I will break their nose!

Peaceful Islam - What A Joke!

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

The nanny-staters learned a

The nanny-staters learned a lot after the manufactured political scams like 'the brink of nuclear war', 'dangerous nuclear power' heterosexual AIDS - if they can scare enough citizens of the nation  at once, they will assuredly get fast-track government action on their pet political issues. We saw it with tobacco, then Global Warming/Climate Change fraud, and now obesity.

Network news starts the propaganda ball rolling with "obesity causes cancer" and hopes it will snowball into legislation. The same people that belly-ache about 'the goverment in our bedrooms' seem to have no problem with the government monitoring our fast food/fat consumption.

Should we tell the goverment to stay the hell out of our cars and our kitchens and mind their own bleepin' business? Or is this new government intrusion necessary because it's for our own good?

What a bird brain

tweet tweet tweet for the twit twit twit....

Chen's concerned over the "legality" of her self-purchased bag of chips containing less product...

Doesn't this cranial-vacuum dunce know that she would have committed a misdemeanor at least for purchasing such a dangerous and soon-to-be-controlled substance?  In fact she might have committed a felony if the bag were the large 10-ounce size??

Shame on her!

OK, lady, drop the chips and back away from them slowly, with your hands in plain sight!  Book her and cuff her, Dan-O!  Off to the People's Reeducation Camp for you!!

What a certifiable idiot.  Even while she's eagerly nodding in agreement to the criminalization of junk foods she's complaining about not getting her fair share.  But of course, classic Liberal Thought Processes -- criminal for thee but permitted for me..... ad naseum...

Interestingly, on the

Interestingly, on the National Cancer Institute website, the first on the list of cancer risk factors is OLD AGE. (Note that obesity and poor diet was last).

Based on this information, do I see a CAROUSEL in our future?

 

 

That's okay, Rog, they are going to fix that, too

Once the government has taken over health care, they are going to make sure that we all drop dead the day before we qualify for SS benefits.

That should also have the added benefit of reducing future cancer cases.

-Dave

Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.

RD -- If Obama keeps up his

RD -- If Obama keeps up his pre-empting primetime TV with his god-awful socialist speechs, that should help increase the "drop-dead" rate" as people stroke out.

I think he's going for a Fidel/Hugo 8 hour speech vibe -- h/t Mark Levin. 

"I am NOT a tax crook!"
Thomas Milhous Daschle

Fast Food Plus

The women at the bar, which prohibits smoking, can no longer drink nor use their cells. Neither they nor the men can use deodorant. Everyone must pass on the 'goodies' provided to eat during happy hour. Drinking a glass of water is strictly prohibited, fluoride might cause cancer. ...   

JDW

DAILY WAVE

Whatever else you think, your mother and my mother are both mothers

RICHARD ROTH: Good

RICHARD ROTH: Good morning, Julie. It's a joint study by leading American and British scientists. The authors are calling it the most systematic policy report ever on cancer prevention.

Oh -- and if you do get cancer, just thank the Lord you live in America because the UK's 60 year old socialized medicine National Health Service has the lowest rates of cancer survivability in the Western world.

And dats a fact. Enjoy it while you can my friends. Because rationing by the government is coming to America.

Not to RINO's like Arlen Specter of course, who reckons older Americans, other than him, should consider their debt to society as they consume SO MUCH healthcare in their twilight years.

ARLEN SPECTER FACT:

79 YEARS OLD Arlen Specter.. what a hypocrite...

Has HE stopped HIS cancer treatment? He's near the average life expectancy for an American. Why doesn't he RETIRE, and just let it all SLIP AWAY?

Ah that's for everyone else.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=4660263

Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter's cancer has returned. The five-term Republican said in a statement released by his office Tuesday that he was diagnosed with an early recurrence of Hodgkin's disease, which is a cancer of the lymph system.
Specter, 78, underwent treatment for the same type of cancer in 2005 and was later given a clean bill of health. The statement said that the cancer was revealed in a medical scan but that he has no symptoms.

Specter, Pennsylvania's longest-serving senator, said he would continue his normal duties — just as he did three years ago. He's already announced he will run for re-election in 2010, and he said the cancer won't stop him from that.

"I am NOT a tax crook!"
Thomas Milhous Daschle

 Next thing we know,

 Next thing we know, they'll be banning guns to help prevent... car accidents o.O

 

Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.-Thomas Jefferson

How kind of them

very noble of them... trying to save us all from ourselves.  But the biggest risk factor is aging.  The second is cigarettes (38%) ... and they have already tried so very hard to save us from that.  Then its...

  • Sunlight
  • Ionizing radiation
  • Certain chemicals and other substances
  • Some viruses and bacteria
  • Certain hormones
  • Family history of cancer
  • Alcohol
  • Poor diet, lack of physical activity, or being overweight

People will change their lives if and only if they choose to do so.  They have already banned trans-fats, published calorie and fat grams on franchise products.  And let me say - I work in the food industry - people pay little to NO attention to this information.   People could eliminate their exposure to HFCS if they would simply cook their own food and avoid soda and those pseudo 'fruit' juices - but they don't.  I look at people's carts in the grocery store.  They are obviously rushed in the morning, afternoon and night ... they simply don't have the time or the patience to put together a meal that is health conscious.  Taxing people to force them to make changes so they won't be a burden on the up and coming government supported health industry is a bad idea.

What's next - calorie tax? 

Step away from the donut!! Put your hands in the air!

  Every overbearing

  Every overbearing government that overreaches when it comes to taxes creates not only a thriving black market but a populace that becomes detached and hostile to it's own government.  Maybe if that happens Newsweek can run the cover story "We are all Rum-Runners now".

I have no problem with...

...gluttons and sloths dying off just so long as I don't have to pay their twinkie addicted med-bills.

 There is NO excuse for poor nutrition in this day and age. READ the labels you idiots.

 You gotta love the welfare/food-stamp mothers who fill their carts with JUNK FOOD eh? Potatoes are CHEAP and good for you and filled with vitamin C and potassium but boo-hoo you gotta cook them and potato chips are so much more convenient. These slackers want convenience? They don't have a JOB and they buy JUNK to avoid the god awful WORK of COOKING healthy meals?

 Sorry but I have NO EFFIN' SYMPATHY. NONE! Nada! Zilch! 

government healthcare is on the way!

I'm sure all of the folks who work for Mars and Frito Lay are excited about their financial futures.  

 

 

But acts of kindness and generosity must be free and voluntary; no man has a right to compel another to follow his conscience. This is a concern which lies between a man and his God.

-Richard Fuhrman, pro slave advocate, 1823

→ Frito-Lay

I'm hip to that.  If California legalizes Marijuana to cash in on the taxes, I'm investing in Pizza Hut also. 

Frit-Lay make BOTH Doritos

Frit-Lay make BOTH Doritos AND Cheetos. right? Count me in!

 

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.