$100 billion in cuts, which they say is tough going

What? Tough going? Here's a handy list. There's damn near $300 billion here. How tough can it be?

In other news, it was reported today that the deer and antelope in our national parks have suffered record layoffs.  However, bambi, the first stupid liberal and his congressional dimocrats are on top of it.  They have allocated nearly $2 billion dollars, should the porkulus bill pass, to this tragic million year unemployment record low that the dear and the antelope are experiencing.

bambi, stateed, " . . . this will get the deer and the antelope back to work . . .  This is a must pass bill.  I want all Americans to be able to go where the deer and the antelope play!"

In other news, still one more prospective cabinet post member "forgot" to pay her taxes in what many are calling the worst start to any presidential term in anyone's memory.  

Finally, this just in, Chris, tingly leg, Matthews, will be staying overnight in the Lincoln Bedroom.  We can't wait until tingly reports on his "experience."

Katie . . .

I see an active movement among the liberals and the liberal media to redefine the political poles. Far-left marxists like Obammy are being reimaged into 'centrists', and ANYone on the conservative side is being reimaged as an 'extremist'. In the new remade political spectrum someone like Hillary Clinton might be the only '(new) conservative' not labeled an extremist.

If successful this of course benefits the democratics enormously. Now, most of us are smart enough to not care what someone like Stephanopopolis labels us, but there is a slightly-dimwitted portion of the voting population and those coming up that are susceptible to this kind of reprogramming.

Obama is a masterful manipulator of the public with he help of the media.  All he has to do is say bipartisan and take a meeting or two, and *poof* he's making all the effort.  Congress, on the other hand, has to do all the dirty work and is taking the fall.  Barack always has it both ways.  If it succeeds, he brought people together.  If it fails, it's all Pelosi or Reed's fault.

He may be naive when it comes to running a country, but he's a pro at information warfare.

You gotta give president obama a lot of credit.  Nobody thought that a presidential administration could be so f***ed up so quickly.  His problem is that he hasn't gotten to the chapter in saul ansky's book where he learns to make everyone bow to him and do whatever he wants.  Unfortunately for that little prick, the modern American conservative has an advanced bulls*** detection system.  "Transparancy" - Bulls***.  "we won, meaning we have a mandate to do whatever we want" - Bulls***.  "No lobbyists" - Bulls***.  "Ethics in the administration" - Double Bulls*** (why is geithner still in his administration???).  "There's no pork in this bill" - Super Bulls***.  "A catastrophe if this bill is not passed NOW!" - The same bulls*** they told us with the first 700 billion bailout.  

This little freak is destroying the trust and the sanctity of the office of the President.  He wants to pass a spending bill to pay back all the little libtard special interest groups that emptied their wallets for him.  He desperately needs Republican support so WHEN this bill doesn't do jack-diddly-s***, he can have someone to blame it on.  This bill is 1.2 trillion dollars worth of everything obama/pelosi/reed stand for:

Bulls***

obama's notion of bi-partisanship is telling conservatives to shut up and do what he wants.

Before we believe, or really understand, what a poll is actually describing, we should know the following:

1. Who is paying for it?

2. What are the specific questions? What hypothesis are they testing? What do the sponsors  really want to know?

3. Have the questions been field tested?

4. What is the sponsor of the poll trying to measure? And how do they define it (in this case, "bipartisan")

5. What statistical package is being used to run the numbers?

6. Who came up with the questions? Why did they chose these questions?

7. What is the internal reliability of the poll?

8. Who was sampled and on what basis? M/F, income level, etc. Not in general, but in specific details.

9. How were the questions designed? How was the design chosen? Who were the questions tested on? What were the results of the field tests?

10 Are the questions correlated. If so, how?

11. How are the results going to be used?

12. How was the poll administered?

There are many more issues to consider, as well.

Unless we know the answers to at least some of these questions, it's nearly impossible to know what the poll is actually describing.  

For liberal Democrats and the Old Media, everything is crisis, chaos, calamity and catastrophe. That justifies stealing your property and liberties.

Communist Backing Nuts??????? 

REID: Late today, the president boarded Marine One on the White House lawn for the first time, unlike past presidents, stopping to shake hands with the marine guard.

Oh please....ROFLMAO!!

Leave it to the press to cover this blunder of his....as usual.

CBS has their own polls, but I talk with ordinary people everyday who, have come to realize that 'Network News' cannot be trusted.  People have really had it with the MSM bias...and that's no bull!