Networks Interview Biden, Bash Palin For Not Showing Up

Photo of Kyle Drennen.
  • Bookmark and Share

Diane Sawyer and Joe Biden, ABC On Wednesday, all three network morning shows interviewed Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden and offered no Republican counterpoint, punishing the McCain campaign for Sarah Palin declining to make similar appearances. On ABC’s Good Morning America, co-host Diane Sawyer concluded her interview with Biden by declaring: "And we want you to know that we have asked Governor Palin to come on Good Morning America. And, of course, debate Senator Biden again here. And repeatedly, she has declined. Although, Senator Biden has said that he's willing to debate her again, if she wants."

On NBC’s Today, co-host Ann Curry made a similar declaration: "And we should also note that we invited Governor Sarah Palin to join us this morning, but she declined. The Governor has an open invitation to appear on Today, but so far she has not accepted our offers." On CBS’s Early Show co-host Harry Smith explained: "We also invited Governor Sarah Palin, John McCain's running mate, but the McCain campaign declined." Apparently, the mainstream media deems itself as John McCain’s communications director.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Meanwhile, all three shows asked Biden about his reaction to Palin’s criticism of Obama. On Good Morning America, Sawyer asked: "Governor Palin has become the point person for the McCain attacks in her speeches. Do you think – she said she's taking off the gloves, putting on the heels. Is it fair game? Or gone too far?" On Today, Curry wondered: "But let's talk about the new style of the campaign because Sarah Palin is now saying that the gloves are off. She's linked Obama to domestic terrorism. She's, she's been bringing up Reverend Wright's name. She, she was hearing at one of these events, Obama introduces "Barack Hussein Obama." Is there a tone, where is this, all this going? Explain what's happening here Joe...Is this an ugly stop? Can you characterize how you view this stop?" Finally, on the Early Show, Smith asked: "Let me ask you about Sarah Palin on the other side of the -- on the other side of the aisle. She's been going to these rallies, tens of thousands of people showing up. Talking about a friend of your running mate's as a domestic terrorist. Does your campaign have an answer for that?"

All three network morning shows have routinely attacked Palin since she was named as McCain’s running mate in late August.

Here are the relevant excerpts of the three interviews:

GOOD MORNING AMERICA

ABC

SAWYER: One question about style and debate last night, and there was one moment that's gotten a lot of attention. Some people say -- asking was It respectful or not? Other people saying, right on. It was Senator McCain. He was talking about Senator Obama.

SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN: There was an energy bill on the floor of the Senate, loaded down with goodies. Billions for the oil companies. And it was sponsored by Bush and Cheney. You know who voted for it? Might never know. That one. You know who voted against it? Me.

SAWYER: "That one." What do you think?

BIDEN: John- I think when John knows he's sort of in attack mode, it's always kind of difficult to look the other person in the eye and say, it's you, John. It's you, Barack. It's you, Harry. I think it's- I think it reflects his more - he's ill at ease with the attack he has under way.

SAWYER: Governor Palin has become the point person for the McCain attacks in her speeches. Do you think- she said she's taking off the gloves, putting on the heels. Is it fair game? Or gone too far?

BIDEN: I think it goes way too far. Look, this really is a case where, when you don't have anything to talk about, attack. And it gets really over the edge. I mean, some of the stuff she's saying about Barack Obama and the stuff that people are yelling from the crowd, if she hears it, she should at least be saying, whoa, whoa, whoa, that's overboard. I mean, this is volatile stuff. And it's -- I just -- I thought we were kind of beyond this place that it seems to be going.

 

TODAY

NBC

CURRY: Okay, well I'm gonna turn and, and ask you about something else. Your campaign made much of the fact that last night, John McCain referred to Obama as, "that one." Was this, in your view, dismissive, Joe?

BIDEN: No, it was, for me, I know John well. I may be wrong, I think it was, when John knows that he's on the attack and, and he's not feeling good about it, John never looks you straight in the eye. John doesn't go and refer to you by your first name. I think it's part of this whole thing, if you noticed, John didn't make a whole lot of eye contact last night because I think John, when he's on the attack mode, and making the other guy a bad guy, it's just not his style. So I think it was unfortunate but I don't think it was, I don't read anything into it other than just like last debate he didn't look at Barack. I mean when John is attacking he doesn't walk up to you and say, "Ann Curry let me tell you something." He says, "You know that Curry person over there." He does it that way. I think that's all it was.

CURRY: So you're saying it's just his style. But let's talk about the new style of the campaign because Sarah Palin is now saying that the gloves are off. She's linked Obama to domestic terrorism. She's, she's been bringing up Reverend Wright's name. She, she was hearing at one of these events, Obama introduces "Barack Hussein Obama." Is there a tone, where is this, all this going? Explain what's happening here Joe.

BIDEN: They're losing. She's been told to go out and pull out all the stops. I think it borders on being-

CURRY: Is this an ugly stop? Can you characterize how you view this stop?

BIDEN: Well I think it is ugly. I mean to have somebody stand up there and, you know, for example I heard people, I watch the news, and I heard that a couple of people hollering from the audience, you know, semi-vile things, you know about terrorists, things like that. And idea that a, that a leading American politician who might be Vice President of the United States would not just stop mid-sentence and turn and condemn that, you know? I just, it's just, this is slippery slope. This is a place we shouldn't be going.

 

EARLY SHOW

CBS

SMITH: Let me ask you about Sarah Palin on the other side of the -- on the other side of the aisle. She's been going to these rallies, tens of thousands of people showing up. Talking about a friend of your running mate's as a domestic terrorist. Does your campaign have an answer for that?

BIDEN: Yeah. It's just malarkey. Flat malarkey. Barack Obama was 8 years old when this guy was engaged in activities he was engaged in. He is no part of our campaign. He would be no part of anything having to do with the White House. The guy Barack Obama's going to turn and ask opinion of is me. Not that guy. You know, the idea here that somehow these guys are once again injecting fear and loathing into this campaign, it's -- it's -- I think it's mildly dangerous. I mean, here you have out there these kinds of, you know, incitements out there, a guy introducing Barack using his middle name as if it's some epitaph or something. This is over the top.

—Kyle Drennen is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Alphabet MSM ... TUFF SH&T

Palin is going to talk to THE PEOPLE and not allow the bastardized and unethical MSM alter her words. KUDOS to Governor Palin!!!

EVERYONE knows that the MSM is in the tank for the Obamamessiah. THE PEOPLE do not trust the MSM... most are just too lazy to find other sources or are themselves Obamabots.

[When this election is over, my congressman is going to get an earful about the MSM and their FREE campaigning for Obama.]

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.

Why

Why would Sarah Palin go on one of these show to be abused by these so-called journalists? Even when there is a so-called "friendly" interview everything gets manipulated to make her look stupid. She definitely is not stupid or full of malarkey. Sarah has said what needs to be said. The MSM needs to do a better job of investigating Obama's past including the association with ACORN.

Even the crickets don't show up

Biden likes to show up on these lib friendly shows.

Besides, Joe can't attract crickets to his personal appearances.

Rally host: And now, heeeeerrr's Joe Biden!!

(Silence)

Rally Host: Can I at least get a cricket noise please?

Lone cricket: churp

Biden: Hey! That you, thank you. Vote for Barack America!

Cricket:  Oops!  I

Cricket:  Oops!  I burped.  Sorry!

How quickly they forget

Remember how the entire Democrat party wouldn't go on Fox?

Brit Hume replied that it was a cheap accusation, since the Democrats knew that Fox would have to bend over backwards to be fair. That's how a reputable journalist responded. But these mainstream media morning shows? They threw fairness to the wind.

Basically, these network shows scheduled a debate, by themselves, without agreement from Palin. Now they're mad that Palin didn't obey them and come running, at their command, on their schedule. So, they're going to take it out on Palin by giving Biden free ammunition.

And oh yeah ... remember how Obama claimed to debate McCain anytime, anywhere ... and the moment McCain offered a series of town halls, Obama hid in the basement?

Make these hacks put up or shut up -- make the same offer to McCain and Obama. Offer to host the same debates for the presidential candidates as they did for the VPs.

See if they allow McCain to ramble while Obama doesn't show up.

So you're saying it's just

So you're saying it's just his style. But let's talk about the new style of the campaign because Sarah Palin is now saying that the gloves are off. She's linked Obama to domestic terrorism. She's, she's been bringing up Reverend Wright's name. She, she was hearing at one of these events, Obama introduces "Barack Hussein Obama." Is there a tone, where is this, all this going? Explain what's happening here Joe.

Since when has teh truth been ugly and out of bounds?  I did not hear the idea of raking Palin through the muck made so out of bounds.  I believe it was described as journalism, even when it was faily trivial.

Bring out all your laundry into the light of day and let us inspect it.  Satan get behind me.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

I hope Palin stiffs the MSM for the rest of the way.

In their blind zeal to get Barry-O installed in the White House, even if it destroys what little is left of their credibility, all they have done so far is distort what she has to say.

Who needs that nonsense?

Besides, Sarah hasn't the time, as it appears she is now carrying the conservative water for the bucketless McCain.

-Dave

 


RD, Sarah... I would

RD, Sarah...

I would like to see Sarah go on the radio with Rush. That would send liberals over the edge!

Do You Feel Better About Your Candidate After Last Nights Debate?

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

Great idea

Let's all send Rush an email with the suggestion. 

If conservatives are RIGHT, then liberals must be WRONG.

Hey great idea Ct and

Hey great idea Ct and LK...let's do just that...

I'm going to!

Talk about frost the flakes of the left...everywhere!!!

(Including McCain...lol) just had to throw that in, couldn't help it.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

If liberals are right then

If liberals are right then there is no God in heaven.

Ct, so would I.

Perhaps it would launch the lefty "suicide protest" most of us have been eagerly awaiting.  :-)

-Dave

If this nation is to be saved, it will be libertarian principles that save it.

*

*

deleware

I thought it was funny that Barry mentioned Biden's home State for its unregulated approach to credit card companies. And, they ignore the point of Ayers and the rest. Barry's early associations, Columbia, then Chicago provided a seamless trail of millitant thought and money that made him the person he is today. He inhaled and he has plans for your money and your Country.

Sara is A Ratings sweepstakes - That is WHY the MSM wants her

Biden is losing votes for BHO - - there you go again, Joe. . . Bringing up "That one"

The Republican Revolution will not be Televised

Biden should be quarantined

Biden should be quarantined - he has hoof-in-mouth disease.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't

I really hope Sarah stays within the conservative base because there is no point in showing up on these Obama shows.

 

Of course they're in the tank for Obama

Malarkey Expert

Man, that Slow-Joe Biden certainly knows his malarkey. I don't call him "Cerebral Man" for no reason. Why he even knows there is a  difference between Article I and Article II of the Constitution. He doesn't know what the difference is; but he knows they are different.

Also, Obama couldn't possible be a Marxist. Marx died about 80 years before he was born. And of course he was only about 10 years old when Saul Alinsky died, so they probably had no relationship. That only leaves a couple of anti-American preachers ,a few Arabs, and other malcontents like Frank Marshall Davis. But I guess that's just malarkey too, right Joe.

Did you have a good time on "Good Mooning America?"

Kyle: "Who ya gonna believe me or your lyin eyes & ears."

"Networks Interview Biden, Bash Palin For Not Showing Up" 

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the statements of the networks qouted by Drennan that Could Even Remotely be considered BASHING (by ANY SANE HONEST PERSON).

The boldness of Drennan's insulting our intelligence while flaunting his dishonesty shoud be completely unacceptable to NB.  Do I really need to explain to those in charge at NB that when you're dishonest, especially as flagrantly dishonest as Drennan is here, YOU lose your credibility?  A liar is a liar and everything he/she states is suspect, not to be believed until proven truthful.   NB and many NB commenters may not care- the end justifies the means.  But others like myself, respect NB's mission and expect honesty.  It would be nice if NB was able to keep strictly to relevant true examples of liberal bias in the media, but I'm able to sort the BS from the bull.  It gives balance to Media Matters, News Hounds, and Crooks & Liars.

I know, I've been preachy and state the obvious, but consider it an opportunity for NB to let their members know if they agree or disagree w/ me.

As to the statements by the networks.  Obviously if they hadn't told their audience why Palin was on while her opponent was, the public might very well think it was because of their liberal bias.  The question for the public IS why wouldn't Palin come on?!  And don't give me the horse sh%! cop out : Poor Palin  is just so unfairly attacked by the  media.  She's a barracuda for crying out loud who might be President of the United States !   If that's your excuse you're just being dishonest with yourselves.  

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.